1. Most of what he did worked. Interleague play? Annoyed the traditionalists, made great bank. Wild cards? Annoyed the traditionalists, made great bank. A bunch of new stadiums? Annoyed the traditionalists, made great bank. The sport is in pretty good shape. Not a bad 20 years. —Russell A. Carleton
2. There was divisional play before Bud Selig showed up, but we never saw the meaning of the championship altered like we have in the last two-plus decades. If you look back on Selig's main innovations that concerned the season, each decision weighed the notion that the best team (or at least a great team) would be crowned champion against financial or other concerns. And each time, the meaningful champion lost.
Selig's tenure saw the expansion to six divisions, which can lead to subpar division winners, the addition of a wild card, the reintroduction of the five-game series, the unbalancing of the schedule and the invention of interleague play with different opponents. These all serve to create randomness and decrease the chances of better teams advancing. (The second wild card has effects in both directions on this.)
It's fine to say that this is fine. That sports are about who can win when it's time to win and if you take the randomness out and play a big sample of 162 with a champion at the end, then you're really just having a GM competition. Like it or not, Selig's reign established where baseball stands on this topic. It stands much closer to every other American sport, where everybody's welcome in the playoffs. That's where the money is. —Zachary Levine
3. Allan Huber “Bud” Selig, acting commissioner 1992-1998, commissioner of baseball 1998-2014. He had a complicated tenure that saw a host of good ideas, a series high-profile disasters and a tied All-Star Game in the middle. Selig will perhaps be most remembered for the Steroid Era and the subsequent prosecution of those users while conveniently ignoring the suppliers. Selig’s final legacy is muddled in opinion as we will define him fairly differently person-to-person. For me, it is a legacy that had its few bright spots dimmed by the specter of his failures. —Mauricio Rubio
4. The shrug that bored. The shrug that was ignored would be better, but it wasn't meant to be. Now, we have an All-Star Game that counts. —Harry Pavlidis
5. Most only ever saw him in a collared shirt. It was for the best. —Jeff Quinton
6. He never quite could say, 'Los Angeles'." —Craig Goldstein
7. Bud Selig ruled a sport of hypermasculine hulks, yet himself looked like Bill Gates after a three-week cleanse. He managed an industry that aspired to break into the youth market, yet was so old he might have once had classmates named Adolf. His primary task was to charm two disparate groups of multimillionaires and multibillionaires, to be the cool cat giving them center, yet himself never came off as anything cool, catlike, or remotely likable. That he accomplished so much and leaves the sport so strong should inspire us all. —Sam Miller
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.Subscribe now
Baseball can be enjoyed just because it's baseball. Bud Selig never understood that. He loved the game, but he was a businessman first, second, and third. For better and for worse.
Epitaph: "Hey, at least we're not hockey."
His unwillingness to enforce some basic rules -- the actual strike zone, time taken between pitches -- has led to the biggest problem facing baseball: There is too much time between the actual activities on the field. The younger people who are expected to support the game down the road aren't willing to invest 3+ hours a night all season long.
Won by losing, over and over again. Oversaw massive growth of industry, and tremendous profit growth, through no fault of his own. Made back-room deals with thugs, drug pushers in order to disgrace Hall of Fame player. Added second Wild Card, making farce of playoff race, in fact watering down meaning of word itself. Threw schedule grossly out of balance, in cash grab, making game harder to market nationally, messing with competitive landscape. Made huge rule changes in order to address previously-obvious problems, only after they bit him in backside. Botched installation of replay, creating creaky system and implementing it years too late.
Did some good with revenue-sharing. By most accounts, a nice guy.
Most of the bad ownership crises of the past 20 years are direct products of Bud. His hands were all over the Loria and McCourt messes.
No idea who this is, but Selig and "sins" sure go together well.
I seem to recall some previous articles and/or research on this very same site demonstrating that interleague play and wild cards did not in fact result in the financial windfalls that Selig claimed they did, in what was a sadly typical PR spin emblematic of all his pet projects.
Furthermore, I don't know any traditionalist who was upset by the new stadium movement as a whole. Virtually everyone is glad to be rid of those horrible multi-use facilities--many with Astroturf--that were built in the '60s and '70s in many cities.
People may rightfully object to how they were financed in Selig's high-stakes game of extortion with the various municipalities, but it's flat out deceptive to say traditionalists are against their mere existence. Traditionalists are the ones who most valued baseball-only parks in the first place, remember?
I used to think the idea of minimizing randomness was noble. Then I came to the realization that meant the Yanks win the Series every other year. Now I love me some randomness.
Look at the A's vs the Yankees (and/or the Red Sox). Brains trumps money.