So you want to bet on the Home Run Derby. Some people would judge you for that. I’m one of those people. Totally judging over here. But I do plenty of things that I could be judged for, so I won’t judge you for being judged. We’re all a little judgeable.

Unsurprisingly, there are people who will take your bet. This is, along with a couple other days this week, the most sports-barren stretch of the year. Among the daily bets you can make today: New Orleans Voodoo vs. Jacksonville Sharks (Arena Football League); Penrith Panthers vs. Brisbane Broncos (National Rugby League); and the Home Run Derby. If you choose the latter, these are the odds you’ll get:

I’m here to help you decide which of these people to bet on, if you insist. Armed with the list of Home Run Derby participants going back to 2000 (when the more-or-less-current format began), each participant’s first, second and third round totals, and a whole bunch of stats dumped into a spreadsheet, I’ve learned this:

1. Don’t necessarily bet on the guy who has hit the most home runs this year. Since 2000, the 16 batters who have entered the derby with the most home runs (sometimes tied with another participant) have won zero derbies. The 22 players who entered the derby with 27 or more first-half home runs averaged 5.3 in the first round; the 22 players who entered with 15 or fewer first-half home runs average 6.2 first-round homers. There’s some logic to this; a player who hit fewer home runs but still made the derby might be an elite hitter, like Miguel Cabrera (2006) or Miguel Tejada (2004) or Vladimir Guerrero (2007). But only a little logic. A lot of times it’s somebody who isn’t very good, like Chris Young (2010) or Hee-Seop Choi (2005) or Nick Swisher (2010) or Ivan Rodriguez (2005). Rodriguez made the derby because that was the year that every player had to be from a different country, to promote the World Baseball Classic. He had six first half homers. He had only 19 the year before. He made it to the derby finals and nearly won the friggin' thing.

Anyway, long way of saying: The correlation between first-half home runs and first-round derby home runs is actually negative (.08). Don’t bet on somebody because he has a lot of home runs this year.

2. Don’t necessarily bet on the guy who has hit the most home runs over the previous year and a half. This should be a pretty good guide to who the best home run hitter in the game has been; it’s a pretty substantial length of time. In fact, it is a pretty good guide to who the best home run hitter in the game has been:

That group of 14 won one derby title (in fields of eight). Two of them made the finals. The correlation between home runs over the previous year and a half and first-round derby home runs is negative (.08).

3. Don’t necessarily bet on the guy with the most Home Run Derby appearances. There have been 47 home run derby participants who have previously appeared in the contest. They have averaged 5.7 first-round home runs. There have been 66 first-timers; they have averaged 6.0 first-round homers. The correlation between previous appearances and first-round derby home runs overall is negative (evvvvvvver so slightly).

4. Maybe just bet on the fattest guy. Very little correlates positively to home run derby success. Weight does, a little (.17). So (almost imperceptibly) do height and career batting average (.05 each). And, in the inverse of numbers one, two, and three on this list, so do inexperience and smaller home runs totals. So aim for big guys without many home runs or much experience and maybe a good batting average.

5. Also, lefties. Lefties (48 of them) hit, on average, two more home runs in the first round than the 58 righties have, which is by far the biggest difference we found based on any variable. (Switch-hitters, a much smaller group, are worst of all, somehow. Small group.) Ten times a lefty and a righty have faced off in the final round, and the lefties have won eight of the 10. Some big lefties without many home runs and maybe a good batting average. There’s only one lefty this year, Justin Morneau. He’s fairly big. He has maybe a good batting average. Go with Morneau. Or…

6. Just flip a coin. In fact, there’s practically no pattern to the Home Run Derby. For instance, total home runs hit in the first round (by all participants) are negatively correlated (.35) to the run-scoring environment of the season. That is, in years when more home runs are hit across the league, fewer home runs have been hit by the home run derby participants. (This is fascinating, incidentally. If the league offensive environment changes, but the derby stays the same, it suggests that whatever variable is causing the broader change is something that isn’t involved in the derby. So not the balls. Not the stadiums. Not global warming. Not even the hitters. It points to pitchers, umpires/strike zones, or defenses, the three things that don’t exist in a home run derby.)

Further, the number of total home runs hit in the first round is negatively correlated (.20) to the ballpark’s park factor, so fewer home runs have been hit in hitters’ parks. That’s just ridiculous. The home run derby is ridiculous. It follows no form. You think Giancarlo Stanton will win because he’s so strong; he will not, or if he does it will be because he’s technically in the thing, but no more than Todd Frazier is technically in the thing and Brian Dozier is also in the thing, technically. So just pick the guy with the longest odds. Last year this would have netted you a small profit, Andrew Koo found. Don’t forget to spend some of your winnings on a BP Premium subscription.

* Bovada’s official style for Bautista’s first name. When did this start happening?

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
Don't think anyone actually calls him Joey Bautista. His nickname is Joey Bats. Or Joseph Bats when you're being formal.
I hadn't considered waging on the Home Run Derby before, but it actually sounds like a good idea to me. It may make a borderline unwatchable event watchable. I'll still have to make copious use of the mute button though.
Just don't forget, if you flip away during a commercial, to flip back back back back back back back
I audibly groaned at this, and now my cubicle neighbors are concerned. BP is going on the NSFW filter now.
Is that your first comment as the boss? Really thought you would've wanted to come out with something a bit stronger, or maybe you were just trying to lower our very high expectations?
#5 on the list has me thinking--do HR derby participants get to choose what type of pitcher throws to them? Do they always get the platoon advantage, or is there just one HR derby pitcher and it's the BP pitcher of the hosting team.
The player chooses, I think -- Yoenis Cespedes is bringing back Mike Gallego this year. (Which also shows that they don't always want the platoon advantage.)
That's interesting, thanks!
There are often some interesting choices among the pitchers... in 2011 Robinson Cano chose his father and Matt Holliday chose Yadier Molina as their personal pitchers.
Brian Dozier is using his brother as his pitcher tonight
Weird, I got Stanton at 11/4 for a red chip yesterday. Line shifted since I woke up?

I would have bet more but those NPB lines were so juicy today.

P.S. I am kidding about the NPB thing. The lines weren't juicy.
As always with Vegas odds, recognize the statistical impossibility. 2/1 odds mean a predicted 33% chance of winning (2 chances he doesn't win to 1 chance he does). That's why Vegas reports the lines in odds ratios, rather than percentages, because people have no idea what odds ratios are.

If you convert all of those odds to percentages, Vegas is predicting that there will be 1.33 winners of the HR Derby. Of course, there can be only one. If you adjust those odds so that they would sum to 1.0 winners, then that book believes that Stanton has about a 25 percent chance of winning, so they should be laying 3/1 odds, but they'll only pay out at 2/1.

The smart way to bet in these situations (not that books let you do this) is to back the losing side of the bet in all 10 cases. You will make 10 dollars minus the lain odds that the eventual winner had. (So if Stanton actually wins, your payout is 8 bucks; If Morneau wins, you are down 5). Probablistically, you will come out ahead because you are saying that there will be 9 losers (the truth) and Vegas is only saying that there will be 8.67.

Never bet against Vegas. They're better at math than you are.
What's the over/under on "Back, Back, Back...?"
I missed the 15/1 line on Justin Morneau. Currently on Bovada 10/1. Only lefty in the group and weather conditions should hurt the righties.
Stanton hits the longest homer is seeing some movement