CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article You Could Look It Up: ... (06/08)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Expanded Horizons: Per... (06/08)

June 8, 2010

Watching Strasburg

What to Look For

by Will Carroll

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

The debut of Stephen Strasburg is one that baseball fans have been waiting to see. Assuming you're reading this, you'll be watching as well (MLB Network, check your local listings.) So now that we've heard all the hype and seen glimpses of him in scouting video and in the minors, what should we be watching for when he actually takes the mound? Get your popcorn, scorecard, and MLB.tv ready, because here's your viewers guide:

1. Fastball
Everyone comes to see the fastball. It's why he's famous, and with good reason. Strasburg's fastball has been credibly recorded as high as 102 and lives in the mid-90's. The fastball comes with all five elements: velocity, control, command, movement, and touch. Velocity is the easy one, so let's define the other three. Control is the ability to hit a spot or, more specifically, to throw strikes. Command is more loosely defined, but most agree it's the ability to move pitches around within a controlled area. Leo Mazzone preached command to his Braves pitchers, putting balls in specific spots in and out of the strike zone in order to make hitters swing at their pitch, so that even if contact was made, it was weak. Greg Maddux famously threw pitches in order to set up players for later at-bats, while Tom Glavine would work as much on the umpire as he did the hitter, drawing the strike zone further and further out. 

Movement has long been the tougher one to define. Hitters left muttering as they walked back to the dugout knew that the ball had tailed, faded, or cut, but there were few outside that small number, and an equally small number of scouts, who could credibly judge movement. With the advent of Pitch-f/x, there's now a way to measure and quantify this movement, allowing comparisons and drawing out for us what hitters have dealt with for years. With Strasburg and a few others who touch velocities most of us can only dream of, there's an additional combination element. Many think that faster pitches have less movement, something noted in my report earlier this year on Aroldis Chapman. I asked Pitch-f/x guru Harry Pavlidis if this was the case. The problem, he told me, is in the sample size. There are very few pitchers with this kind of velocity, and fewer still that also feature a breaking ball to go with it. Harry focused on Justin Verlander as the best comparable, but found a very weak correlation between horizontal movement and fastball velocity. Many will be watching the Pitch-f/x stats for Strasburg's first start to see just how much his pitches move.

Touch is the final element, and one that is perhaps more apparent in Strasburg than most pitchers. Because of the variance between his "normal" fastball and his "max" fastball, Strasburg effectively turns it into multiple pitches. The touch on his pitch, his ability not only to control the placement and location of the pitch, but to change the movement and speed at will, disrupts the timing of the hitter. "Part of it is mental," an advance scout for an NL team told me. "A guy that's been told it's coming at 100 is cranked up for 100. He gets 95 and it looks like a change. Then he gets 100 and it looks like a million. It's really disruptive." Work by Eric Seidman and others on apparent velocity is well in play here, but due to all of these elements, Strasburg's fastball is a devastating weapon.

2. Slider
As good as Strasburg's fastball is and as much as hitters have to sit on it for any chance to get to it, the slider might actually be as good, if not a better, pitch. Scouts told me when they first saw him that while his fastball was awesome, it was the slider that really caught their eye. One gave me the great line that when he first saw it in-game, he thought it had hit something mid-flight. There's no question that the pitch is devastating, a two-plane breaking ball that not only is tough to hit due to the movement, but due to the velocity. The pitch comes in somewhere between 84-89, making it something of a change of pace as well as a breaking ball. Mark Prior used his curve in the same way, using the actual changeup as more of a show-me pitch. Hitters aren't having much luck with it, either. One player that played against him in Double-A asked me not to use his name "because he embarrassed me. I had no chance against that guy. He buzzed a fastball down the middle that I barely saw, then threw a slider that broke a mile. When it caught the corner, I just hacked at strike three." 

Strasburg's slider has been compared to one that surprised me. "Jonathon Broxton," an NL scout told me last week. "It's fast, it's based off his heat, and it's really sharp." Pitch-f/x says that Broxton's slider moves in two distinct ways—eight inches right to left and seven inches down from the expected plane. (The drop is actually more severe, but I'll leave the explanation of that to one of the sharper knives here.) The pitch can very literally be heading for the batter's hip and then break enough to catch the back of the plate. Worse, the movement is so severe for both Broxton and Strasburg that the umpire can have a hard time. "You saw this more in college with [Strasburg]," the scout told me, "but umps would get crossed up. Some wouldn't believe it could break that much, and others figured it probably broke enough to catch the plate if it was a strike." Watch to see where the umpire is setting up and if the catcher (expected to be Ivan Rodriguez*) can help him out with some framing.

* Rodriguez is coming back from a quick rehab assignment in order to catch Strasburg's debut. 19 years ago, in his second major-league game, Rodriguez caught Nolan Ryan. That's a pretty nice bookend for a Hall of Fame career.

3. Mechanics
Let's be clear—we don't know the forces that Strasburg's delivery is putting on his arm. We don't know how he feels before, during, or after each pitch, each start. I don't know it, you don't know it, and sadly the Nats don't know it, either. That said, we can take a look at a couple visible things that will give us a clue. First, Strasburg's mechanics are both smooth and repeatable. This is very apparent with even a quick glimpse of his pitching. He's not a max-effort guy even when getting into triple digits, and all of his pitches look very similar. Nowhere is this more clear than in his warm-ups. Whether he's in the pen before a game or on the mound getting ready for an inning, you'll see what one scout called "digital copies." He's a tall pitcher and he pitches tall. (Yes, I know that sounds goofy, but go with it.) He has a very stiff leg and he "flamingos" at the top of his windup. His timing is very good, his tempo fast but not rushed, and he gets his elbow up. 

As he goes into the acceleration phase, many will point at the "Inverted W" that's created by Strasburg's elbows. That's actually a scapular retraction, something you see in some pretty healthy pitchers. Pitching coaches seem less focused on that type of figure and more about timing. Rick Peterson often discusses timing between the front foot landing and the ball being in the "high-cocked" position. Strasburg has that, and you can see it if we get the right angles on replays. Trust me, don't try it from the normal center-field camera angle. As Strasburg accelerates through his delivery, he "stacks up" very well. That means that his foot, knee, glove, chest, and head are lined up over a theoretical pivot point. It's clearly demonstrated in this picture. You'll also see in that picture that Strasburg has very loose, fluid wrists. It might be easier to see that his abduction angle is right. Strasburg doesn't have much shoulder tilt, and the angle created by his body and upper arm is often apparently right on 90 degrees. Like everything else in his delivery, the follow-through is very smooth and consistent. He doesn't end up in the best defensive position ever, but so few have hit it back at him that it's understandable. No one seems concerned about his ability to play his position, and he's more athletic than many expect. 

4. Stamina
It's going to be very difficult to get any real gauge on Strasburg's stamina in this start or for much of the rest of the year due to the limits the Nats (and Scott Boras) are putting on the kid. That makes this start a bit more important. Let's assume that Strasburg is human and has some serious adrenaline going when he gets the big stadium and pro hitters at the plate. If he's able to control that and "stay within himself," that's a big plus. If he comes out playing to the crowd and the radar gun, we might see him tire a little bit as he approaches 60 pitches. Strasburg doesn't often allow himself to "hulk up," as one scout described Aroldis Chapman's style recently. Chapman, a much less polished if nearly as talented pitcher compared to Strasburg, often amps up his fastball to the upper 90s when he's frustrated or feels he needs a pitch or out.

Look for any sign of fatigue in his velocity chart. There should be a slow but steady decline after the sixty-pitch mark with the occasional bump. This is a very normal pattern, though it should be more apparent with Strasburg. Due to the increased top end of his pitches, the physicality of his effort makes a bigger jump than normal possible. Where the average pitcher lives around 90 and can touch 94, Strasburg lives at 94 and can touch 102. Showing the type of math skills that makes Baseball Prospectus famous, eight is more than four, and even more, it's more noticeable at the higher level. It's unlikely that Strasburg will be allowed to go much beyond 80 pitches in his first start and will be both pitch- and innings-limited over the course of the season. One athletic trainer wondered if he'd adjust well to the humidity of Washington: "He's lived in paradise his whole life, with perfect weather year-round. We really don't know much about his conditioning or his acclimatization." 

5. Composure
As I said above in the stamina section, Strasburg's demeanor on the mound has been described as everything from "controlled" to "robotic" to "aloof." Observers can see what they want to see in his dispassionate exterior, but he never seems to lose his composure on the mound. One FOT mentioned this as a major point of concern for him after his recent start against Toledo. "There were some professional hitters there, like Carlos Guillen," he told me, "and I wanted to see if a couple good hits off good pitches shook him up any, if he lost any confidence or started to lose his sequencing. He didn't." Some scouts have been a bit concerned by this, spouting the old saw that a player has to deal with failure before he can succeed. Much like Mark Prior's march through the minors, Strasburg wasn't challenged much. A hit here or there isn't going to tell us much. With Prior, he never struggled until after his injury, and he never could get back through it, with many thinking that his stoic attitude contributed to that. There are some comparisons here. "They're both San Diego kids," said one scout who saw both pitch in college, "and both were men among boys. Both had to deal with the pressure of being stars before they were picked, big contracts and all that. I think the influence of Tony Gwynn is one factor in [Strasburg's] favor. Gwynn always preaches not too high, not too low, and I think it took pretty well on this kid." 

 With the advent of MLB Network and the timing of Strasburg's debut with the 2010 draft, the stars have aligned for what has to be the most-watched debut of all time. I've given you five things to watch, but let me add in one more, perhaps the most important one. Watch the hitters. See if their knees buckle. Look to see if they shuffle their feet between pitches or move back a bit in the box. Are they getting good swings or flailing at where they think the ball might be? The most important thing we might see tonight is whether the hitters are talking about Strasburg to their teammates in the dugout or telling the first baseman that his pitcher is all hype.

 

29 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

BurrRutledge

Thank you for posting this here (and not ESPN) today, Will.

Jun 08, 2010 11:16 AM
rating: -2
 
BP staff member Will Carroll
BP staff

I don't write for ESPN.

Jun 08, 2010 11:20 AM
 
dannimal

Makes him sound like a combination of Verlander (velocity) and Greinke (Touch), with those two sharing the others to some extent. Rob Neyer once wrote a piece detailing that Greinke (before his mental issues) hit every speed from the mid/high 70s through the low/mid 90s over the course of the game. That's bordering on absurd.

Also, this is a fantastic article. Written well enough to have value to a real stathead, but also clearly enough for a fan (big or casual) to take a lot away from it on both the statistical/PitchFX side as well as the "watch like a fan/scout" side.

Jun 08, 2010 11:29 AM
rating: 8
 
BP staff member Will Carroll
BP staff

Very apt comparison. There's a story about Greinke calling his catcher out in the minors and saying some number. The catcher was Latin and didn't have any clue what he meant until after the pitch. He looked at the radar gun and Greinke had basically called his shot. Not sure if the story is true, but like any good story, it ought to be.

Jun 08, 2010 11:39 AM
 
BurrRutledge

Well, thanks for that!!!

Great article. My nephew pitches in Little League, and he's visiting me this week. I'm printing this article so we can read it and hopefully watch the game together tonight.

Jun 08, 2010 11:30 AM
rating: 1
 
BurrRutledge

My nephew was more interested in his Playstation than watching the game. Too bad for him. I enjoyed the game immensely, and even more so with Will's primer.

Jun 09, 2010 13:13 PM
rating: 0
 
SaberTJ

Love the article Will. One of my favorites.

Jun 08, 2010 11:30 AM
rating: 1
 
BP staff member Will Carroll
BP staff

Thanks.

Jun 08, 2010 11:39 AM
 
Brian Cartwright

His best comp based on a high ground ball rate, strike rate and contact rate looks to be Kevin Brown

Jun 08, 2010 11:49 AM
rating: 0
 
Richard Bergstrom

And for a record breaking contract ;)

Jun 08, 2010 12:09 PM
rating: 1
 
Richard Bergstrom

Since the game isn't televised for most of the country except for MLB's Extra Innings package or maybe a MLB.tv membership, not many people will be able to watch for anything...

Jun 08, 2010 12:09 PM
rating: -3
 
NYYanks826

It's being broadcast on MLB Network.

Jun 08, 2010 12:19 PM
rating: 1
 
NYYanks826

MLB.com is also simulcasting MLB Network's pre-game coverage, as well as the tops of the first four innings, so for people without MLB Network and an MLB.tv membership, they'll see most of what they need to see.

Jun 08, 2010 12:22 PM
rating: 2
 
Richard Bergstrom

Thanks.

Jun 08, 2010 15:18 PM
rating: 0
 
makewayhomer

Will this was a fantastic article

Jun 08, 2010 12:41 PM
rating: 0
 
jetson
(660)

Kevin Brown was in the majors for many years before he struck out many batters.

Jun 08, 2010 12:42 PM
rating: 1
 
acahoon

Great article. One question, though: why "inverted W" and not "M"?

Jun 08, 2010 13:59 PM
rating: 3
 
BP staff member Will Carroll
BP staff

I have *NO* idea.

Jun 08, 2010 19:52 PM
 
Richard Bergstrom

Maybe an M implies that his pitching hand and glove hand point down at the ground perpendicularly, instead of at an angle?

Jun 08, 2010 20:07 PM
rating: 1
 
david88

Thank God for the MLB At Bat app on my iPhone. Due to Dish Network I would never have gotten to see the second coming tonight.

Also great article Will, I learned a lot in this and it was a fantastic read.

Jun 08, 2010 14:42 PM
rating: 1
 
makewayhomer

they are showing Strasburg pitch on mlb.com, free for all

Jun 08, 2010 17:02 PM
rating: 0
 
Richard Bergstrom

Those sliders remind me of Kerry Wood... but I'm not sure I've heard a fastball "pop" the catcher's glove as loud as that.

Jun 08, 2010 16:29 PM
rating: 0
 
Michael Bodell
(89)

How many swinging strikes did he get? He ended his part of the game with 6 straight swinging strikeouts.

Jun 08, 2010 18:34 PM
rating: 0
 
OonBoon

They called him too fat! He'll have a chip on his shoulder his whole life. He'll come back strong from his 2015 Tommy John surgery. This is not Pretty-Boy Prior we're talking about here.

Jun 08, 2010 19:03 PM
rating: -1
 
Richard Bergstrom

Well, both are said to have clean mechanics, are low key, and hail from San Diego.

Besides, it took a long time for many of the "sure things" to get established. King Felix took quite a few years to earn his crown, Ubaldo Jimenez walked half the park, Greinke's mind left the park, and Lincecum didn't light the world on fire his first season. Baseball is a tough game, after all.

Jun 08, 2010 19:27 PM
rating: -1
 
jtrichey

Simply awesome! Strasburg threw out a performance for the ages there. Let the hype machine really start rolling. Dwight Gooden 1985, step aside.

Jun 08, 2010 22:12 PM
rating: 0
 
Tuck
(667)

Seems some places label it a curve, here Will calls it a slider. Whatever it is is nasty. But why the trouble in labeling? (To my eyes it seemed like a curve)

Jun 09, 2010 07:10 AM
rating: 1
 
BP staff member Joe Sheehan
BP staff
(17)

I was late to this, but it's just stupid awesome. Great, great stuff, Will (and Harry).

Jun 09, 2010 11:11 AM
 
BuzzingThalami

Just a minor note on Harry's velocity-vs-movement analysis. An r^2 of .000005 means r = .002. That's about as close to zero as one ever gets in correlating real data. There is essentially *no* relationship between the two then, from that one Verlander start (saying that there was "a very weak correlation" between them implies some statistically significant relationship, and there was none).

Jun 10, 2010 18:25 PM
rating: 0
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article You Could Look It Up: ... (06/08)
Next Article >>
Premium Article Expanded Horizons: Per... (06/08)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Fantasy Rounders: The Young and the Splitles...
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Thursday, May ...
Premium Article What You Need to Know: Bummed!
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit List: Friday, May 22
West Coast By Us: Day 1: In The Land Where E...
Premium Article Rubbing Mud: The Quarter-Season Odds Report
Going Yard: The Near Perfection of Pederson

MORE FROM JUNE 8, 2010
Premium Article Expanded Horizons: Perfection
Premium Article You Could Look It Up: Is Losing This Pick Re...
Prospectus Q&A: Dallas Braden
Premium Article Another Look: Baseball Truly is a Funny Game

MORE BY WILL CARROLL
2010-06-14 - Premium Article Under The Knife: Monday Update
2010-06-11 - Premium Article Under The Knife: Friday Update
2010-06-09 - Under The Knife: Wednesday Update
2010-06-08 - Premium Article Watching Strasburg
2010-06-07 - Premium Article Under The Knife: Monday Update
2010-06-04 - Premium Article Under The Knife: Friday Update
2010-06-03 - Premium Article Under The Knife: Thursday Update
More...


INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2010-06-10 - Premium Article Prospectus Hit List: NL: Tapping Into the V-...