Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/generators/schema/article.php on line 52
keyboard_arrow_uptop

Alex Faedo, RHP, University of Florida
Seen in a 8 2/3 IP start on 2/24. Athletic body; lacks remaining physical projection due to age as well as current body mass. Pitches from a full-wind; compact arm action with a high elbow in the back; slight reach in the back; above-average arm speed; three-quarters slot; has crossfire; not the most athletic delivery and somewhat awkward but repeats it well and makes it work. Fastball 90-92, T94; velo dropped to 88-90 later in game; average arm-side life; uses it against righties well. Slider 83-85; future plus offering; late darting action; can get big at times and lose sharp break but should be a consistent plus pitch in future; used to both sides. Change 87-88; has quality arm speed; but lacks movement; has right idea against LHH in throwing on outer half away; should improve to an average offering down the road. 1.14-1.20 to the plate. Missed fall due to arthroscopic knee surgery on both knees; has not regained prior velocity; will have to be monitored going forward; if velo comes back is a middle of the rotation candidate.

Jesse Lepore, RHP, University of Miami (FL)
Seen in a 6 IP start on 2/24. Pitches form a Full wind; compact arm action with average arm speed; high-three-quarters slot; hides ball behind body adding to deception; creates steep downhill plane; tended to leave balls up and arm-side, suggesting a lack of coordinated timing. Fastball 90-92; has average cut action at times; inconsistent; should improve to average in time; more around zone then hitting spots consistently. Slider 79-82; large break and depth with early break; some had downer action but wasn't consistent; effective as an out pitch as well as for strikes. Change 77-81; quality arm speed; added deception helps the pitch play up; has some late fade; but lacks overall movement. 1.28-1.33 to the plate. Interesting starting pitcher; average across the board arsenal; command and control should play enough to suggest a starting role at the next level. See as a back-end of the rotation candidate with a bullpen fallback.

Pearson McMahan, RHP, St. John River State (JUCO)
Seen in a 6 IP start on 2/9. Lean, muscular body; has some physical projection remaining; lean in lower half. Pitches from a full wind; compact arm action with fair arm speed; three-quarters slot. Fastball 92-94, T95; lacked overall movement; didn't get swing/miss on fastball in zone; was able to locate for strikes later in game but struggled early; command not as sharp as it needs to be. Slider 80-83 T84; has depth; can locate for strikes as well as for whiffs; early break and can be slurvy out of hand but effective against both sides. Only threw one in-game CH at 83; lacked movement but showed arm speed on it; had feel for pitch in warmups and should improve with more repetitions. 1.2-1.28 SS. Intriguing young arm; drafted in 19th round as a freshman in 2016; quality FB/SL; but struggled with lack of strike-throwing and hittable fastball. Committed to Mississippi State.

Trent Autry, RHP, Florence-Darlington Tech (JUCO)
Seen in a 4 IP start on 2/9. Body needs to be monitored going forward—will always be a big kid but need to watch for added bad weight; large midsection; not a lot of physical projection remaining. Pitches from a full wind-up; steps towards 3B with crossfire; struggles to repeat delivery. Longer arm action with a slightly high elbow; three-quarters slot. Fastball 88-92, T93; some cut; added deception from crossfire in delivery; struggles with strikes. Slider 84-85, T87; flashed average with depth and tilt; others with small break and cut-like action; inconsistent at present but should improve with reps and working through delivery. No CH thrown; didn't seem comfortable with pitch in warmups. 1.03-1.13; too quick in slidestep which can hinder his control. Interesting arm; might be a candidate for draft next year but has some intrigue.

Colby Fitch, C, University of Louisville
Seen in 3 games from 2-17/2-19; caught Fri. & Sat.; DH Sun. Thick muscular build; lacks remaining physical projection; catcher’s body. Hits from an even stance with hands behind ear; good rhythm; leg tap for timing; below-average bat speed but has good contact ability; tough to strikeout; slightly uphill swing plane; understands the zone; approach is mainly opposite field to middle; but can pull a ball when a mistake is made. Average raw power now; has strength and loft on hit balls out from right to right-center; plays down slightly due to lack of overall bat speed as well as approach. Not a runner; 4.44 H-1B; not expected to steal bases. Average arm strength; 2.00-2.06; fair hands. Defense is rough currently; lacks consistency in framing and catching but has made improvements from game to game. Not an agile blocker; struggles with blocking balls in front in the dirt.

Drew Ellis, 3B/1B, University of Louisville
Seen play 1B and 3B from 2-17/2-19; played 1B Fri.; 3B Sat. & Sun. Large frame with a lean, muscular body; has some physical projection remaining. Hits from a tall, even stance with hands about halfway between ear and shoulder; above-average bat speed; slightly uphill swing plane with quick hands; approach is primarily pull-side but can spray to all fields; looks to pull the ball for power. Plus raw power; has bat speed and loft to take ball out from left to center field; plays down now but projects to play to plus in future given bat speed; contact ability; and overall approach. Not a runner; 4.42 H-1B; is athletic enough to take an extra base but isn't a base-stealing threat. Average arm strength that is accurate; plays at the position. Below-average fielder now; struggles with initial reads off the bat as well as lateral range. Has athleticism and ability to improve to average; soft hands. Played R-Fr. year in left field and projects to play corner infield this year; could play OF in minors to improve flexibility as well as versatility.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe