Two weeks ago, the Cincinnati Reds undid perhaps the best part of last
July’s trade in which they sent a broken-down Denny Neagle to the
Yankees for four prospects, one of which was erstwhile college football
star Drew Henson. Henson’s situation illustrates a problem far more
important for competitive balance than disparities in the free-agent
market: the vast differences in amateur and international signing budgets.

Several factors here made the Henson situation unique, so drawing broader
conclusions from it may not be as valuable as we’d think. One is that
Henson had first-round, if not #1, potential for the 2002 NFL draft, so his
financial leverage was significantly greater than most minor-league
prospects have. Another is that Henson was apparently willing to turn down
a contract from the Reds that, if it came from the Yankees, he would have
accepted. Those two factors combined to lead the Reds to believe that they
had no choice but to trade him.

Although the Reds clearly lost some leverage here, they made a huge blunder
in their deal with the Yankees by
acquiring failed bonus baby Wily Mo
. Not only has Pena shown almost no ability to hit in the minor
leagues, but his ludicrous contract requires him to be on the major-league
roster next year or be exposed to waivers. Granted, the Reds have shown a
predilection for players who don’t hit by trading for or signing
, Wilton Guerrero,
and Deion Sanders, but trading a
player of Henson’s caliber along with a useful fourth outfielder in
Michael Coleman and getting a total zero like Pena is unacceptable.

The Reds did have an alternative, which was to let Henson walk. Had Henson
decided to play football, the Reds would have retained his rights in the
baseball world, they’d still have Michael Coleman (who alone is more
valuable than Pena), and they wouldn’t have handed the Yankees a potential
future All-Star. They could have also tried to deal Henson elsewhere,
perhaps seeing if the Mets or Indians would offer Henson a package that
would have coaxed him out of a football career, although it is conceivable
that they determined that Henson was only going to play for the Yankees.

Several readers wrote to suggest that the Henson contract is more proof
that the Yankees can merely throw money against the prospect wall (or
prospects against the money wall) and see what sticks, whereas other teams
must be more judicious with their amateur and undrafted free-agent
signings. Although this is true, it’s less of a large-market/small-market
problem as it is a Yankees/everyone else problem, since the Yanks have been
more aggressive in signing these players than most teams. Regardless, New
York’s track record in this department isn’t strong, as only Orlando
has paid off so far, with Adrian Hernandez probably on
his way as well. They’ve been as successful with cheap finds like Deivi
as they have with million-dollar signings like Jackson

However, let us presume for a moment that, given enough time, the efforts
of the Yankees and Dodgers in signing international free agents to
big-money contracts does result in a decrease in competitive balance. (This
seems to be a rational assumption, since international free agents are
rarely signed in secret, leading to open bidding contests, and since they
are frequently younger than U.S. free agents and thus more likely to
produce positive returns on investment over the lives of their contracts.)
One simple solution would be to require major-league teams to place
free-agent signings with contracts above a specific annual or total value
directly on the 40-man roster, or to create a limited number of slots for
such players. Although this would slightly dampen the salaries of some of
these players by limiting demand from teams whose slots are already filled,
it would be far less damaging to those players than folding them into the
draft would.

Meanwhile, I don’t see the Henson situation as the fourth sign of the
baseball apocalypse. Right now, he looks like a pretty good prospect. He
also has just 54 walks in more than 650 minor-league plate appearances, and
he has missed a lot of development time by focusing some of his energies on
football. He’s not a sure thing, and if he doesn’t turn into the next
Scott Rolen, the Yankees will have poured a lot of money and
organizational attention down a toilet.

Keith Law is an author of Baseball Prospectus. You can contact him by clicking here.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe