BP Comment Quick Links
| Home | Unfiltered | Articles | Newsletter | Statistics | Fantasy | Events | Radio | Glossary | Search |
![]() |
|
|
|
June 12, 2006 Under The KnifeHeads Will RollThe Jason Grimsley case continues to percolate. Behind the scenes, the owners and Players Association are prepping for a fight over the retiring Grimsley’s pay and the likely 80-game penalty that will be levied against him. The names in the document are starting to leak--Mike Sweeney is said to be just one of the players who “have been made aware” of the names--and the whispers may end up more damning than the truth. As we look at the document, some errors are starting to show up. Grimsley is alleged to have stated that his steroid use began after shoulder surgery in 2000. That would make sense, if he’d had shoulder surgery. Grimsley had elbow surgery to remove bone chips after the season and multiple checks confirm that this is the case. Bone chip removal is one of the simpler operations for a pitcher and would not be affected by steroid use in the recovery. HGH after shoulder surgery? Sure. Tommy John? Again, sure, since studies show HGH has the benefit of affecting cartilage while steroids do not. It’s a small error for a pitcher that many describe as “not intelligent” but perhaps it's not his error. It’s just one thing in a long document; enough to cause some to question the accuracy of Jeff Novitzky’s leaked affadavit. It’s interesting to see the reactions around sports to this, including comparisons of baseball’s policy to those of other sports (short version: baseball’s is stronger) and for the reaction to Congressional calls for blood testing (short version: baseball may end up being the only union that may not fight it). This week’s BP Radio heartened me. After spending the first hour focused on the draft, our local call-in hour centered on the Grimsley case. Not one call came in, an unusual occurrence. I’d normally be bothered by that, but I think we’ve gone past the point of most people caring. Absent big names or more solid evidence, I doubt my statement that "This is the big one." Finally, the intriguing part of ESPN’s HGH story is buried at the bottom. According to the story, MLB has allowed therapeutic use waivers for testosterone. While there are valid medical uses for testosterone, none of those seem to meet MLB’s stringent standards for waivers. Cases like pituitary tumors make sense, though that isn’t the most common condition, especially in baseball. While I respect the right to privacy, I’d be very interested in hearing why baseball approved any waiver for testosterone or other anabolic agents. A great article in the NY Times helps explain why this fight will be so tough. Powered by respect for Jim Leyritz, on to the injuries:
|