keyboard_arrow_uptop

The baseball world is abuzz with trade rumors that have a pair of
thirtysomething Hispanic right fielders with good power and suspect
defensive ability changing addresses. Juan Gonzalez and Sammy
Sosa
could be going to Boston, Toronto, the Bronx, Queens or possibly
even staying in their current cities, Detroit and Chicago.

Not to be a contrarian…OK, in part to be a contrarian…I’m going to
point out something that may ruin the fun: whatever happens isn’t going to
impact the standings that much, either for the team trading the star or for
the team acquiring one.

Over the course of a season, the very best players in baseball are worth
between seven and nine wins over an average player. In half a season, those
players can be worth, then, between three-and-a-half and four-and-a-half wins.

That’s the best players: otherworldly hitters like Mark
McGwire
; great hitters who play key defensive positions like Alex
Rodriguez
and Nomar Garciaparra; or great pitchers having their
best seasons, like Pedro Martinez and Randy Johnson. It’s not
unfair to say that Gonzalez and Sosa, while excellent players, are not in
that category. Both are corner outfielders who play average or
below-average defense and will hit at a .300 EqA level.

Sosa and Gonzalez look very good to the Yankees, Mets and Red Sox right now
because those teams are wasting at-bats on unacceptable corner outfielders.
But there are other players who would upgrade those at-bats for
considerably less than what either of the two famous guys will cost, either
in talent and in future commitments.

That last part is key: Gonzalez is a free agent after the 2000 season, so
trading for him without signing him to an extension sets up the possibility
of trading a lot of talent for 275 at-bats. Signing him to an expensive
extension, given his performance decline, age and single-dimension game, is
an even bigger risk.

Sosa isn’t a free agent until after the 2001 season, but he is a 10-and-5
player who is expected to demand an extension before approving any trade.
While a better player and a better risk than Gonzalez, he will also be more
expensive and probably require a longer commitment. Is it worth committing
$18 million a year for four to six years to Sammy Sosa when better, younger
players like Chipper Jones, Alex Rodriguez and Manny
Ramirez
will be available in three months?

(Free hint: No.)

If you’re the Tigers or the Cubs, history is not looking kindly upon you.
Teams that trade superstars in-season have generally done a lousy job of
acquiring talent that eventually contributes to a winning team. You hear a
lot about Jeff Bagwell-for-Larry Andersen and John
Smoltz
-for-Doyle Alexander, but those trades are exceptions. The
Mariners did well in trading Randy Johnson in 1998, but for every John
Halama
there are a half-dozen Marty Janzens.

The Tigers probably have to trade Gonzalez. He’s unlikely to re-sign with
them and he can’t help them do anything this year but hurt their draft
position. They should do everything they can to get a deal worked out,
focusing less on quantity and more on getting the one right
prospect–Nick Johnson or someone of that ilk–from the right suitor.

On the other hand, the Cubs don’t have to trade Sosa, and they need to
recognize that. Somewhere along the line, the time to make a decision on a
player who could be lost to free agency was moved up from the trade
deadline of his walk season to the winter before his walk season to, now, a
season-and-a-half before his walk season. The line runs from Randy Johnson
through Ken Griffey and Shawn Green and now to Sosa, and it’s
a silly trend that is easily stopped by baseball front offices.

The Cubs have Sosa signed at below market value through 2001. He’s a hot
property now, but this winter they can get more teams involved and make a
trade that really helps the organization. The sudden rush to move him has
more to do with a silly personality dispute than with any sound baseball
judgment. Recognizing that and backing away from a panic trade would be the
best thing they could do.

If either player is dealt, he won’t be the difference in the AL East race
or push the Mets into a wild-card slot. Over three months, he might be
worth a game or two over and above what his new team would have played in
his spot, while receiving credit well in excess of that for any success his
new team has. Keep that in mind when reading about the latest thing
whispered in the ear of a sportswriter.

Joe Sheehan can be reached at jsheehan@baseballprospectus.com.

You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe