Yesterday’s Shea Hillenbrand-for-Byung-Hyun
trade is many things, all of which can be summed in one word: Fun.

It’s a baseball trade, one in which the financial considerations are a
tertiary concern. It’s two teams getting together to exchange strength in an
effort to patch weaknesses, with an eye towards glory this year. It’s a
challenge trade: one-for-one, no cash, players to be named or future
considerations. I’m not ashamed to say that the deal put a real hop in my
step; there are so many angles to the swap, so many facets to be examined, and
so many ways in which it could go right or wrong for either team.

My initial reaction is that the Diamondbacks got the bad end of it. For the
second time in six months, Joe Garagiola Jr. correctly identified both a need
and a surplus, yet botched
the deal
(the first being Erubiel
for Elmer
). Hillenbrand is an average player, working on his second
season of .290/.330/.440 hitting with plus defense at third base. He’s better
than the ghost of Matt
, but only a moderate improvement on what the D’backs could
have gotten from prospect Chad
(.347/.401/.492 at Tucson this year, good for a .254 Major League EqA vs. Hillenbrand’s .278 this year and .277 last year). As badly as the D’backs
need offensive help, Hillenbrand doesn’t put enough runs on the board to be
worth the cost: a pitcher with a career ERA of 3.26 who has proven himself
able to fill just about any role on a pitching staff.

There are some markers in the D’backs’ favor. Hillenbrand makes less money in
2003 and has about a year’s less service time than Kim, so the Snakes will
save some dough immediately and can control Hillenbrand for an extra season.
That would mean more if the D’backs didn’t have Tracy coming up right behind
Hillenbrand, and if Hillenbrand wasn’t exactly the kind of player–solid batting
average, RBI total–likely to be overpaid in arbitration.

A more significant edge for the Diamondbacks is that Hillenbrand has a huge
home/road split, and not in the usual way: for his career, he’s hit
.259/.293/.359 in Fenway Park, but .308/.340/.505 everywhere else. With more
than 1,300 career plate appearances, that split starts to look meaningful. As
a gap-to-gap hitter who puts a lot of balls in play, Hillenbrand could benefit
from going to Bank One Ballpark, which is big up the middle and at as high an
altitude as any non-Coors park in MLB. If there’s one thing D’backs’ fans can
hang their hopes on, it’s that split.

There’s something else nagging at me. Despite the criticism of his work,
Garagiola’s history is that the prospects he trades away never amount to much.
I’ll have more on this in a longer piece next week, but as much bile as we’ve
heaped on his work, the fact is that only one player he’s dealt away–Tony
–has had the kind of career that makes you miss him. Some of the
guys Garagiola has traded have had good seasons here and there, but only
Batista stands out as being one that got away. After five seasons, 20 or so
trades involving at least a dozen top prospects and 15 other players, that
kind of record takes on meaning.

Now, Kim isn’t a prospect as much as he’s an established star (albeit an
unknown one), but does he look that much different right now than Brad
(4.24 career ERA) did, than Vladimir
(4.62 career ERA), than Travis
(742 career OPS) or Nick
or Jack
did? Think about how highly-regarded those players once were, and what
the reaction–even my reaction–was to those deals.

Anyway, I’ll have more on Garagiola next week. For now, though, his track
record has to be considered in evaluating this deal. He’s earned that.

When word of the trade first came down, I thought it was the perfect deal for
the Sox. Earlier this month, I wrote:

I didn’t see this coming. I was so enamored of the idea that the Red Sox were
abandoning the concept of the high-save closer that I ignored that fact that
they were missing a key element: The ace reliever who you want to funnel 100
high-leverage innings to, a guy who can handle the workload. The Red Sox lack the talent needed to make this work. There’s speculation that they’ll trade for Scott
, who is just the type of pitcher that they need: dominant
and capable of going multiple innings a couple of times a week. Williamson did
very well in Jack McKeon’s version of this bullpen in 1999, and would be a
great addition for the Sox, immediately becoming their ace reliever.

Kim is that kind of guy; he’s a dominant pitcher who is capable of making more
than one multi-inning outing in a week. He doesn’t have the platoon split he
used to carry, and he has enough of a repertoire that he can face a guy twice
without giving away the store. If I made a list of pitchers suited for the
role of relief ace a la 1976, Kim would be right there with Williamson and Octavio

When the trade first went down, I thought how unfortunate it’d be if Byung-Hyun Kim continued to push for a spot in the rotation, the way he had in Arizona–especially given Boston’s bullpen needs. At first it appeared that the Red Sox would acquiesce to that demand. The decision to acquire Kim had been
positioned as a patch for Pedro
‘s injury, which ignores the fact that you cannot replace
Pedro Martinez
. The marginal difference between Robert
or someone of that ilk and Kim, as compared to Martinez, is small.

If the Red Sox were to start Kim, they’d likely get 130 or so innings of varying
leverage from him. Once Martinez returns, John
would probably go to the bullpen, adding to Boston’s
unbelievable depth in second- and third-tier relief arms, and leaving them
with the same hole in the pen they’ve had all along.

But an article in today’s Boston Herald suggests the Sox will move Kim to the pen once Pedro returns. Quoth Sox manager Grady Little: “We feel when Pedro gets back and all of our pitchers are pitching well and doing the job, we’ll move (Kim) to the back end of the bullpen.”

Convincing Kim to relieve means they’ll get fewer innings–probably
something between 65 and 80–from him, but the vast majority of them would be
high-leverage. Having Kim in the bullpen would make the fabled Red Sox Bullpen
Plan of 2003 work in a way it hasn’t worked all year. He is the missing piece
to the puzzle if used that way. If the Sox change their minds use him suboptimally instead, that further closes the gap in this trade.

Happily, Kim seems OK–for now anyway–with the idea of working out of the pen: “I really love to be a starting pitcher but whatever the team needs–if the team needs me to do the closing role–I will do it,” he said. Sox fans should hope he keeps that view all year long. Kim added to that bullpen could cement the Sox’ position as the divisional favorite.

While the Sox do appear to win on a talent-for-talent basis, the deal weakens
their defense. Hillenbrand was their best defensive first baseman–faint
praise, I concede, but he was all right–and he was a key part of Grady
Little’s daily matching of the defense to his starting pitcher. Derek
, John Burkett and Ramiro
will lose a little because of this. Presumably second-base
prospect Freddy
(.391/.484/.577) will be promoted (fun fact: the Sox have used
just 13 position players all season), but he has no experience at third base.

More importantly, trading Hillenbrand makes this team heavily reliant on Bill
. Now, Mueller was a great signing, and his .382/.441/.625 bat
is a big reason why the Sox are in first place and sending Hillenbrand west.
However, he has an extensive injury history, and has missed large parts of
three of the past four seasons. His knees, healthy so far, are a source of
constant concern. If Mueller had to miss time, Kevin
could play third base, which would be unpleasant defensively.
Millar also now gets the right-handed at-bats at first base. While Millar has
a reputation as a professional hitter, his bat is nothing special for a first
baseman and he’s no great shakes with the glove, either.

The Sox should come out ahead in this deal, because they’ve acquired the
better player. It’s not clear-cut, however, because the marginal
edges–and the potential for surprise–go to the Diamondbacks.

Not knowing. That’s the most fun of all.

You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe