Is this “the year” for the loyal legions of Cubs fans? Disappointment comes a little more frequently in Wrigleyville the last two decades. It used to be that just mentioning years like “1969” or “1984”—without providing a single detail—could cause a confidently well-perched fan in your nearest hoodie to tumble from his stool in despair. That’s no longer the case, not when we get to muck through the messier details of what hurt worst lately, the humiliatingly quick exits in 1989, 1998, and 2007, or the more elaborately agonizing NLCS loss in 2003, or their more infamous losses involving black cats or Leo Durocher or Gatorade-soaked gloves or Steve Garvey. Whatever the self-reinforcing certainty in circulation in the city that this year will be different, the Cubs come into the postseason with a team that makes for a study in contrasts when it comes to its assets: a broad and deep collection of hitters to attack the other team’s pitchers with, balanced against a stars-and-scrubs pitching staff that runs perhaps no more than six men deep before you start getting into trouble.

They’re matched up with a Dodgers team that comes with its own attendant narrative, although in their case the dominant theme is less about overcoming disappointment as much as it is managing a certain organization-wide schizophrenia. Whether you want to invest your faith in Joe Torre in the dugout, or Ned Colletti in the front office, or Logan White on the farm, the constant doubt over who’s really in charge or the facts on the ground as far as who’s really responsible for the various segments of the team has made sorting out whether or not there is a long playbook that everyone’s following a dubious proposition at best. Colletti’s mass acquisition of older veteran players contributed to the injury issues that made sorting out how to keep this team competitive a season-long problem, particularly Nomar Garciaparra‘s infrequent availability, Jeff Kent‘s slide into adequacy, or the inverse relationship between Andruw Jones‘ size and his productivity proving that too much of a good thing is true for ballplayers and bon-bons alike. However, just as Colletti had done his share of harm, in keeping with the franchise’s Sybil-like nature, he turned around and instead made a pair of productive deadline deals in July, first adding Casey Blake to stock the hot corner, followed by the almost miraculously successful coup of landing Manny Ramirez and then seeing him become Super Manny. Best of all, the deal eventually prefigured the Dodgers’ eventual recognition of the obvious, that playing Juan Pierre—and worse yet, leading him off—wasn’t conducive to contending.

So, it took a while, but the Dodgers may well now finally be a unit, the value of whose parts in a short series probably exceeds the team’s production over a whole season. With the seeming likelihood that Furcal is healthy and will lead off, the Dodgers can answer the Cubs with a lineup better than any they got to play with for any extended period of time during the regular season, a lineup that can go toe to toe with Lou Piniella‘s charges in offensive firepower. Add in that the Dodgers’ rotation boasts a pair of ace-quality starters of their own, and that the Dodgers have the one asset the Cubs lack—a bullpen as deep and talented as the Chicago attack.

The Dodgers may have finished the season with the league’s eighth-best record, but their inability to field their initially-designed team and then any set squad for any extended period of time makes it hard to evaluate them as a team as weak as an 84-78 record superficially suggests. They didn’t get here by decisively outclassing their mediocre NL West peers, only going 40-32 in divisional play on the strength of their going 11-7 against the hapless Padres. Dig down into the standings using BP’s Adjusted Standings and evaluate their season by strength of schedule and their own production using Clay Davenport‘s “third-order wins,” and you get an 89-win team, whereas the Cubs should have won 94 or 95 instead of 97. While 89 wins might not sound like much, it’s the fourth-best adjusted record in this season’s playoff slate. What initially looks like a mismatch tightens up; add in the changes in personnel on the Dodgers roster and the seeming arrival of a now-healthy Furcal plus closer Takashi Saito, and this squares up as a much more interesting series than a reference to their relative records would have you think


Dodgers                AVG/ OBP/ SLG   EqA   VORP
SS-S Rafael Furcal    .357/.439/.573  .343   24.5
C-R  Russell Martin   .280/.385/.396  .283   33.6
LF-R Manny Ramirez    .332/.430/.601  .344   83.5
RF-L Andre Ethier     .305/.375/.510  .304   39.7
1B-L James Loney      .289/.338/.434  .270   16.9
CF-R Matt Kemp        .290/.340/.459  .279   31.5
2B-L Blake DeWitt     .264/.344/.383  .262    9.5 @ 2B
3B-R Casey Blake      .274/.345/.463  .281   27.0

Cubs                   AVG/ OBP/ SLG   EqA   VORP
LF-R Alfonso Soriano  .280/.344/.532  .289   32.1
SS-R Ryan Theriot     .307/.387/.359  .263   27.3
1B-R Derrek Lee       .291/.361/.462  .279   29.6
3B-R Aramis Ramirez   .289/.380/.518  .297   44.7
CF-L Jim Edmonds      .235/.343/.479  .274   16.2
RF-R Mark DeRosa      .285/.376/.481  .291   31.3 @ RF
C-R  Geovany Soto     .285/.364/.504  .288   39.3
2B-L Mike Fontenot    .305/.395/.514  .304   24.2

In terms of team-level offense, again, cumulative full-season data portrays a mismatch that doesn’t give you a realistic appreciation of the lineup the Dodgers can now actually throw out there: the Cubs wound up with a .271 team EqA, good for third in the NL and fourth in the majors, while the Dodgers finished with a definitively mediocre .260, eighth in the NL and 16th in the major leagues. So, throw out those marks for what they might lead one to conclude, and instead take a look at these two lineups: neither one features an unproductive hitter in any of the eight slots. Admittedly, I’m indulging in some wishcasting by putting Furcal and DeRosa in their teams’ respective lineups. However, initial reports suggest that both are going to be available and start. In Furcal’s case, given the limited sample of his incredibly hot hitting in the season’s first five weeks, his more likely value is a bit overstated, but still, those are two lineups which offer their fans little or no cause for complaint.

If there’s a “surprise” to some of you in the Cubs lineup, it might be the absence of Japanese import Kosuke Fukudome, but between Fontenot’s slugging and the reverse gaijin‘s terrible second-half slump, it’s really a no-brainer. It’s also a reflection of Piniella’s in-season flexibility as a tactician: the skipper initially started relying on Fontenot and playing DeRosa in the outfield against opposing right-handed starting pitchers when Alfonso Soriano had to go on the DL early on, and it returned to his options menu on a regular basis once Fukudome’s bat went slack. Piniella also mixes in Reed Johnson in a straight center-field platoon (pulling Edmonds), and also hasn’t been afraid to spot Ronny Cedeno for Fontenot at second so that DeRosa can play right when he wants to avoid having any lefty bats in the lineup. In short, it’s a lineup that, outside of their quartet of right-handed sluggers (Soriano, Lee, Ramirez, and Soto) provides Piniella considerable freedom of in-game action. It’s old-school tactical adaptability in a competitive environment where such refinements have become virtually extinct, and it affords the Cubs the adaptability to either pinch-hit for position players or pull well-timed double-switches to avoid problems with in-game situational matchups.

That’s not to say there aren’t items of concern, above and beyond DeRosa’s injury. Since a red-hot April, Derrek Lee has been struggling to maintain even mediocrity as a first baseman, hitting only .275/.344/.415 since. Add in Lee’s ranking among the leaders in grounding into double plays, and he represents a first-order rally killer. Geovany Soto’s production also tailed off a bit in September, perhaps reflecting some natural fatigue. Similarly, Theriot’s to be found among the game’s worst, understandable given his grounder-generating tendencies at the plate; while some percentage of those numbers are the product of hitting second behind Soriano much of the year (with the breaks on the leadoff man to avoid exacerbating his leg injuries), it makes for some squelched opportunities given the club’s overall lack of speed. With only 32 unintentional walks in 506 PAs, Alfonso Soriano isn’t really an ideal leadoff hitter if your vision of one involves lots of free passes; in his defense, despite the reputation for not being able to bear down and drive in runners that contributes to his winding up in the leadoff slot, he ranks third among the team’s regulars in OBI% with 16.4 in terms of his rate of baserunners driven in.

The Dodgers’ lineup radically altered its fortunes with the Ramirez deal: in the two months since, they’ve averaged 4.6 runs per game after scoring 4.2 before. Even that understates the impact of adding Ramirez (and Blake, to a significantly lesser extent), in that the Dodgers were actually down to 3.7 runs per game in the 76 games after losing Furcal before adding Manny. That’s the kind of “production” which encourages you to try things like returning Nomar Garciaparra to short, but this is no longer the team running Angel Berroa out there on a regular basis. If Furcal’s really close enough to 100 percent, it isn’t implausible to suggest that the Dodgers are a five-run-per-game offense, ranking with the Cubs’ league-leading 5.3 clip. Getting Furcal back also allows the Dodgers to shift some things around, like getting to move away from picking between Kemp and the slumping Martin for the leadoff slot. It should put both players where their offensive contributions mesh more suitably: Martin’s OBP still should serve in the second slot, and Joe Torre’s recent attempt to rest his regular backstop will ideally provide some dividends, while Kemp’s ability to make contact and deliver consistent power on contact is more serviceable lower in the order. Batting Ethier and Loney back to back might seem unorthodox, since Torre’s big on alternating by handedness to protect himself against a situational lefty’s getting a good run of batters to face, but the Cubs don’t have a good lefty, so Torre can pretty much do as he pleases here. Ethier in particular could shine, between his post-Manny breakout (.360/.442/.640 from August 1 on) and the perhaps related willingness by Torre to leave him be. Loney may nevertheless get platooned and sat down in the fourth game (if the series gets there), in that his hitting against lefties (.249/.303/.361) provides a ready excuse for Torre to plug in either Kent or Garciaparra at first.

The problems are related to some of the points noted before with the Cubs. Martin’s real problem in the second half was that his power went away—hitting .260/.371/.336 is serviceable, but if he wasn’t hitting with authority, people are going to wonder whether Ned Colletti really should have given more thought to acquiring a reserve better than the execrable Gary Bennett or the equally well-traveled Danny Ardoin. If Derrek Lee’s a double-play threat, Loney has him beat, ranking third among all major leaguers in NetDP where Lee rates 12th. With relatively immobile hitters on base ahead of him, and with his season representing an already altogether massive disappointment for Dodgers fans, Loney gives this series a pair of first baseman as likely to wind up goats as heroes. Casey Blake’s production with the Dodgers looks nice enough, but after plating 20.6 percent of his baserunners as an Indian, he’s slumped to driving in a miserable team-low 7.6 percent with the Dodgers. I’ll leave it to you to decide what that’s supposed to mean as far as whether he’s clutch, unclutch, sort of clutch, or another reason why we should recognize that “clutch” is an adjective, and not necessarily a skill.

If there’s an odd, fun factoid to ponder, it isn’t often that you might be able to argue that two potent offenses are so strong top to bottom that their respective first basemen might be their weakest links, but that’s the funny thing about these two lineups—it’s almost true. Edmonds’ numbers are his combined totals with the Cubs and Padres, which take his overall Cub numbers (.301 EqA, 23.1 VORP) down several pegs. Sure, Theriot and DeWitt aren’t outhitting Loney and Lee, but they’re both contributing healthy doses of OBP from middle-infield lineup slots, and it’s harder to find those than first basemen a little light in the slugging department.


Dodgers                 AVG/ OBP/ SLG   EqA   VORP
OF-L Juan Pierre       .283/.327/.328  .246    1.0 @ LF
C-R  Danny Ardoin      .235/.278/.314  .208   -1.2
2B-R Jeff Kent         .280/.327/.418  .259   12.4
SS-R Nomar Garciaparra .264/.326/.466  .272    7.3
SS-R Angel Berroa      .230/.304/.310  .218   -3.7
UT-R Pablo Ozuna       .260/.290/.344  .214    NA

Cubs                   AVG/ OBP/ SLG   EqA   VORP
RF-L Kosuke Fukudome  .257/.359/.379  .261    5.6
CF-R Reed Johnson     .303/.358/.420  .264   12.4
MI-R Ronny Cedeno     .269/.328/.352  .237    2.0 @ 2B
PH-L Daryle Ward      .216/.319/.402  .247    0.1
C-R  Henry Blanco     .292/.325/.392  .244    3.0
1/O-L Micah Hoffpauir .342/.400/.534  .311    7.5
CF-L Felix Pie        .241/.312/.325  .231   -0.7

Whether or not DeRosa can go, expect Fukudome to spot-start against Billingsley, given his extreme vulnerability to lefty hitters. However, the import’s second-half slump (.217/.314/.326 since the All-Star break) makes for pretty dubious utility, even for platoon advantage purposes. Unfortunately, Ward isn’t especially playable in the outfield, nor is Hoffpauir should Piniella elect to keep the organizational slugger over Felix Pie’s uses as a defensive replacement and pinch-runner. Certainly, between Ward and Hoffpauir, Piniella would have pinch-hitting a-plenty. Johnson’s reputation as a speed player is really just a suds-soaked Wrigleyville pink elephant-level mirage—he’s what he was as a Blue Jay, a contact hitter with value against lefties, and stretched more than a little afield as Edmonds’ platoon partner in center. Blanco’s not this effective a hitter, but being gifted with garbage time makes for an easy way to avoid over-exposure; while he remains an effective catch-and-throw type, only anticipate seeing him if Piniella has cause to give Soto some time off, or elects to pinch-run for him. Even that’s unlikely, in that it would require a selection of Pie over Hoffpauir.

Now that Joe Torre’s belatedly sorted out that Pierre’s charms are better enjoyed as you fly far above them, the opportunity is definitely there to employ Pierre to best effect—as Manny Ramirez’s legs, perhaps, in the bottom of the eighth or ninth at home, or for any of the second base options, or Loney… you get the idea. The Dave Roberts-as-post-season-hero scenario isn’t that complicated, and it’s the one chance Pierre has to demonstrate actual tactical value on a scale that magnifies his virtues. Beyond Pierre, the Dodgers have Kent and Nomar to plug in anywhere around the horn (Nomar anywhere but second, Kent only on the right side), choose between as starting alternatives at first base against Ted Lilly, and use as high-leverage pinch-hitters. Again, it’s the postseason, so as with Pierre, set aside the expense and embrace their virtues. As for the rest, if you see Ardoin or Ozuna or Berroa on the field, we’re either in extras, or things are going very badly or very well (with no room in between).


Dodgers                IP     ERA  SNLVAR   SNW%
RHP Derek Lowe        211    3.22    6.9   .607
RHP Chad Billingsley  200.2  3.14    6.0   .592
RHP Hiroki Kuroda     183.1  3.73    4.9   .561
RHP Greg Maddux       194    4.22    3.7   .514

Cubs                   IP     ERA  SNLVAR   SNW%
RHP Ryan Dempster     206.2  2.96    6.8   .611
RHP Carlos Zambrano   188.2  3.91    5.0   .572
RHP Rich Harden       148    2.07    6.9   .676
LHP Ted Lilly         204.2  4.09    4.8   .546

Because the Cubs and Dodgers finished their season series against one another early on in June, it’s hard to know what to expect. Harden didn’t have to face this team, for example, but even if he’d been a Cub at the time, he wouldn’t have seen the Manny-enhanced Dodgers team, and by the time these clubs matched up against one another the first time, Furcal was already on the DL. Advantages may well go to the pitcher in these circumstances, but the interesting dilemma is that there’s a good amount of unknowns when it comes to how the Cubs’ rotation matches up with the Dodgers. They may have the name pitchers and the personalities, but here again this isn’t as cut-and-dried an advantage as it might appear at first glance. With the questions over whether or not Zambrano or Harden have gas in the tank, and reasonable doubts over Dempster’s performance against top teams, this almost becomes a matter of faith. Harden’s one of the best pitchers in baseball when he’s sound; will the careful management of him that Piniella exhibited during the regular season mean that he now opens up the throttle and leaves Harden in late, to avoid that ghastly pen? Will has noted that Zambrano’s inconsistency and arm-slot issues make him a bit of an adventure—can he rise to this challenge as he did in his no-hitter against the Astros, or is he worn down to a nub? Will the dominant pitcher that Dempster has been in Wrigley Field (2.9 RA/9 at home, 3.8 on the road) make all the difference in his first- and fifth-game assignments?

While there’s still a question over whether or not Maddux will start the fourth game of the series—perhaps if the Dodgers are up 2-1 at that point—the Cubs might consider that a mercy, because the Dodgers’ front three managed quality starts in five of six games against Chicago this season, with only Billingsley failing to. Lowe’s cruising, having logged 10 quality starts in his last 13 (and one of the three was a quick-hook tuneup to wrap up the regular season, throwing three shutout innings against the Giants). In that time he’s gone 7-3, posted a 2.09 ERA, allowed just 78 baserunners in 81 2/3 IP. Add in that he’s not showing the big platoon split from years past (and in a perhaps-related development, throwing his slider much more frequently), and the worm-killer’s enjoying his best-ever season as a rotation regular, and truly graduating to ace-level performance. Billingsley’s big-talent rep comes with a noteworthy chink in his armor: while he’s dominated right-handers by limiting them to .225/.283/.338 at the plate, lefties aren’t biting on his off-speed stuff, touching him for .263/.369/.391. Kuroda’s sinker/slider mix has similarly mowed down right-handers (.246/.292/.319 this year), making the Cubs’ righty-heavy lineup all that much more vulnerable.

Effectively, what this really means is that however great the potential for the Cubs’ starters to spin dominating outings—if Harden and Zambrano are at their best, and if Dempster keeps on keeping on in the Friendly Confines—the problem is that they might absolutely need for them to be, because the Dodgers have a hot trio well-equipped to attack a righty-heavy Cubs lineup, and almost equally likely to spin a dominant outing or two.


Dodgers                IP     ERA   WXRL    FRA
RHP Takashi Saito     47.0   2.49   1.95   2.85
RHP Jonathan Broxton  69.0   3.13   2.28   3.71
LHP Joe Beimel        49.0   2.02   1.31   3.44
RHP Cory Wade         71.1   2.27   2.84   2.36
RHP Chan Ho Park      95.1   3.40   0.85   3.76
LHP Clayton Kershaw  107.2   4.26   0.10   4.51
RHP Ramon Troncoso    38.0   4.26  -0.08   4.93

Cubs                   IP     ERA   WXRL    FRA
RHP Kerry Wood        66.1   3.26   2.23   3.20
RHP Carlos Marmol     87.1   2.68   5.15   2.37
RHP Bobby Howry       70.2   5.35  -0.08   5.34
LHP Neal Cotts        35.2   4.29  -0.02   4.88
RHP Jeff Samardzija   27.2   2.28   0.43   4.95
LHP Sean Marshall     65.1   3.86   0.62   4.05
RHP Jason Marquis    167.0   4.53  -0.28   4.82

The Dodgers might be the team that lost its closer for most of the second half, but it’s the Cubs whose second-half performance has been a major problem. As Jay Jaffe noted two weeks ago, positive pen performance for the Piniellans was a product of the season’s first part. In the first half, the Cubs’ pen finished an adequate 12th in the majors in FRA; in the second, they fell to 20th. In both the first half and the second, they had Wood and Marmol… and very little else; the Dodgers lost Saito and unsung middle-relief fireman Cory Wade for extended periods of time, and followed up their first-half performance (third in the majors in FRA) by ranking sixth in the second. In short, this is a unit with the talent to work around Saito’s likely limitation to not be available to pitch on consecutive days.

For the Cubs, this is very clearly a stars-and-scrubs setup. If they wind up trying to win games and matchups with Howry, Samardzija, or Cotts, they’ll be rolling the dice. While going after Ethier or Loney in key mid-game situations with a solid situational lefty makes sense, neither Cotts nor Marshall have been at all effective in the role. If, on the other hand, the rotation carries leads into the seventh inning, they’re into Marmol territory. And while Wood had problems getting lefties to bite on his breaking stuff as a starter, as a full-time reliever his slider seems to have added bite, on top of some added oomph on his fastball. In short, they’re the perfect tandem to protect late-game leads.

In contrast, the Dodgers have the depth and the talent in the pen to win a game in the middle frames, and can attack opponents with a broad assortment of weapons. Whether Cory Wade’s curveball and uncanny ability to work with men on base, Broxton’s pure power mix of mid-90s heat and high-80s slider, Beimel’s relative reliability, or Park’s starterly variety, Torre has an exceptional crew to call upon as needed. The interesting addition to the pen is Kershaw, perhaps in an altruistic effort to control his workload, but perhaps also more practically as a way to add an exceptionally talented lefty to the mix to work multiple innings in relief should a starter need to leave early. There’s also Troncoso, who clocks consistently in the 90s, but perhaps more importantly spared the Dodgers from keeping Scott Proctor because of his ability to keep throwing 90 and stay loose after warming up a couple of times in-game. Consider that kind of physical gift a sign of the times.


Score this a definite Cubs advantage, because they rank second in the majors in straight Defensive Efficiency, and first in park-adjusted defensive efficiency. None of the Cubs’ infielders are exceptional, but all are effective enough, while their outfield combinations, however often Soriano’s clumsiness causes scares, work effectively. Fontenot represents a slight upgrade on DeRosa at second, adding to the benefit that comes from playing him, even if it costs them Fukudome’s rangy play in right. Soto’s slightly better at deterring the running game than Martin, perhaps evening out the Dodgers’ slight advantage in speed among their top speedsters.

The Dodgers might be a storied franchise, but one important part of the story has been a willingness to move people around the diamond that borders on institutional, and not merely historic. Whether returning Nomar to short (out of desperation), trying Blake DeWitt at second (out of desperation), or smiling their way through Manny’s diffident play in left (need I repeat the obvious?), the Dodgers have been as gloriously indifferent to glove work now as they were in the Lasorda days, or even back when they were willing to make Davey Lopes, Bill Russell, and Steve Garvey move around the diamond because… well, it made sense. Admittedly, accepting Manny’s brand of cheery incompetence means that Kemp and Ethier wind up in positions where they’re not exactly exceptional, but with Kuroda and Lowe relying on ground-ball outs and Billingsley getting a healthy chunk of his outs at the plate, this is more survivable for the front three than it is for, say, Greg Maddux. The man who doesn’t help them any in the infield is Blake, but that’s less of a disaster if they have Furcal around to cover the hole at short.


As a true product of the ’80s, Piniella is easily the more nimble manager on offense, but given the Dodgers’ quality starting pitching and deep pen, he may well need to be to avoid losing control of games where LA’s pitching comes to the fore. In contrast, Torre’s willingness to ride relievers hard and play a relatively set lineup may serve him well—there’s plenty of junk worth avoiding on the Dodgers’ bench, and relegating formerly famous people like Nomar or Kent to high-leverage pinch-hitting roles might make either man a newly-minted Dodgers post-season hero. In terms of in-game tactics, neither is overly fancy—Torre hasn’t bunted much with position players not named Pierre or Berroa, while Piniella’s a bit more bunt happy with his non-pitchers (perhaps one of the side effects of having great-hitting pitchers like Zambrano and Jason Marquis). Both men let the players who can, run, but the distinction is that Torre’s got faster horses in Kemp, Pierre, and Martin. If a game goes to extra innings, the interesting problem there is whether Piniella’s variety and strength on his fully-stocked bench can beat the equally strong Dodgers pen, or if the relatively weak group of Dodgers reserves can help out all that much against the Cubs’ weak assortment of third-rank relievers pressed into second-rate responsibilities.


It’s that pen which might save the Dodgers from the kind of outsized matchup their fourth game might otherwise appear to be, because that might also spare them from attempting to start Lowe on short rest, something that has yet to produce a quality start in the four times it has been tried in the LA portion of his career. Nevertheless, I still see this winding up as a Cubs series win in five, perhaps something of an upset considering the relative perceived virtues of the two clubs, but a victory that will be worth watching and hard-fought. I guess if I sketch out a scenario and take it to some fanciful conclusions, I can foresee a split between the two teams in the Lowe/Dempster matchup, a Cubs’ win in the second game after losing the opener, a pitcher’s duel in the third game that comes out with Big Z adding something to his legend, a pen-led win by the Dodgers in the fourth game that involves some Manny heroics at Lilly’s expense, all capped by a Dempster gem for the folks at home. As long as I’m predictin’, may as well aim high, right?

You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
I\'m now terrified. Thanks a lot.
I\'m here to help. ;)
Wouldn\'t it make more sense to choose Hoffpauir over Ward? Ward had a pretty bad year at the plate; while he can still draw a walk with the best of them, that seems to be his only remaining skill. If Daryle Ward is considered essential for his veteran leadership, then that silliness has reached a new level. Plus, if a guy whose rookie card I bought in high school is now a veteran, then I\'m officially old.
Well, it isn\'t quite that easy. Ward struggled this year in the always-difficult pinch-hitter\'s role, batting only .145/.294/.291. That\'s lousy, yes, but in just 68 PA spread across 68 different games, it\'s not necessarily all that meaningful in terms of describing what Ward\'s able to do. On his career, he was a lot of experience in the role, and modest success, and that understandably carries some weight. I\'m not saying that means they shouldn\'t also keep Hoffpauir, especially if they wanted to give thought to spot-starting somebody for Lee at first, either Ward or Hoffpauir. Frankly, if there\'s an omission on the roster that I find controversial, it\'s Michael Wuertz.
While we\'d only be talking about 9-15 PA\'s, it might be worth mentioning the bats that belong to the Cub\'s pitching staff, especially Zambrano. In a short series like this, a few hits from the depths of the lineup can go a long way.
It\'s more than that. Jason Marquis effectively becomes Brooks Keishnick in this series, pinch hitting, pinch running for big D. Ward, or pitching long relief. Zambrano could also get a look as a pinch hitter in this series. Coupled with Furcal\'s shaky back and the very real possibility it could go, the Cubs have a fairly significant depth advantage in terms of possible position players.
A good point. I pondered that a bit where the decision to keep Marquis in particular was concerned, because between Big Z and Marquis, that\'s a pair of right-handed bats with some value. Seeing Zambrano against the Dodgers\' bullpen lefties in any of the games he doesn\'t start would be a sensible use of resources, to be sure.
Jason Marquis bats lefty.
So he does, shame on me, Tsuyoi.
And Big Z is a switch hitter who actually does a lot of his good power hitting from the left side.
I read all the predictions before posting and I have gone the opposite on them all. I assume once the Rays/White Sox gets posted, I will agree with that one as I am picking the Rays. But to the point, your analysis was spot with my thinking except that I just dont see Zambrano and Harden holding up. This puts them with Marquis and that middle bullpen on the mound for two games that will be two losses. All this without Lowe pitching which should be good for at least one W. Add in the Manny factor (he helped me win fantasy so I stick with what words), its just the edge the Dodgers need in a lousy 5 game series. PS. If the cubs were playing at Miller Park, I would have picked them in 5. ;)
Christina - do you see the loss of Kuo hurting the Dodgers? He was very good this year in the middle/late innings. Those guys can be VERY valuable in postseason play.
While Kuo\'s absence for the LDS round isn\'t good news, remember that they\'ve got Wade back in action and Kershaw pushed to the pen. I completely agree with your appreciation of Kuo\'s value, but I think the Dodgers are covered in the pen. I\'m impressed that their final roster includes James McDonald instead of Troncoso. As was, I was wondering early on if Torre would do something as silly as carry Scott Proctor as some sort sad doppelganger for Jason Grimsley; he couldn\'t resist that same thing with Ozuna-as-Clay Bellinger, though.
Great analysis, but one quibble. \"[Lowe] enjoying his best-ever season as a rotation regular, and truly graduating to ace-level performance\" is questionable. Lowe was much better in 2002--2.58 ERA in 32 starts for the Red Sox (in a much more difficult environment and with peripherals that matched) and third in Cy Young.
It\'s not a quibble, it\'s a point in fact, and you\'re quite right. I\'d meant to say \"as a Dodgers rotation regular.\"
I think Marquis is a superior PH comp to Pie, seriously. Nice writeup, Christina - I agree that today\'s opener may well go to the Torre\'s
Don\'t get too carried away, Pie struggled quite a bit earlier this season but had a terrific second half in AAA and appeared to sort out the long swing that was plaguing him in the first couple months of the year.
And while Marquis can swing the bat well for a pitcher, he OPSed 598 this year including 508 against righties. Pie could definitely outproduce that.
you\'re right Matt, his 08 numbers this year don\'t cut it but I could make a case for JM in a couple of prior seasons - and Pie seems real vulnerable to the out-then-in pitching sequence, something about his hands still seems off ... Pretty cool stat there - alltime series to date is 1012-1012
Big Z is scheduled to pitch Game 2, Harden will be the hero of Game 3.
Indeed, this change of gears changes the equation somewhat, but mostly in terms of my nit-nattering about specific events. I\'m sticking with Cubs in five, while noting that the really notionally cool upshot of this development is that it might set up the NLCS to lead off Big Z and then Harden in the first two games, assuming of course that they fulfill my Kreskin-like silliness.