CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

Vote in the Internet Baseball Awards for a chance at a free copy of Dollar Sign on the Muscle
Voting ends in 16 days and 2 hours

No Previous Article
<< Previous Column
Aim For The Head: Barr... (05/23)
Next Column >>
Aim For The Head: Temp... (06/12)
No Next Article

June 7, 2001

Aim For The Head

Temperature and OPS

by Keith Woolner

This week's question comes from Joel Wirth:

Plenty is made about players pre- and post-All-Star Break numbers, but what I'm interested in our "cool" and "hot" weather splits. Who does significantly better/worse in June, July, and August compared to April, May, and September/October? Thanks.

Thanks for the question, Joel.

We often hear about players who start slowly attributing it to the colder weather. And indeed, science gives us good reasons to believe that offense should rise as the temperature does. Robert K. Adair's fine book The Physics Of Baseball has a good explanation of why balls carry farther in warm air than in cold, for example.

However, is it the temperature that causes the difference, or simply a player getting used to his in-season regimen and routine? Since the cooler days tend to occur at the beginning and the end of the season, it will be hard to separate the climatic effect from personal adjustments and work habits.

However, let's speculate for a moment that there are players who are more sensitive to temperature than other players. Now, if offense as a whole is up during warm weather, we shouldn't be surprised that any individual player plays better in the heat. As a baseline, we would expect a certain amount of increase from any player. What we're really interested in is whether players tend to gain more (or less) than average from year to year.

Thanks to groups like Retrosheet and The Baseball Workshop, we have recorded game-time temperature data for most games of the past few years, and can use this to see whether certain players gain more or less offense than average when the temperature rises. As it turns out, the mean game-time temperature over the past decade has been around 72 degrees, so I'll break up the data into two categories:

Cold games (72 degrees or less)

Hot games (73 degrees or more)

(For the nitpickers: all game temperatures are recorded as integers, so we don't have to worry about where a 72.5-degree game ought to fit.)

I looked at all players active in 1999 and 2000, and selected those who had at least 100 plate appearances in both hot and cold games in each season (ignoring games for which temperature data wasn't available). I computed the OPS (on-base percentage plus slugging average) for each player in each temperature condition, and took the ratio of the Cold OPS to the Hot OPS.

For example:

During 1999, Phil Nevin had an 816 OPS in cold games, and a 948 OPS in hot games. His ColdOPS to HotOPS ratio (or C/H) was 816/948 = 0.861. In other words, his production declined about 14% in cold weather.

During 2000, Nevin posted a 748 OPS in cold games, and a 1037 OPS in hot games, for a C/H of 0.721, an OPS decline of nearly 28% in cold games.

I ran similar calculations for each qualifying player (224 in all), and plotted their 1999 C/H versus their 2000 C/H to see if a distinct linear trend emerged that would indicate that players respond differently to temperature fluctuations, and charted the results in the graph below:

As it turns out, not only does there not seem to be a consistent temperature effect, but rather the reverse--players who do unusually well in hot weather in one year are slightly more likely to be below average the next year (a negative correlation of -0.15165). The black line shows the best-fitting linear trend in the data, and it slopes slightly downward rather than upward as we would have expected it to do if heat-preferring players existed. I wouldn't jump to the opposite conclusion (that being unusually good one year makes you more likely to be unusually bad the next), especially with such a low correlation. The linear relationship between 1999 and 2000 C/H performance explains less than 2.3% of the overall variance, and should probably be attributed to chance at this juncture.

Of course, there are several factors we didn't include in the analysis. For example, players who play for teams in domed stadiums would have a nearly constant temperature for half their games. Assuming this temperature is 72, that's a large portion of the "Cold" games that are affected by that park's specific features (a tendency for a dome to be a pitchers' park would overly depress the Cold OPS figures), rather than a mix of hot and cold games in that park. A hot game in Denver does not have the same effect on OPS as a hot game in Oakland, even if the temperatures are identical.

We haven't considered players who've changed teams, divisions, or leagues, and for whom the mix of parks in which they played are different from year to year. Nor have we considered how different climactic patterns affect the mix of hot/cold games in the same park from year to year. We're also not considering how temperatures may change during a game. Plate appearances in the late innings of night games probably tend to be cooler by a couple of degrees, whereas late innings in day games might warm up a bit. We're assuming that all plate appearances during the game can be assigned to the game-time reported temperature without significantly distorting the relationship we're investigating.

In fact, there still could be a measurable temperature-sensitive characteristic for players that can be shown in their C/H ratio, but which only emerges over longer periods of time. The random fluctuations in comparing just two years of data may not be sufficient for the pattern to emerge. But the short answer, for now, is that we haven't found any evidence that players consistently under- or over-perform expectation in games of varying temperature.

Keith Woolner is an author of Baseball Prospectus. Contact him by clicking here.

Keith Woolner is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Keith's other articles. You can contact Keith by clicking here

Related Content:  The Who,  Baseball Ops,  Temperature,  Ops,  OPS+

0 comments have been left for this article.

No Previous Article
<< Previous Column
Aim For The Head: Barr... (05/23)
Next Column >>
Aim For The Head: Temp... (06/12)
No Next Article

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The '80' Pitches In This Yea...
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: Playing a Hinch
The Lineup Card: Awards We Wish We Could Giv...
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: AL Wild Card Game Recap
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: ALDS Preview: Angels vs....
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: NL Wild Card Game Previe...
Premium Article Playoff Prospectus: ALDS Preview: Orioles vs...

MORE FROM JUNE 7, 2001
Transaction Analysis: May 31-June 4, 2001
The Daily Prospectus: AL All-Stars

MORE BY KEITH WOOLNER
2001-06-26 - Aim For The Head: Fan Satisfaction
2001-06-20 - Aim For The Head: Response Rates
2001-06-12 - Aim For The Head: Temperature and OPS, Redux
2001-06-07 - Aim For The Head: Temperature and OPS
2001-05-23 - Aim For The Head: Barry Bonds and the Three ...
2001-05-16 - Aim For The Head: Expected vs. Actual Wins
2001-05-09 - Aim For The Head: Good-hitting Pitchers
More...

MORE AIM FOR THE HEAD
2001-06-26 - Aim For The Head: Fan Satisfaction
2001-06-20 - Aim For The Head: Response Rates
2001-06-12 - Aim For The Head: Temperature and OPS, Redux
2001-06-07 - Aim For The Head: Temperature and OPS
2001-05-23 - Aim For The Head: Barry Bonds and the Three ...
2001-05-16 - Aim For The Head: Expected vs. Actual Wins
2001-05-09 - Aim For The Head: Good-hitting Pitchers
More...