CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Future Shock: Org Watc... (05/19)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Checking the Numbers: ... (05/13)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Checking the Numbers: ... (05/24)
Next Article >>
Under The Knife: Wedne... (05/19)

May 19, 2010

Checking the Numbers

Bad Ollie or Worse Ollie?

by Eric Seidman

the archives are now free.

All Baseball Prospectus Premium and Fantasy articles more than a year old are now free as a thank you to the entire Internet for making our work possible.

Not a subscriber? Get exclusive content like this delivered hot to your inbox every weekday. Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.

Subscribe for $4.95 per month
Recurring subscription - cancel anytime.


a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Purchase a $39.95 gift subscription
a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

On May 9, Oliver Perez lasted just 3 1/3 innings against the Giants, issuing seven walks and surrendering four runs. Five days later, he was removed after a mere 3 2/3 innings when the Marlins tagged him for seven runs. A couple of days after that, the Mets were presented with a decision regarding the future of their high-priced yet ineffective left-hander. It had become clear that his spot in the starting rotation was hindering the overall performance of the team but ignoring his hefty $12 million salary is no small feat.

The Mets had to decide whether to try and send Perez to the minor leagues—he would have to accept the demotion—or to place him in the bullpen in an attempt to fix his mechanics while sustaining his presence on the major-league roster. After all, the National League is weak this year and, while their chances of making the playoffs are slim, the Mets could still vie for the wild card. With this in mind, they did have another option with Perez: cut ties altogether. Now, while I am not exactly endorsing that option, let's explore the possibility. But before getting into that, let’s take a step back and revisit what led to the present scenario, as well as their ultimate decision.

The Mets decided to send Perez to the pen, though their hand was essentially forced when it was learned he would not accept a demotion to the minors. When the decision was made, I ran a quick web search to find some articles on the topic, and stumbled upon this piece from early May, written by Brian Costa of The Star Ledger in Newark. I read most of the article without anything seeming strange, until a quote from Mets catcher Ramon Castro. At that point, I did a double take, scrolled to the top and discovered that I was reading an article from May of last year. Realistically, the same article could have been written with an updated year and quote from Henry Blanco, and no other changes, and still have applied to Perez’s current struggles. Case in point, this isn’t anything new, and the Mets were faced with a similar decision last season, “lucking out” when Perez had to go undergo knee surgery.

Perez might be healthy this year but he is in no way effective, and his performance is approaching the point of no return, if it isn’t already there. Sending him to the bullpen might sound like a viable solution on the surface, but when would he even pitch? Though Jerry Manuel has his own fair share of faults as a manager, I cannot imagine he would use Perez as a late-inning lefty, or that he would trust him in even the seventh inning, given his propensity for issuing walks. This would relegate Perez to mop-up duty, a role in which Raul Valdes could likely perform better. Pitching in low-leverage situations might help Perez's confidence… or he could turn a 10-3 lead into a four-run game with two runners on base and continue to get unmercifully booed. If there is a positive to be found in his bullpen role, it would be that low-leverage situations are better forums for tweaking mechanics or fixing problematic motions. There is less pressure and more wiggle room to allow a run or two in exchange for an improved throwing motion.

But is there anything to fix? While pitching coaches around the league might swear they can fix someone like Perez, control has constantly eluded him since he burst onto the scene as a hard-throwing 20 year old in 2002 with the Padres. His lowest career walk rate is 3.7 per nine innings, which came in 2004 with the Pirates, the only truly stellar season of his career. Here are his BB/9 rates for the other eight years of his career, in order: 4.8, 5.5, 6.1, 5.4, 4.0, 4.9, 7.9, 7.6. Yes, since signing his three-year deal for $36 million, Perez has walked over seven and a half batters per nine innings. How many pitchers have even done that once? Since 1974, just 39 pitchers have managed to walk that many batters while staying on the mound for at least 50 innings in a season. Should Perez reach that mark without reducing his rate, he would become just the third pitcher in the last four decades to post BB/9s above 7.0 in two or more seasons with the same innings pitched qualifier. The others: Mitch Williams (1986, 1987, 1992) and Bobby Witt (1986, 1987, 1991).

Perez has faced 487 batters since the beginning of last season, and he's walked 86. While an 8.1 K/9 is well above average, its value is severely discounted when stacked up against a 7.8 BB/9. Due to injuries and ineffectiveness, Perez has made just 21 starts over the last two seasons, producing a 6.52 ERA in 99 1/3 innings. Even though his walk rate over the last two years is historically terrible, it isn’t as though he had displayed solid control in the past. Most find it easy to conflate Perez with a pitcher like the Giants' Jonathan Sanchez, but he realistically hasn’t even approached that level of performance in three seasons. What would benefit Perez and the Mets the most would be a trip to the minor leagues to completely rework any mechanical flaws. If Perez has anything capable of being fixed, throwing in the fifth inning of a 12-2 blowout against the Astros is unlikely to do anything for anyone.

I didn’t comment much on the Perez signing at the time, other than to simply say it probably wasn’t an incredibly smart decision, and it makes little sense to wax poetic on the move now. He was signed, it didn’t make much sense at the time, and it looks disastrous while wearing hindsight goggles. No matter how you slice it, Perez represents a sunk cost, one that cannot be recovered. They could attempt to trade him, but the Mets would likely have to pay 96 percent of his remaining salary to even make a team glance in their direction. Since nothing of interest would be returned in a hypothetical deal, a trade would represent salary relief more than anything else.

One option that piqued my interest was cutting ties with Perez completely. Granted, he isn’t this bad, but Perez’s upside is a mid-4s ERA with a mid-4s BB/9. Numbers along those lines are acceptable for a fourth or fifth starter, but wouldn’t it make more sense to fill those slots with pitchers whose upside or potential surpasses those marks? I’ve long held that back-of-the-rotation spots should go to pitchers like Anibal Sanchez, who can dominate the opposition one night and get dominated the next, but who have the upside of a mid-rotation hurler.

This may have been true of Perez back in 2006 or 2007, but I find it terribly difficult to believe that a trip to the bullpen or a few skipped starts will do much of anything. A trip to the minors could work, but with that option off the table, I honestly might be more inclined to release him altogether. Pitchers who bring what Perez does to the table are put up with when under team control because it doesn’t cost much to give them chances to reach their potential, but when free agency rolls around, it’s silly to pay big bucks without being convinced of performance levels readily achievable.

If you were Mets general manager Omar Minaya, how would you handle Perez? Would you give him some more opportunities before making a decision? Or has he done enough to make you move in a different direction and spend $3 million on Jarrod Washburn for the rest of the season? Could the Mets conceivably make the playoffs with a better pitcher in the rotation?

Eric Seidman is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Eric's other articles. You can contact Eric by clicking here

Related Content:  Oliver Perez

20 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

Richie

Do the Mets have the $3 mill to sign Washburn?

I'd think the Mets could get somebody to take Ollie off their hands (Royals, I'd wager) if they swallow 80-95% of his salary. Hold such a reverse auction, send him off to that lowest bidder, and save a few bucks at least.

May 19, 2010 08:54 AM
rating: 1
 
Sharky

Eric, nice article. I like your point about 4th and 5th starters (the Anibal Sanchez model). To answer your question, if I were Omar Minaya I would:

1) Fire myself.
2) Release Oliver Perez (after trying to unload him unsuccessfully). Why would any team pay even the major league minimum, knowing Perez could be had for that soon?

Of course, if I were really Omar Minaya, I would be loath to release Oliver Perez because it would be tantamount to admitting what a colossal mistake I had made. Combine that with Luis Castillo, JJ Putz, etc. and you have the makings of a fine GM's resume.

May 19, 2010 09:09 AM
rating: 2
 
danielowen

Oliver Perez has been given every opportunity to prove that he can limit walks and be successful at the ML level. We all know, by now, that he can't. He is not salvageable and, therefore, should be released. Anybody off the scrap heap could give the Mets equal or greater production out of the position.

May 19, 2010 09:49 AM
rating: 0
 
kcboomer

The Royals already have 5 starters better than Perez so why would they take him??

May 19, 2010 11:41 AM
rating: 1
 
anderson721

Cause they're the Royals?

May 19, 2010 14:40 PM
rating: 4
 
chokehope

you answered your own question

May 19, 2010 22:55 PM
rating: 0
 
rweiler

If the Mets had a good option at AAA, you would just release him, but Pat Misch and R.A Dickey aren't likely to be improvements. Dave Littlefield isn't a GM anymore, so I doubt Minaya can find a trading partner.

May 19, 2010 11:50 AM
rating: 2
 
escapingNihilism

the Mets have a 24 year old pitcher in AAA named Dillon Gee who has nice numbers this year: 7.7 K/9, 2.7 BB/9 in 47 innings. he posted similar figures of 7.8 and 3.0 in 48 innings last year at AAA. I certainly think he could outperform Perez at the major league level and maybe even generate a few tenths of a win above replacement.

May 19, 2010 13:53 PM
rating: 0
 
OonBoon

Perez will sign with STL next year for 1 year at $500k, strike out 176 guys with a 3.18 ERA, then sign a 3 year contract with CHI for $34MM and go back to being garbage.

May 19, 2010 11:55 AM
rating: 7
 
amazin_mess

I can totally see that happening.

May 19, 2010 15:13 PM
rating: 0
 
Agent007

It's obvious -- release him and replace him with Daniel Cabrera.

May 19, 2010 12:47 PM
rating: 2
 
orlandoca7

The history of the Wilpons suggests they may not understand -- or accept -- the concept of sunk costs. That's hard to believe considering Fred Wilpon has been a successful business man his whole life, but there's plenty of evidence.

Release Perez makes solid sense at this point if they can't convince him (and his agent Boras) to accept a demotion to Buffalo.

The Mets are not close to playoff-caliber. Washington has better overall talent at this point. They'd be hurting themselves if they approached this season with a playoff rationale. Throwing any type of cash to Washburn, or other similar veterans, should be discounted.

That said, the organization is challenged because they lack depth in starters, which makes Manuel's decision to keep Mejia ridiculous. Mejia is the Met's little vesion of Strasburg -- at least their only current chance of developing a 1 or 2. Instead, he's been used for six weeks in the bigs and produced replacement reliever results.

It's possible we may see the right thing happening with Perez but under a new regime, yet soon enough. The Wilpons are totally reactive when it comes to personnel moves. They needed to make changes in the FO and in the dugout this past winter at the latest. I think we'll see both Minaya and Manuel gone after the early June draft.

May 19, 2010 13:00 PM
rating: 1
 
bflaff1

The Newark Bears are anxiously awaiting this decision.

May 19, 2010 13:54 PM
rating: 2
 
amazin_mess

The Wilpons are too proud to cut Perez. They should, but they won't.

May 19, 2010 15:11 PM
rating: 0
 
Peter Hood

I was a little surprised to read that the Mets couldn't (wouldn't??) assign Perez to the minors because he wouldn't accept the assignment. What are the grounds on which he can refuse?

May 19, 2010 15:41 PM
rating: 0
 
amazin_mess

All I know is he was out of options and they had to get his permission. He refused.

May 19, 2010 15:52 PM
rating: 0
 
losermix

Think the Cubs might be willing to take him off their hands for Zambrano? They clearly want to cut ties, and while Ollie seems overpaid he's not as overpaid as Zambrano, especially if the latter stays as a long man/mop up reliever. Is that a crazy idea? Because I'd be totally okay with it.

May 19, 2010 23:23 PM
rating: 0
 
jlister

There is something profoundly painful about watching Perez pitch that goes far beyond the merely miserable results.

May 20, 2010 07:56 AM
rating: 0
 
jlister

Perez manages to make the Steve Trachsel years look relatively serene.

May 20, 2010 08:00 AM
rating: 0
 
PeterBNYC

In the real world, Perez is not a sunk cost, he is worse- he is a dead weight dragging down team results. He will not stay in shape, he will not try to correct his always marginal mechanics (watch him pitch and watch his arm angle- it never repeats), he will not do anything for the team such as accepting- at no reduction in salary!- a minor league assignment to correct his mechanics, because, ahem, HE WON'T CORRECT HIS MECHANICS. ANY replacement level LHP in the Mets system would be an improvement over keeping Perez around. He is unproductively occupying a slot in the pen that could be held by a minimum salary LHP who would produce better results. So the Mets are carrying 12 pitchers, of whom one is useless. This is what the stupidities of a Perez type contract produce. Cut him loose.

May 20, 2010 11:19 AM
rating: 0
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Future Shock: Org Watc... (05/19)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Checking the Numbers: ... (05/13)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Checking the Numbers: ... (05/24)
Next Article >>
Under The Knife: Wedne... (05/19)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit List: Friday, May 29
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Thursday, May ...
Fantasy Rounders: San Diego's Marine Player
Premium Article Rubbing Mud: Context is King
Premium Article Daisy Cutter: How the Kipnis Got His TAv
Premium Article What You Need to Know: Another Day, Another ...
Premium Article Release Points: Where Have You Gone, Stephen...

MORE FROM MAY 19, 2010
Premium Article On the Beat: Wednesday Update
Under The Knife: Wednesday Update
Premium Article Future Shock: Org Watch: Orioles, Astros, Ma...
Premium Article Manufactured Runs: Everything You Wanted to ...

MORE BY ERIC SEIDMAN
2010-06-02 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Sneaky SIERA
2010-05-26 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Royal Pains
2010-05-24 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: The Trade-Me Clause
2010-05-19 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Bad Ollie or Worse Oll...
2010-05-18 - Premium Article Contractual Matters: Werth The Funds
2010-05-13 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Caught Quantifying
2010-05-07 - Seidnotes: Livan La Vida Loca
More...

MORE CHECKING THE NUMBERS
2010-06-02 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Sneaky SIERA
2010-05-26 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Royal Pains
2010-05-24 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: The Trade-Me Clause
2010-05-19 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Bad Ollie or Worse Oll...
2010-05-13 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: Caught Quantifying
2010-05-05 - Checking the Numbers: Catchers on Catching
2010-04-30 - Premium Article Checking the Numbers: A League Average Artic...
More...

INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2010-05-20 - Premium Article Transaction Action: Senior Circuitry