I’m going to type “it’s time to answer some reader mail” into AltaVista’s Babelfish, translate it from English to German, from German to French and then from French back to English. Then, I’ll take what comes out of the wash, translate it from English to French, French to German and then back to English. And we have: “it is a time, in order to answer to the station of the reader.” This entertains me.
Howdy, J.O. Your latter inclination is the correct one. Although Burnitz fits the power component of the Dodger Stadium prescription, he does not, as you suggest, pass OBP muster. Burnitz’s seasonal OBPs since 2001 have been .347, .311 and .299, which is not what you want from a corner defender–even one with good power. So, yes, the Dodgers were right to let Burnitz take his decline-phase endeavors elsewhere.
And here’s one more on the Dodgers piece…
I know that you’re all individuals at BP, but it seems that the consensus on the Rockies is that they should focus on getting good players rather than players that fit their home field. The position appears to be based on the historical results for Rockies hitters at home and away. From what I gather, they always hit well at home and strangely poorly away. Maybe the Dodgers don’t exhibit the same qualities, so the answer for them is different, but it seems that there is an explanation needed regarding your possibly divergent opinion.
Howdy, Josh. I really don’t think my opinion is all that divergent since we’re talking about different teams playing in wildly different environments. The problem with garden-variety Rockies cure-alls is that they advise investing in a breed of player that’s not all that valuable under normal conditions.
What you’ll often hear is that Colorado needs to lard up on contact types who put the ball in play and cut down on strikeouts. While there’s nothing inherently wrong with making contact and putting the ball in play at a high rate, such hitters often have a lack of skills in other, more important facets of the offensive game. Namely, commanding the strike zone and hitting for power. To boot, they’re often ground-ball hitters, which is not what you want in Coors. Put another way, a lineup full of Juan Pierres is going to lose to a lineup of Sammy Sosas almost every time, in any park.
In contrast, what I’m recommending for the Dodgers are hitters who knock the snot out of the ball and draw walks. Batters of that ilk will be just fine no matter where you’re playing.
Just looking for more info. In your article you showed the projected standings of the AL East and projected run scored and runs allowed. I would be interested in seeing the numbers for the AL Central and AL West. Is that info on the Web site somewhere?
Howdy, S.R. (By the way, S.R.’s referencing a recent Can devoted to the fortunes of the ’04 Blue Jays.) The PECOTA division breakdowns can be cobbled together by taking a peek at the uber-cool BP Fantasy Depth Charts, but I’ll save you the mouse-work. Here’s how PECOTA, which has a particularly soothing female British accent oddly reminiscent of an NPR foreign correspondent, sees the division races shaping up:
AL East Team Record RS RA Yankees 105-57 920 654 Red Sox 105-57 922 661 Blue Jays 84-78 856 826 Orioles 82-80 789 773 Devil Rays 64-98 712 900 AL Central Team Record RS RA White Sox 81-81 827 824 Twins 81-81 795 793 Royals 79-83 870 893 Indians 73-89 698 776 Tigers 65-97 726 896 AL West Team Record RS RA A's 92-70 791 686 Mariners 85-77 795 756 Angels 84-78 756 723 Rangers 78-84 845 883 NL East Team Record RS RA Phillies 94-68 835 705 Braves 82-80 774 761 Expos 80-82 884 891 Marlins 78-84 693 723 Mets 74-88 708 772 NL Central Team Record RS RA Astros 91-71 810 712 Cubs 91-71 728 636 Cardinals 88-74 782 710 Reds 74-88 781 857 Brewers 68-94 718 846 Pirates 68-94 669 799 NL West Team Record RS RA Padres 84-78 740 716 Giants 82-80 767 759 Diamondbacks 82-80 781 774 Rockies 73-89 808 896
And here’s a missive on the piece I wrote comparing a hypothetical Yankees-Red Sox All-Star team to the rest of civilization:
I was reading your Can of Corn article and was wondering something. How does Tom Gordon have such a high “value over replacement”, higher than Foulke, Dotel, Rivera??? Those three have had better stats than Gordon each of the past four years, with way less injuries. Ask any GM who they would rather have and I bet Gordon would be on the bottom of that list. Just wondering.
Howdy, Chris. While I can’t speak for PECOTA, I tend to agree with you that Foulke, Dotel and Rivera are better relievers at this juncture and certainly better bets for success in future seasons. If you own a copy of BP ’04, you’ll have a good idea of how PECOTA reaches its projections. I’ll just say it’s a fascinating process.
As for Gordon, well, he’s been a highly effective reliever for years now. In his career as a reliever, he’s posted a 3.31 ERA in 546 innings with 624 strikeouts and 251 walks. He’s also coming off a fine 2003 with the White Sox: 74 IP, 3.16 ERA, 11.1 K/9, 2.94 K/BB. Not bad, eh? I can’t say why PECOTA sees Gordon as being the most valuable reliever on NY-BOS United, but, given his fine track record, it’s certainly conceivable. Signing Gordon was a great, if roundly overshadowed, signing by the Yankees this winter.
You said in your chat that there will be pizza feeds in Austin and Houston. About time!!!!! When and where?? How much does it cost? Are girls welcome, or do we have to show up in drag?
Howdy, L.G. Yes, indeed: we do have bookstore feeds tabbed for Austin, Dallas, and Houston. They’ll all be at Barnes and Noble, with the Austin feed on April 6, the brand-spanking-new Dallas feed on April 15, and the Houston feed on April 16–7:00 p.m. on both counts. Cost? The pizza and the author signatures are free, and BP ’04 is a nifty $17.95. Get the details right here. So, yeah, all you BP readers in Texas, come on down and let’s chow down, talk some baseball and win some street cred for the flyover states. And yes, females are most welcome at all BP events.