Who were the best pitchers of the 1990s? Almost everyone would rank Greg
Maddux number one, and you probably wouldn’t get too much argument by
picking Roger Clemens number two, but after that it gets a little
more controversial. With the voting for the Team of the 1990s
in the home stretch, we thought it would be interesting to see who the
rate as the top starting pitchers of the 90’s.
Support-Neutral Wins (SNW) and Support-Neutral Losses (SNL) are the
expected number of wins and losses a pitcher’s starts would produce given
league average support from his offense and bullpen. We won’t go into
detail here about what the stats are and how they’re calculated. If you’re
interested in finding out more, we have a short summary and a long article that describe the measures and
compare them to other approaches to pitching evaluation.
We’ll rank the pitchers based on the number of Support-Neutral Wins they
had above what a replacement level starter would have had in the same
number of Support-Neutral decisions. This measure is called Support-Neutral
Wins Above Replacement, or SNWAR. We’ll use a .425 winning percentage
pitcher for our replacement level.
[Note: We don’t actually have the Support-Neutral numbers for 1990 and
1991, because we don’t have the game-by-game pitching lines necessary to
calculate them. Instead we’ll use an estimate based on innings pitched and
earned runs allowed.]
With that background, here are the 10 best starting pitchers of the 1990s:
SNW SNL SNPct SNWAR 1. Greg Maddux 172.8 79.6 .685 65.5 2. Roger Clemens 158.9 78.1 .670 58.1 3. Randy Johnson 141.3 79.3 .641 47.6 4. Tom Glavine 148.2 93.0 .615 45.7 5. Kevin Appier 130.2 73.7 .639 43.6 6. David Cone 133.6 81.9 .620 42.0 7. Kevin Brown 140.9 96.6 .593 40.0 8. Mike Mussina 121.6 70.5 .633 40.0 9. John Smoltz 137.0 94.8 .591 38.5 10. Chuck Finley 134.7 102.2 .569 34.0
There aren’t many names or placements on this list that will surprise
people. All of these pitchers have been active throughout all or most of
the 1990s, and all have been among the league’s best for most of that time.
If there are any surprises here, they’re that Kevin Appier finishes
as high as fifth and that Chuck Finley is one of the top 10.
Appier is underappreciated for a number of reasons. Until July, he had
toiled in obscurity for a crummy Royals team. That crummy team hasn’t given
him any run support, so his actual record (120-90) understates the value of
his pitching (130-74 Support-Neutral record) by a fair amount. And of the
pitchers in the top 10, he’s been the least effective recently, thanks to
But none of that should lessen our appreciation of Appier’s excellence in
the middle years of the decade. According to his Support-Neutral record, he
was the third-best starter in the AL in 1992, the best by a wide margin in
1993, fifth in 1994, fourth in 1995, eighth in 1996 and eighth in 1997.
Perhaps more interesting than the top 10 is a list of the
"also-rans", numbers 11 through 20:
SNW SNL SNPct SNWAR 11. Pedro Martinez 90.7 45.1 .668 33.0 12. Curt Schilling 105.8 69.6 .603 31.2 13. Andy Benes 123.7 105.5 .540 26.3 14. David Wells 113.5 92.1 .552 26.1 15. Jimmy Key 94.3 66.3 .587 26.1 16. Dennis Martinez 93.0 66.3 .584 25.3 17. Jose Rijo 75.2 43.3 .634 24.8 18. Jack McDowell 98.8 75.3 .567 24.8 19. Alex Fernandez 104.1 82.7 .557 24.7 20. Bret Saberhagen 82.0 53.7 .604 24.3
This list contains more surprising names because many of them are no longer
pitching, or no longer pitching effectively. The great performances by
Jimmy Key and Dennis Martinez in the early years of the
decade aren’t as fresh in our memories. Jose Rijo was practically as
good in the first half of the decade as Pedro Martinez has been in
the second half.
Speaking of Martinez, why is he here instead of in the top 10? Only because
of his late start; he didn’t become a rotation starter until 1994. Pedro
hasn’t pitched enough to accumulate the wins above replacement value that
some of the full-decade pitchers did. But if you look at his Support
Neutral Winning Percentage (SNPct), which measures the rate at which a
pitcher contributes expected wins to his team, Martinez is among the elite
of the 1990s, just below Maddux and Clemens.
While we were at this, we also generated a quick list of the top relievers
of the 1990s. This ranking is not based on Support-Neutral records, which
only apply to starting pitchers. Instead it is based on a modified version
of Pete Palmer’s Adjusted Pitching Wins (APW), which uses run prevention to
estimate wins added compared to an average pitcher. Unlike the starter
rankings, this list only evaluates 1990 through 1998.
IP ER APW 1. John Wetteland 536.3 151 9.8 2. Jeff Montgomery 643.3 225 9.0 3. Roberto Hernandez 508.7 170 7.6 4. Jeff Brantley 656.3 214 7.0 5. Mike Jackson 627.7 218 6.8 6. Mark Eichhorn 428.0 133 6.7 7. Rick Aguilera 627.3 249 6.7 8. Tom Henke 347.3 96 6.5 9. Eric Plunk 678.0 261 6.5 10. Trevor Hoffman 441.7 136 6.4
Once 1999 gets added in, there will be a few changes to the rankings.
Roberto Hernandez might pass Jeff Montgomery for second,
Mike Jackson would probably pass Jeff Brantley, Trevor
Hoffman would jump up a few spots and Mariano Rivera would
probably crack the top 10.
We were surprised by several of the names on this list. If you ask a random
baseball fan to name the top relievers of the decade, spelling out the
rough criteria that were used to make this list–lots of innings, few runs
allowed, sustained performance across the decade rather than good
individual seasons–you’re not going to hear the names Jeff
Brantley, Mark Eichhorn or Eric Plunk very often. The
more memorable relievers are those who have had dominating
stretches–Rob Dibble, Randy Myers, Dennis Eckersley,
Bryan Harvey, Mark Wohlers–but so many of them seem to fall
off the face of the earth after two or three years. It’s rare to find
relievers like Wetteland, Hernandez and Jackson who sustain their high
levels of performance over an extended period.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.Subscribe now