
Craig Biggio 2BAstrosAstros Player Cards | Astros Team Audit | Astros Depth Chart |
| Years | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | TAv | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 12503 | .281 | .363 | .433 | .282 | 61.3 |
|
|
| YEAR | TEAM | AGE | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | TB | BB | SO | HBP | SF | SH | RBI | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | TAv | VORP | FRAA | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | HOU | 22 | 50 | 131 | 123 | 14 | 26 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 43 | 7 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1 | .211 | .254 | .350 | .237 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 1989 | HOU | 23 | 134 | 509 | 443 | 64 | 114 | 21 | 2 | 13 | 178 | 49 | 64 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 21 | 3 | .257 | .336 | .402 | .286 | 29.2 | -0.3 | 3.2 |
| 1990 | HOU | 24 | 150 | 621 | 555 | 53 | 153 | 24 | 2 | 4 | 193 | 53 | 79 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 42 | 25 | 11 | .276 | .342 | .348 | .258 | 21.1 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| 1991 | HOU | 25 | 149 | 609 | 546 | 79 | 161 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 204 | 53 | 71 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 46 | 19 | 6 | .295 | .358 | .374 | .289 | 45.1 | 0.5 | 4.8 |
| 1992 | HOU | 26 | 162 | 721 | 613 | 96 | 170 | 32 | 3 | 6 | 226 | 94 | 95 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 39 | 38 | 15 | .277 | .378 | .369 | .287 | 41.7 | -22.4 | 2.1 |
| 1993 | HOU | 27 | 155 | 706 | 610 | 98 | 175 | 41 | 5 | 21 | 289 | 77 | 93 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 64 | 15 | 17 | .287 | .373 | .474 | .301 | 42.7 | 3.4 | 4.7 |
| 1994 | HOU | 28 | 114 | 511 | 437 | 88 | 139 | 44 | 5 | 6 | 211 | 62 | 58 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 56 | 39 | 4 | .318 | .411 | .483 | .313 | 54.0 | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| 1995 | HOU | 29 | 141 | 673 | 553 | 123 | 167 | 30 | 2 | 22 | 267 | 80 | 85 | 22 | 7 | 11 | 77 | 33 | 8 | .302 | .406 | .483 | .315 | 64.0 | 0.1 | 6.2 |
| 1996 | HOU | 30 | 162 | 723 | 605 | 113 | 174 | 24 | 4 | 15 | 251 | 75 | 72 | 27 | 8 | 8 | 75 | 25 | 7 | .288 | .386 | .415 | .285 | 38.8 | -2.9 | 3.4 |
| 1997 | HOU | 31 | 162 | 744 | 619 | 146 | 191 | 37 | 8 | 22 | 310 | 84 | 107 | 34 | 7 | 0 | 81 | 47 | 10 | .309 | .415 | .501 | .324 | 79.4 | 11.8 | 9.0 |
| 1998 | HOU | 32 | 160 | 738 | 646 | 123 | 210 | 51 | 2 | 20 | 325 | 64 | 113 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 88 | 50 | 8 | .325 | .403 | .503 | .306 | 59.0 | 0.2 | 5.8 |
| 1999 | HOU | 33 | 160 | 749 | 639 | 123 | 188 | 56 | 0 | 16 | 292 | 88 | 107 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 73 | 28 | 14 | .294 | .386 | .457 | .290 | 49.3 | -8.6 | 3.8 |
| 2000 | HOU | 34 | 101 | 466 | 377 | 67 | 101 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 148 | 61 | 73 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 35 | 12 | 2 | .268 | .388 | .393 | .267 | 18.1 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| 2001 | HOU | 35 | 155 | 717 | 617 | 118 | 180 | 35 | 3 | 20 | 281 | 66 | 100 | 28 | 6 | 0 | 70 | 7 | 4 | .292 | .382 | .455 | .283 | 39.7 | -18.4 | 2.1 |
| 2002 | HOU | 36 | 145 | 655 | 577 | 96 | 146 | 36 | 3 | 15 | 233 | 50 | 111 | 17 | 2 | 9 | 58 | 16 | 2 | .253 | .330 | .404 | .257 | 12.3 | -18.4 | -0.6 |
| 2003 | HOU | 37 | 153 | 717 | 628 | 102 | 166 | 44 | 2 | 15 | 259 | 57 | 116 | 27 | 2 | 3 | 62 | 8 | 4 | .264 | .350 | .412 | .269 | 28.1 | -10.1 | 1.8 |
| 2004 | HOU | 38 | 156 | 700 | 633 | 100 | 178 | 47 | 0 | 24 | 297 | 40 | 94 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 63 | 7 | 2 | .281 | .337 | .469 | .274 | 22.2 | -5.0 | 1.7 |
| 2005 | HOU | 39 | 155 | 651 | 590 | 94 | 156 | 40 | 1 | 26 | 276 | 37 | 90 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 69 | 11 | 1 | .264 | .325 | .468 | .277 | 29.0 | 1.2 | 3.1 |
| 2006 | HOU | 40 | 145 | 607 | 548 | 79 | 135 | 33 | 0 | 21 | 231 | 40 | 84 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 62 | 3 | 2 | .246 | .306 | .422 | .240 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.3 |
| 2007 | HOU | 41 | 141 | 555 | 517 | 68 | 130 | 31 | 3 | 10 | 197 | 23 | 112 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 50 | 4 | 3 | .251 | .285 | .381 | .231 | -1.5 | -9.8 | -0.9 |
| Career | 2850 | 12503 | 10876 | 1844 | 3060 | 668 | 55 | 291 | 4711 | 1160 | 1753 | 285 | 81 | 101 | 1175 | 414 | 124 | .281 | .363 | .433 | .282 | 677.4 | -63.8 | 61.3 | ||
| YEAR | Team | Lg | G | PA | TAv | oppAVG | oppOBP | oppSLG | oppTAv | BABIP | BPF | BRAA | repLVL | POS_ADJ | FRAA | BRR | BVORP | BWARP | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | ASH | A | 64 | 260 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .411 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| 1988 | HOU | MLB | 50 | 131 | .237 | .242 | .300 | .352 | .000 | .253 | 95 | -2.9 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 0.5 |
| 1988 | TUC | AAA | 77 | 329 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .360 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| 1989 | HOU | MLB | 134 | 509 | .286 | .244 | .303 | .363 | .000 | .272 | 97 | 12.9 | 13.3 | 7.7 | -0.3 | 4.1 | 29.2 | 3.2 | 29.2 | 3.2 |
| 1990 | HOU | MLB | 150 | 621 | .258 | .253 | .312 | .375 | .000 | .315 | 96 | -1.5 | 16.7 | 7.2 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 21.1 | 2.6 | 21.1 | 2.6 |
| 1991 | HOU | MLB | 149 | 609 | .289 | .248 | .305 | .367 | .000 | .331 | 97 | 17.3 | 16.5 | 9.6 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 45.1 | 4.8 | 45.1 | 4.8 |
| 1992 | HOU | MLB | 162 | 721 | .287 | .247 | .302 | .357 | .000 | .319 | 98 | 19 | 18.7 | -0.9 | -22.4 | 2.4 | 41.7 | 2.1 | 41.7 | 2.1 |
| 1993 | HOU | MLB | 155 | 706 | .301 | .262 | .318 | .396 | .000 | .307 | 96 | 30.9 | 20.3 | -0.9 | 3.4 | -6.5 | 42.7 | 4.7 | 42.7 | 4.7 |
| 1994 | HOU | MLB | 114 | 511 | .313 | .265 | .322 | .412 | .000 | .355 | 97 | 30.2 | 15.5 | -0.7 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 54.0 | 5.8 | 54.0 | 5.8 |
| 1995 | HOU | MLB | 141 | 673 | .315 | .261 | .323 | .401 | .000 | .320 | 95 | 41.5 | 20.2 | -0.9 | 0.1 | 3.7 | 64.0 | 6.2 | 64.0 | 6.2 |
| 1996 | HOU | MLB | 162 | 723 | .285 | .256 | .317 | .400 | .000 | .302 | 99 | 21.1 | 22.4 | -1 | -2.9 | -1.6 | 38.8 | 3.4 | 38.8 | 3.4 |
| 1997 | HOU | MLB | 162 | 744 | .324 | .255 | .320 | .400 | .000 | .340 | 98 | 52.6 | 19.8 | -1.1 | 11.8 | 9.3 | 79.4 | 9.0 | 79.4 | 9.0 |
| 1998 | HOU | MLB | 160 | 738 | .306 | .265 | .327 | .416 | .000 | .368 | 99 | 37.6 | 19.1 | -1.1 | 0.2 | 3.6 | 59.0 | 5.8 | 59.0 | 5.8 |
| 1999 | HOU | MLB | 160 | 749 | .290 | .270 | .339 | .430 | .000 | .330 | 96 | 26.3 | 20.3 | -1.3 | -8.6 | 4.3 | 49.3 | 3.8 | 49.3 | 3.8 |
| 2000 | HOU | MLB | 101 | 466 | .267 | .266 | .334 | .433 | .000 | .309 | 108 | 4.1 | 12.8 | -0.7 | 2.6 | -0.0 | 18.1 | 1.9 | 18.1 | 1.9 |
| 2001 | HOU | MLB | 155 | 717 | .283 | .265 | .327 | .429 | .000 | .318 | 105 | 18.1 | 19.3 | -1.1 | -18.4 | 4.4 | 39.7 | 2.1 | 39.7 | 2.1 |
| 2002 | HOU | MLB | 145 | 655 | .257 | .258 | .325 | .410 | .000 | .289 | 103 | -2.2 | 16.7 | -0.9 | -18.4 | 0.3 | 12.3 | -0.6 | 12.3 | -0.6 |
| 2003 | HOU | MLB | 153 | 717 | .269 | .265 | .328 | .423 | .000 | .303 | 104 | 7.3 | 18.9 | 1.9 | -10.1 | 2.7 | 28.1 | 1.8 | 28.1 | 1.8 |
| 2004 | HOU | MLB | 156 | 700 | .274 | .263 | .324 | .422 | .000 | .297 | 99 | 10.8 | 18.3 | -1.9 | -5.0 | -0.8 | 22.2 | 1.7 | 22.2 | 1.7 |
| 2005 | HOU | MLB | 155 | 651 | .277 | .264 | .324 | .418 | .000 | .273 | 99 | 11.9 | 16.7 | -1.2 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 29.0 | 3.1 | 29.0 | 3.1 |
| 2006 | HOU | MLB | 145 | 607 | .240 | .268 | .329 | .431 | .000 | .254 | 101 | -13.5 | 16.4 | -1.3 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 0.3 |
| 2007 | HOU | MLB | 141 | 555 | .231 | .268 | .330 | .422 | .000 | .300 | 103 | -17.9 | 15.7 | -1.1 | -9.8 | 2.1 | -1.5 | -0.9 | -1.5 | -0.9 |
| Career | MLB | 12503 | .282 | .260 | .321 | .405 | .254 | .311 | 99 | 303.6 | 340.3 | 12.4 | -62.3 | 46.1 | 677.4 | 61.3 | 677.4 | 61.3 | ||
| Year | Team | Lg | PA | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | ISO | TAv | VORP | FRAA | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | ASH | A | 260 | 59 | 81 | 17 | 2 | 9 | 49 | 39 | 33 | 31 | 10 | .375 | .473 | .597 | .222 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1988 | HOU | MLB | 131 | 14 | 26 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 29 | 6 | 1 | .211 | .254 | .350 | .138 | .237 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 1988 | TUC | AAA | 329 | 60 | 90 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 41 | 40 | 39 | 19 | 4 | .320 | .407 | .456 | .135 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1989 | HOU | MLB | 509 | 64 | 114 | 21 | 2 | 13 | 60 | 49 | 64 | 21 | 3 | .257 | .336 | .402 | .144 | .286 | 29.2 | -0.3 | 3.2 |
| 1990 | HOU | MLB | 621 | 53 | 153 | 24 | 2 | 4 | 42 | 53 | 79 | 25 | 11 | .276 | .342 | .348 | .072 | .258 | 21.1 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| 1991 | HOU | MLB | 609 | 79 | 161 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 46 | 53 | 71 | 19 | 6 | .295 | .358 | .374 | .079 | .289 | 45.1 | 0.5 | 4.8 |
| 1992 | HOU | MLB | 721 | 96 | 170 | 32 | 3 | 6 | 39 | 94 | 95 | 38 | 15 | .277 | .378 | .369 | .091 | .287 | 41.7 | -22.4 | 2.1 |
| 1993 | HOU | MLB | 706 | 98 | 175 | 41 | 5 | 21 | 64 | 77 | 93 | 15 | 17 | .287 | .373 | .474 | .187 | .301 | 42.7 | 3.4 | 4.7 |
| 1994 | HOU | MLB | 511 | 88 | 139 | 44 | 5 | 6 | 56 | 62 | 58 | 39 | 4 | .318 | .411 | .483 | .165 | .313 | 54.0 | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| 1995 | HOU | MLB | 673 | 123 | 167 | 30 | 2 | 22 | 77 | 80 | 85 | 33 | 8 | .302 | .406 | .483 | .181 | .315 | 64.0 | 0.1 | 6.2 |
| 1996 | HOU | MLB | 723 | 113 | 174 | 24 | 4 | 15 | 75 | 75 | 72 | 25 | 7 | .288 | .386 | .415 | .127 | .285 | 38.8 | -2.9 | 3.4 |
| 1997 | HOU | MLB | 744 | 146 | 191 | 37 | 8 | 22 | 81 | 84 | 107 | 47 | 10 | .309 | .415 | .501 | .192 | .324 | 79.4 | 11.8 | 9.0 |
| 1998 | HOU | MLB | 738 | 123 | 210 | 51 | 2 | 20 | 88 | 64 | 113 | 50 | 8 | .325 | .403 | .503 | .178 | .306 | 59.0 | 0.2 | 5.8 |
| 1999 | HOU | MLB | 749 | 123 | 188 | 56 | 0 | 16 | 73 | 88 | 107 | 28 | 14 | .294 | .386 | .457 | .163 | .290 | 49.3 | -8.6 | 3.8 |
| 2000 | HOU | MLB | 466 | 67 | 101 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 35 | 61 | 73 | 12 | 2 | .268 | .388 | .393 | .125 | .267 | 18.1 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| 2001 | HOU | MLB | 717 | 118 | 180 | 35 | 3 | 20 | 70 | 66 | 100 | 7 | 4 | .292 | .382 | .455 | .164 | .283 | 39.7 | -18.4 | 2.1 |
| 2002 | HOU | MLB | 655 | 96 | 146 | 36 | 3 | 15 | 58 | 50 | 111 | 16 | 2 | .253 | .330 | .404 | .151 | .257 | 12.3 | -18.4 | -0.6 |
| 2003 | HOU | MLB | 717 | 102 | 166 | 44 | 2 | 15 | 62 | 57 | 116 | 8 | 4 | .264 | .350 | .412 | .148 | .269 | 28.1 | -10.1 | 1.8 |
| 2004 | HOU | MLB | 700 | 100 | 178 | 47 | 0 | 24 | 63 | 40 | 94 | 7 | 2 | .281 | .337 | .469 | .188 | .274 | 22.2 | -5.0 | 1.7 |
| 2005 | HOU | MLB | 651 | 94 | 156 | 40 | 1 | 26 | 69 | 37 | 90 | 11 | 1 | .264 | .325 | .468 | .203 | .277 | 29.0 | 1.2 | 3.1 |
| 2006 | HOU | MLB | 607 | 79 | 135 | 33 | 0 | 21 | 62 | 40 | 84 | 3 | 2 | .246 | .306 | .422 | .175 | .240 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.3 |
| 2007 | HOU | MLB | 555 | 68 | 130 | 31 | 3 | 10 | 50 | 23 | 112 | 4 | 3 | .251 | .285 | .381 | .130 | .231 | -1.5 | -9.8 | -0.9 |
| Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-08-02 | - | 60-DL | - | - | Left | Knee | Surgery | ACL | 2000-08-10 | - |
| 2000-08-02 | 2000-10-02 | Minors | 61 | 56 | Left | Knee | Surgery | ACL and MCL | 2000-08-10 |
Compensation
|
|
Craig Biggio is referenced in the following articles.
requires BP Premium access to view,
requires BP Premium or BP Fantasy access to view
| Date | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-09 13:00:00 | Hey Jay -
Do you feel that the Hall of Fame will start to give guidelines to the voters sooner rather than later when it comes to steroids? I have seen comments regarding how quickly Bagwell shrunk in size as to why someone was not going to vote for him (Chicago Tribune). As Phil Rogers says, 580+ writers, 580+ opinions on the matter.
Thanks (Brian from Tinley Park) | Good question. I think we're years away from that, because while there are several candidates about to hit the ballot whose careers have been linked to PED use, there are also a bunch of milestone candidates whose elections are a virtual lock. Even without Barry Bonds and Roger Clmeens, you'll still have Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, Randy Johnson and Craig Biggio on that score, as well as solid candidates without the milestones OR PED connections such as John Smoltz and Curt Schilling. I think we're years away before the Hall feels a need to interject itself into the debate on the guideline grounds. (Jay Jaffe's Hall of Fame Special) |
| 2010-04-29 13:00:00 | What is your best estimate as to the attendance gain the Phillies will receive because they locked up Howard? Asked another way: if they had let him walk after 2011, what percentage of their fans would not buy a ticket in 2012? (Ruben from Philly) | I don't think it would have made any added difference, aside from the impact it has on the team itself. If the Phillies are good, people will come regardless of who is playing first base. Howard doesn't have that Craig Biggio franchise value where it's almost sorta kinda worth having him around, even if you have to pay him or play him more than you'd normally want. (Shawn Hoffman) |
| 2009-05-12 13:00:00 | Moondog Matinee - both because you learn something about stuff you might not have ever heard (Frogman Henry!), and because you can feel how much they care.
Forget the 'roids stuff for a bit. If Griffey continues to hit like Jose Vidro, what do they do with him. Has any other team ever dealt with a similar situation of nostalgia v poor performance?
(mattb from Tacoma) | A ton of them, be it the Astros with Craig Biggio a couple of years ago, or the Brewers taking on Hank Aaron... For the M's, I suspect part of the calculus was giving the fans someone to root for while they rebuild. It's a one-year deal, so they won't dump out of it, but they can start restricting his playing time a lot more than they have. (Steven Goldman) |
| 2009-02-06 13:00:00 | Steven: Joel Sherman has a piece up today about Jeter and what the Yanks will do when his current contract expires. It seems clear that he won't be moving off of SS within the next two years (and it seems just as clear that at age 37 he won't have a real position). So what does the team do? (Joe from Washington, DC) | This is the zillion-dollar question, one that I've asked both in the Pinstriped Bible and in BP 2009. I don't know, because it's hard to imagine the Yankees passing up Jeter's hunt for 3000 hits -- even though said hunt could shackle them the way Craig Biggio shackled the Astros. (Steven Goldman) |
| 2008-11-07 13:00:00 | Hey Joe, I love your work, but throw away comments like this: "Because his offense isn't developing, and there's a notion--one I can get behind--that he's stagnating as a player in part because of his inability to master second base" cause me to scratch my head. What would lead you to believe that Weeks' inability to defend has a negative effect on his hitting, or that switching to an arguably harder position would increase his offensive production? Is there any evidence that supports players switching positions and then producing more at the plate? (Steve from NY) | No studies. Scads of ancedotal evidence. B.J. Upton, Craig Biggio come immediately to mind. Paul Molitor, maybe. We know that Weeks hasn't hit as expected. We know that he's struggled to master second base. We know that he has tools that might translate to center field. There's risk, sure, but there's upside as well. I'd rather take a shot with the position change. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2008-05-29 13:00:00 | Joe, what do you think of Russell Martin moving to another position in the next few years? It would be dumb for the Dodgers, but would it be smart for Martin individually? He seems to be very comparable to Craig Biggio. (jtrichey from Indianapolis) | Biggio couldn't catch very well, and speed was a huge part of his value. Martin is a good defensive catcher whose speed is an asset, not a defining thing. He should stay behind the plate for a long time. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2008-01-10 13:00:00 | Alright, what about any current players likely to be underrated by HoF voters? Craig Biggio? (Nick from NYC) | Lots, I think. Not Biggio, who has the "scrappy" card, and reached the magic number he didn't really need.
A whole bunch of pitchers whose win totals reflect the changes in the game stand to be judged harshly: Mussina jumps out at me as the vanguard of this group. There are some players, such as Jim Thome, who are more than qualified but who may find themselves struggling to get in as voters overcompensate for the era. Note that this DIDN'T happen for pitchers who played in the 1962-68 period, because preventing runs is morally superior to producing them. Especially on deadline. (Joe Sheehan) |
No BP Roundtables have mentioned this guy.
A Collaboration between BrooksBaseball.net and Baseball Prospectus - Pitch classifications provided by Pitch Info LLC
BP Annual Player Comments
The rest of this card is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.
Not a subscriber? Click here for a free card so you can see what's missing.
Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.