The focus on the market for players in July can cause you to lose sight of what’s happening on the field. This hit home for me Monday, when I happened to look at a television screen and see “Mark Reynolds (32)” scrolling along the bottom. This didn’t register initially, because Reynolds wasn’t a trade target last month, and he’s been playing for a team in Arizona that has been irrelevant pretty much from the moment back in April when Brandon Webb was placed on the disabled list. Reynolds is best known for what he does when he’s not hitting homers: striking out. Reynolds set the single-season record for strikeouts in a season last year with 204, and is on pace to shatter that mark, pushing the record into the 220s, this time around.

This season, Reynolds’ productivity when not striking out is historically significant. We know that players with high strikeout rates, such as Ryan Howard and Adam Dunn, have to be very successful when they do hit the ball to sustain any offensive value. You won’t reach base enough to be a viable hitter if you can’t hit up over .380 and slug well over .700 when you’re not whiffing. Reynolds has done this, with a .446 batting average on contact through Monday’s games, and a .942 slugging average, both marks that, if sustained, would be in the top dozen on-contact seasons in baseball history.

Best Batting Average on Contact, min. 500 PA

Player           AVGoC    Year
Manny Ramirez    .478     2000
Babe Ruth        .478     1921
Babe Ruth        .455     1920
Ryan Howard      .455     2006
Hugh Duffy       .452     1894
Rogers Hornsby   .454     1924
Jim Thome        .449     2001
Jose Hernandez   .448     2002
Babe Ruth        .446     1924
Sammy Sosa       .446     2001

Best Slugging Percentage on Contact, min. 500 PA

Player          SLGoC     Year
Mark McGwire    1.082     1998
Barry Bonds     1.073     2001
Babe Ruth       1.026     1920
Sammy Sosa      1.002     2001
Babe Ruth        .996     1921
Mark McGwire     .994     1996
Jim Thome        .962     2002
Ryan Howard      .957     2006
Mark McGwire     .955     1999
Jim Thome        .953     2002

(Statistical research for this piece was provided by Clay Davenport and Eric Seidman. All stats through Monday’s games.)

As you might expect, the lists consist of a mix of players from the two slug-happiest eras in baseball history, about half from the 1920s-and at that, mostly restricted to Babe Ruth’s exploits-and half from the modern game. These were the two times in baseball history where strikeouts were even close to being acceptable, the first coming when Ruth’s power prowess changed the expectation of what batting could be, the second, our modern era, with its greater understanding of what strikeouts are, the byproducts of power and patience.

Reynolds’ 2009 is an outlier even among his modern peer group. His .446 batting average on contact this year is 17 points higher than what the next player, Kevin Youkilis, is batting. Reynolds’ power is even more impressive, as he’s slugging .942 when he puts the bat on the ball. Adam Dunn is second in that category with an .837 mark, and no other player is above .800.

It is because these numbers are outliers that we can expect Reynolds’ rate stats and value to decline quite a bit as we move into the home stretch. It’s not unheard of for a player, especially in today’s game, to bat .450 or slug .800 on contact. It’s also not common, and with Reynolds not making any notable progress towards cutting his strikeout rate, he’s more reliant than most on strong on-contact numbers. The ones he’s had to date in 2009 are not sustainable.

A look inside the data on Reynolds at Fangraphs among other sites suggests that he’s not really learning as a hitter. He’s swung at nearly one in four pitches he’s seen, an uptick from his career rate, and he’s missing more than a third of the pitches he swings at. His 63.4 percent contact rate is the lowest in baseball. That’s where all the strikeouts are coming from. He’s been drawing a few extra walks, pushing his OBP up to .369, and the value he gets from those is real, and the one definite skill we can see in his 2009 line. Those 32 home runs? Two in seven of Reynolds’ fly balls have cleared the fence, as opposed to less than one in five for his career coming into this year.

He’s catching a lot of breaks, being the same basic player he was last year but showing stronger stats. The gap between the skills and the performance makes Reynolds a strong candidate for regression in the season’s second half, something that would make a long Diamondbacks season that much more draining.

You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
How negatively do strikeouts effect a players value, or VORP? I know of course the obvious situations, don't move the runner up or in, but how does it effect the metrics? I've long wondered why players like Reynolds, Russell Branyan and Adam Dunn compare offensively to contact oriented 1B like James Loney. Surely Branyan is more valuable with a .250/.350/.500 line then Loney at .300/.350/.450.
Since that's an OPS of .850 for Branyan and .800 for Loney I'd say that's a pretty easy call.
Probably. But please, don't call me surely.
Surely Branyon is Russell's lesser known, Quad-A brother... played only up the middle positions.
They wouldn't let him play first base because of his war record.
Joe, I must ask. Why do you use Batting Average on Contact over BABIP, which you can at least use to compare what a player with his hit rates can be expected to do?
This whole article is centered on his HRs which are discounted with BABIP. Wouldn't have hurt to take a peek, though.
You've got a problem...Jim Thome can't have hit for two different sluggling percentages (.962 and .953) in 2002.
my guess is that one of the years is wrong. Perhaps, the other year was 2001 or 2003. In any case, good eye.
Those lists at the top of the article are interesting in that Jim Thome appears on both surrounded by Babe Ruth & a bunch of suspected/confirmed steroid guys. Obviously, no major-leaguer is above some casual suspicion given the events of the last few years--but Thome's got to rank up there with Griffey & Jeter on the list of top-players-least-likely-to-be-juiced, at least based on his reputation on & off the field even if his style of play & results are similar to some of the could-be-juiced guys. If one were to make the admittedly premature assumption that Sosa/Bonds/McGwire were juiced (none of them, of course, are admitted intentional users) & that Thome was not, it may be that in a non-steroid world, Thome would now be viewed as one of the three or four of most prodigious power hitters ever. As it is, he's just kind of lost in the shuffle of players from the era...