Red Sox/Angels

This game was so good, it got me to write about the day’s contests out of chronological order.

The weird thing about this game was just how Yankees/Red Sox it felt. With the cool night air, the extra innings, the slow pace-the first four innings took two hours after starting late, and it took four hours to play nine-all could have come right out of a 2003 or 2004 ALCS. Josh Beckett’s command problems even had the Angels working deep counts-his curve was the only pitch he could throw for a strike. All you needed were 462 cuts to a stern Derek Jeter and promos for shows that no one will ever wa…OK, the Jeter shots were all that was missing.

I can’t help but think, however, that the game didn’t need to go 12 innings. It seems to me that Mike Scioscia had ample opportunity to get the job done in nine, but he kept making the wrong choice. In the fifth, he had a tiring, moderately effective Joe Saunders holding a one-run lead, tying run on second, and Kevin Youkilis coming to the plate. There was little chance that Saunders was going to pitch into the sixth, and with three right-handed batters coming up, so there was not much tactical value to his continuing to pitch in the fifth. The Angels are carrying six right-handed relievers, and one of their key competitive advantages is the trio of power arms they have in their pen.

The only reason I can see for leaving Saunders in was the idea of having him pitch five innings for the win, because that’s what we do with starting pitchers. And as we’ve pointed out with things like saves, shutouts, and complete games, this winds up being a case of putting an individual’s statistic ahead of the team’s best chance of winning, in this case in the short term. Saunders, who admittedly could have been working on a shutout but for the Angels’ Keystone Cops handling of a short fly ball in the second, had put baserunners on in four of his five innings and worked many of his pitches from the stretch. Letting him face Youkilis and Jason Bay was giving the Red Sox an edge there was no need to give in a high-leverage situation.

Does the argument become more convincing when you consider what happened after his departure? Jose Arredondo retired five of the six men he faced, walking the other. Then Scot Shields retired all seven men he faced. Getting to those two with a lead, rather than a tied game, might have saved the Angels three innings of baseball, a bunch of pitches on Shields and/or Francisco Rodriguez, and put them in better position to win tonight.

Scioscia was also far too willing to go down with Erick Aybar, who can’t hit. In the seventh, Aybar came to the plate with two outs, two on, and Hideki Okajima entering the game. If Brandon Wood isn’t going to bat in that spot, why is he on the roster? Wood isn’t a star, but Aybar-all together now-can’t hit, and Wood can pop the occasional lefty. Aybar’s empty .262 career average was of little value in that spot.

(I realize that Aybar blooped a single in the 12th to drive in the winning run. It doesn’t change the fact that repeatedly letting someone who can’t hit do so in high-leverage situations is a bad idea.)

While he was acting as if Aybar was Barry Larkin, Scioscia was also using four players in the number six spot over the course of about 15 minutes. He ran Reggie Willits out to right field in the bottom of the seventh for defense, hit Kendry Morales for him in the ninth, then put Gary Matthews Jr. in afterwards. Why not just put Matthews in in the seventh, or for that matter, let Willits and his Slappy McOBP routine bat in the ninth? Morales is better than Willits at the plate, but not by so much as to warrant burning two players with one out in the ninth, not when you’re repeatedly letting Erick Aybar determine your fate. Willits is probably a better hitter than even Aybar is, although it’s close. The 80 points of OBP, career, may be swaying my appraisal.

Scioscia’s tactical judgment can be called into question, but so can his approach to the game. Perhaps you want to blame Torii Hunter, and only Torii Hunter, for trying to stretch a ninth-inning leadoff single into a double and getting thrown out by the distance between “FrankTV” and funny. I can’t argue with that. However, I have to think some of that decision to take the extra base is Scioscia’s influence, the way he wants the Angels to play. The problem is, the Angels’ nominal style of baseball is terribly ill-suited for their personnel. This is not a contact-hitting, take-the-extra-base roster. It hits for power, strikes out a bunch, and doesn’t run well. Maybe a 26-year-old Torii Hunter is safe at second. Maybe the 2002 version of Darin Erstad gets there standing up. But in October 2008, that play is just handing the Red Sox an out. At some point, Scioscia, aided by Tony Reagins, is going to have to either revamp the roster or instruct his players to stop running the bases as if there were no consequences. Since he can’t do the former by 8:30 p.m., I’d suggest the latter.

The Angels got their fifth run, the decisive run, on two soft singles wrapped around a sacrifice bunt. Yay. The other four came on a solo homer, a two-run homer, and a double followed by two walks. So while Chip Caray’s 11-second version of the word “manufactured” was entertaining, let’s not pretend that the Angels won last night for any reason other than that they played big ball. Remember: look past the storyline to what actually happened. Watch the game, think about the game, and don’t let anyone-whether on TV, in the newspaper, or at some web site for stat dorks-tell you that black is white. Or that the difference between closers and set-up pitchers is some character trait that one, but not the other, has.

That was the other interesting part about last night-Francisco Rodriguez. Do you think he cost himself a few bucks? Probably not, but he didn’t look like a pitcher I want making $200,000 an inning for my team over the next five seasons. He seemed completely unwilling to throw his fastball over the plate, which was noticeable given that Shields had just spent two innings beating the Sox with his, and Jonathan Papelbon was doing much the same during his time on the mound. Rodriguez’s pitch selection was the biggest reason why he loaded the bases and needed 33 pitches to get out of the tenth inning. I just don’t know that you can be a high-leverage reliever if you’re that reliant on a breaking pitch; I certainly question whether you can be a high-cost investment throwing a curveball with that kind of frequency.

It’s a first-game rematch tonight, with Jon Lester taking on John Lackey. Both teams had to lean hard on their pens last night; I might give a slight edge in this department to the Red Sox, who didn’t ride their top three quite as hard as the Angels did theirs, and who have a little more history of riding Papelbon hard when necessary. The one time Rodriguez went 30 pitches this year, however, May 20 in Toronto, he did come back the next night to throw a shutout inning.


What a weird series. The Phillies scored in just five innings, the Brewers bullpen was terrific, Chase Utley and Ryan Howard were lousy, and the Phillies still won in four games.

The Brewers’ inability to do anything at the plate was their primary downfall; they scored just nine runs in the series, hitting just one homer, Prince Fielder‘s solo shot in the seventh yesterday. They were helpless against mid-rotation guys Brett Myers and Joe Blanton, a continuation of the problems they had against righties all year-.210/.278/.284 in the series-although they were even worse against lefties, .200/.260/.200.

The Phillies/Dodgers matchup should be an excellent one. The Phillies are a better match against the Dodgers’ staff than the Cubs were, thanks to having better lineup balance. However, the Phillies don’t have the pitching the Cubs do, not beyond Cole Hamels. Not only should this be a long series, but it should be a highly entertaining one.

White Sox/Rays

The White Sox scored five runs without hitting a home run, which was the biggest upset of the day. That offensive outburst, keyed largely by Dewayne Wise‘s Hatcheresque run through the Division Series, was more than enough for John Danks, who pitched well yet again in a 5-3 win.

This may very well end up being a series in which the home team wins every game. Not only did the two teams have dramatic home-road splits during the season, but their relative strengths and weaknesses are magnified by their home parks. The White Sox didn’t use the long ball yesterday, but they do hit a lot of homers at the Cell, while the slow track hinders the Rays’ speed on the bases and in the field. Today’s matchup of Andy Sonnanstine and Gavin Floyd, a pair of fourth starters this year, promises to be the highest-scoring game of the series.

Of the two teams, the Rays are better equipped to survive a short start. After all, while the Sox are down to two relievers they trust-Matt Thornton and Bobby Jenks-Joe Maddon has a full complement of options. His bullpen has thrown 8 1/3 innings, allowing just one earned run, striking out 10 batters, and walking just one. Maddon can go after righties or lefties, get a strikeout or a ground ball, play matchups or get multiple innings… and 99.99 percent of America couldn’t name a single reliever he’s used in this series. That’s something GMs should think about this winter as they prepare their offers on Rodriguez, Brian Fuentes, and other relievers. Yes, Omar, I’m looking at you.

You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
Watching the White Sox actually successfully manage to run the bases aggressively was just bizarre, although they have been able to do that at times this year, the slow veterans and AJ are usually pretty smart about it. Even saw Jim Thome stretch a single to a double earlier this year because he was watching the play in front of him and noted that it didn\'t look like anyone was going to cover 2nd base. But a strange sight it was to see Thome, Konerko and Griffey all successfully tag up on a play. Their successful application of agressive baserunning probably got them the 2 runs that were the winning margin. Wise doesn\'t score the first run without stealing 2nd, and Griffey probably doesn\'t score on Wise\'s double without the tag-up. And I hope Ozzie doesn\'t push his luck too much, because I really doubt it will all work that well again. They need the big bats to be big bats today. Odds are good that too much aggressiveness today will end up running them into outs.
I was a little confused by Francona last night as well, letting the game end with Alex Cora at the plate in the 12th. I know that we heard all about how Sean Casey was the last bat left on the bench and all that, but if you\'re not going to use Casey there (vs. a righty \"reliever\" when you need an extra-base hit to tie the game), then ... why is he on the post-season roster?
Having eviscerated the Angels\' management style, Joe, any comments on the Sox management? I think Terry Francona is about as good a manager as the Red Sox could hope for given the various pressures the Sox managers have historically had to deal with, but that doesn\'t mean I don\'t have some quibbles: - I was surprised Beckett pitched the 5th, as it seemed like he\'d pretty much lost it in the 4th, and he gave up the game-tying home run and then a single in the 5th. Isn\'t this where you have Wakefield or Masterson come in to pitch 2 or 3 innings? - I thought it was weird that Ortiz ran for himself in the bottom of the 10th, inasmuch as he represented the winning run and there\'s no guarantee that he\'d hit again. It didn\'t make any difference, although Cora ran for Lowell later in the inning. I guess if they were ready to pull Lowell anyway then that would have left the offense even more weakened. - I was also a little surprised Masterson didn\'t come out to pitch the 10th, having thrown only 16 pitches and with Kendrick-Aybar-Figgins coming up. Okay, it\'s hard to argue going with Papelbon in a \"if we hold them off for an inning then we could just flat-out win in the bottom half\" situation, but I think the outcome of the game (the #5 guy in the pen gives up the losing run in the 12th) is an example of why it\'s useful to stretch Masterson to 2 or 3 innings when possible. (Or do I overrate Masterson?) Then again, with the Angels running themselves into outs, I think leaving Beckett in an inning too long is the big error here; the others are tactical details. P.S.: Geez, this was a long game.
Francona played the bullpen pretty well in Game 3. Not sure you want to ask Masterson to go another inning there and then ask him to come back against tonight. I know he threw just 16 pitches, but the Angels were starting to get into their righty/switch part of the lineup, which is not Masterson\'s strength. Francona is using Masterson very much like he did Arroyo in \'04 -- looking for stretches of righties and leveraging the kid in those spots. Plus, he probably figured that two shutout innings from Papelbon would be enough of a chance for the Sox to push one across. Francona got six shutout innings out of his four best relievers. In Game 2, he made two very poor decisions (leaving Okajima in for one or maybe two batters too many, and letting Masterson start the eighth -- those were two decisions that I was first-guessing) that bit him, but either by choice or circumstance, he didn\'t make those same bad decisions on Sunday. The decision to (finally) use Delcarmen is a good one. Delcarmen doesn\'t give up homers, can get lefties out with that changeup and plus fastball and strikes out a bunch. His only weakness is walks, but Paps is the only guy in that pen who isn\'t prone to the walk. Delcarmen should be used often for the rest of whatever\'s left of this series. Besides the Red Sox and Angels not being able to push across a run earlier, this game came down to Boston not having as good of a fourth starter as the Angels. Paul Byrd is eminently hittable and Wakefield is always a risk in the pen (especially since Cash was gone by the time Wake would have pitched in the 12th). Wake was probably on the roster only as a failsafe for an injured Beckett. So, I agreed (and still agree) with the decision to bring in Javier Lopez in the 12th, even against four straight righties/switch-hitters. It obviously didn\'t work out, but he got ahead and the Angels just managed to find two holes. That\'s baseball. I still think Lopez was the best option there. The bigger issue is that the Red Sox didn\'t have enough confidence in Mike Timlin or David Aardsma there to even put them on the roster. This has been quite a series.
Focusing only on the last sentence of Joe\'s column: I\'d rather see the Mets sign Fuentes for .6*(K-Rod money) than sign K-Rod. Aside from Wagner, whose injury will keep him out next year, it seems the Mets have a blank slate on which to write their bullpen plans for 2009. Here is a list of the nominal candidates, along with their career FIP and \'09 contract status: Heilman 4.09 (arb-eligible) Ayala 3.93 (arb-eligible) Schoeneweis 4.71 ($3.6m) Wise 4.31 (arb-eligible) Feliciano 3.93 (arb-eligible) D. Sanchez 4.37 (arb-eligible) Rincon 3.90 (FA) Burgos 4.88 (arb-eligible) Stokes 5.03 (team control) Joe Smith 3.98 (team control) --- Eddie Kunz (team control) Jon Niese (team control) Bobby Parnell (team control) Of the first group, the only players I\'d want back are Heilman and Smith. It\'s unclear how the Mets will use the pitchers in the second group. Kunz struck out 43 and walked 25 in 48 innings in double-A. Of the 39 hits he allowed, none were homers. I\'d add Kunz to the mix. Niese was great at double-A, then struggled a bit at AAA and struggled more in the majors. Probably best to send Niese back to the PCL for more seasoning as a starter. Parnell did not show anything special as a minor league starter or as an MLB reliever. He should spend his age-25 season back in AAA. So far only three pitchers have made our potential 2009 Mets bullpen: Kunz, Heilman and Smith. Smith is a ROOGY but the others are capable of pitching full innings. That means we are 4-5 pitchers short. Given the Mets\' need for a lefty bullpen arm, it\'s not unreasonable to offer Fuentes $8 million a year for three years.
Joe, Frankie\'s lost one game, nearly lost another and we aren\'t even through one series yet, but as you suggest, it won\'t cost him a cent - surely the Mets will pay top dollar for him. I\'m on the border line about playing Wood, but you are right - why put him on the roster if you aren\'t going to play him? The choice was between Wood and Sean Rodriguez, and I\'m glad he chose Wood and it\'s because of his bat. S. Rodriguez would have been a better replacement for Kendrick\'s defensively if he broke his hammy again, and offers more speed of the bench. And last night was a perfect example of why Mike likes to carry three catchers on his roster, but thank God this year, he knew Bobby Wilson wasn\'t ready. It worked out OK, but having Nap on 2nd in the 12th with the winning run wasn\'t exactly making me feel comfortable. I see your point about removing Saunders in the 5th but i\'ll just disagree with that one. He\'s a guy I want on the mound. And Papelbon also pitched a lot last night - he\'s the key guy in the Sox bullpen. Maybe Boston\'s pen is in better shape overall but i\'m glad Papelbon took most of the load last night.
What does \"mid-rotation guys\" mean? Joe Blanton undeniably falls into my intuitive grasp of the category, but not Brett Myers. Aside from his lousy (likely callowness-induced) start to 2008, Myers was a 188 and 120 ERA+ pitcher in his age 24 and 25 seasons, respectively (\'05 and \'06), a solid impromptu closer, and returned from a minor league stint with a string of 11 starts: 7-2, 80 IP, 17 RA, 69 SO/17 BB. It\'s hard to say that the Brewers performance against the tough RHP was hard to foresee, given his handedness and performance of late (including a 2 H, 1 R complete game on 3-days rest against the very same Brewers.) I suppose you could talk about his start, or his last two starts of the year which may signal a cooling off (although the lingering mechanical and psychological effects to the start on shorts rest are mitigating factors.) In which case, I can see the judgement that he is a mid-rotation guy. But to many, he was the opening day starter for this team. A guy who people thought could be an ace, but now is a solid #2 pitcher on most teams, I\'d think. I hate to echo the venerable Joe Morgan here, but one primary, general question concerning this Phillies team is consistency and reliability. Which Myers will show up? Which Ryan Howard or Pat Burrell? Even Ryan Madson, a shut-down 7th inning/set-up man of late had a ~10-15 IP stretch of inherited runner futility. Chase Utley SLG has disappeared. I could go on.
that \"188\" ERA+ should be \"118\" ERA+. Apologies.