Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/generators/schema/article.php on line 52

I have two distinct memories of April 29, 2009. One is that Jerry Manuel, then with the Mets, made the single worst managerial decision I’ve ever seen. The other is that what should have been a treat—a Mets fan then living in Boston treated to a rare nationally televised game in resplendent high definition—was somewhat soured by the commentary of then-ESPN analyst and former Mets GM Steve Phillips, whose aesthetically pleasing screen presence was overshadowed by the negative associations of his time with the team.

Late in the game, talk turned to Phillips’ tenure as Mets general manager (which lasted from 1997-2003, or as I like to call it, forever). Phillips said some interesting things about having to learn to run an office and handle a large-market press corps and added a few other nuggets to remind us that being a GM would be much easier if it really were all spreadsheets and video. What he said next, though—a little side comment you’ve surely heard from your favorite team’s general manager, star player, manager, or owner—has stuck with me ever since. This was over three years ago, so allow me to paraphrase somewhat:

               Mets fans are the smartest fans in the game. They won’t tolerate a loser.

I don’t blame Phillips for saying this, nor do I think he meant anything by it other than to explain the pressures of his job. But when someone you don’t know throws you an unexpected compliment, you aren’t a cynic for wondering if perhaps you’re being taken advantage of. When the car salesman says, “Hey, you seem like a smart guy; you really know your stuff!” you roll your eyes. When a politician tells you you’re a great American who pulls himself up by his bootstraps and will no doubt make an informed decision on Election Day, you know he wants your vote.

Similarly, the above cliché, in no way unique to Phillips, comes off as so confoundingly disingenuous it makes me wonder what its originator meant in the first place. Whoever that originator is, though, should win an honorary MLB Executive of the Year award, because his turn of phrase has thrown a safety blanket over every shortsighted move a large-market team ever made. Sure, the trade didn’t work out, but we had to pull the trigger—these fans won’t tolerate a loser. Of course, the idea that any fan base is smarter than another is rubbish, but we accept that statement with a grain of salt as part of the de riguer politicking common to many public positions. What’s truly insulting is the idea that a fan base might not see the difference between a bad move and a move that weakens the team only in the short term. To then imply that it might somehow be smarter for not seeing this difference is all the more galling.

(While we’re here, what about the inverse of this statement? Are Royals and Pirates fans dumber for “tolerating” a loser for so long?)

Now comes news that the Mets have exercised a pair of critical player options for 2013: $5 million for R.A. Dickey, and $16 million for David Wright. This didn’t shock anyone, of course; picking up the options was the obvious and expected move. The real question is whether the Mets will decide to trade one or both of those players or shell out for contract extensions that might combine to exceed $200M. The franchise today looks something like the franchise near the end of Phillips’ reign: a couple of tantalizing prospects—Wright and Jose Reyes then, Matt Harvey and Zack Wheeler today—but by no means a deep farm system, and a big-league club that figures to be at least a few years away from contention. The difference, of course, is that the 2013 Mets will not be splurging on the likes of Carlos Delgado, Carlos Beltran, and Cliff Floyd on their way to contention. (Although GM Sandy Alderson has hinted that the purse strings may be loosening somewhat in the aftermath of the Madoff scandal.)

It is a strong possibility, then, that Dickey and Wright won’t still be productive by the time the Mets’ rebuilding project is complete. With a full year of Harvey and the imminent arrival of Wheeler, the team appears to have a deep rotation for 2013, and if some spare bullpen parts can be found over the winter, the Mets should prevent runs at a decent clip. But scoring runs is another matter entirely: only five teams scored fewer runs in 2012, and that was despite some early surges from Mike Baxter, Kirk Nieuwenheis, Jordany Valdespin and others. The farm is almost completely bereft of offensive talent at the upper levels—Wilmer Flores and Brandon Nimmo, the former now an all-but-exclusive third baseman, are years away and have serious questions to answer as they climb the ladder—while two of their brightest young players, Lucas Duda and Ike Davis, earned a trip to Triple-A Buffalo and had one of the least helpful 32-homer seasons in recent memory, respectively.

Dickey’s career arc is next to impossible to predict, given that his 80-mph knuckleball has never been thrown before, but it’s safe to assume that the 38-year-old won’t be a top-end starter in, say, 2016. For this year at a bargain price, however, his value couldn’t possibly be higher. Wright, who turns 30 in December, may be in for a more traditional decline. Although his 25-homer days might be behind him, no matter what park he calls home, he very likely has four or five more sterling seasons in him before he begins to taper off in earnest. Even as a one-year rental player, he’d command a haul of prospects.

Alderson has already turned Carlos Beltran into Wheeler and let Reyes walk for compensatory draft picks, so to pony up the money to keep Dickey and Wright at this early stage of rebuilding would seem to go against the plan. And yet there may be an invisible floor at which the Mets perceive their fans would turn against them; in other words, just how bad is this team willing to get? Miami and Tampa have held famous firesales down the years and come out improved on the other side, but one could argue that those franchises felt they didn’t have much to lose on a PR level by outright tanking for a while.

You needn’t look far to find what a half-baked rebuilding project looks like. The Red Sox had the look of a likely playoff team entering 2012, but through injuries and an alarming number of decisions blowing up in Ben Cherington’s face, by midsummer the rebuild was on. Notice, though, that David Ortiz, enjoying yet another productive year, was not among Boston’s exports. Of course Boston will likely be active in free agency and might reload quickly, but the point is that the face of the franchise holds greater value; ask for Adrian Gonzalez or Jose Reyes, and we can talk, but ask for Ortiz or Wright, and the line goes dead.

With that in mind I took an informal survey of every Mets fan I know, and not surprisingly every one wanted Wright locked up long term. They all wanted Dickey extended too, although many said something about how they aren’t as emotionally tied to him. The prevailing reasons given for extending both were that a) the club needs some semblance of veteran leadership, b) I just love David Wright and R.A. Dickey, and c) the Giants just won the World Series with Gregor Blanco and Brandon Crawford prominently involved, so how far away could we be? There’s an argument to be made on all three counts, I think—especially the third, in light of the second wild card.

Obviously, it’s the front office’s job not to be overly conscious of these sentimental reasons for making personnel moves. It’s their job to either pay those stars and try to back into a wild-card berth, or blow the whole thing up and shoot for the moon with prospects. They should know that tightening their belt with Reyes only to turn around and pay Wright and/or Dickey doesn’t lead anywhere, and that letting off-the-field issues govern transactions does a disservice to the team. But they are conscious of those reasons, in their own way, in the way that they understand that their real job may be to entertain the fans rather than win games at any cost, that making those deals would flood their media relations people with calls from angry fans, that tabloid columnists would rip them to pieces, that reduced attendance would put ownership in a foul mood, that—

Wait. This feels familiar. I sound like Steve Phillips, circa April 2009. I understand why he did all those deals—well, maybe not those deals specifically, but I understand the intent. (And hey, Met fans were all excited for Roberto Alomar, if not Mo Vaughn.) The job really isn’t just spreadsheets and video; media pressure, fan expectations, and, at the core of it all, lack of job security get in the way of all but the strongest executives. The Mets franchise faces a similar crossroads today, and though to date Alderson has shown himself to be a capable GM, the coming winter will be the truest test of his resolve. If he caves and resigns Wright and/or Dickey, I’ll hold him accountable as both a fan and an analyst, although I’ll know why he did it. After all, I’m one of the smartest fans in the game. Even if I’d tolerate a loser.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
Apples and oranges. Reyes isn't and never was the player Wright is. I think every intelligent Mets fan knew that Reyes turned it on and had a career year in his walk year, and that he'd regress to career norms once he had a long term contract somewhere, and that's exactly what happened. Wright, otoh, improved this year, but has had better years, and has always been a better all around player than Reyes. Plus he brings leadership to the team. So if Alderson's going to open up and spend money on only one of them, Wright's significantly more worth it than is Reyes.

Noe looking at Dickey - well that's a totally different deal. Dicky's older and there's just no way we can expect him to still be getting it done when Alderson's rebuilt this club. He has trade value, though - I'll bet there are numerous contenders who are looking to win now, and who'll deal some prospects for a starter like him.
Of course, there is very little evidence to support the "walk year" meme.

That bit of snark was repeated over and over about Adrian Beltre, and look how how well he's done since he walked away from playing in the dead zone known as Safeco Field.
Of course there's no evidence. How WOULD you prove a thing like that? But the fact remains that Jose had a career year when he stood to profit from it the most, and once the money was made, his performance regressed to career norms. Is it possible for that to be coincidental? Sure it is. Likely? Well as a Mets fan who watched Jose play for 9 years, I'll go on record that it's improbable.
What you say is plausible, but Wright is not necessarily infinitely durable (viz. 2011), and he is on the cusp of his decline phase. Still, he is a better 3B than any in baseball except Beltre, I think will take a 6 year deal at 120 million, which is within the club's reach and unlikely to be one the club will regret until the last (?2) years. Dickey, on the other hand, has just come into his own at 36; should win the Cy Young, even if he doesn't; and as odd as it is for a knuckleballer to be a staff stopper, he is it. Wheeler, Harvey and whoever else steps forward, will still not be up to the pressure of the No. 1 starter role. Dickey, say what you will about himn, is. Especially because knuckleballers are a long-lived species, I think a 4 year deal at $20 million a year takes him off the market, and is within the club's reach.
I agree with many of your individual statements, but I wonder what your true sentiment is here. You present the high and low for each player and leave it at "within the club's reach". The Mets have seemingly been a "nothing is beyond reach" club for years, and once the effects of the Madoff situation start to diminish, I think that they will return to that position. But right now, I have a hard time seeing the Mets becoming a good team through spending on post-arb. players. It rarely works for any team, and seems especially dubious for this one (without even addressing the fact that these two would be 36 and 42 when the deals you suggest end). The Mets need to follow the course. They can get a really nice haul for each of these two and rebuild the right way.
The key question is:
When will the Mets realistically have their next contender ?
Probably not in 2013 with half the budget going to Bay & Santana.
But is it 2014 or 2016 ?

By 2014, with those 50 million off the books and probably 30 million available to spend in the 13/14 off - season even with Wright & Dickey extended at 35 million per year overall and a big wave of promising young pitching pretty much major league ready, enough to survive the likely attrition rate ( Harvey, Wheeler, Mejia, Familia, McHugh, Gorski, Edgin, Ramirez, Carson & Co), is contention then unrealistic ?
If no, then Wright has to stay with two weak free agent classes coming up. Dickey depends on what he is asking for and what market is willing to offer.

If you believe 2016 is the answer, then sure you trade both Wright & Dickey this winter
i think they should keep Wright (one of best 3b in the game; close to mvp level this year) and trade RA Dickey if they can get a close-to-majors excellent prospect for him. no idea if that's realistic, but if so then 2014 and 2015 might be looking decent.
if there is no RA trade, then our rotation looks pretty good even in 2013 (Niese, Harvey, Wheeler, RAD and maybe Dillon Gee). Maybe we end up with a team that makes us fondly recall the early 70s Mets who (at least in my memory) played lots of low-scoring close games. Could be worse.
I would agree with you. Thirdbasemen are so scarce. Sure, they could play Daniel Murphy there, but he's far from Wright on both sides of the ball and it creates another hole at second. And personally, I don't trust Wilmer Flores to be the future 3b either.

Trading Dickey makes a lot of sense. Starting pitching is the only strength of the organization. Deal from that strength and sell high. Teams like Toronto, San Diego, Houston and Kansas City could all use a dose of Dickey.
For $5M you have to keep R.A. Dickey, especially if he wins the Cy Young. That's just too much PR and on-the-field value for the Mets to lose.

As Sandy Alderson, I would try to get David Wright to sign a new deal this winter, for 5-6 years.
The fact that Dickey is only $5M should be all the more reason to trade him. The trade value of Dickey is substantially boosted by his low cost. If the Mets make Dickey available they will get A LOT of calls. I agree with the above poster. Trade Dickey if the deal is there and sign Wright.
Do you get more value in the off-season or at the trade deadline?

Bringing him back for the first half of the season buys goodwill (and season ticket packages) and also carries risks. But I suspect that's the path Sandy takes unless he receives a knockyoursocksoff offer this winter.
With the new compensation rules, there may be added value to a team getting Dickey now rather than mid-year when they get no added draft pick (assuming he warrants a $13.3M offer). There is utility in signing both, riding it out and then trading later if there is a market and a belief that the maturing prospects are too far off. I still have a hard time forgiving Alderson for not dealing Reyes and getting back a haul similar to that received with Beltran when it was a stone-cold fact the team decided it was not going to re-sign him before the season started.