American League

National League

Team Audit | Player Cards | Depth Chart
Return to Top

Signed RHP Jeremy McBryde; designated OF-L Roger Kieschnick for assignment. [11/7]

Jerry Dipoto adds his third pitcher of the offseason. Unlike Cesar Ramos and Nick Tropeano, who each had previous big-league experience, McBryde is (or will be) a complete newb to The Show. Despite compiling impressive minor-league statistics over the years, McBryde never received a look with the Padres or A's—two orgs that, it must be noted, know how to find cheap middle relief. Now he'll take his low-to-mid-90s fastball and slider combination to another team located in California, hoping in turn for a shot. Given that McBryde is now on the 40-man roster, there's a fair chance it happens. —R.J. Anderson

Team Audit | Player Cards | Depth Chart
Return to Top

Re-signed OF-R Chris Young to a one-year deal worth $2.5 million deal with nearly $4 million in incentives. [11/8]

That didn't take long. Young auditioned with the Yankees last season, hitting .282/.354/.521 in 79 plate appearance. Brian Cashman liked what he saw enough to give Young his second one-year deal with a New York-based club in the past year—although Cashman undoubtedly hopes Young continues to play like he did in pinstripes, rather than across town with the Mets. Odds are, Young will be somewhere in between—some power, some walks, some strikeouts, and a lot of infield flies. Still, he gives the Yankees cheap right-handed sock in a lefty-heavy outfield. Signing Young isn't a winter-defining move for Cashman, but it's a decent start to the offseason. —R.J. Anderson

Team Audit | Player Cards | Depth Chart
Return to Top

Signed OF-R Michael Cuddyer to a two-year deal worth $21 million. [11/10]

The Mets exchange the 15th pick in next June's draft for Cuddyer qualifying offer. It's an interesting decision, in large part because Sandy Alderson could position his team as a legitimate contender between now and April. At the same time the future is untold, and the difference between a defensible and indefensible signing hinges on the Mets' forthcoming moves—like, say, acquiring an upgrade at shortstop, be it Troy Tulowitzki or someone else.

Cuddyer is a polarizing player, largely due to the limited appeal of his game. He can hit, there's no doubting that; during his three seasons in Colorado, he batted .307/.362/.525 while offering production against lefties and righties. Unfortunately, almost everything else is in question. Cuddyer doesn't field well, and ought to be limited to a corner-outfield spot—although there's a case to be made that he should take some reps away from Lucas Duda at first base when the Mets face a left-handed starter. Then there's the matter of durability and age. Cuddyer has averaged fewer than 400 plate appearances in the past three seasons, and turns 36 in March.

In summary: Cuddyer would ideally be younger, more athletic, able to play a premium defensive position, and healthier. Oh, and he wouldn't cost a draft pick to sign. (Of course he wouldn't be available for $21 million over two years were all that the case, but that's for another time.)

Nonetheless, the Mets think Cuddyer can help them and they might be right. Should Alderson make a few more additions before spring rolls around—and remember, the Mets could now add another player tabbed with a qualifying offer while sacrificing just a second-round pick—he could run out a quality lineup and rotation. Given the roster's potential and the wealth of their farm system, there's a fair chance they won't miss the 15th pick as they hunt their first postseason appearance since 2006. —R.J. Anderson

Fantasy Impact

Michael Cuddyer

It should go without saying that Cuddyer’s fantasy value will decrease outside of Coors. His ISO away from the altitude was merely .136 in 2014 and .174 in 2013; however, we must be careful not to overstate the importance of leaving Colorado. He still hit .311/.367/.485 and .282/.316/.418 in away games the past two seasons, respectively. Worst-case scenario, that’s roughly what Torii Hunter did last year—.286/.319/.446 —and he was essentially a top-30 outfielder in ESPN leagues. Furthermore, Citi Field has played as a homer-friendly park for right-handed hitters since they adjusted the fences. If the fences are brought in even more, the concerns about his home ballpark wane even further.

Instead of focusing on the road/home splits, fantasy owners would be wise to focus on the injury history and the fact that he’ll be 36 years old next season. Emma Span highlighted Cuddyer’s checkered injury past on Twitter:

He’s reached the 500 PA threshold once in the past three seasons, and his age isn’t improving. Only two players (David Ortiz and Hunter) who were 36 or older ranked in the top-60 for OPS in 2014. That ain’t a pretty picture. I’m not sure we should be questioning whether Cuddyer can hit, if healthy. Given his age and history, it’s the latter part of the equation that should make owners’ knees quake in fear.

Eric Young Jr.

Given the presence of Lagares and Granderson on the roster, I’m working under the assumption that Cuddyer will primarily play left field for the Mets. Although the club doesn’t already have an everyday left fielder, Young did start 65 games there last season. The addition of Cuddyer should result in decreased playing time for the 29-year-old speedster unless the Mets attempt to shoehorn him into a different position.

Of course, as mentioned above, fantasy owners should probably expect Cuddyer to miss some time due to injury. Matt den Dekker is another candidate to steal some playing time in left should Cuddyer land on the disabled list, but as it currently stands, Young would be the direct beneficiary. The problem, however, is that he’s not someone to target until the hypothetical opening for playing time has occurred, as he will do little good sitting on your fantasy squad’s bench. Those valuable positions are better utilized on someone with much higher upside or even a platoon guy or two, even if the stolen bases are attractive on paper. —J.P. Breen

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
A good start to the Met's off-season, will need more, but certainly a decent start.
You may be correct but I could not believe the Rockies put the qualifying tag on Cuddyer and only foresaw him becoming the Drew and Morales of 2015. He is a big man and this body type tends to age rapidly once the inexorable decline begins. That can manifest itself by loss of skill or injury. I just cannot bring myself around to the idea that this signing will work out well for the Mets.
How many position players have ever played as few games as Cuddyer did in 2014 (49) at age 35 or later and come back and had at least one 2 WARP season, nevermind two? I don't know the answer, but I suspect it is a very small list indeed.
Not that it matters from a fantasy perspective, but Cuddyer likely won't play left. He's deaf in his left ear and has only started 3 games in LF (vs. 854 in RF) in his entire career. Presumably Granderson will shift to LF.
Cuddy's contract is estimated at $21mil for 2 years? Given the qualifying offer was 1 year at $15mil, the second year is a relatively humble $6mil, by MLB standards. "A bird in the hand", I guess, for Cuddy.

When you look at it that way, the second year may be a bargain for the Mets.
Buster Olney implies the Rockies knew of the Mets strong interest and that's why they tagged him. Smart move by Rockies then. But also, the Mets can now sign tagged players at a much lower penalty. Which is a weird but tangible advantage going forward.

Also I think we will see a lot of 1B platoon going with Cuddyer. The Mets need bats in the worst way. I wouldn't be surprised if they went after Robertson to close.
Is this the first move in the Mets trade for Tulowitzki?

Can't trade a draft pick? Sign Michael Cuddyer and send the Rockies one that way.

It would be risky for the Mets if that's the case but I would't rule out a gentleman's agreement here.