Premium and Super Premium Subscribers Get a 20% Discount at MLB.tv!
May 18, 2000
Strength of Schedule
Do the Standings Lie?
As we approach the quarter mark of the season, many people are starting to assemble "surprises and disappointments" lists. Some of these lists reflect a lack of careful analysis--such as any comments about Dante Bichette's inept performance--but another widely-ignored problem is whether the quarter of the season just played will be representative of the season as a whole. In many cases there's reason to think that it's not.
As an example, let's look at a couple of teams in the NL East. In its pre-season predictions, the BP staff regarded both the Phillies and the Expos as middle-of-the-pack teams. Yet after Monday's games, the Phillies had the worst record in the National League while Les Expos were only a game out of the wild-card spot. It would be easy to come to the conclusion that we had goofed badly on these teams.
But a closer look at the schedule reveals some interesting facts. Through Monday, Philadelphia had played 36 games, with 21 of them against the Braves, Cardinals, Reds and Diamondbacks, the four teams who would make the playoffs if the season had ended May 15. They had yet to play any of the Pirates, Cubs, Brewers, Rockies or Padres, teams which had combined for a record 31 games under .500. By contrast, Montreal has played those five teams a remarkable 23 times in 35 games, while not playing a single game against the four playoff-position teams.
Now, there is a chicken-and-egg question here. Do the four top teams have a great record because they've been beating up on bad teams like the Phillies, or are the Phillies scuffling because they've had the bad luck to play the top teams a lot? Clay Davenport took a look at the strength of schedule for all 30 teams and used won-loss records from both 1999 and 2000 to try and escape this problem. The methodology is fairly simple: the strength of each team is determined by dividing their wins by their losses, and then the difficulty of a team's schedule is determined from those numbers. The results are given here:
The numbers were run twice, with the 1999 column using the final standings from last season and the 2000 column using the early results from this one. The larger the number in the table, the tougher the team's schedule.
1999 2000 1999 2000 Anaheim 1055 1041 Arizona 890 767 Baltimore 1054 1132 Atlanta 866 830 Boston 964 902 Chicago 1161 1184 Chicago 948 929 Cincinnati 982 875 Cleveland 1049 1101 Colorado 1170 1355 Detroit 980 1178 Florida 1083 978 Kansas City 1000 1033 Houston 892 845 Minnesota 1022 1061 Los Angeles 1312 1378 New York 982 906 Milwaukee 1110 1232 Oakland 1043 1085 Montreal 865 774 Seattle 1054 1133 New York 894 902 Tampa Bay 1019 1088 Philadelphia 1313 1573 Texas 1063 1168 Pittsburgh 1154 1167 Toronto 1060 1101 St Louis 968 838 San Diego 1306 1480 San Francisco 1108 1402
The numbers confirm the eyeball analysis. Using both 1999 and 2000 numbers the Phillies came out with the toughest schedule in the majors while the Expos came out with either the easiest or second-easiest schedule.
While it would be silly to suggest, based on these numbers, that the Phillies could claw their way back into playoff contention or that the Expos will wind up at the bottom of the heap, they do indicate that the results so far should be taken with a grain of salt, and that our pre-season predictions of mediocrity may very well wind up looking pretty accurate.
That grain of salt should also be taken when looking at individual players on those teams as well. Vladimir Guerrero has been a popular pick for NL MVP so far, but what will happen when his free swinging ways (six unintentional walks in 150 plate appearances) run into Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, Randy Johnson and the other elite pitchers he has yet to face? Scott Rolen's .278 batting average and .360 on-base percentage might seem somewhat disappointing compared to his 1997 and 1998 numbers, but he has yet to get a chance to fatten up the numbers on the detritus that constitutes the pitching staffs of the Cubs and Brewers.
The Braves have had it easy so far, but none of their close competitors have had it that much worse. So while they probably won't keep up the 110-win pace, they can be pretty confident that the schedule so far is a fair sample. Bad news for Mets fans: there's reason to think things may get worse given that their schedule has been fairly easy so far.
The top teams have had a somewhat easy time so far, but again there's not much sign of competition. The Pirates have had a harder road, so they could sneak up as the season moves along.
Out West, Diamondbacks fans shouldn't start budgeting for those playoff tickets yet. While they do have a substantial lead, they've done it with the help of a schedule that's among the three easiest in the majors. Lurking behind them are the Dodgers, Giants and Rockies, all of whom have managed to assemble a record of .500 or better despite very difficult schedules. With that many teams lurking in the weeds, the odds are good that someone will make a charge once their schedule eases up.
Those who argue that the Blue Jays will yet make their presence known in the race will find some evidence to support them here. They're only four-and-a-half games out despite one of the toughest schedules in the league, while the Red Sox and Yankees have played two of the easiest.
The White Sox have had a substantially easier time of it than the two teams breathing right down their necks, which is bad news for the South Siders. At least for this year, it's still reasonable to expect the Indians to eventually take over the division.
Everyone seems to be clustered in the middle of the pack, which is only fitting for a division where 2 1/2 games separate the top from the bottom and no one is that far from .500.
Looking at the results across the majors, perhaps the most startling fact is that there is a much smaller spread in the AL numbers than there is in the NL numbers. There may be a simple logistical reason for that though. Since the AL has had 14 teams since 1977, they've had plenty of time to develop a reasonably balanced schedule that avoids some of the quirks of the NL schedule, such as teams finishing with one team for the year before ever playing other teams.
And just think, if Bud Selig gets his way and realignment goes through, there could be even more confusion at this time next year.