Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/generators/schema/article.php on line 52

I’ve been thinking about…Jurickson Profar. We’ve established that the 19-year-old is the top talent in the minors, and talk of a major league promotion is at the tip of many a lip within the industry. I’m all for the move, but my level of excitement is dependent on any developmental benefit of the promotion. Given his age and experience level, I’d rather see Profar playing every day in the minors than jump to the majors for the privilege of watching the rest of the team. That’s not to say that you can’t find value in such an experience, but if Profar is expected to be a major contributor to the major league squad in 2013, playing in the field and getting reps at the plate is more important than anything else. Voyeurism can only teach you so much. Of course, trading two weeks of minor league action for the major league experience isn’t going to retard Profar’s development.

The best possible situation would find Profar at the major league level, drinking in the experience while getting regular (semi-regular) playing time. I just don’t see this particular fantasy playing out without an injury to a middle infielder, as Profar isn’t going to steal at-bats from Andrus or Kinsler at this stage of the game. A utility role makes sense, but I do have concerns about Profar’s overall defensive utility; he has a very good glove with good actions, but he is still prone to the casual error and the postseason isn’t a good time to experience developmental pains. Don’t get me wrong: I love the kid’s skills. But I wouldn’t want to put an inexperienced teenager on the field in big games unless I was forced to. That’s just my approach. What would you do?

I’ve been thinking about…Kolten Wong. I receive a lot of questions about the diminutive second baseman, and in the last month, the general tenor has been more sour than sweet. I can understand why. In the first half, national voices sang his praises, and I suggested on multiple occasions and on multiple platforms that he had one of the best hit tools in the minors; at the time, Wong was hitting for average, showing surprising pop for his size, and looking the part of a prototypical number two hitter at the major league level, with a feel for contact and situational hitting. After slugging a respectable .432 in the first half, Wong has been hitting with an empty bat since July, making contact but not driving the ball with the same authority. I’ve been asked if Wong’s stock has fallen in my eyes. The answer is no. It’s quite common for players to deal with fatigue in the summer months of their first full season, and despite the fact that Wong has better strength than his size might suggest, he’s still not a physical specimen and the daily grind of the game will take its toll. The hit tool is still a major force, as his compact and balanced stroke has a knack for putting the barrel of the bat on the ball. The strength will improve, and the body/conditioning will adjust to the extreme schedule of professional baseball. Wong has the type of hitability that you just can’t teach, an instinctual relationship that allows contact in every situation and environment. He might not be an All-Star, but he’s going to hit for average at every level, and if he can improve his secondary offensive skills, he can develop into a valuable major league regular, and perhaps a first-division type if everything comes together.

I’ve been thinking about…”For Your Pleasure” by Roxy Music. Fantastic record. It’s always a cool scene when your love of art, your love of glamor, and your love of production can be satisfied by one source.

I’ve been thinking about…Gerrit Cole. I know the results haven’t been of the Bundy variety; the type of numbers that acutely reflect the quality of the arsenal. But Cole has quietly put together a very strong debut season, logging innings, missing bats, and limiting damage. Perhaps when you draft a player 1:1 you expect more than a quality workload and solid peripherals, but not every prospect explodes with the same intensity. Cole has monster stuff, including a near-elite fastball that can touch over 100 mph, a slider that is thrown harder than most fastballs with sharp tilt, and changeup that has a chance to be the difference maker for the big righthander in the majors. The control has been very good, and the command has taken steps forward, but the total package has yet to be delivered at the minor league level. Some are quick to point out that Cole lacks that secret ingredient that allows players with talent to blossom into superstars, a drive to reach an even higher plateau than becoming a millionaire athlete. I’m not sure what he lacks inside—and those concerns might prove to be legit—but I know what he possesses outside, and I think it’s going to be special. Cole is 21 years old, he owns three major league quality pitches, a power pitcher’s body, and a good feel for the overall process of pitching. I’ve watched him pitch a few times and I saw an arm with a chip on its shoulder, which is a good thing. I didn’t see the laid back SoCal kid that has everything a 21-year-old kid needs to be happy and the contentment that is bred from that. Instead, I saw someone who wanted to throw 100 mph and make hitters looks foolish. If he can put all the pieces together while maintaining that intensity and competitive edge, he’s going to be pitching at the top of a major league rotation within a few years.

I’ve been thinking about…writing an advice column for Baseball Prospectus. I’ve been kicking around the idea with our fearless leader and Editor-in-Chief, and I think it could be a funny weekly addition to the blog side of the site. First of all, it’s a pretentious idea and a pretentious format, so it’s perfect for a pretentious writer who enjoys finding pretentious formats. I receive a wide variety of questions and comments on Twitter, the kind that don’t share a connection to baseball yet are silly enough or strange enough to demand a response. It made me think: I’d love to give advice on subjects that I have little-to-no expertise or experience with, and I’d love for you to read that advice even though I’ll be providing inaccurate and often irresponsible counseling. Baseball questions will not be answered, but every other topic imaginable is open for submission. It’s ridiculous enough to have value……I think.

I’ve been thinking about…Jean Segura.  I was in Houston last weekend for a Baseball Prospectus event and I was able to watch the Astros take on the Brewers. More importantly, I was able to watch Jean Segura. I’ve been watching him for years on the backfields in Arizona, and I’ve always been a fan; that’s not to say I haven’t been realistic about his shortcomings, as I’ve been vocal in the past with the opinion that second base might be better suited for his defensive skill set. Segura’s body concerned me as well; he has thick legs that I thought would suppress range as he matured, and he has an injury history that didn’t form a happy marriage with the physical demands of the position. In Houston, I thought Segura looked fantastic at shortstop, and I thought he looked quicker and more athletic than I had ever seen him before. In the field, he showed very good range with a quick first step, reaching a ball hit up-the-middle. He was able to turn his body and get in proper position to make the throw. At the plate, Segura looked young at times and experienced at others, showing off his bat speed and barreling several balls in the two-game sample. I always liked his quick trigger, and once in the zone, Segura shows good bat control and can pack a punch when he makes contact. I’ve always had Segura graded as 6 runner, but I clocked him running a 4.0 from the right side, which is the fastest time I have on record for the 22-year-old. As I said, his body looked good and he looked quick and agile, and I really liked what I saw. I think he’s more of a 5 role player, a solid regular at the major league level. That’s not a knock on Segura, but I don’t see the type of big tools normally found with All-Star level talent. He is, though, a very nice piece to have on a roster.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
Oh good god yes please do an advice column.
I vote "Yes" for the advice column. The BP purists are happy, as the advice column would be relegated to the blog portion. The Jason Parks fans are happy, as they get their fix by reading your non-baseball musings.
Professor, I've been fortunate enough to meet you in person and I've read your columns for 2+ years at this point. There is plenty that tells me you would make a fantastic advice columnist, whether the matter at hand is fashion, relationships, music, or barbecue. There is, however, a nagging doubt I have that tells me that such an endeavor would detract from your value as a prospect evaluator. I don't know whether you've re-thought your dreams and aspirations in recent months, but if you haven't then I think you risk painting yourself into a corner as the resident spaceman at BP who writes cool fiction and has an awesome advice column...oh, and he does prospect stuff, too, I guess. Maybe I underestimate the abilities of MLB front offices to retain a sense of humor about the activities of their possible employees--I certainly hope I do. If I'm right, however, that's the risk you run.

That said, I think you should do whatever the hell you want. It'll be awesome, probably.
I don't think this is a totally unreasonable concern, but I do disagree with the notion that one cannot wear two (or more) hats and look good in them all.

I doubt that an advice column for the blog would in any way overshadow Jason's contributions on the prospect side of things, which have continued to be extremely strong even with occasional (and appreciated, from my end) forays into the more creative avenues for info-tainment.
Re the advice column: Doubtless many of us would enjoy your advice. But even moreso, I suggest an advice column responding to fictional submissions from baseball players. Who cares about my problems, but if you can get Randall Simon some therapy to deal with his fear/hatred of giant running sausages truly a mitzvah will have been done.
Advice column--uh, yeah! Snark and sensitivity in reasonable proportions, ideally. I trust your judgment as to what constitutes reasonable.

That said (a fave construction of the Professor), I would endorse almost anything that provided more avenues for Jason's writing.
An incredibly self-indulgent writer wants an advice column. Oh boy. "There's plenty of other content on this site," I keep reminding myself.
Plus plus
If only there was some way you could avoid reading such content. Like some sort of tool that allowed you click on only the things you wanted to view on the internet.
My favorite piece on this site was the interview you conducted with yourself. I vote for the advice column as long as you submit questions to yourself.

Ben - make this happen, please.
I love Roxy Music. Am I allowed to say that? Although, I tend to like Siren more than For Your Pleasure.
Advice column would even further distinguish BP from other lemming baseball sites out there. Most of us are not just stat geeks or irrational uber fans after all!

At some point this rash of prospect call ups will really backfire on some team/teams who go overboard. Trout is unique and needed some seasoning last year. As long as expectations are kept low for these guys for at least the first year or so, it is fine but that's generally not how fans roll. Love the younguns but realize how hard it is
I see a Dr. Ruth comp in Jason's future.
Oh yes PLEASE on the advice column.
Add me to the list of people who would happily read an advice column. . .
I've always felt "Beauty Queen" is the perfect litmus test for listeners with Bryan Ferry--and if they can't take his magnificently mannered vocal on that one, plus that sustained little Eno non-solo solo, well, they won't like Roxy Music much. And then there seems to be little reason for me to like them.
First off, yes, the world does need a Professor Parks advice column. If Dr. Phil can tell people what's wrong with them, why can't Jason?

Second, I didn't understand the talk of calling Profar up. Everything I have read and heard about him says that he could handle himself, but, like you mention, how would the Rangers use him?

If he gets called up after the minor league season is over, that might make some sense, but even then he would still likely be getting sporadic at-bats.

Given how plugged in you are to the Rangers, Jason, have they said anything about why they are bringing him up now?
The call-up [Profar] is under consideration. This article was speculative.
Yeah, but there were reports earlier this week they were debating bringing him up. That's my fault for wording the question the wrong way. It should have said: Why would they bring him up now? Not "why are they?"
If they bring him up, its either for the experience or because they legitimately believe he could make the team better (in some capacity). He's very young and he is far from being a finished product, but he's a talent injection and sometimes you can catch lighting in a bottle. You could also look at a promotion as a reward. Profar has emerged as the top prospect in the game, and bringing up him up (even if he doesn't play much) is a nice gesture by the team.