This winter, we at the Baseball Prospectus have been very fortunate in that
some very busy people have been generous enough to give us some of their
time. Recently, Oakland Athletics general manager Billy Beane spoke with
our own Gary Huckabay about the philosophy and future of the Oakland A’s.

GH: Mr. Beane, you’ve been quoted in the media repeatedly about the importance
of developing offensive players that get on base effectively. A lot of
organizations, inside and outside of baseball, talk about implementing plans or
philosophies in their system, but the A’s seem to have really done a great job
at developing hitters with a good batting eye. Operationally, how have you
been able to align your organization towards that goal?

BB: There’s a lot of important steps. First, we look for players with a
good batting eye. We’re preaching the gospel of on base percentage to 16
and 17 year old Dominican kids. Then, from the moment they first put on an
A’s uniform, we teach the importance of getting on base. We can show the
players the results on paper – you score more runs if you have a high OBP.
The numbers bear out that correlation between scoring runs and getting on base.
And it’s easier to find runs than it is to find pitchers. There’s a reason
that casinos and insurance companies make money – the oddsmakers and
actuaries make the numbers work. We take the same approach to on-base
percentage — we can show the players the results in black and white.

The players need to know about this from a selfish standpoint, too. Would
they rather face the 10th or 11th guy on a staff because they got the
starter’s pitch count up, or would they rather face just the starter and the
closer? We preach on base percentage and slugging.

We have a minor league player of the week, of the month, of the year, etc.
We’ve had guys in the organization just tear it up, hit .400 with a bunch of
HRs and RBI, but if they don’t draw enough walks, they don’t win those
awards. Our target is a minimum of 10 walks per 100 at bats, and we
reinforce what we say about on base percentage – the players have feedback
and know it’s important to us.

GH: A few questions about some of the A’s prospects. What about Ryan

BB: Ryan Christenson’s a pedal-to-the-metal type guy. He plays hard all
the time, has great instincts, and he goes full out – almost like a Pete
Reiser. We drafted him pretty late, in the 10th or 11th round, but one of
my best scouts had him rated as a late 1st or early 2nd rounder, but he
slipped down to us in the draft. He spent most of 1996 battling some
injuries, but he basically came through the system in one year – he’s a
ballplayer. Plays like Rex Hudler, but will take a walk. Ryan will
probably start the year in Edmonton.

GH: How about AJ Hinch?

BB: Everything good you’ve heard about him in college is true. Real good
guy, confident guy, and a very good hitter. If he wouldn’t have been made
eligible for the expansion draft last year, he would have been up on the
major league roster. His makeup is really off the board. He’s a tremendous
athlete, kind of like Craig Biggio – probably athletic enough to play second
base. He’s not going to ever have an Ivan Rodriguez cannon for an arm, but
he’s going to be a good hitter, and I think with a lot of pop later on down
the road.

GH: Mr. Beane, thanks for taking the time to chat with us today, and much
success to you and the A’s in 1998 and the future.

It should be noted that Billy Beane called very late on a Friday afternoon
before flying down to Southern California, and patiently waited on the phone
while I pulled my dog in from running after someone. Way above and beyond the
call of duty. Thanks again.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe