BP Comment Quick Links
| Home | Unfiltered | Articles | Newsletter | Statistics | Fantasy | Events | Radio | Glossary | Search |
![]() |
|
|
|
February 19, 2009 Team Health ReportsCincinnati Reds
Head Trainer: Mark Mann Trend: Neutral. The Reds haven't been above average in any of the past five years, but much of that has been a direct result of Ken Griffey Jr.'s presence on the team, as well as their having a tough time keeping pitchers healthy. Last season, despite Griffey not hitting the DL in Cincy, a number of fluke injuries, including two knee fractures to their shortstops, amped up their final tally as far as days lost. There were also a broad spectrum of injuries with no discernible pattern, both traumatic and non-traumatic, to pitchers and players. The team's risk profile is similar to last year's, so Mann and his staff will have to do a better job of staying ahead of the injuries if this team is to have any hope of competing in the division. The Shape of the Season:
|
In what direction do the modifiers "high" and "low" point for each color? Does "high green" mean close to yellow? (I would have thought it meant "very green", i.e. no risk.) Does "low yellow" mean close to green or close to red?
There's an underlying number (0-100, though this year's range was 11-74), so "high" means that it was close to the top of that band's range and "low" means close to the bottom of the range. A high green and low yellow might be 2 apart.
So Visually...
High Red (Highest Risk)
Red
Low Red
High Yellow
Yellow
Low Yellow
High Green
Green
Low Green (Lowest Risk)
Will - the confusion is that you're mixing your metaphors.
How about adjusting to the following:
Dark Red (most risk)
Red
Light Red
Dark Yellow
Yellow
Bright Yellow
Dark Green
Green
Light Green
Just a suggestion
No. I'm not complicating this any more than it needs to be. I already get enough complaints about using colors from our colorblind readers.
I was really referring to your descriptions of the colours, as opposed to the colours themselves.