CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

Happy Holidays! Regularly Scheduled Articles Will Resume Monday, December 29

No Previous Article
<< Previous Column
The Daily Prospectus: ... (05/31)
Next Column >>
Premium Article The Daily Prospectus: ... (06/03)
No Next Article

June 3, 2002

The Daily Prospectus

Wet Horsehide

by Joe Sheehan

So, what's this whole humidor thing about, anyway? What are the effects of storing baseballs in a 40% humidity environment?

The biggest effect you would expect is that heavier balls hit in the air wouldn't carry as far, and that appears to be the case. The most obvious impact is in the home-run rate at the park:

(Note that the numbers for the last five seasons do not include interleague games. I was working with the STATS Major League Handbook's park data, which sensibly excludes those games.)


       AB/HR
2002:   32.4

2001:   22.0
2000:   24.0
1999:   19.7
1998:   27.4
1997:   23.5

Home runs are almost 50% harder to hit at Coors Field this year than they were last year, and about 40% harder to hit than they've been over the past five seasons. That's a remarkable dropoff, almost like moving into a completely new park.

Where are all of these home runs going? Into gloves, mostly. I pointed out in Baseball Prospectus 2002 that simply not striking out at Coors Field made you a .378 hitter with a .649 slugging average. This year, players who put the bat on the ball are down to a .342 batting average and a .544 slugging average. That dropoff, particularly in slugging, is huge.

It's not just the home runs. Last year, a ball in play at Coors turned into a double or a triple once every 10.1 times. This year, that figure is once every 12.4 times. On the other hand, the rate of singles per BIP is up slightly, from 4.11 to 4.25. Essentially, extra-base hits are being traded for a lot of outs and a few extra singles (perhaps the result of outfielders playing deep in what is a large Coors Field pasture).

Just how many more outs? According to the Defensive Efficiency statistic, balls put in play at Coors are being turned into outs 68.4% of the time. This isn't a high figure-it's well below the league average of 70.4%-but it is miles beyond what we'd seen at Coors previously:


        DE
2002: .684

2001: .658
2000: .656
1999: .651
1998: .659
1997: .658

For years, balls traveled farther, faster, and landed more quickly in Denver than they did everywhere else. Now, they're behaving more the same way as they do at ballparks around the country. After nine seasons of high offense at high altitude, it appears that the simple act of storing baseballs in a moist environment has essentially turned Coors Field into a slightly-above-average park for run scoring, shaving five runs a game off of the average match.

Isn't that an indication that the idea has overshot its mark?

I've said all along that the people who wanted to correct for Coors Field-pressurized domes and special baseballs and the like-were doing so for aesthetic reasons. There's a segment of fans and writers who were weaned on a low-offense style of baseball and who become offended at the idea of a place where the average game has 15 runs scored.

Personally, I loved the "old" Coors Field. Not because I'm some simpleton who needs to be entertained by home runs, but because it was different. Baseball is baseball no matter where it's played, but baseball at altitude was a game unlike that I'd ever seen-yes, I'm too young to remember 1930, or the Baker Bowl-and that made it fun. Variety is great for the game; having a Coors Field is just as good for it as having a Dodger Stadium or a Comerica Park is. The different ways in which teams have to try and win in these places one of the things that makes the game so enjoyable.

Yes, I know that the conditions presented some challenges for the Rockies as far as keeping pitchers healthy and assembling a roster, but many of those problems still exist. The strikeout and walk numbers of Rockies pitchers are still unimpressive (13th in the NL in Ks, ninth in walks allowed), because the thin air still makes it difficult to throw breaking stuff. The lack of oxygen in the air is still going to create problems with stamina and make it harder to recover from injuries.

All the humidor has done is made the game more homogenous. It has turned one of the game's most unique environments into just another place where baseball is played. Maybe that's a good thing to some people, but to me, it's sad, and something I hope the powers that be will change.

Joe Sheehan is an author of Baseball Prospectus. You can contact him by clicking here.

Joe Sheehan is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Joe's other articles. You can contact Joe by clicking here

0 comments have been left for this article.

No Previous Article
<< Previous Column
The Daily Prospectus: ... (05/31)
Next Column >>
Premium Article The Daily Prospectus: ... (06/03)
No Next Article

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: Catching On to the Cub...
Premium Article Baseball Therapy: Do Stars and Scrubs Lineup...
Premium Article Minor League Update: Puerto Rican Winter Lea...
Premium Article Rumor Roundup: Marlins Not Really Interested...
The Lineup Card: Seven Items That Tell the S...
Premium Article Ninety Percent Mental: What's Really Behind ...
Premium Article 2015 Prospects: San Diego Padres Top 10 Pros...

MORE FROM JUNE 3, 2002
Premium Article The Week in Quotes: The Week in Quotes: May ...
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: Transaction Analysis: ...
Premium Article The Daily Prospectus: The Daily Prospectus: ...
The Week in Quotes: May 27-June 2
Transaction Analysis: May 30-June 1, 2002

MORE BY JOE SHEEHAN
2002-06-05 - Draft 2001: The First Round
2002-06-04 - The Daily Prospectus: Draft Day
2002-06-03 - Premium Article The Daily Prospectus: The Daily Prospectus: ...
2002-06-03 - The Daily Prospectus: Wet Horsehide
2002-05-31 - The Daily Prospectus: Padre Problems
2002-05-31 - The Daily Prospectus: Padre Problems
2002-05-29 - The Daily Prospectus: Juice
More...

MORE THE DAILY PROSPECTUS
2002-06-06 - The Daily Prospectus: Notes on a Monitor
2002-06-04 - The Daily Prospectus: Draft Day
2002-06-03 - Premium Article The Daily Prospectus: The Daily Prospectus: ...
2002-06-03 - The Daily Prospectus: Wet Horsehide
2002-05-31 - The Daily Prospectus: Padre Problems
2002-05-31 - The Daily Prospectus: Padre Problems
2002-05-29 - The Daily Prospectus: Juice
More...

INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2007-10-23 - Prospectus Toolbox: A Tale of Two Ballparks