BP Comment Quick Links
![]() |
|
|
|
December 27, 2012 Overthinking ItBourn to Be ... What?Michael Bourn turns 30 today, but barring a buzzer-beating offer, he won’t get the gift of a new contract until after his birthday. Bourn, the highest-ranked free agent remaining on the market, hasn’t attracted the widespread interest that he and agent Scott Boras had hoped for. Some teams may be concerned that the center fielder’s speed-based skill set could suffer once he loses a step; others might be reluctant or unwilling to forfeit the draft pick Bourn would cost them because of the qualifying offer he received from the Braves. Regardless of their reasons for looking elsewhere, several potential buyers for Bourn have already removed themselves from the running by making other moves: the Nationals, Phillies, Reds, and A’s have landed center fielders via trade, while the Giants and Braves have invested in other free agents, re-signing Angel Pagan and bringing in B.J. Upton, respectively. It’s still too soon for Bourn to panic or consider seeking new representation. While it’s possible that he’ll have to settle for the so-called “pillow contract” that some Boras clients have had to swallow when their expected megadeals never materialized, Boras has often wangled the biggest possible payday by waiting until late in the offseason, when some teams are desperate for an upgrade and there are few attractive alternatives to his high-profile clients. While the pool of potential suitors has shrunk, several destinations are still in play. Of course, some teams with vacancies in center probably aren’t realistic possibilities: Bourn would improve teams like the Mets, Astros, or even Rockies (in the event of a Dexter Fowler deal) as much as anyone, but those clubs are too strapped for cash or too far from competition to consider signing such a big-ticket item. Assuming he’ll eventually land an Upton-esque deal—or at least a contract of equivalent annual value over fewer years—the following three teams would both be able to afford Bourn and benefit most from his services: Seattle Mariners Bourn would also bring some on-base ability to the top of an order that’s sorely in need of anyone who can avoid making outs: Mariners leadoff batters (mostly Dustin Ackley) managed only a .281 OBP last season, by far the lowest of any AL team. The M’s have largely been linked to hitters who would have improved the team's power output, like Josh Hamilton and Nick Swisher, but putting more men on base would go a long way toward curbing their offensive ineptitude. Improving their performance after they reach base wouldn’t hurt, either: the Mariners were the AL’s second worst baserunning team in 2012, at more than eight runs below average. Bourn, who led the majors with 11.7 Baserunning Runs last season, could have put them in the black by himself. Texas Rangers
|
I'd be very disappointed in Jon Daniels, were he to sign Bourn, for reasons you mentioned in your first paragraph- he would cost the Rangers a draft pick. This, in addition to the also aforementioned Gentry/Martin. IMHO, with what's left of the free agent market, the Rangers should stand pat until Spring Training, see what they have, and go from there. Obvious deficiencies, are set-up men for Joe Nathan, and a run producer for the middle of the order. It'd be nice to have another decent starter, but they might be able to live with that situation for a while.
Except that the Rangers window is now. A shorter term , higher AAV deal for Bourn would make sense for the Rangers.
With their farm system, and the big TV contract coming up, the Rangers' window will remain open for a while. There is no need for any knee-jerk, panic moves to shore up what appears to be a decent, though not dominating team. The front office braintrust continues to exercise common sense, in the face of MSM, and bandwagon fans choler.