<< Previous Article
The Lineup Card: 8 Thi... (07/18)
|
<< Previous Column
Manufactured Runs: Doe... (06/20)
|
Next Column >>
Manufactured Runs: The... (08/15)
|
Next Article >>
The Platoon Advantage:... (07/18)
|
July 18, 2012
Manufactured Runs
Getting Shifty Again
by Colin Wyers
A while back, you may recall, I wrote an article about Brett Lawrie’s rating in one defensive metric, Baseball Info Solution’s Defensive Runs Saved. My conclusion:
So let’s play around with this basic framework and see how far it takes us. It helps to have some sample data to play around with. Again, we don’t have access to the raw data underpinning DRS. For the purposes of illustrating this point, however, any zone data should do, and the most convenient source of that is from Project Scoresheet. This is what the Project Scoresheet field diagram looks like:

I have consolidated the “S” and “D” zones with the primary zone, so for instance 5D is lumped in with 5—this way we pay attention only to the horizontal spray angle of the data. So here are third baseman play made rates on ground balls for each of those zones, from 1995 (no particular reason for that year):
|
LOC_TX
|
PM_RT
|
|
5
|
0.5889
|
|
56
|
0.3506
|
|
6
|
0.0220
|
|
6M
|
0.0031
|
|
4M
|
0.0017
|
|
4
|
0.0013
|
|
34
|
0.0022
|
|
3
|
0.0055
|
<< Previous Article
The Lineup Card: 8 Thi... (07/18)
|
<< Previous Column
Manufactured Runs: Doe... (06/20)
|
Next Column >>
Manufactured Runs: The... (08/15)
|
Next Article >>
The Platoon Advantage:... (07/18)
|
Colin, first of all, your explanation of the distribution of credit in the Plus/Minus system is wrong. What you are describing more closely matches UZR (as I understand it) than Plus/Minus and DRS. Plus/Minus does not have the same problem.
Also the shared zone "problem" is a lot less of a problem when you divide the infield into single degree slices, 90 of them, rather than the 8 (!) in the retrosheet diagram you display here. Also, splitting each into six velocity/timer buckets, as BIS does, helps to further segregate plays.
Ben, I'm going off what's in the most recent version of the Fielding Bible. If you can provide a more detailed description of your methodology, I think that would be helpful to everyone.
As for the impact of smaller zones on the shared zone problem, you'll have fewer shared zones that way, yes, but you'll still have them. The Retrosheet numbers were merely to help illustrate the point.