
Nolan Ryan PAstrosAstros Player Cards | Astros Team Audit | Astros Depth Chart |
| Years | IP | W | L | SV | SO | ERA | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 5386 | 324 | 292 | 3 | 5714 | 3.19 | 63.2 |
|
|
| YEAR | TEAM | AGE | G | GS | IP | IP-SP | IP-RP | W | L | SV | BS | QS | BQS | PA | H | R | ER | HR | TB | BB | UBB | HBP | SO | ERA | FIP | FRA | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | NYN | 19 | 2 | 1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 15.00 | 6.01 | 4.11 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| 1968 | NYN | 21 | 21 | 18 | 134.0 | 125.7 | 8.3 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 559 | 93 | 50 | 46 | 12 | 142 | 75 | 71 | 4 | 133 | 3.09 | 3.49 | 3.21 | 4.0 | 0.3 |
| 1969 | NYN | 22 | 25 | 10 | 89.3 | 56.7 | 32.7 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 375 | 60 | 38 | 35 | 3 | 84 | 53 | 50 | 1 | 92 | 3.53 | 2.85 | 3.45 | 10.3 | 1.0 |
| 1970 | NYN | 23 | 27 | 19 | 131.7 | 123.3 | 8.3 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 570 | 86 | 59 | 50 | 10 | 129 | 97 | 95 | 4 | 125 | 3.42 | 4.24 | 5.43 | 0.7 | -0.1 |
| 1971 | NYN | 24 | 30 | 26 | 152.0 | 147.3 | 4.7 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 705 | 125 | 78 | 67 | 8 | 173 | 116 | 112 | 15 | 137 | 3.97 | 4.01 | 4.09 | 8.9 | 0.9 |
| 1972 | CAL | 25 | 39 | 39 | 284.0 | 284.0 | 0.0 | 19 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 1154 | 166 | 80 | 72 | 14 | 239 | 157 | 153 | 10 | 329 | 2.28 | 2.36 | 3.08 | 20.9 | 2.4 |
| 1973 | CAL | 26 | 41 | 39 | 326.0 | 323.7 | 2.3 | 21 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 1355 | 238 | 113 | 104 | 18 | 355 | 162 | 160 | 7 | 383 | 2.87 | 2.50 | 3.02 | 54.7 | 5.9 |
| 1974 | CAL | 27 | 42 | 41 | 332.7 | 331.0 | 1.7 | 22 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 6 | 1392 | 221 | 127 | 107 | 18 | 325 | 202 | 199 | 9 | 367 | 2.89 | 2.97 | 3.64 | 24.5 | 2.7 |
| 1975 | CAL | 28 | 28 | 28 | 198.0 | 198.0 | 0.0 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 864 | 152 | 90 | 76 | 13 | 218 | 132 | 132 | 7 | 186 | 3.45 | 3.64 | 4.27 | 8.1 | 0.9 |
| 1976 | CAL | 29 | 39 | 39 | 284.3 | 284.3 | 0.0 | 17 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 1195 | 193 | 117 | 106 | 13 | 281 | 183 | 181 | 5 | 327 | 3.36 | 2.90 | 3.60 | 19.7 | 2.2 |
| 1977 | CAL | 30 | 37 | 37 | 299.0 | 299.0 | 0.0 | 19 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 2 | 1272 | 198 | 110 | 92 | 12 | 263 | 204 | 197 | 9 | 341 | 2.77 | 3.12 | 3.95 | 29.0 | 3.0 |
| 1978 | CAL | 31 | 31 | 31 | 234.7 | 234.7 | 0.0 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 1008 | 183 | 106 | 97 | 12 | 262 | 148 | 141 | 3 | 260 | 3.72 | 2.93 | 3.68 | 26.6 | 2.9 |
| 1979 | CAL | 32 | 34 | 34 | 222.7 | 222.7 | 0.0 | 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 937 | 169 | 104 | 89 | 15 | 254 | 114 | 111 | 6 | 223 | 3.60 | 3.25 | 3.56 | 42.6 | 4.4 |
| 1980 | HOU | 33 | 35 | 35 | 233.7 | 233.7 | 0.0 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 982 | 205 | 100 | 87 | 10 | 275 | 98 | 97 | 3 | 200 | 3.35 | 2.89 | 3.71 | 19.5 | 2.1 |
| 1981 | HOU | 34 | 21 | 21 | 149.0 | 149.0 | 0.0 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 605 | 99 | 34 | 28 | 2 | 114 | 68 | 67 | 1 | 140 | 1.69 | 2.35 | 2.77 | 32.7 | 3.6 |
| 1982 | HOU | 35 | 35 | 35 | 250.3 | 250.3 | 0.0 | 16 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 1050 | 196 | 100 | 88 | 20 | 299 | 109 | 106 | 8 | 245 | 3.16 | 3.23 | 3.52 | 26.9 | 2.9 |
| 1983 | HOU | 36 | 29 | 29 | 196.3 | 196.3 | 0.0 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 804 | 134 | 74 | 65 | 9 | 190 | 101 | 98 | 4 | 183 | 2.98 | 3.01 | 3.80 | 15.9 | 1.9 |
| 1984 | HOU | 37 | 30 | 30 | 183.7 | 183.7 | 0.0 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 760 | 143 | 78 | 62 | 12 | 206 | 69 | 67 | 4 | 197 | 3.04 | 2.69 | 3.73 | 15.9 | 1.4 |
| 1985 | HOU | 38 | 35 | 35 | 232.0 | 232.0 | 0.0 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 3 | 983 | 205 | 108 | 98 | 12 | 290 | 95 | 87 | 9 | 209 | 3.80 | 2.83 | 3.84 | 17.7 | 1.4 |
| 1986 | HOU | 39 | 30 | 30 | 178.0 | 178.0 | 0.0 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 729 | 119 | 72 | 66 | 14 | 199 | 82 | 77 | 4 | 194 | 3.34 | 3.04 | 3.80 | 19.6 | 2.1 |
| 1987 | HOU | 40 | 34 | 34 | 211.7 | 211.7 | 0.0 | 8 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 873 | 154 | 75 | 65 | 14 | 225 | 87 | 85 | 4 | 270 | 2.76 | 2.47 | 3.44 | 40.6 | 3.8 |
| 1988 | HOU | 41 | 33 | 33 | 220.0 | 220.0 | 0.0 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 930 | 186 | 98 | 86 | 18 | 284 | 87 | 81 | 7 | 228 | 3.52 | 2.98 | 3.69 | 15.1 | 1.3 |
| 1989 | TEX | 42 | 32 | 32 | 239.3 | 239.3 | 0.0 | 16 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 988 | 162 | 96 | 85 | 17 | 245 | 98 | 95 | 9 | 301 | 3.20 | 2.60 | 3.29 | 50.1 | 5.5 |
| 1990 | TEX | 43 | 30 | 30 | 204.0 | 204.0 | 0.0 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 818 | 137 | 86 | 78 | 18 | 235 | 74 | 72 | 7 | 232 | 3.44 | 2.87 | 3.97 | 30.0 | 3.2 |
| 1991 | TEX | 44 | 27 | 27 | 173.0 | 173.0 | 0.0 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 683 | 102 | 58 | 56 | 12 | 169 | 72 | 72 | 5 | 203 | 2.91 | 2.80 | 3.70 | 31.8 | 3.4 |
| 1992 | TEX | 45 | 27 | 27 | 157.3 | 157.3 | 0.0 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 675 | 138 | 75 | 65 | 9 | 198 | 69 | 69 | 12 | 157 | 3.72 | 3.08 | 3.33 | 34.0 | 3.7 |
| 1993 | TEX | 46 | 13 | 13 | 66.3 | 66.3 | 0.0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 291 | 54 | 47 | 36 | 5 | 84 | 40 | 40 | 1 | 46 | 4.88 | 4.45 | 5.45 | 4.9 | 0.5 |
| Career | 807 | 773 | 5386.0 | 5326.0 | 60.0 | 324 | 292 | 3 | 3 | 481 | 50 | 22574 | 3923 | 2178 | 1911 | 321 | 5747 | 2795 | 2717 | 158 | 5714 | 3.19 | 2.98 | 3.65 | 605.2 | 63.2 | ||
| YEAR | Team | Lg | G | GS | IP | FRA | FRA+ | TAv | oppAVG | oppOBP | oppSLG | oppTAv | BABIP | PPF | PVORP | PWARP | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | NYN | MLB | 2 | 1 | 3.0 | 4.11 | 95 | .398 | .278 | .346 | .431 | .291 | .571 | 96 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| 1968 | NYN | MLB | 21 | 18 | 134.0 | 3.21 | 91 | .260 | .260 | .315 | .368 | .274 | .242 | 87 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 0.3 |
| 1969 | NYN | MLB | 25 | 10 | 89.3 | 3.45 | 115 | .228 | .269 | .335 | .405 | .275 | .252 | 99 | 12.1 | 1.3 | 10.3 | 1.0 |
| 1970 | NYN | MLB | 27 | 19 | 131.7 | 5.43 | 78 | .243 | .277 | .349 | .432 | .281 | .228 | 98 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.7 | -0.1 |
| 1971 | NYN | MLB | 30 | 26 | 152.0 | 4.09 | 94 | .270 | .269 | .331 | .392 | .275 | .273 | 98 | 9.2 | 1.0 | 8.9 | 0.9 |
| 1972 | CAL | MLB | 39 | 39 | 284.0 | 3.08 | 97 | .220 | .251 | .320 | .369 | .267 | .236 | 86 | 21.2 | 2.5 | 20.9 | 2.4 |
| 1973 | CAL | MLB | 41 | 39 | 326.0 | 3.02 | 124 | .236 | .267 | .335 | .395 | .269 | .280 | 92 | 54.7 | 5.9 | 54.7 | 5.9 |
| 1974 | CAL | MLB | 42 | 41 | 332.7 | 3.64 | 104 | .241 | .266 | .329 | .383 | .266 | .255 | 92 | 24.5 | 2.7 | 24.5 | 2.7 |
| 1975 | CAL | MLB | 28 | 28 | 198.0 | 4.27 | 92 | .259 | .264 | .334 | .390 | .269 | .264 | 92 | 8.1 | 0.9 | 8.1 | 0.9 |
| 1976 | CAL | MLB | 39 | 39 | 284.3 | 3.60 | 100 | .242 | .266 | .327 | .379 | .268 | .270 | 90 | 19.7 | 2.2 | 19.7 | 2.2 |
| 1977 | CAL | MLB | 37 | 37 | 299.0 | 3.95 | 107 | .234 | .276 | .337 | .422 | .270 | .263 | 93 | 29.0 | 3.0 | 29.0 | 3.0 |
| 1978 | CAL | MLB | 31 | 31 | 234.7 | 3.68 | 110 | .252 | .267 | .327 | .396 | .268 | .292 | 97 | 26.6 | 2.9 | 26.6 | 2.9 |
| 1979 | CAL | MLB | 34 | 34 | 222.7 | 3.56 | 122 | .239 | .279 | .339 | .424 | .273 | .266 | 96 | 42.6 | 4.4 | 42.6 | 4.4 |
| 1980 | HOU | MLB | 35 | 35 | 233.7 | 3.71 | 101 | .245 | .271 | .330 | .395 | .265 | .291 | 93 | 20.3 | 2.2 | 19.5 | 2.1 |
| 1981 | HOU | MLB | 21 | 21 | 149.0 | 2.77 | 126 | .206 | .271 | .333 | .392 | .272 | .246 | 96 | 28.9 | 3.2 | 32.7 | 3.6 |
| 1982 | HOU | MLB | 35 | 35 | 250.3 | 3.52 | 109 | .239 | .268 | .330 | .395 | .265 | .264 | 95 | 29.3 | 3.1 | 26.9 | 2.9 |
| 1983 | HOU | MLB | 29 | 29 | 196.3 | 3.80 | 102 | .224 | .266 | .332 | .395 | .267 | .247 | 94 | 19.5 | 2.1 | 15.9 | 1.9 |
| 1984 | HOU | MLB | 30 | 30 | 183.7 | 3.73 | 100 | .234 | .268 | .330 | .391 | .266 | .275 | 91 | 17.3 | 1.9 | 15.9 | 1.4 |
| 1985 | HOU | MLB | 35 | 35 | 232.0 | 3.84 | 96 | .246 | .266 | .333 | .400 | .267 | .293 | 91 | 17.3 | 1.8 | 17.7 | 1.4 |
| 1986 | HOU | MLB | 30 | 30 | 178.0 | 3.80 | 102 | .224 | .268 | .336 | .409 | .268 | .241 | 93 | 22.6 | 2.4 | 19.6 | 2.1 |
| 1987 | HOU | MLB | 34 | 34 | 211.7 | 3.44 | 117 | .213 | .275 | .344 | .431 | .270 | .282 | 92 | 43.7 | 4.3 | 40.6 | 3.8 |
| 1988 | HOU | MLB | 33 | 33 | 220.0 | 3.69 | 100 | .256 | .263 | .325 | .391 | .267 | .285 | 95 | 17.7 | 1.9 | 15.1 | 1.3 |
| 1989 | TEX | MLB | 32 | 32 | 239.3 | 3.29 | 126 | .218 | .266 | .330 | .394 | .271 | .258 | 103 | 50.1 | 5.5 | 50.1 | 5.5 |
| 1990 | TEX | MLB | 30 | 30 | 204.0 | 3.97 | 111 | .219 | .265 | .330 | .394 | .266 | .244 | 103 | 30.0 | 3.2 | 30.0 | 3.2 |
| 1991 | TEX | MLB | 27 | 27 | 173.0 | 3.70 | 117 | .206 | .267 | .333 | .411 | .273 | .230 | 99 | 31.8 | 3.4 | 31.8 | 3.4 |
| 1992 | TEX | MLB | 27 | 27 | 157.3 | 3.33 | 122 | .256 | .266 | .332 | .388 | .269 | .302 | 98 | 34.0 | 3.7 | 34.0 | 3.7 |
| 1993 | TEX | MLB | 13 | 13 | 66.3 | 5.45 | 83 | .251 | .271 | .338 | .407 | .264 | .246 | 98 | 4.9 | 0.5 | 4.9 | 0.5 |
| Career | MLB | 773 | 5386.0 | 3.65 | 106 | .237 | .267 | .332 | .397 | .269 | .265 | 94 | 623.0 | 67.0 | 605.2 | 63.2 | ||
| Year | Team | Lg | W | L | SV | G | GS | IP | H | BB | SO | HR | GB% | BABIP | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | WHIP | ERA | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | NYN | MLB | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3.0 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 33% | .571 | 15.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 18.0 | 2.67 | 15.00 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| 1968 | NYN | MLB | 6 | 9 | 0 | 21 | 18 | 134.0 | 93 | 75 | 133 | 12 | 40% | .242 | 6.2 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 8.9 | 1.25 | 3.09 | 4.0 | 0.3 |
| 1969 | NYN | MLB | 6 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 10 | 89.3 | 60 | 53 | 92 | 3 | 45% | .252 | 6.0 | 5.3 | 0.3 | 9.3 | 1.26 | 3.53 | 10.3 | 1.0 |
| 1970 | NYN | MLB | 7 | 11 | 1 | 27 | 19 | 131.7 | 86 | 97 | 125 | 10 | 48% | .228 | 5.9 | 6.6 | 0.7 | 8.5 | 1.39 | 3.42 | 0.7 | -0.1 |
| 1971 | NYN | MLB | 10 | 14 | 0 | 30 | 26 | 152.0 | 125 | 116 | 137 | 8 | 47% | .273 | 7.4 | 6.9 | 0.5 | 8.1 | 1.59 | 3.97 | 8.9 | 0.9 |
| 1972 | CAL | MLB | 19 | 16 | 0 | 39 | 39 | 284.0 | 166 | 157 | 329 | 14 | 47% | .236 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 0.4 | 10.4 | 1.14 | 2.28 | 20.9 | 2.4 |
| 1973 | CAL | MLB | 21 | 16 | 1 | 41 | 39 | 326.0 | 238 | 162 | 383 | 18 | 46% | .280 | 6.6 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 10.6 | 1.23 | 2.87 | 54.7 | 5.9 |
| 1974 | CAL | MLB | 22 | 16 | 0 | 42 | 41 | 332.7 | 221 | 202 | 367 | 18 | 48% | .255 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 9.9 | 1.27 | 2.89 | 24.5 | 2.7 |
| 1975 | CAL | MLB | 14 | 12 | 0 | 28 | 28 | 198.0 | 152 | 132 | 186 | 13 | 49% | .264 | 6.9 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 1.43 | 3.45 | 8.1 | 0.9 |
| 1976 | CAL | MLB | 17 | 18 | 0 | 39 | 39 | 284.3 | 193 | 183 | 327 | 13 | 50% | .270 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 10.4 | 1.32 | 3.36 | 19.7 | 2.2 |
| 1977 | CAL | MLB | 19 | 16 | 0 | 37 | 37 | 299.0 | 198 | 204 | 341 | 12 | 49% | .263 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 0.4 | 10.3 | 1.34 | 2.77 | 29.0 | 3.0 |
| 1978 | CAL | MLB | 10 | 13 | 0 | 31 | 31 | 234.7 | 183 | 148 | 260 | 12 | 46% | .292 | 7.0 | 5.7 | 0.5 | 10.0 | 1.41 | 3.72 | 26.6 | 2.9 |
| 1979 | CAL | MLB | 16 | 14 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 222.7 | 169 | 114 | 223 | 15 | 47% | .266 | 6.8 | 4.6 | 0.6 | 9.0 | 1.27 | 3.60 | 42.6 | 4.4 |
| 1980 | HOU | MLB | 11 | 10 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 233.7 | 205 | 98 | 200 | 10 | 48% | .291 | 7.9 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 7.7 | 1.30 | 3.35 | 19.5 | 2.1 |
| 1981 | HOU | MLB | 11 | 5 | 0 | 21 | 21 | 149.0 | 99 | 68 | 140 | 2 | 54% | .246 | 6.0 | 4.1 | 0.1 | 8.5 | 1.12 | 1.69 | 32.7 | 3.6 |
| 1982 | HOU | MLB | 16 | 12 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 250.3 | 196 | 109 | 245 | 20 | 54% | .264 | 7.0 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 8.8 | 1.22 | 3.16 | 26.9 | 2.9 |
| 1983 | HOU | MLB | 14 | 9 | 0 | 29 | 29 | 196.3 | 134 | 101 | 183 | 9 | 55% | .247 | 6.1 | 4.6 | 0.4 | 8.4 | 1.20 | 2.98 | 15.9 | 1.9 |
| 1984 | HOU | MLB | 12 | 11 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 183.7 | 143 | 69 | 197 | 12 | 51% | .275 | 7.0 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 9.7 | 1.15 | 3.04 | 15.9 | 1.4 |
| 1985 | HOU | MLB | 10 | 12 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 232.0 | 205 | 95 | 209 | 12 | 55% | .293 | 8.0 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 8.1 | 1.29 | 3.80 | 17.7 | 1.4 |
| 1986 | HOU | MLB | 12 | 8 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 178.0 | 119 | 82 | 194 | 14 | 47% | .241 | 6.0 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 9.8 | 1.13 | 3.34 | 19.6 | 2.1 |
| 1987 | HOU | MLB | 8 | 16 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 211.7 | 154 | 87 | 270 | 14 | 52% | .282 | 6.5 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 11.5 | 1.14 | 2.76 | 40.6 | 3.8 |
| 1988 | HOU | MLB | 12 | 11 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 220.0 | 186 | 87 | 228 | 18 | 45% | .285 | 7.6 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 9.3 | 1.24 | 3.52 | 15.1 | 1.3 |
| 1989 | TEX | MLB | 16 | 10 | 0 | 32 | 32 | 239.3 | 162 | 98 | 301 | 17 | 41% | .258 | 6.1 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 11.3 | 1.09 | 3.20 | 50.1 | 5.5 |
| 1990 | TEX | MLB | 13 | 9 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 204.0 | 137 | 74 | 232 | 18 | 38% | .244 | 6.0 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 10.2 | 1.03 | 3.44 | 30.0 | 3.2 |
| 1991 | TEX | MLB | 12 | 6 | 0 | 27 | 27 | 173.0 | 102 | 72 | 203 | 12 | 35% | .230 | 5.3 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 10.6 | 1.01 | 2.91 | 31.8 | 3.4 |
| 1992 | TEX | MLB | 5 | 9 | 0 | 27 | 27 | 157.3 | 138 | 69 | 157 | 9 | 35% | .302 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 9.0 | 1.32 | 3.72 | 34.0 | 3.7 |
| 1993 | TEX | MLB | 5 | 5 | 0 | 13 | 13 | 66.3 | 54 | 40 | 46 | 5 | 47% | .246 | 7.3 | 5.4 | 0.7 | 6.2 | 1.42 | 4.88 | 4.9 | 0.5 |
| Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993-09-23 | 1993-10-04 | DTD | 11 | 10 | Right | Elbow | Sprain | UCL Ligament | - | - |
| 1993-08-22 | 1993-09-12 | 15-DL | 21 | 20 | - | Trunk | Strain | Ribcage | - | - |
| 1993-05-08 | 1993-07-19 | 15-DL | 72 | 63 | Left | Hip | Strain | - | - | |
| 1993-04-15 | 1993-05-07 | 15-DL | 22 | 18 | Right | Knee | Surgery | 1993-04-15 | - | |
| 1992-09-28 | 1992-10-05 | DTD | 7 | 6 | Left | Hip | Strain | Glute | - | - |
| 1992-04-07 | 1992-04-30 | 15-DL | 23 | 22 | Left | Lower Leg | Strain | Calf with Inflamed Achilles | - | - |
| 1991-07-29 | 1991-08-19 | 15-DL | 21 | 22 | Right | Shoulder | Strain | - | - | |
| 1991-05-14 | 1991-05-29 | 15-DL | 15 | 13 | Right | Shoulder | Inflammation | - | - | |
| 1990-05-18 | 1990-06-06 | 15-DL | 19 | 18 | - | Low Back | Spasms | - | - | |
| 1986-07-28 | 1986-08-12 | 15-DL | 15 | 13 | Right | Elbow | Inflammation | - | - | |
| 1986-06-01 | 1986-06-24 | 23 | 23 | Right | Elbow | Sprain | Ligamanet | - | - | |
| 1984-09-21 | 1984-10-01 | DTD | 10 | 9 | Left | Lower Leg | Strain | Calf | - | |
| 1984-06-18 | 1984-07-03 | 15-DL | 15 | 15 | Left | Lower Leg | Strain | Calf | - | - |
| 1984-06-02 | 1984-06-17 | 15-DL | 15 | 15 | Right | Fingers | Blisters | - | - | |
| 1983-05-03 | 1983-06-07 | 35 | 30 | Left | Thigh | Strain | Hamstring | - | - | |
| 1983-03-26 | 1983-04-17 | 15-DL | 22 | 11 | - | General Medical | Inflammation | Prostrate | - | - |
| 1978-08-21 | 1978-09-06 | 15-DL | 16 | 11 | Left | Trunk | Sprain | Rib Cartilage | - | - |
| 1978-06-11 | 1978-07-05 | 24 | 24 | Left | Thigh | Strain | Hamstring | - | - | |
| 1969-05-12 | 1969-06-11 | 30 | 22 | - | Groin | Strain | - | - | ||
| 1968-07-30 | 1968-09-03 | 35 | 37 | Right | Hand | Blisters | - | - |
Compensation
|
|
Nolan Ryan is referenced in the following articles.
requires BP Premium access to view,
requires BP Premium or BP Fantasy access to view
| Date | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-26 13:00:00 | If Bryce Harper were a native Texan, would he be a combination of Babe Ruth and Ryan Braun (sans herpes medicine)? (Busty Olner from Chicago) | Combination of Babe Ruth, Nolan Ryan, and a plate of BBQ brisket with Stubbs all over it (Jason Parks) |
| 2011-11-30 13:00:00 | Me and my friend had a little disagreement the other day over Nolan Ryan. My friend thinks he's one of the top 10 pitchers of all time, I say he might not even crack the top 20. What's your take on it? (yankeesbg13 from Indianapolis) | The new JAWS figures have him 14th all-time, well ahead on career, but a bit behind on peak (64.1/32.3/48.2 vs the standard of 53.0/37.1/45.1). Having watched him throw his 5th no-hitter and caught several more starts where he gave it a good run, he's absolutely in my top 10 in terms of "If I could have a ticket to see one guy pitch." (Jay Jaffe) |
| 2010-07-22 13:00:00 | Tommy, how bad is it for baseball that the Rangers are still in bankruptcy court? And how likey is MLB to get involved under the "for the good of the game clause"? I kinda get the feeling Nolan Ryan's getting the shaft here. (Jquinton82 from NY) | Is it bad for baseball? I don't know. As long as most of the players and employees do not take haircuts on their contracts, and most bond holders come out mostly unscathed, I don't think it's so bad. Look at the alternative: Hicks is running the risk of completely ruining the Liverpool EPL franchise into the ground by his refusal to sell below his (very high) reservation price.
Bankruptcy exists for a reason, and that's the orderly resolution of insolvency. That is to say, it beats the heck out of the alternative. (Tommy Bennett) |
| 2010-05-25 13:00:00 | How tense are things between Nolan Ryan and his (as of right now) employer, Tom Hicks? (xxx from yyy) | Very tense. (John Perrotto) |
| 2010-01-06 13:00:00 | As an older Mets fan who fondly remembers Ventura for his grand slam single, and a young baseball fan who fondly remembers Ventura for charging Nolan Ryan. He deserved better than being one and done, right? (J.P. from Hartford) | Absolutely. I'm not convinced yet that he belongs, but as with Will Clark, Lou Whitaker, Dwight Evans, Bobby Grich and several others, I certainly feel the debate should have gone on a whole lot longer before anyone made up their minds. (Jay Jaffe) |
| 2010-01-06 13:00:00 | I'd like to make an argument for aesthetically pleasing baseball (for lack of a better term) being just as good reason to elect someone to the Hall Of Fame. The reason we love baseball is because it's amazing, exciting, and beautiful. There are some players who win ugly, and there are some players who don't help the team win as much as some would think, but are certainly fun to watch (Rice, Dawson, Nolan Ryan). Shouldn't there be room in the Hall for both? (Jim from Brooklyn) | I have no beef with Ryan being there. If your idea of aesthetics includes exciting long home runs salted among lots and lots of outs, where's Dave Kingman on your ballot? (Jay Jaffe) |
| 2009-12-15 14:00:00 | Will Nolan Ryan "cure" injury-prone Rich Harden by having him throw more? If Harden does throw more than 200 innings, is Ryan a genius? (Drew W from NoVA) | Ryan? You meant to say "Mike Maddux," and the answer to whether or not he's a genius is perhaps better answered by saying an exceptional technician is worth his weight in gold, which is why the Rangers filched him from the Brewers in the first place. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2009-10-09 13:30:00 | Happy to see Nolan Ryan is going to give Neftali Feliz a chance to start next year. Thoughts on implementing a Joba Rules type approach with him? (Corey from Fort Worth, TX) | I don't think the Joba rules should be applied to Joba, so no, not a fan. (Kevin Goldstein) |
| 2009-06-25 13:00:00 | Will the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim win the division or will Nolan Ryan's Manly Man pitchers be enough to carry the Rangers? (Bogomil from (Anaheim, Gm 2, 2002 ALDS)) | I still like the Angels, with 85 wins or so. I don't trust the Rangers' offense much more than I do their rotation. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2009-05-12 13:00:00 | Hi Steven. Do you think the Yankees should trade or release Veras and Ramirez? (Kevin from Texas) | My coffee finally arrived... It's easy to get frustrated with Veras and Ramirez, particularly the latter because he's so vulnerable to the home run. He's been a mess this year, with more walks than he can sustain, more than anyone this side of Nolan Ryan could sustain, and the longball rate is insane. He shouldn't be released, nor should Veras, but there's certainly an argument to be made for sending him down given that he's done just about nothing right so far. The question is, who do you replace him with? The Yankees have already sorted through Mark Melancon and Dave Robertson and are now looking at Brett Tomko for goshsakes. Steve Jackson sat in the pen for two weeks without being tried like he had been blacklisted or something... Veras's problem has always been control, and it's probably worth giving him more time to get it locked down again. Unlike Ramirez, he's not a gimmick pitcher. (Steven Goldman) |
| 2009-04-06 13:00:00 | The A's have taken Trevor Cahill and Brett Anderson, highly regarded pitching prospects with little experience over A-ball, and put them in the Opening Day rotation. The Rangers have taken Neftali Feliz and Derek Holland, highly regarded pitching prospects with little experience over A-ball, and put them in AAA, with Nolan Ryan saying they will likely initially pitch out of the bullpen when they do get to the majors. Which path do you think is preferable? (X from Y) | I lean towards the latter, although the pitchers in question are so different that the divergent approaches probably work best for each pairing. It's worth noting that breaking in pitchers in Oakland is much different than doing so in Arlington, so you can push the envelope more. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2008-12-23 14:00:00 | What's your take on Nolan Ryan's planned pitching expedition to the 1970s? Even if the Texas youngsters all avoid getting hurt will anyone follow them on the journey to 40 starts and 280 innings? (Cris E from St Paul, MN) | I like what Ryan's saying conceptually, because on some level he's right--one of the causes for today's offensive levels is the amount of mound time going to third-tier talent (or worse). I don't think we're going to see 40 starts any time soon, but he's right to want to return to relief workloads that aren't defined by the habitual pursuit of slivers of situational advantage that handicap your ability to manage and develop actual pitching talent. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2008-12-15 13:00:00 | How do you feel about Nolan Ryan's plan for his pitchers? I'm skeptical about whether more random throwing (such as BP) mixed in between starts and bullpen sessions will really lead to increased durability. It seems like these things were gotten rid of as part of an attempt to increase the control a club had over how much a pitcher used his arm. If that's the case, they'd actually know less about how hard their pitchers are working. Or is that line of thinking just indicative of how cautious we've become with regards to the position? (Rob from Brighton) | I like that he's got the right goal - more innings, but I'm not sure about the method. I like "throw more, pitch less" and I like that Jamie Reed and Keith Meister are involved, which will help them when they start seeing the inevitable burnouts. I don't like the idea of sacrificing some arms in the hopes that they'll get more innings across the board because those arms might be Neftali Feliz or Derek Holland as much as they're Joe Filler. I wish a team would take me up on a logical, individualized progression. One team discussed it with me, but it didn't go farther. I'm convinced on this one I'm right and no one's been able to say I was wrong. (Will Carroll) |
| 2008-11-19 13:00:00 | A lot of talk out of Texas about Nolan Ryan implementing a stricter conditioning regime for the pitchers, with pitchers expected to throw more and longer, including throwing live BP in the spring. Good idea? Bad idea? (X from Y) | We'll see. It's definitely a change and I think, as I said previous, that they're willing to break some to find some. If they break the wrong ones, this will look like a terrible idea. (Will Carroll) |
| 2008-10-24 14:00:00 | You've been pretty critical of the job Jon Daniels has done as Ranger g.m. Do you think Nolan Ryan, as the new team president, has made a mistake in committing to Daniels and bringing him back? (X from Y) | I thought Daniels did nice work at the 2007 deadline in trading Teixeira, and the Hamilton deal did bring back a superstar level talent whereas Volquez was probably unlikely to flourish under the conditions there. Those two things plus the Bradley signing buy him a bit of time.
The bottom line, though, is that the team needs to find a way to field a competent rotation as opposed to the doormats they've put out there. Yes, injuries have played a part, as have some of Daniels' clinkers. We'll see how Ryan's plan for the pitchers' improved fitness plays out - Arlington's a tough place to pitch and maybe they should explore moving the fences back to give their kids a break. (Jay Jaffe) |
| Date | Roundtable Name | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-10-06 10:00:00 | 2010 Playoffs Day One | If Buck Martinez would have read Ben Lindbergh's preview of this series, he'd realize all that talk about the Rangers' starters going longer under Nolan Ryan's plan is a bunch of BS so far. (John Perrotto) |
| 2010-04-05 09:30:00 | Season Opener Roundtable | Just caught up on the fact of the Heyward homer... well, that's up there with Will Clark's homering off of Nolan Ryan his first time up in terms of fulfilling expectations from his first live-game introduction. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2009-10-28 17:00:00 | 2009 WS Game One | Nolan Ryan was the first million/year guy, he's still in the game obviously. Wasn't Canseco the highest paid at one time? (Kevin Goldstein) |
| 2008-10-10 13:30:00 | Friday LCS | I know it's early and I shouldn't say this, but this game kind of reminds me of Game 5 of the 1986 NLCS, the one where Nolan Ryan and Dwight Gooden threw all those zeroes at each other... (Steven Goldman) |
BP Annual Player Comments
No BP Book Comments have been found for this player.