BP Comment Quick Links
| Home | Unfiltered | Articles | Newsletter | Statistics | Fantasy | Events | Radio | Glossary | Search |
![]() |
|
|
|
March 17, 2009 Prospectus TodayThe Motor City Money Pit
I've been spending a lot of time on this site, looking at bad contracts for a piece that should run this week. It's a fantastic resource for all baseball fans, and one of those reminders that we are incredibly fortunate to live in a time when so much information is available with so little effort. We care a lot about payroll now, mostly because some teams don't seem to care what they spend on it, like the Yankees, and some teams really don't seem to care what they spend on it, like the Marlins. The extremes always make for interesting copy, but there are many stories to be told in between the two. Take the Tigers, for instance. A year after being hyped as the runaway favorites in the AL Central with their potential for a thousand-run offense, and then falling on their faces in the season's first month and never recovering, the Tigers appear to be a solid contender in a three-team Central race. What's interesting is that despite getting very little attention for their spending, they might have as much dead money as any team in the game. This year, Gary Sheffield is guaranteed $14 million, $10 million of which will be paid to him now, with $4 million deferred. Sheffield is 40 years old, and coming off of a season in which he batted .225/.326/.400 while playing 47 innings in the field. He was a below-average hitter for the league as a whole, and a sub-replacement designated hitter. Sheffield's last good year was in 2005, though he was adequate in '07. There's very little reason to be optimistic here; Sheffield's leading indicators, like contact rate, K/BB, and isolated power, are all going backwards at a high rate of speed. Even a return to '07 levels wouldn't be enough to make him more than an average DH, and there's every chance he's done. For $14 million. The rotation is a money pit. The Tigers will pay Jeremy Bonderman $12.5 million this season, less than a year after he underwent a number of surgeries to correct circulatory problems in his arm. Will Carroll is confident that Bonderman can come back, but to what, exactly? Bonderman made 12 starts last year. He made 28 with an ERA of 5.01 in 2007. His peripherals have been going backwards since '06, and the combination of that trend and the questions about his health—he probably won't make Opening Day—make that $12.5 million a considerable overpay. The Tigers gave Nate Robertson a three-year extension coming off of the lefty's fourth straight innings-eating season in '07. A closer look at his lines would have revealed him to be a poor candidate to continue his success, and he blew up last year, with a 6.35 ERA. Splitting the difference between '07 and '08 would leave the Tigers paying $7 million for 29 starts with an ERA of about 5.50. PECOTA gives him two-thirds of that workload with a 4.72 ERA. In either case, the $7 million is too much money.
|
Sure, those numbers on Cabrera look scary right now, but you're not going to be paying him for an age 31 season in 2009; you're going to be doing in in 2013 when salary inflation will have pushed average rates up another 30-40%. In other words, it'll be like paying him $13-15M today. And while I agree that that could still be painful, it's unlikely to cripple the team like, say, Todd Helton seems to be doing.
That's assuming salary inflation continues at the pace before this previous offseason. I don't know if you noticed, but contract sizes went down considerably this past winter.
I suppose if the global economy continues to free-fall that may be the case. But I expect ML revenues to be about stable this year and then continue to grow afterwords, what with the MLB network and all.
I guess my broader point was that we often fail to take into account salary inflation when decrying long-term deals. Derek Lowe and Adrian Beltre's come to mind immediately as contracts that people were outraged about at the time but turned at to be solid investments for the club involved.
You mean the salary inflation that gave Abreu a 1-year $5m contract this year?
Assuming present business conditions will persist 6 years into the future is as unwarranted as assuming a player's performance will persist over that time. That's why long-term contracts are a Bad Idea.
I would use the same argument to say why expecting salary inflation is the correct course of action. Last year was an aberration in what has been for player salaries a 10-year hike up a steep mountain. Taking this year's contracts to be indicative of a plateauing or trend the other direction is silly, IMO.
I expect salaries to increase because I expect MLB's revnue to continue to increase due to things like the MLB network and the game's increasing international exposure through stuff like the WBC. There aren't signs of this slowing down, nor are there signs of a salary cap or anything like that to limit salary growth going forward.
If you have something besides one off-season in the worst global economic crisis in half a century to convince me that salaries will not be increasing, I'd love to see it.