By: Meg Rowley
Plunking a batter is about being seen doing. It’s also an extra-judicial means of resolving conflict, but that’s not all. If this was simply a matter of settling accounts, there are more private places; we have parking lots. It isn’t enough to do. A baseball man must be seen doing.
1. Rick has seen this before. He’s lived a life. He wonders how we got here. What lessons could our fathers have taught us differently? What word might we use instead? Also, he’s just a little bit gassy. You almost always regret that last beer.
2. Jan has seen Giancarlo’s face. We don’t know exactly what she has seen on that face, but we do know that Giancarlo Stanton is 6 foot 6, that he is carrying a bat, and he has just been intentionally hit with a baseball. We also know that Jan looks nervous. She’s a cloudy mirror.
3. Kelsey was just hoping for a Giancarlo Stanton highlight.
4. and 5. This is the sort of polite concern that makes me think Marc and Janet are visiting LA from the Midwest, and aren’t sure of their obligations in this moment.
6. Riley: “Honestly, the thing that worries me is, impeachment is as much a matter of political will as it is anything else.”
7. Amy: “Totally.”
8. “Fools,” said I, “You do not know, silence like a cancer grows.”
9. Abigail smiled. It had been a long game, and nothing like what she had been led to believe. But it was finally happening. The fans would finally get their blood.
10. Austin Barnes has a very important question to answer very quickly: In the event that a bat-wielding, 6 foot 6, 245 pound Giancarlo Stanton charges his pitcher, how convincingly does he have to injure himself to avoid interceding without people thinking less of him?
11. Carlos Torres has just had the realization we all experience when a co-worker deletes part of the quarterly report: he has to do so much more of his job now.
1. Rick is burping. I’m glad they didn’t show us that. It would be embarrassing for him.
2. Jan has done an important bit of math; Giancarlo still has his bat, and Ross has thrown his one weapon away. Jan feels a duty to warn him. Look out, Ross! Of course, Ross can see him. Giancarlo is probably all Ross can see. It’s possible that he has never been more aware of his size relative to another person’s than he is in this moment. But on the off chance Ross is distracted, it’s ok. Ross has Jan.
3. Kelsey is just hoping for a Giancarlo Stanton highlight.
4. and 5. Marc and Janet would like you to know that this is not how they do things in Waukesha.
6. Riley sees Dave Roberts begin to sprint from the dugout, aghast that his pitcher would suffer consequences for intentionally throwing at someone, and worries that our sense of decency and shame is hopelessly eroded.
8. “Hear my words that I might teach you, take my arms that I might reach you.”
9. Abigail closed her eyes, breathed in. She could almost smell the blood in advance, felt the world pulse in expectation. This was what it was to be human, what it was to be alive. The world is a fire, Abigail nearly said out loud. The world is a fire and we must all burn.
10. Austin Barnes is wearing gear. He’s physically clad in armor. That has to count for something, right? Even if Stanton did try to go through him, he wouldn’t really feel it, right? His upper legs feel so naked and exposed all of a sudden.
11. Carlos Torres sighs. There’s going to be so much paperwork tomorrow morning, he just knows it.
12. A new face. This is Jim. Jim is amused because he knows Giancarlo means business. Of all your dad’s friends, Jim is your least favorite. Jim is the guy who sits back and says in a satisfied voice, “Oh you’re in it now” before watching you make avoidable mistakes as a young person.
On Keeping a Pitcher’s Notebook
By: Holly M. Wendt
“That lefty Travers,” the entry reads, “is most of the reason why the Toledo Mud Hens and I are separated today.” Clean road grays, clubhouse sofa, Indianapolis, 4:53 p.m., August, Saturday afternoon.
On Friday evening, Phillies radio commentator and former pitcher Larry Andersen recommended that Nick Pivetta—and other pitchers, especially young ones moving between the minors and the majors—keep a notebook. The suggestion was largely practical; a notebook is an excellent way to record important data about one’s own performance in one’s own particular idiom: which pitches are working best on which days, against which hitters? Where were the known mistakes and the known opportunities for correction? For a pitcher who may be in the position of balancing multiple kinds of successes and failures—the promotion and demotion cycle that so often hinges on more than one player’s performance—the pitcher’s notebook seems a worthy endeavor. But the radio clip was brief, scratching only the surface of such a potential notebook. Thus we turn to Joan Didion, sage advisor on the subject of notebooks.
Didion, of course, spends ample time interrogating the unreliability of such notebooks; the fallibility of memory and motive are central concerns of the essayist. She asks, “Why did I write it down? … How much of it actually happened? … It is easy to deceive oneself on all those scores.”
So it is with baseball—we spend our time as fans reliving this moment or that to reassure ourselves that we remember it correctly, though correctness and memory are not always close companions, and the act of collaborative memory is often a collaborative fiction.
But the pitcher’s notebook looks upon these questions in another way: Did the pitcher hit his spots and see hitters make still better swings? Or has memory nudged the recollection some inches inside or outside, the width of the catcher’s mitt’s webbing? One can double-check these memories now, certainly, but it’s the impulse that matters: seeing the ball where it was against the ego’s desire to see the ball where one wishes it was.
The heart of Didion’s essay is the undeniable fact that such a notebook is about the self, even if its subject matter appears to be external, for the lens of such a notebook “is always, transparently, shamelessly, the implacable ‘I.’” A pitcher’s notebook is not about the team. A minor league pitcher’s notebook is, most of all, devoted to ways to leave one team for another.
I remember wishing that I could stay in the show. “Someday you will,” he said lazily. “Someday it all comes.”
How to Combine Board Games with Baseball: Part 1
By: Patrick Dubuque
Fantasy baseball is fun and potentially profitable. But market research tells us that you, the reader, are thirty-four years old, which means that you’ve been playing the same fantasy sports for nearly twenty years now. It’s time for a change of pace. And that’s why Short Relief is bringing you the first in what will very probably be a one-part series: Board Game Fantasy Baseball.
Today’s example is the 1999 bidding game Ra, by prolific German mathematician Reiner Knizia.
Explained briefly, the game of Ra is played as follows: each player has a certain number of gold tokens of different values they can use to bid on tiles. There are many different tiles which do different things, are are worth points based on the combinations or the relative number each player has. Some of the tiles score in each of the three rounds, while others are only counted at the end of the game. Most points, as often tends to be the case, wins.
On their turn, each player can add a tile to the center, increasing the value of the haul, or start an auction on what’s currently there. Sometimes, the tile they pull will force a bid to begin automatically. What makes the game interesting is the asynchronous values both in what players have to bid with and the tiles they’re bidding on: a prize may be worth far more to one player than another. The challenge is in measuring this relative delta in value, and getting the most out of the bids the player wins.
How does this relate to fantasy baseball? Well, it can relate to anything. All auctions are essentially games, where the bidders measure the value of the prize against the value of their bid, along with the desires of their opponents. In our case, the tiles on the board can easily be replaced by baseball players.
With that in mind, Fantasy Baseball Ra:
Take an upcoming baseball game. Write the names of the players on both teams, hitters and pitchers, in a bag, including relievers and reserves. Devise a simple scoring method for evaluating their performance, like any points league. A system with some negative values (strikeouts and infield flies for hitters, earned runs for pitchers) makes for a better contest.
Give one player tokens with the numbers 9, 6, 5, and 2. Give the other player 8, 7, 4, and 3.
One by one, players may either pull a name out of the bag and put it on the table, or declare a bid on the present names. If there are three names on the table, bidding automatically begins on those three.
The other player picks a face-up token and puts it in front of him, bidding that amount, or passes.
The second player then makes their bid, either topping the first player or, in the case of a forced bid, also pass. (If you instigate an auction, and the other player passes, you must bid. Herein lies the strategy.) Whoever wins the bid puts his token face down and takes the names of the players. If the auction started because the center was full and no one wanted them, sweep those names away and start over.
When all players have made their bids, rosters are complete. Watch the game, assign values to the players drafted, and see who wins.
That’s it! Give it a shot. And if you don’t like it, buy a copy of Ra and just play that while the game’s on. It’s pretty fun, even if it doesn’t have enough baseball.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.Subscribe now