Big Hurt Hurt… But Not As Bad As You Think
One of the great pleasures of baseball in the 1990s has been watching
Frank Thomas hit. A lethal package of bat speed, raw power, and plate
discipline, "The Big Hurt" has put up a string of seasons that
have let us talk about him in the same breath as hitters like Ted
Williams and Lou Gehrig. Sure, big Frank isn’t much with the leather,
but when your career OPS is 1.052, people tend to make allowances for
that sort of thing.
Now, Thomas has endured a season-long slump. With his season wrapped up,
he finished up hitting .265, and his OPS was off almost 200 points from
his career norm. What’s wrong with Frank?
Thomas is going through a divorce, and there has been a lot of
speculation that this has impacted his performance. Only he knows
for sure, and I’m reluctant to join in the second-hand psychoanalyzing.
Let’s take a look at his performance this year, and compare it
to his estabished level of performance. The first line below is Thomas’
stat line from this year. The second, his 1995-97 stats in seasonal
notation (per 162 games).
UIBB: Unintentional walks.
Because the raw ABs are so close in this comparison, the two lines
compare quite nicely.
The first thing, of course, is to notice that Thomas put up an .861 OPS,
a year many DHs would take. He just missed 30 HRs, and has more than
100 walks for the eighth consecutive season. In fact, there’s only three things
Thomas seems to be doing significantly worse than in a typical season: hitting
singles, hitting home runs and being intentionally walked. The rest of his line
is right in line with his typical performance.
We’ll deal with the most obvious difference first. From 1995-97,
with Robin Ventura and an "off-year" Albert Belle hitting behind
him, Thomas was intentionally walked 64 times. This year, with
a torrid Belle behind him, he’s been given an intentional pass twice. Thomas’
unintentional walk rate, his plate discipline, is essentially unchanged.
Now, this isn’t meant to minimize the difference between this year and
the previous three. It is a 200-point drop in OPS, but it’s not an
across-the-board collapse. Crash Davis‘ infamous "one hit a week…a dork…a
groundball with eyes" would give Frank back about 55 points of average and
almost 100 points of OPS. Swings in batting average like that, when they’re not
accompanied by a falloff in other areas, can reasonably be the result of
hitting in bad luck all season. The loss in power is more disturbing, but it’s
also within a reasonable range for a good power hitter.
My personal observation is that Thomas got into a rut early this year handling
pitches in the upper-right quadrant of the strike zone. Thomas
has a tendency to back away from this pitch, one that is arguably a
strike. And whether it was intentional, or merely coincidental, that pitch was
being called a strike on him much more frequently than it had been in the past.
Note that his strikeouts are up by almost as much as his singles are
down. That essentially looks like a tradeoff, caused in part by Thomas striking
out on that pitch more, and being slow to adjust his approach.
This pitch has caused him to be behind in the count more often, giving him
fewer opportunities to tee off in cripple counts, affecting his home run
Left-handers appeared to attack this chink in Thomas’ armor aggressively,
particularly earlier in the year. Typically, Frank obliterates lefties;
here are his splits:
Thomas vs. LHP, 1998: .327/.365
Thomas vs. LHP, 1995-97: .507/.815
Thomas vs. RHP, 1998: .396/.516
Thomas vs. LHP, 1995-97: .441/.556
The bulk of his falloff has come against lefties. Considering the sample
size, and the admittedly anecdotal evidence for causes, I see no reason
to believe Thomas will not be back at his 1.050 OPS level in 1998. In fact,
he seems to have already made some adjustments:
Thomas K/UIBB ratio, pre-ASB: 61/55
Thomas K/UIBB ration, post-ASB: 32/50
Thomas may be a born DH, but he’s definitely an H. His decline this year is
part a slow reaction to external change (the strike zone), part the impact of a
great hitter behind him (goodbye to the intentional walk) and part hitting a
stretch of bad luck (singles). He’ll be back next year.
Relief From a Bad Idea
OOPS: Opponent’s OBP + SLG
IR/ISc: Inherited Runners, Inherited Runners Scored
Three pretty good seasons, right? Not a whole lot to delineate them? Mr. A has
the best OOPS and inherited runner performance, while Mr. B has thrown a lot
more innings than the other two, but allowed a number of unearned runs. Mr. C
hasn’t been used to get out of jams as much, but his performance is almost a
dead match for Mr. A. While all three have pitchers’ parks for home stadiums,
Mr. A’s home park is one of the best pitchers’ parks in history.
If you were going to give one of these guys a major award, or even a
corned beef on rye, who would it be?
Oops, forgot something…
Based on this last bit of information, the Padres’ Trevor Hoffman is
considered in many circles to be a legitimate Cy Young contender, while the
Giants’ Robb Nen and the Expos’ Ugueth Urbina aren’t even mentioned.
Unfortunately for Nen and Urbina, their excellent years were not supported by
Gardner and F.P. Santangelo.
Personally, I’ll have Hoffman far down on my Cy ballot, if he shows up
there at all. Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, et al. all throw more than three times
the number of innings as Hoffman and his ilk, and that’s just not something
that can be made up, shy of a Steve Reed 1995 performance. And Hoffman’s year,
once you factor in Jack Murphy (OK…Q******m) Stadium’s extreme depression of
offense, doesn’t measure up.
But if you do believe that bullpen aces can be Cy candidates, then you
have to have Nen and Urbina on your ballot as well, because the only real
differences between them are the opportunities they got and the ballparks.
Hoffman may be the best of the three, but the other two need to get those
down-ballot votes, to be consistent.
Just For Laughs
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.Subscribe now