Happy Thanksgiving! Regularly Scheduled Articles Will Resume Monday, December 1
July 8, 2005
Leader of the Pack
Not that you should care about saves, but it’s kind of interesting that
2004: 32 for 39 -- .821
Fortunately, most fans look beyond that surface scum of a stat and see his first half for the complete implosion it’s been. Consider that last year Foulke was ranked 15th out of 518 relievers in WXRL (Expected wins added over a replacement level pitcher, adjusted for level of opposing hitters. WXRL combines the individual adjustments for replacement level [WXR] and quality of the opposing lineup [WXL] to the basic WX calculation.) This year, he’s fourth from the bottom.
Here’s a small chart. On the left side of the slash mark is the rank and VORP for the players from one team. On the right side are the rank and VORP for the players from a second team. Can you name the teams?
C: 2nd, 15.2 / 11th, 8.8
The club represented on the left is the Cincinnati Reds. The team on the right is the Chicago White Sox. I think it’s safe to say that if they played tee-ball in the majors instead of using pitchers, the Reds would be 57-26 and the White Sox 33-51 instead of the other way around.
How much of a down-year is it for National League catchers? Consider that the Reds’
2000: minus 5
Last year, he finished a very respectable seventh with a VORP of 21.1. What’s happened to the six men who were ahead of him?
The last time the Cards were the heavy in the Biggest Mismatchup, they split with the Rockies at home. A good showing in San Francisco will put the Cards near the top of this list:
19: 2001 Mariners
These are the teams in the three-division era with the largest leads headed into the All-Star break. In fact, St. Louis is in a position to best everyone on this list save for the ’01 Mariners. Since none of these leads were coughed up, the Cardinals need to start thinking about what they need to do to keep themselves amused until the playoffs start.
No sooner did I plead a lack of knowledge in my last column about the man who started the 1948 All-Star Game for the American League than I cracked open the latest publication from the Society of American Baseball Research, The National Pastime. There, in an article by Larry DeFillipo, are two long paragraphs about
My contention was that Masterson was the most obscure man to start an All-Star Game, not the worst. In another article in the same publication, Timothy Connaughton compiles a team of the best players never to make an All-Star team and the worst players who did. One of his selections at pitcher was
Armstrong is not obscure for many of us because we remember seeing him pitch. (He was also an original Marlin in 1993.) Twenty-five to fifty years from now, though, he will be far more obscure than Masterson, a pitcher with a much longer career.
The Padres are a five-game winning streak from burying the Diamondbacks and Dodgers and putting the clamps on the division.
Have you ever noticed how a name will suddenly become very popular in baseball? In an instnat, there are a ton of guys with that name when there had been none before. I’m thinking specifically of the name "Cabrera." Prior to 1997, there had only been two Cabreras in big league history and one of those--Al, with the 1913 Cardinals--only played in one game. The next in was
The Yankees just recalled Melky Cabrera to replace the injured