CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Future Shock: Blue Jay... (01/14)
<< Previous Column
Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Right F... (01/08)
Next Column >>
Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Startin... (01/17)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Baseball Therapy: Free... (01/15)

January 15, 2010

Fantasy Focus

Catcher Rankings Review

by Marc Normandin

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

Catcher was a strange position in 2009. There were some breakout campaigns and some returns to form, but there were also plenty of disappointments from players both new and old. Catcher was not my best list, but it also wasn't my worst. I do feel that it is one list I need to work on for 2010 much more, though, as some of the things I justified to myself at the time seem just plain odd in retrospect.

Just to save the commenters who have to answer this question each time out, this is a review of my 2009 rankings. If a player is not listed here, it is not because I don't like them for 2010. For one reason or another, they were omitted from 2009, which is especially true if someone was a surprise in 2009, but I am just reviewing the actual rankings from last year, not setting up the new ones.

Before diving in to the rankings, I also want to start some discussion about what it is we should do about the lists themselves. Should the format change? Should it stay the same? Would you prefer something like star ratings and tiers, like those that Kevin Goldstein uses in his Top 11 Prospects list, or do you want to retain the basic 1-20 ranking system? For that matter, are 20 players at each position enough? Let's get all of these ideas out in the open now so that there's plenty of time to accommodate requests by the time ranking season rolls around. That way, I provide you with the service you ask for, and still have time to do the things I plan on doing for you outside of that. Reply in the comments, ask me in chats, e-mail me, or talk to me via Twitter (@Marc_Normandin) over the next few months with your thoughts; I may not respond to all of you, but I will keep track of your replies for the purposes of 2010's rankings.

1. Brian McCann (.299/.371/.511 PECOTA) .281/.349/.486: McCann's season was below PECOTA's expectations by a bit and also below his 2008 production, but it was still a fine season for a catcher, especially when you consider his 94 RBI and 21 homers. He seemed the safest pick for the top pick from both a health and production standpoint, but even with the missed time, a certain someone was able to outpace him.

2. Joe Mauer (.307/.388/.436 PECOTA) .365/.444/.587: Mauer not only flew past his projected weighted mean, but also outdistanced his 90th percentile (.337/.422/.496) considerably thanks to an uncharacteristic power surge. Considering his previous career home run high was 13 and he had just hit nine bombs in 2008, I'm finding it tough to be too broken up over missing on this one after he hit 28 in 2009. For 2010, you should expect more power out of him, but if you're banking on him to hit .360 again, then you're setting yourself up for disappointment.

3. Geovany Soto (.288/.370/.519 PECOTA) .218/.321/.381: Soto had a .337 BABIP in 2008, which was high but not at the level where it couldn't be repeated or, at least, if it wasn't repeated, it wasn't so high that falling back towards the average would kill his value. Soto fell well past the average, though, dropping all the way to .251 while dealing with shoulder and oblique injuries. He didn't lose all of his power, a .163 ISO is still good, especially considering how far his BABIP fell, but he will need to bump that average back up to be worthwhile, even at a low-offense position.

4. Chris Iannetta (.295/.392/.499 PECOTA) .228/.344/.460: Iannetta's season was one of the odd ones. Because of the .228 average, it looks poor, but in reality, his ISO was in line with last season's breakout, he showed loads of patience, and didn't get enough playing time to show us that he's capable of more, as his projection suggested. A .253 BABIP may be at fault, and given the lack of issues in the rest of his numbers (and the fact he plays in Coors, where a .253 BABIP just seems out of place) it's not a stretch to suggest this was a weird bump in the road.

5. Russell Martin (.293/.382/.434 PECOTA) .250/.352/.329: It appears as if there was more to Martin's drop to a .116 ISO in 2008 than expected, as even a season with fewer games played (read: less physical abuse of Martin behind the plate) couldn't bring his power back. In fact, he posted his first sub-.100 ISO, swiped just 11 bases, and finished with the lowest batting average of his career. In conclusion, we went from five players with loads of offensive talent giving a notoriously weak offensive position plenty of depth to having a notoriously weak offensive position doing what it's known for thanks to players like Martin.

6. Matt Wieters (.311/.395/.544 PECOTA) .288/.340/.412: I stated in the rankings last year that Wieters' 10th percentile forecast (.280/.355/.461) was the one I was most comfortable with, but even that was a bit higher than his actual performance. PECOTA didn't have any mention of failure in any of the forecasts, which was a problem, but I did say it was possible "he could tank" relative to expectations. He picked things up in the second half, which is good news for 2010, but 2009 is a good example of why his PECOTA forecast, or that of any projection system, is not the sole input for any ranking.

7. Ryan Doumit (.281/.344/.453 PECOTA) .250/.299/.414: Doumit missed significant time with a wrist injury, then struggled upon returning, which kept him from having three strong seasons at the plate in a row. He did hit .346/.424/.481 in September, so hopefully he will be 100 percent healed by the time 2010's Opening Day rolls around, and he can earn a high ranking once again.

8. Pablo Sandoval (.289/.329/.454 PECOTA) .330/.387/.556: My lone concern with Sandoval was that he lacked the patience to make consistent offensive production easy, and would need to keep up his excellent contact rates in order to succeed. He showed in 2009 that he's up to the task-I could have been a bit more aggressive with my ranking of him-but catcher looked like a pretty deep position up front, so I wasn't sure if it was worth the risk. Looking back, I would have gotten away with it had I pushed him up further, as even a season like his projection would have stood out.

9. Mike Napoli (.240/.344/.482 PECOTA) .272/.350/.492: Napoli surprisingly hit for a good average again, but lost some of his power along the way, with his ISO dropping from .313 to .220, which is closer to his previously established levels. It's a shame he doesn't play more often because higher runs scored and RBI totals would make him one of the better options at the position

10. Jeff Clement (.258/.341/.449 PECOTA) Clement never ended up catching for the Mariners in 2009, or the Pirates either, once he was traded to that organization. In fact, he spent the entire season at Triple-A. So in the sense that I advocated a player who never played, my bad, but it's tough to gauge how on or off his projection was given he never showed up.

11. Chris Snyder (.254/.355/.451 PECOTA) .200/.333/.352: After a few solid years in a row, Snyder fell apart in 2009 thanks to a back injury that put him on the DL twice and required off-season surgery. He didn't play much, and didn't play healthy even less, so it's tough to see how off this was.

12. Miguel Montero (.269/.351/.468 PECOTA) .294/.355/.478: I shouldn't have ranked Montero this high given he was sharing time with Snyder, but I got lucky because he took over for Snyder and did a wonderful job in his place. My thinking was that, in leagues with daily changes, he was a great catcher to have on your roster to slot in when he was playing, but since he played all the time, he worked out in leagues without those changes, too. I don't want to pat myself on the back too hard, though, since this was more of a lucky situation than my nailing something.

13. Jorge Posada (.249/.336/.409 PECOTA) .285/.363/.522: Drawing from the same well of spite that fueled Derek Jeter's bounce-back campaign, Posada not only played most of the year, but had one of the better offensive campaigns of his career. I did say that I had more faith in his 75th percentile (.267/.352/.441) given PECOTA didn't know the difference between being 37 and aging and being injured, but his recovery from shoulder surgery clearly did not bother him to the degree I expected in what I thought was a generous attitude. I'm very interested in his 2010 forecast.

14. Victor Martinez (.272/.342/.408 PECOTA) .303/.381/.480: I relied on his projection and his 2008 campaign far too much when making this ranking, as was pointed out to me by readers before the season even began. Trying to balance that is difficult (see: Posada), but it's something I'm working on improving, despite its case-by-case nature. As an aside, I was upset Martinez was doing well in the sense that it made me wrong, but didn't care any more once he was dealt to Boston. Funny how that works.

15. Jesus Flores (.252/.316/.432 PECOTA) .301/.371/.505: PECOTA and I agreed that Flores was capable of becoming one of the better hitting catchers in the league. His 75th percentile forecast, which was quoted as the evidence of this in the rankings, was .264/.329/.463. He ended up hitting for a higher batting average, which also boosted the other two numbers, a fun surprise for those who selected him towards the back of their drafts. My one worry is his .381 BABIP, but given I felt his 75th percentile was reasonable, I'm still positive about him for 2010.

16. Bengie Molina (.276/.312/.416 PECOTA) .265/.285/.442: His BABIP and average fell, but he kept his power up and drove in 80 runs. He's by no means an elite-level catcher, but you know what you're getting if you pick up Bengie.

17. Dioner Navarro (.259/.326/.382 PECOTA) .218/.267/.322: I should have listened to PECOTA and its skeptical ways as even though it didn't predict the level at which Navarro would fail, it had a better grasp on his abilities than I did. I said he wouldn't hurt you much in deeper leagues, but he did.

18. Ramon Hernandez (.259/.318/.396 PECOTA) .258/.336/.362: It's a bit surprising that Hernandez didn't see his power bump up with the move to the NL and the friendlier parks, but overall, his lack of production at this stage of the list isn't shocking.

19. Kurt Suzuki (.263/.335/.386 PECOTA) .274/.313/.421: "If only Kurt Suzuki could combine his 2007 ISO with his 2008 batting average; then we'd have ourselves an intriguing backstop to talk about for fantasy purposes." Oh, hey, look what happened in 2009, despite the fact he still hits more grounders than fly balls. He even did it with a below-average BABIP, so it should be a repeatable year.

20. John Baker (.248/.330/.377 PECOTA) .271/.349/.410: I liked Baker much more than his weighted mean forecast, saying his 75th percentile (.266/.352/.416) was a better starting point. He hit right along those lines, so if you scooped him up late, he gave you some value.

As for the Just Missed players, the catching situation in Texas ended up earning its place off of the main rankings, as neither Jarrod Saltalamacchia nor Taylor Teagarden did much of anything at the plate. Victor Martinez rebounded, which cut into Kelly Shoppach's playing time until he was dealt, but Shoppach didn't play that well on the year for the Indians. I would like to point out that I said, "Lastly, we have Ramon Castro, who should once again only pick up around a third of the plate appearances and still out-produce the Mets' starter by miles" if only because the Mets dealt him so they could play inferior hitters in the slot. Castro hit just .219 in 171 plate appearances, but also posted a quality ISO for the umpteenth time in his no-respect career as a backup.

Related Content:  PECOTA,  The Who,  Time,  Power Rankings,  Year Of The Injury

24 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

rotoman21
Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway.

You have Sandoval needs to me much higher in the rankings.

Jan 15, 2010 09:31 AM
rating: -34
 
rotoman21
Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway.

Meant to say, you need to have Sandoval much higher in the rankings. Didn't see a way to edit my post.

Jan 15, 2010 09:32 AM
rating: -34
 
DWrek5

Every dang time he does one of these, someone responds with one of these. Its not an 2010 ranking, its a retrospective of 2009.

Jan 15, 2010 09:34 AM
rating: 16
 
Tderrick17

Marc - what do you think a good strategy is for two-catcher leagues? I had Mauer & McCann last year... and an average team around them... and couldn't get out of 6th place in a 10-team league.

Jan 15, 2010 09:38 AM
rating: -1
 
eighteen

Beyond 10 teams, you don't provide any information to answer that question (such as what kind of league you're in, what stats you count, etc.); but as a general rule catchers have 100-150 fewer PAs than other position players, so the difference between tier 1 and tier 2 catchers doesn't impact counting stats nearly as much as it does at other positions.

In a 10-team league, you're much better off going after thin tier 1 positions like SS and 2B. The difference between Hanley Ramirez and Erik Aybar is a lot bigger than the difference between Mauer and Bengie Molina.

Jan 15, 2010 14:05 PM
rating: 3
 
krissbeth

I'd say that top 20 is fine, provided you set aside space for about 10-15 extra people. Leagues that start two catchers or leagues with CI and MI or leagues with lots of owners need some of the depth info.

Jan 15, 2010 10:11 AM
rating: 1
 
alxlevin

To answer the preference question, I'd love to see next season's rankings in a tiered list with 25 players. Looking forward to it.

Jan 15, 2010 10:24 AM
rating: 3
 
jenstad

I think 1-20 (or whatever number works), but I would suggest and appreciate some sort of tiering system so we can see where you think the separation lies a bit more within each position. Very helpful for draft prep.

Jan 15, 2010 11:17 AM
rating: 0
 
cmaczkow

In a perfect world, I'd love to see tiers and an expanded list. I know there's not necessarily a whole lot to say when you get below #20, but one thing that might be useful would be to list some guys that have potential to help (or hurt) if they were to fall into more playing playing time. I'd also love to see analysis of different ways to approach the position from a fantasy standpoint (for example, given the expected talent distribution, is it worth it to overpay for two high end guys? to punt the position totally? take more or fewer risks than you would at a different position?).

Jan 15, 2010 13:27 PM
rating: 0
 
dkirschner

Marc, Thanks for these articles and being willing to review your predictions. I prefer tiering with ranks inside the tier. Without tiering there is no way to know whether there is a significant difference between two players that are ranked near each other. This type of knowledge would be helpful when drafting.

Jan 15, 2010 13:40 PM
rating: 0
 
Richard Bergstrom

"It's a shame he doesn't play more often because higher runs scored and RBI totals would make him one of the better options at the position."

Um, the fact he hit 20 home runs each year for the last two years makes him one of the better options at the position. Runs and RBIs can be as unpredictable as wins and saves and aren't a category I go out of my way to specifically draft for.

Jan 15, 2010 17:37 PM
rating: -1
 
Richard Bergstrom

This is in regards to Mike Napoli btw.

Jan 15, 2010 17:37 PM
rating: 0
 
Marc Normandin

Yeah, I got that :-)

I mean very top. If he played all the time he'd pick up a lot more R and RBI in that Angels' lineup, and he'd be much more rounded categorically speaking. I really don't think my statement was off base.

Jan 15, 2010 20:46 PM
rating: 0
 
Dano

Don't forget that you also have to account for the fact that Molina hits cleanup for the Giants, while he'd be a 7 or 8 in the Angels lineup. Fewer PAs and hitting around lesser hitters means less RS and RBI.

Jan 16, 2010 07:49 AM
rating: 0
 
memflyken2
Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway.

No Yadier Molina in the top 20? ????

Jan 15, 2010 22:56 PM
rating: -4
 
eighteen

THis is "Fantasy Focus." For all his other virtues, Yadier's a lousy Fantasy option. One of those players who's a lot more valuable in real baseball than in fantasy.

Jan 16, 2010 07:59 AM
rating: 1
 
memflyken2

Of course i know this is "fanatsy report," but tell me how a catcher who bats .293 and steals 9 bases is a "lousy" fantasy option when compared to the likes of Jesus Flores and John Baker. Yady is no Top Ten catcher, but he sure as heck belongs in the Top Twenty...

Jan 16, 2010 09:28 AM
rating: -2
 
Marc Normandin

This is a review of my 2009 rankings. I didn't have Molina ranked in my 2009 rankings. He does not appear in a review of the 2009 rankings because he was not in the 2009 rankings. I'm going to keep saying 2009 rankings in every single sentence in the comment thread, because apparently saying it in the article doesn't cut it :-)

Jan 16, 2010 10:27 AM
rating: 0
 
eighteen

Yadier had 4 career SBs in 4 full seasons prior to 2009. If you saw those 9 SBs in 2009 coming, you are a Fantasy God.

Jan 16, 2010 16:12 PM
rating: 1
 
bradyj20
(933)

The Phils' Carlos Ruiz would be ranked .... where?

Jan 16, 2010 08:04 AM
rating: 0
 
bill1car

I would like to analyze the rankings a different way.

Below are who turned out to be the top 11 catchers in 2009 based on fantasy stats used in most leagues.

1) Mauer BP ranked 2
2) Martinez BP ranked 14
3) McCann BP ranked 1
4) Suzuki BP ranked 19
5) Posada BP ranked 13
6) Montero BP ranked 12
7) Pierzynski BP did not mention in top 20 or just missed
8) Napoli BP ranked 9
9) Y Molina BP did not mention
10) B. Molina BP ranked 16
11) M Olivo BP did not mention

With so much technical research analyzed at BP, why are most of the C rankings so far off?

In 2008, Pierzynski was 8th best C, Y. Molina was 11. How could they not be in top 20 in 2009 rankings? V.Martinez was one of the top C in the league from 2004 to 2007. He was hurt in 2008 and supposed to be healthy in 2009. How does he get ranked 14 (behind J Clement and Chris Snyder)???
I know predicting stats is very difficult. But these 2009 catcher rankings were very poor for fantasy purposes.

Jan 16, 2010 11:11 AM
rating: 3
 
rdierkers

yes to tiers

Jan 16, 2010 13:05 PM
rating: 1
 
hessshaun

Anyone who questions catcher rankings at all, please log as many expert opinions you may find for pre rankings and then grade them at the end of the season.

I think this is something that BP puts out there pretty often. Catcher is the most demanding position in the game, and as a result, these lists will fluctuate considerably. Hindsight is always 20/20.

I am not in a two catcher league, so I always take one in the very last round of my drafts. It has become tradition for me.

Jan 16, 2010 14:22 PM
rating: 0
 
Nathan

I agree with the idea that deeper rankings would be helpful for a lot of fantasy players, myself included. Not just at C, but that is where the need is greatest.

I think the most interesting leagues to play in are the ones in which you draft players other than superstars, where forecasting the minor breakouts is the key skill. I don't know how many BP readers feel the same way, but thought I would toss in my two cents for whatever its worth.

Thanks for the rankings and commentary.

Jan 16, 2010 16:16 PM
rating: 1
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Future Shock: Blue Jay... (01/14)
<< Previous Column
Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Right F... (01/08)
Next Column >>
Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Startin... (01/17)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Baseball Therapy: Free... (01/15)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Fantasy Article TTO Scoresheet Podcast: 10 Players to Pick i...
Fantasy Article Fantasy Starting Pitcher Planner: Week Eight
BP Chicago
Fantasy Rounders: Diversification
Fantasy Rounders: The Young and the Splitles...
Premium Article Rubbing Mud: The Quarter-Season Odds Report
Going Yard: The Near Perfection of Pederson

MORE FROM JANUARY 15, 2010
Premium Article Prospectus Hit and Run: The Replacement-Leve...
Premium Article Transaction Action: AL Catsup
Premium Article Baseball Therapy: Free Agency Personals, Par...

MORE BY MARC NORMANDIN
2010-01-24 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Starting Pitcher Rankings Rev...
2010-01-22 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Starting Pitcher Rankings Rev...
2010-01-17 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Starting Pitcher Rankings Rev...
2010-01-15 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Catcher Rankings Review
2010-01-08 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Right Field Rankings Review
2010-01-05 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Center Field Rankings Review
2009-12-28 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Left Field Rankings Review
More...

MORE FANTASY FOCUS
2010-01-24 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Starting Pitcher Rankings Rev...
2010-01-22 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Starting Pitcher Rankings Rev...
2010-01-17 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Starting Pitcher Rankings Rev...
2010-01-15 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Catcher Rankings Review
2010-01-08 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Right Field Rankings Review
2010-01-05 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Center Field Rankings Review
2009-12-28 - Fantasy Article Fantasy Focus: Left Field Rankings Review
More...