Performance Analysis:
While it was no surprise that Raul Ibanez would see a boost in production due to his move from the American League to the weaker National League, his first two-plus months have been far better than anyone could imagine. Ibanez’ line stands at .322/.380/.678 with 22 home runs, just one fewer than he hit all of last year, and 11 off of his career high from 2006. Despite just turning 37 earlier this month, he is in the midst of the best season of his career, and would more than likely finish the year that way even if he reverted to his career norms from here on out. That last point is the central question regarding Ibanez though: What exactly is it that we should be expecting out of him at the plate for the remainder of the season?

Taking a look at his batted-ball data reveals little. He’s not hitting as many line drives as he normally does (just 15.3 percent so far), but he is sustaining a high rate of success on the ones he does get (.806/.784/1.222). He’s hitting a few more grounders and fly balls instead, but neither figure has seen that substantial an increase. The lone number that looks out of place here is his HR/FB rate of jacks landing in the seats on 25.6 percent of his flies, a figure that’s over nine percentage points higher than his career-high rate. This is the key to Ibanez’ season, as a fluctuating HR/FB rate over a small sample can make a player look better or worse than he actually is.

Let’s take a deeper look at his home runs to see if we can learn anything from them. First of all, Ibanez seems to have benefited from the move to the NL as much if not more than from the move to Citizens Bank Park, which isn’t all that surprising given how well Safeco treated left-handed pull hitters like Ibanez despite its overall pitcher-friendly leanings. He’s hitting .333/.421/.696 at home and .314/.347/.664 on the road, with a homer every 11.3 at-bats at Citizens, and one every 10.8 elsewhere. Most of his homers have landed between right and center field, with just a handful going the opposite way.

Using information from Hit Tracker shows us what Ibanez’ homers look like. He’s leading the league in three home-run types that are tracked there, with nine “No Doubts,” seven “Just Enoughs,” and three “Lucky” homers. Two of those “Lucky” shots are overlaps with the “Just Enoughs”-“Lucky” homers are those that would not have left the park on a day that’s 70 degrees with calm weather. There is little to complain about when it comes to the “No Doubt” shots, as those left the bat and never looked back. The seven “Just Enough” homers (and the one extra lucky shot) have influenced Ibanez’ line significantly, though; hypothetically, if we were to count all eight of those homers as fly-ball outs, Ibanez’ line would be .289/.351/.545. That’s still very impressive, but it’s not the same as the ridiculous pace he’s set for himself, and in fact looks a lot like his 2002 season with the Royals.

We can’t just take those homers away from him though, for two reasons. First, they have already been hit, and the Phillies‘ record is the better for it, and second, even the best sluggers pick up a few so-called “Just Enough” shots each year. Those are homers that clear the fence by less than 10 vertical feet, or by less than one fence-height. Though they barely made it over the fence, they accounted for nearly one-third of all homers hit in the majors last season; in short, they happen. You can adjust for those homers going forward-maybe you don’t think Ibanez will have the same luck with them in the second half as he had in the first-and that’s probably the best course of action.

How do we explain the “No Doubt” shots though? In this category Ibanez shares the lead with Albert Pujols. Looking at Ibanez’ distance for his homers tells us a little more about his luck. The average True Distance of his homers is 409 feet-the True Distance is how far a ball actually traveled, without any adjustments for conditions such as wind or temperature. His average Standard Distance-the measurement that does account for those things-is 401.2 feet. That’s close to last year’s 400 feet of True Distance (and 398.3 standard), which was roughly five feet more than his 2007 numbers. Consider how many of those “Just Enough” homers may not have cleared the fence were the weather not kind to him; it’s also possible that a few of his “No Doubt” shots got an extra boost that pushed them out of standard or lucky homer territory.

It looks like a wonderful chain of events unfolded for Ibanez, all at once. Between the league switch and favorable weather conditions for hitters in his games, Ibanez has been able to make the Phillies’ front office look smart for signing him. Assuming he does not have the same meteorological blessings in the second half that he has had in the first, we should see his performance return to a much more Ibanez-like level. That’s still really good for the Phillies though, especially with the previous two-plus months already in the bank.-Marc Normandin

Scouting Report:
Those who know Ibanez will tell you that his work ethic and willingness to adjust and adapt are second to none. That helps explain why he is defying the laws of aging by getting off to the best start of his career this season despite turning 37 earlier this month. Ibanez is also making Phillies first-year general manager Ruben Amaro Jr. look smart for signing him last winter to a three-year, $31.5 million contract in a free-agent market where money was tight; at the time Amaro was heavily criticized for overpaying.

Obviously, Ibanez is a late bloomer, but this isn’t the first of it, as he did not get a chance to play every day until his seventh big-league season, in 2002 with the Royals. He’d spent his first five seasons with the Mariners stuck behind such outfielders as Ken Griffey Jr., Jay Buhner, and Mike Cameron.

Ibanez has become better as he has gotten older because of that aforementioned willingness to change. He came to the majors with an all-or-nothing swing, but has learned the value of hitting to all fields rather than trying to pull every pitch. Pitchers also used to be able to expand his strike zone by exploiting Ibanez’s tendency to chase breaking balls in the dirt, but he has learned to lay off those offerings.

“He’s reached that point in his career where he has figured things out,” said a scout who has watched Ibanez since he broke into the majors in 1996. “He has a plan every time he steps into the box, and he’s smart, so he adjusts quickly to whatever the pitcher is trying to do to him. Going to the weaker league (the NL) and playing in that bandbox (Citizens Bank Park) in Philadelphia has helped jack his numbers up a little bit, there’s no doubt, but he is now one of the smartest hitters in the game. And don’t discount what great shape the guy is in. He’s in better shape now than when he a kid breaking into the league. He’s not a big bulky guy, but he’s strong, real strong.”-John Perrotto

A version of this story originally appeared on ESPN Insider Insider.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
Please, enough Ibanez...
One huge part of his “late blooming” is his adjustment to hitting left-handed pitching. So far in 2009 Ibanez has hit 9 homeruns against left-handed pitchers. That's 43% of his homeruns. In 2007 he hit 2 homeruns off of lefties, he hit 7 in 2008 and now 9 so far in 2009. Ibanez has also increased his AVG vs. LHP every season since 2006. He’s just an experienced hitter who is staying healthy and taking full advantage of just about every mistake thrown his way.
"He's not hitting as many line drives as he normally does (just 15.3 percent so far), but he is sustaining a high rate of success on the ones he does get (.806/.784/1.222)" I know its been covered before, but how exactly does one get a BA higher than their OBP?
Mostly due to sacrifices, I believe.
More sacrifice flies than walks/hbp.
One can't draw a walk on a line drive...
The section called "Scouting Report" has perhaps 2 quips that could qualify as scouting: he's hitting to all fields, he's laying off stuff in the dirt.

Otherwise, Perrotto's gone and written a good snippet if Ibanez ever needs to call on a character witness. Even the quote from the scout has little to do with any physical characteristics or tendencies at the plate instead relying on Ibanez being "one of the smartest hitters".

And can we please wait more than 2 months before calling Amaro smart for this signing? If asked, could he really say, with a clean conscience that he expected something like this from Ibanez? Was Ibanez just not willing to adapt enough in earlier seasons?

Lazy writing that meanders towards an amorphous conclusion. . .
Well, according to FanGraphs he's already provided almost 15 million worth of value to the Phillies. So if he just matches that over the next 2 and a half years, the contract will have been worth it.

Once again, the contract might have been bad, but the production he's already given is real. It counts. It doesn't get nullified just because Amaro overpaid.
Scouting is much more than "physical characteristics" and "tendencies at the plate". Baseball is as much a game of the mind as it is physical. "Work ethic", "willingness to adjust and adapt", having "a plan every time he steps in the box" and staying in "great shape" are exactly the kind of scout-y things that separate players as they age. Andruw Jones would be an obvious counter-example.
"Ibanez is also making Phillies first-year general manager Ruben Amaro Jr. look smart..."

"Ibanez has been able to make the Phillies' front office look smart for signing him."

Looking smart and being smart are two different things. I purposely chose "look" as a modifier because I still don't think the deal was a good one (there's still 2.5 years left on it, so let's see how they go) and am not crediting Amaro with something he did not foresee. I can't speak for John, but he did use the same modifying word, so...
Ibanez has had several hot streaks like this over the course of his career. Of course, none of them have come at the beginning of the season, so they haven't been as noticeable as this one, but parsing the numbers shows that this is not unusual for him. You can see the information here:
Very cool. I'll be happy when the season is over so we can see how his numbers look when things have evened out.
one day citizens bank park won't be called a band box. this year CBP is 13th in HRs and in Runs scored. 2008 it was 11th in HRs and runs scored

Granted, it HAS been pretty HR friendly prior to the last 2 years:
2007 it was 1st
2006 it was 6th
2005 it was 3rd
2004 it was 5th

is it the pitching? Ryan Howard's power numbers skewing the results? I just wish CBP didn't get such a bad rap.

the real good news is that Raul Ibanez is making everyone get over the loss of Pat Burrell around here. Raul doesn't have to maintain power numbers to keep the fans happy -- as long as he keeps his average up, this team will succeed.
Excellent point. It is a little frustrating when writers use the bandbox argument to belittle the HR totals of certain Phillies.

I am not sure why exactly less HRs are hit there, maybe it's because they moved the wall back, but it is definitely not the homer haven that lazy journalists make it out to be anymore.

I think overall this article was fairly well-written. The weaker league argument is thrown out multiple times and very quickly, but my question is, does Raul see weaker pitchers in NYM, ATL, WAS, and FLO than he did with OAK, ANA, and TEX last year?

For instance accounting for league differences are the pitchers he sees most frequently in the NL much weaker??? Just curious...
I wish that when I clicked to read this article, it would have just said "STEROIDS" in 48-point font.
i laughed
At least I didn't submit the article from my mother's basement! Please don't send me a urine or blood sample, Raul.

Just goes to show the east coast bias... do you realize how few houses on the West Coast have basements? :)
agreed, that was funny
Exactly. The truth wouldn't make as interesting a story.