Nearly two months ago to the day, I wrote an article about Max Scherzer’s rather unique season. At that point, he was striking out 11.0 per nine innings and had a strikeout-to-walk ratio of 3.6. Despite that, his 4.84 ERA and mere eight wins were driving fantasy owners crazy.
Since that time, Scherzer has been a fantasy marvel, winning eight of 11 decisions with a 2.30 ERA while continuing his historic pace. In 74 1/3 innings, he has permitted just 57 hits while striking out 95. His rate stats during the run are as follows:
H/9 = 6.9
HR/9 = 0.8
BB/9 = 2.4
K/9 = 11.5
WHIP = 1.04
ERA = 2.30
K/BB = 4.8
BABIP = .298
FIP = 2.68
Scherzer’s overall run of success still places him among very elite company when looking back at the history of dominant seasons. Only four pitchers have ever completed a season with a K/9 of at least 11.0 and a walk rate below 3.0 while qualifying for the ERA title, as the table below illustrates:
YEAR |
SO |
SO/9 |
BB/9 |
HR/9 |
|||||
2001 |
249.7 |
21 |
2.49 |
372 |
71 |
13.4 |
2.6 |
0.68 |
|
1999 |
Randy Johnson |
271.7 |
17 |
2.48 |
364 |
70 |
12.1 |
2.3 |
0.99 |
2000 |
Randy Johnson |
248.7 |
19 |
2.64 |
347 |
76 |
12.6 |
2.8 |
0.83 |
2002 |
Randy Johnson |
260.0 |
24 |
2.32 |
334 |
71 |
11.6 |
2.5 |
0.90 |
1997 |
254.3 |
17 |
2.97 |
319 |
58 |
11.3 |
2.1 |
0.88 |
|
1999 |
213.3 |
23 |
2.07 |
313 |
37 |
13.2 |
1.6 |
0.38 |
|
1997 |
Pedro Martinez |
241.3 |
17 |
1.90 |
305 |
67 |
11.4 |
2.5 |
0.60 |
1995 |
Randy Johnson |
214.3 |
18 |
2.48 |
294 |
65 |
12.3 |
2.7 |
0.50 |
2000 |
Pedro Martinez |
217.0 |
18 |
1.74 |
284 |
32 |
11.8 |
1.3 |
0.71 |
2012 |
Max Scherzer |
176.7 |
16 |
3.77 |
220 |
55 |
11.2 |
2.8 |
1.17 |
Scherzer’s run of success has somewhat flown under the radar while the bigger names garner the Cy Young attention. Scherzer’s season is unique but not exactly award-worthy; the high ERA will be impossible for mainstream voters to overlook. That said, Scherzer’s second-half numbers stack up with the best in baseball on both a surface and peripheral level while satisfying fantasy owners as well:
PLAYER |
HITS/9 |
HR/9 |
BB/9 |
K/9 |
||
Max Scherzer |
2.30 |
2.68 |
6.0 |
0.8 |
2.4 |
11.5 |
2.13 |
2.95 |
6.6 |
0.7 |
2.3 |
9.0 |
|
3.19 |
3.03 |
8.3 |
0.7 |
2.7 |
9.6 |
|
2.63 |
2.84 |
7.0 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
7.2 |
|
3.82 |
4.52 |
8.2 |
1.5 |
2.2 |
7.3 |
|
3.61 |
4.07 |
8.6 |
1.5 |
2.4 |
9.3 |
|
3.22 |
3.42 |
6.1 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
8.7 |
Scherzer’s player card shows that he is throwing five percent fewer fastballs this season, has increased his slider usage by the same amount, and is throwing both pitches a tick harder than he has in the past.
In one start a few weeks ago, Scherzer credited Gerald “G-Money” Laird with the sequencing and usage patterns of his pitches, which led to some very vexed Angels’ hitters. In looking at Scherzer’s player card, we can visualize how his pitch usage has changed this season:
All Years Percentage Pitch Usage |
2012 Percentage Pitch Usage |
In the past, Scherzer leaned heavily on his fastball and less on his slider in later innings, but that has changed this season as he has looked to his slider more frequently as the game progresses.
If we look at his splits, he has been just as bad as he has ever been against lefties due to his arm angle. The story has changed in a dramatic way against righties, however; Scherzer has been downright dominant against same-handed hitters. In his previous three seasons as a starter, Scherzer’s OPS against versus righties was over .700, but this season it is just .587. Additionally, he has struck out 116 while walking just 13 in 334 plate appearances—both career bests.
Overall, Scherzer has been one of the better pitchers in baseball this season. He went for $8 in Tout Wars Mixed and $14 in Tout Wars AL, earning $14 and $19, respectively. It may be the first time that Scherzer’s performance has exceeded his potential. Hopefully it is not the last.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now
Scherzer has posted good stats for the last 74.1 innings, as you point out. However, his first 100+ innings ths season count, too. Even a little bit more.
It would have been entirely appropriate to point out Scerzer's progress, and his nice season overall, without having to drop a Cy Young bomb to try and justify the point. Some writers just can't seem to resist the urge to go completely over the top.
I could not help but recall our rather lengthy conversation last year when you trotted out a plethora of names to try and push your favored 2011 Cy Young candidate, "ABV." Anybody But Verlander.
"Scherzer’s season is unique but not exactly award-worthy; the high ERA will be impossible for mainstream voters to overlook"
The point of the article was to show how he was performing down the stretch while the actual Cy Young candidates garnered all of the attention as Scherzer actually delivered better results making fantasy owners rather happy. The conclusion of this article says as much.
Last year's discussion centered around me just mentioning that Sabathia should be at least involved in the Cy Young discussion where his numbers stood on the date of the article, not that he had a stronger case than Verlander. As I stated last year, "I'm cool with either guy winning it but I'm not cool with it not being up for discussion and that's how I see it playing out right now with those that have the votes."
Discussion is a great thing - and it can be done without continually calling my credibility into question.
This season, I think it is a 2-man race between JV and Price at this point. Me, as the Rays fan, would be voting for Verlander if I had a ballot but am enjoying the fact the discussion has already been quite strong on the national level and people are looking at WAR, quality of opponent (SPR system by Gennaro favors JV while OppOPS here favors Price), etc. Another step away from the traditional metrics and narratives that have driven these votes in the past.
I don't understand the vitriol behind your post (and many others you've directed at Jason). You seem only to have an axe to grind as opposed to any desire for moving the discourse along in a constructive fashion.
So I ask, what is your desired end game w/J?