CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Draft Ten Pack: Whom W... (05/22)
<< Previous Column
Prospects Will Break Y... (05/06)
Next Column >>
Prospects Will Break Y... (06/08)
Next Article >>
Daily League Strategy:... (05/23)

May 22, 2014

Prospects Will Break Your Heart

What Did I Miss: Brandon Nimmo

by Jason Parks

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.

a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

The 2011 amateur draft was a talent smorgasbord that could satisfy the most esurient of appetites, the significance of which we are only beginning to scratch the surface of. Starting up top with Pirates’ ace Gerrit Cole, the players taken in the first round read like a who’s who for the next generation of baseball—names like Bundy, Bradley, Lindor, Baez, Fernandez, Gray, Meyer, Springer, and Stephenson. Sandwiched between these hyped warriors of the future is Brandon Nimmo, the 13th overall selection in the class, taken right after Taylor Jungmann and right before Jose Fernandez. At the time, Nimmo was a relatively unknown prospect from the relatively unknown state of Wyoming, a player without a high school team and a narrative that was more focused on his lack of playing experience than his exploits. At the time, it was a head scratcher given the talent still available on the board, and even years later the revisionist commentary has been easy to come by. Brandon Nimmo over Jose Fernandez? Really?

I first put eyes on Brandon Nimmo in the summer of 2012 in the New York-Penn League, and despite recognizing and appreciating his obvious athleticism, I didn’t see a first-division type. In August of that year, I wrote the following about Nimmo, after a long summer of watching him in Brooklyn:

“Excellent physical profile; plus athlete; very strong top half; wide/angular shoulders; fluid movements/coordination; at the plate, very high hands in setup (above shoulder blade); long journey to get into hitting position (has to drop down before going back); loses some bat control and swing efficiency; in FB counts, has a tendency to trigger early; off-speed exploitation as consequence; shows quality bat speed; can square velocity; shows ability to use all fields; good hip movements; good hands; easy pull-side power; swing has slightly elevated plane; 4 present/High-5 future power; not as sold on hit tool, which is present 3/future 5; good overall approach; seems to track pitches well; uses plus speed well, but mistake-prone with routes and angles in center; more raw athlete than instinctual defensive player; arm is average; better defensive profile in a corner (probably LF); shows all five tools; potential for average hit, average power, plus run, average arm, and average glove; possible role 5 player in majors; really nice young player with upside, but not a first-division talent.”

That offseason was my first at the helm of the Baseball Prospectus prospect lists, and I was extremely low on Nimmo when I compartmentalized the Mets’ system, pushing the toolsy outfielder to ninth on the list, behind the likes of Michael Fulmer, Gavin Cecchini, and Domingo Tapia; it should be noted that at the time, I didn’t even like Cecchini and mentioned it ad nauseam on podcasts, radio spots, the site itself, and to strangers on the street. I remember an off-the-record chat I had with a member of the Mets front office after the list was finalized, where it was brought to my attention that I was too low on Nimmo, that I was not giving him enough credit for his professional performance despite the lack of experience against quality opponents. I took the propitious hype as organizational justification, and I stuck to the story told by my own eyes. I saw a tweener type emerging at the short-season level, and despite the physical tools I wasn’t willing to bet on the ultimate ceiling. It made me think then—and even more so now: If Brandon Nimmo was a teen-aged Dominican outfielder with the same physical gifts, would I be more likely to dream on the ceiling? More on that later.

Nimmo moved to the full-season level in 2013, and despite a tough home environment and a lingering hand injury that limited his power he managed to hit for a respectable average and draw 71 walks in 110 games. Scouting sources were mixed on his performance, as the significance of the hand injury was still unknown, but the overall athleticism still received high marks, and given the fact that he was more than holding his own at the full-season level as a 20-year-old, the year should have been viewed as a developmental success. But apparently I’m the old man standing on his porch yelling at the sun for being hot, as I ignored the context of the season and continued to question Nimmo as a prospect—at least as he compared to other high-ceiling talent in the minors. In the Futures Game that summer, I was parked behind the batting cage watching the never-ending assembly line of freakshow talents take their rips in the cage. Not a surprise, I wasn’t fond of Nimmo’s performance and singled him out for it:

“Because of the talent surrounding him on the field, Nimmo’s bat stood out, but not in a positive way. I’ve never been a huge fan of the swing [itself], mostly because of the hand location and the path he takes into the zone, but the bat speed [or lack thereof] stood out in his cage sessions, magnified because of the plus bat speed that was on display before and after him. I thought it was a slow stick.”

Perhaps the stick was slow in the cage that day, but the point is that I chose to negative scout instead of finding something of value to document, or better yet, just ignoring his performance all together; the latter option making the most sense given the extraordinary talent I could have highlighted instead. I was now convinced that Nimmo just didn’t belong on any of the prospect tiers I had assembled in my head, and once you are out, subjective bias can be quite the armed guard against scouting-report emendation.

More of the same that offseason, as Nimmo once again landed ninth on the Mets’ prospect list, this time behind an 18-year-old Dominican shortstop with 58 games of professional experience at the rookie level, and Dominic Smith, another teenager with around 50 games of professional experience, who offers a nice bat but a debatable power future with an extremely limited defensive profile. I’m not even high on Dominic Smith and I think he’s incredibly overrated nationally, yet he was an easy choice over Brandon Nimmo, a [then] 20-year-old with plus athleticism that plays a premium position coming off a more than acceptable full-season debut in a tough hitter’s park. Nice work. Nice process.

At times, we [read: me] can get a little too cute when it comes to analyzing talent, searching for prototypes that rarely exist instead of scouting what it right in front of you. Nimmo isn’t without warts, and I’m not the only source on the internet to undervalue the player based on less-than-stellar scouting experiences. But at what point is it prudent to admit that you were wrong about a prospect? It’s certainly too early to suggest Nimmo has become the star the Mets envisioned when they popped him 13th overall in such a delicious draft, and it’s certainly too early to suggest my tweener projection has fallen short of the mark based on his solid run in the Florida State League to start 2014. But it is starting to look like Nimmo is a much better prospect than I originally gave him credit for, and this is proven true with each new scouting update I receive from my sources in the industry or the prospect staff at Baseball Prospectus. Speaking of which, here’s a recent scouting report on Nimmo courtesy of Jeff Moore.

I’m okay with missing on a prospect—or being late to the party on a prospect—but it frustrates me when my process fails, something I write about frequently and place a tremendous amount of significance on. In this case, my process was not only flawed but contained a scouting bias that I was slow to recognize and react to. I spend most of my time fawning over athleticism—which is just a way of saying I love tools—and projection, with a particular fondness for raw Latin American talent. I cut my teeth learning from industry evaluators specific to this market, and as a result, my tastes are more often of the high-ceiling/high-risk variety than the safety found in the high-floor floor/low-ceiling types. While I won’t apologize for being attracted to impact types on a baseball field, it’s the particulars of these types that can get me into trouble and allow players like Nimmo to catch my ire instead of my eye.

I should absolutely love Brandon Nimmo. Physical? Check. Plus athlete? Check? Unrefined skills at present but a lot to dream on? Check. Defensive profile at an up-the-middle spot? Check. Young for the level? Check. Aptitude for the game? Check. We just checked off all the things I tend to salivate over when looking at a young toolsy prospect. As silly as it sounds, if Brandon Nimmo was a prospect from the Latin American market, there is a strong possibility that I might have been higher on him coming into the season. I ranked Rockies outfield prospect Raimel Tapia as the top position player in that system, and pushed him on the Baseball Prospectus 101 based on his projectable profile and 66 games of stateside baseball. He is far less physically composed than Nimmo, far less refined when it comes to approach and matters of swing execution, far less refined when it comes to his reads/routes in center, is more likely to bust than Nimmo given the amount of physical projection involved in his ultimate profile, and Tapia is only one year younger than Nimmo, yet he might as well be on another prospect planet as far as I’m concerned; Tapia is the best thing that ever happened to baseball and Nimmo is just some guy in the Mets system drafted ahead of Jose Fernandez.

This makes sense to me on most levels, and I’m not wavering on Tapia because I might actually be in love with the kid. But this seemingly divergent interpretation of prospect status concerns me as someone who takes player evaluation very seriously, and it’s something I want to be more mindful of going forward. This shouldn’t suggest that Nimmo has the same potential as Tapia and therefore belongs on the same tier; rather, this is a critique of the rationale to which I tether when blowing a player up on prospect lists based on some abstract prototype at the expense of a similar player just because he doesn’t fit all the specifics of said prototype, which in this case, has more to do with ethnicity and prospect provenance than the physical characteristics on the field.

Jason Parks is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Jason's other articles. You can contact Jason by clicking here

Related Content:  Prospects,  Scouting,  Minor Leagues,  New York Mets

24 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links


Is romantic love of this sort even allowed in baseball? I read and then reread this piece, and almost none of it made sense. This is worrisome, given that I drafted Tapia in two Scoresheet leagues on your recommendation.

May 22, 2014 04:26 AM
rating: 2
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

Do not worry about Tapia. He's still a stud.

May 22, 2014 06:32 AM
Other readers have rated this comment below the viewing threshold. Click here to view anyway.

Nimmo is in High-A yet you already admit that you "missed" on him. Let him be effective in MLB first before saying this.

May 22, 2014 05:16 AM
rating: -4

"it’s certainly too early to suggest my tweener projection has fallen short of the mark based on his solid run in the Florida State League to start 2014." . . . not sure how he is saying he "missed"

May 22, 2014 05:45 AM
rating: 5
Lloyd Cole

I appreciate that you are serious about what you do, and are willing to reflect critically on how you do it AND share the results with your readers. Thanks.

May 22, 2014 05:54 AM
rating: 11

Interesting reflections.

May 22, 2014 05:56 AM
rating: 0

One of the best pieces you've written Jason.

May 22, 2014 06:20 AM
rating: 5
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

Wow. Thanks for the comment. Appreciate it.

May 22, 2014 06:33 AM
Andrew G.


May 22, 2014 06:57 AM
rating: 0

Really great piece. It's always interesting to see how a scout thinks and the process and biases that are involved in evaluating a young player. Thanks and keep up the great work!

May 22, 2014 09:19 AM
rating: 1

Great piece Jason, I think it's fantastic for people to do self reviews on themselves. Shows a lot of #want. Anyhow, obviously over the course of researching this you have at least somewhat changed your perception of Nimmo and I'm wondering what is it that changed? Do you now view his tools as higher now that potential bias is off? Do you now view his ceiling as being higher? Speaking of which, what do you think his ultimate ceiling is?

May 22, 2014 06:56 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

Thanks. Honestly, I'm not sure that my opinion has changed a great deal (individually), but it has relationally, if that makes any sense. I really thought Jeff Moore nailed his scouting report, putting a 5 on the floor and a 6 on the ceiling. That's completely fair and reasonable, and even though I'm still thinking he might have a tweener future, I can see and accept this outcome based on the updated reports from this season. Given that outcome, he should not only be ranked higher in the Mets system but also nationally. Not sure he's a top 101 guy for me yet, but I think he has a better case than I have admitted in the past, and I will make sure to keep that in mind when I start to put together such lists.

May 22, 2014 07:42 AM

Best of luck on the pending nuptials. How does Nimmo's rawness express itself on the field? I usually equate rawness with swinging at every pitch, being confused on the bases, not throwing to the correct bases. Obviously Nimmo does not swing at every pitch so where does the rawness translate to on field actions?

May 22, 2014 07:42 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

Inconsistent tool utility. Keeps improving on this front. Always put good ABs together. Reads/routes aren't always crisp; can get passive at the plate and mis opportunities to drive mistakes; general execution issues. To be expected with a young player, but he is better than his initial rawness would suggest. He can play baseball.

May 22, 2014 07:48 AM

Your ability to reflect on your past experiences will serve you well. Nice work.
Of all your 'misses', I don't think this is going to be a big one. He does not have significant speed or power and his hit tool, which is his only real value, is buoyed by a BABIP well over .400 for the second year running. He sounds like he has the absolute upside of Mark Kotsay.

May 22, 2014 08:18 AM
rating: -1

You have a superfluous, dangling "of" in your first sentence.

May 22, 2014 08:33 AM
rating: 1
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

"Real tomato ketchup, Eddie?"

May 22, 2014 09:13 AM

And you didn't even comment on the "high-floor floor" line?

May 22, 2014 13:08 PM
rating: 0

When teams are scouting players for the draft, do they send different scouts to view players to counteract this type of bias, or do they just trust their people and realize they may miss on a few good players? Also, since you're feeling so positive, can you find something nice to say about Jungmann?

May 22, 2014 11:28 AM
rating: 0
BP staff member Jason Parks
BP staff

I think any team that makes a point to put a variety of skilled eyes on players will benefit as a result. Each scout is going to see the game through a different subjective lens based on their previous experience with the game, and diversity of opinion should be paramount to any high dollar decision.

Jungmann has been better this season, but the profile is still more of a backend starter/long man than the player the Brewers thought they were getting in the draft.

May 22, 2014 11:34 AM

This kind of systematic review of your process earns you the title Professor. Definitely continue with these reflection pieces when they come to mind.

May 22, 2014 13:24 PM
rating: 1

Wonderful article. Good reminder that it's impossible to be truly "objective", and try as we might there are some players we just like more than others, often without rational evidence to support our feelings.

May 22, 2014 13:53 PM
rating: 1

To be fair, Nimmo is / was a more difficult prospect to judge, not only based on his background, lack of playing HS ball as an Amateur to playing in two home parks in Brooklyn and Savannah that tend to destroy LH hitters. Then he came to spring training 2013 in much better physical shape, batted .400 over tthe first three weeks and then got the hand injury that after trying to play through it, going 1 for 27, cost him over a month and pretty zapped his bat speed for most if not all the rest of 2013. Nimmo then came to spring training of 2014 in far better physical shape, more muscular and certainly stronger. The results have been impressive so far - not only the high line drive rate / BA together with leading the minors in BB but also the fact that he has managed to massively cut down on the strikeouts in the process at the higher level.

The big question probably revolves around his power (potential). And maybe Nimmo gets selected to the Futures Game yet again in 2014 and Professor Parks receives another look in the cage. Will the bat speed look different then ?

May 22, 2014 21:59 PM
rating: 2

Great piece. Learned tons from it. The kid seems easy to root for too. Raw talent, no high school team, no scouts to fawn over him (except some desperate dude from Flushing). Not exactly Sidd Finch, but ....

Anyway, from a team perspective, I wonder if it's sometimes too easy to knock an organization for a selection by using a quick compare (Nimmo v. Fdz, etc.) that perhaps fails to put the situation -- & thus, the player himself -- in proper context. I think this was the first dePodesta/Alderson draft, which followed a period of lackluster, conservative ones (relievers going in early rounds twice in a row, that kind of stuff). If I'm not mistaken, the system was more than lacking in high ceiling, young, athletic position players. Nimmo looked/looks risky, no doubt. Cecellini & Smith too, for that matter. But maybe we should begin to give dePodesta & his team credit (full jury is still out, sure) for assuming the risks to try to fill some big gaps.

May 23, 2014 00:01 AM
rating: 1
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Draft Ten Pack: Whom W... (05/22)
<< Previous Column
Prospects Will Break Y... (05/06)
Next Column >>
Prospects Will Break Y... (06/08)
Next Article >>
Daily League Strategy:... (05/23)

Eyewitness Accounts: June 30, 2015
Fantasy Rounders: South Pause
Premium Article Some Projection Left: The Top J2 Prospects
Premium Article Pitching Backward: Chaz Roe and the Mechanic...
Premium Article What You Need to Know: June 30, 2015
BP Wrigleyville
Premium Article Baseball Therapy: Better Playing Through Che...

MORE FROM MAY 22, 2014
Premium Article Skewed Left: Dallas Keuchel Defies his Desti...
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Wednesday, May...
Fantasy Article Free Agent Watch: Week Eight
Fantasy Article Fantasy Freestyle: Representativeness, Valua...
Fantasy Article Closer Report: Week Eight
Fantasy Article TTO Scoresheet Podcast: Running a Scoresheet...
Fantasy Article Fantasy Freestyle: Dallas Keuchel: Sell-High...

2014-06-02 - Premium Article Monday Morning Ten Pack: June 2, 2014
2014-05-31 - Premium Article The Call-Up: Oscar Taveras
2014-05-23 - Fringe Average Podcast: Episode 29: #RIPBach...
2014-05-22 - Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: What Did I ...
2014-05-21 - Behind the Curtain: Hunter Harvey
2014-05-19 - Premium Article Monday Morning Ten Pack: May 19, 2014
2014-05-13 - Eyewitness Accounts: May 13, 2014

2014-08-28 - Prospects Will Break Your Heart: Pain Don't ...
2014-07-22 - Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: What Did I ...
2014-06-08 - Prospects Will Break Your Heart: Mock Draft ...
2014-05-22 - Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: What Did I ...
2014-05-06 - Prospects Will Break Your Heart: Re-Introduc...
2014-05-01 - Premium Article Prospects Will Break Your Heart: What Did I ...
2014-04-30 - Prospects Will Break Your Heart: Scouting Fo...