“When you get right down to it, no corner of American culture is more precisely counted, more passionately quantified, than the performance of baseball players.”
–Alan Schwarz, from the introduction to The Numbers Game
All of us who appreciate the numbers that baseball generates understand that they have an inherent visual appeal. Whether it’s the simple “slash stats” in the familiar 3-4-5 pattern (.331/.417/.559 describing Stan Musial‘s career, for example) or an entire batting line from the back of a baseball card, for us the order, spacing, and shapes of the numbers themselves paint a picture of the players they describe. And from spray charts to spark lines to graphical representations of daily performance, we continue to find new ways to illustrate and appreciate the numbers of the game.
In a very small way, I hope to contribute in that vein this week by releasing version 2.0 of the Balls In Play Chart software I discussed at the end of 2006. In addition, we’ll take on a reader question and look at the size of the strike zone in the postseason.
Did You Say Free?
Some readers will recall that the BIPChart software breaks down all batted balls for hitters and against pitchers into fly balls, groundballs, line drives, and popups, and that it displays a percentage for each in a baseball field that appears on the left side of the window. It then further divides these into vectors based on the fielder who fielded the ball. Balls fielded by the third baseman, shortstop, and left fielder fall on the left side of the field, so they’re included in the slice to the left; those fielded by the catcher, pitcher, and center fielder are assigned up the middle; and balls fielded by the first baseman, second baseman, and right fielder are assigned to the right-side vector. The number and percentage of balls are then displayed on the diamonds for each hit type, as shown below for all left-handed hitters from 2003 through 2007.
Just as for the aggregate data, the data for individuals spans the 2003 through 2007 seasons, with hitters getting one set per year (except switch-hitters, who get two) and pitchers getting one each against lefties and righties. To find the player you’re looking for, you simply use the drop-down box in the upper left to start typing the last name of the player. You can compare individual seasons for a player by using the down arrow to scroll through each year.
New to this version are two primary enhancements. First, you’ll notice that on the different fields a batting average is displayed in parentheses after each percentage value, indicating the player’s batting average (for pitchers it’s average against) on the balls in play for that category. For example, for all left-handed hitters, line drives hit to the left side yielded a batting average of .657, while those hit to the right side resulted in a .729 average. You can also see that overall lefties hit .326 on balls in play, and righties .323 at the top of the diamond on the left. It should be noted that this definition of batting average on balls in play includes home runs, and so the numbers are typically higher than you might find on various baseball sites. In addition, these balls in play do not include bunts.
Second, you’ll see a button labeled “Grid Display” directly above the diamond on the left (it’s disabled in the screenshot above). When viewing a player line, the button will be enabled; when pressed, it will display a small window with the seasonal aggregates for that player. For example, when viewing David Ortiz, the window will display as follows:
To get started installing and using the software (which runs on Windows) you can click on this link to download the set-up program. By running the .msi file, you’ll be prompted to install the application in a folder on your machine; it will create a shortcut both on the desktop and in your Start/Programs menu. The only prerequisite for installation is the .NET Framework 2.0 runtime, which you can download and install from here.
I hope you enjoy the new version and, as always, I welcome your feedback. And just to throw out an idea: I’d like to gauge the interest in making this software auto-updating. For example, during the season the application would recognize the availability of new data on startup and download it, thereby giving you up-to-date information.
The Incredibly Shrinking Strike Zone?
At this time of year, you’ll often hear announcers and read mainstream reporters opining about the way the game is played differently in the postseason. From employing one-run strategies to using a quick hook, they make it sound as if the game is played under a different set of rules when the weather turns cold (and thankfully, it appears cold is the worst we can expect at Coors Field this weekend).
It turns out that same mindset also plays into some folk’s perception of how umpires do their jobs in the postseason. Typical of that view is this question from a reader:
It seems that strike zones are shrinking this postseason. Can you use PITCHf/x to see if balls and strikes are being called any differently in the playoffs?
Yes, sir, indeed we can. To start, let’s do a simple comparison of the ball and strike percentages in the regular season and postseason. To do this, we’ll examine all called ball (not intentional) and strike pitches that were recorded as reaching the front of home plate in a rectangle 30 inches wide, centered on home plate, and eight inches both below and above the reported strike zone for the hitter. As in previous columns, we’re using a definition of the strike zone where we count as an “impartial strike” any ball that comes within 2.5 inches of the regulation strike zone (an inch and a half accorded because of the radius of the ball and another inch for the error in the system).
For the regular season, these criteria yield 111,349 pitches out of 174,563, or 63.8 percent. For the postseason, this yields 2,389 pitches out of 3,787, or 63.1 percent. The results can be summarized in the table below:
Time CSPct CBPct AgreePct Regular Season 83.5% 85.3% 84.4% Postseason 82.8% 88.5% 85.5%
So what does this mean? In the regular season, umpires agree slightly more often with the regulation strike zone as far as calling strikes than they have thus far in the 2007 postseason. On the contrary, they do better on called balls in the postseason than they do in the regular season by over three percentage points. In other words, it would appear that in the postseason, umpires tend to call a slightly tighter strike zone than they do in the regular season.
From a statistical standpoint, we can say that there is a greater than 95 percent chance that the differences in called ball percentage are indeed real, although the other differences are not statistically significant at that level.
What this analysis doesn’t take into account is the actual umpires who have worked in postseason games. After all, it could be the case that the particular set of umpires who have worked the 24 postseason games thus far (this was done prior to game one of the World Series) actually call a tighter strike zone than do others. When we weight the percentages utilizing the distribution of umpires who actually worked the games, we come up with the following table:
Time CSPct CBPct AgreePct Regular Season 83.1% 89.8% 86.4% Postseason 82.8% 88.5% 85.5%
With that adjustment, the differences shrink and are not statistically significant at the 95 percent confidence level. In other words, this provides no evidence that umpires are systematically calling a different strike zone in the postseason than they do in the regular season.
Even so, I thought it would be interesting to look at the data for the umpiring crew who will work the World Series. The data in the table below includes all games for 2007, including the postseason:
2007 World Series Umpires Name Games Pitches CS Agree CSPct CB Agree CBPct Agree AgreePct Ed Montague 19 1825 855 737 86.2% 970 839 86.5% 1576 86.4% Mike Everitt 18 1613 753 638 84.7% 860 738 85.8% 1376 85.3% Ted Barrett 23 2167 1066 871 81.7% 1101 962 87.4% 1833 84.6% Mike Reilly 17 1641 762 638 83.7% 879 743 84.5% 1381 84.2% Laz Diaz 11 1013 521 419 80.4% 492 425 86.4% 844 83.3% Chuck Meriwether 20 1925 884 750 84.8% 1041 840 80.7% 1590 82.6%
Crew chief Ed Montague–who was behind the plate last night–has the highest agreement percentage, and would seem overall to call the strike zone most in agreement with the rule book. Laz Diaz and Ted Barrett would seem to have the tightest strike zones.
Finally, let me reinforce a bit of knowledge you already have, and see displayed in postseason telecasts on Fox, with a pretty graphic. Although the analysis above shows that umpires don’t call a different strike zone in the postseason from the one in the regular season, the operative shape of the strike zone differs from the rule book shape. This can be seen using PITCHf/x data and creating a hexagonal bin chart, shown here:
This chart summarizes 56,869 called strikes and plots their density using the polygons that are roughly the size of baseballs. The more yellow the polygon, the more strikes were called in that area; a bright yellow polygon represents about 2.5% of all called strikes. As you might have guessed, this illustrates that the actual strike zone is flatter and wider than the rule book definition, and sits a little to the low end of the rule book zone vertically. It’s also the case that the zone differs for left- and right-handers, as we’ve talked about on a previous occasion, but a display of that fact will have to wait for another column.
For now, let’s just enjoy the World Series, and hope that it provides a fitting end to what has been another exciting and entertaining season.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.Subscribe now