Driven by deep data sets, sophisticated technology, and collaboration between skilled statistical and scouting staffs, major-league teams have become increasingly adept at projecting player performance. In some respects, assembling a roster is the easy part of building a winning team. The hard part is making sure that roster remains intact. Speaking at Internet Week in New York earlier this year, Athletics General Manager Billy Beane stressed the importance of predicting and preventing injuries:
The biggest indicator now—for a sports team—of whether you’re going to be successful or not is whether or not you stay healthy. The health of baseball players, the health of football players, is going to be a better predictor of a team’s performance. And the guy who gets his arms around that is going to be the wealthiest man in the world.
It’s easy to see why Beane—who has spent the last 15 years trying to make the most of Oakland’s modest payrolls—would ascribe such importance to health. According to BP’s injury database, 20 teams have spent $10 million or more on injured players this season, led by the Red Sox at $49 million. As a group, major-league teams have spent over $3 billion on player payrolls this season, and almost 16 percent of that total—roughly $480 million—has gone to players who were unavailable due to injury. The percentage is even higher if you exclude players with major-league contracts who aren’t on 25-man rosters and released players still being paid by their former teams. That’s a lot of cash that could have gone to good use elsewhere.
Of course, the impact of injuries goes beyond the bottom line. It’s also felt on the field: when starters are injured, more playing time goes to less talented replacement players, and team performance suffers. But a team’s financial and on-field fates are intertwined. The more prospects a team loses to career-ending injuries, the more it has to pay for free agents to fill holes. The more time a team’s established starters miss, the more it has to spend on the players who take their places. And the less success a team has in the standings, the more its attendance will suffer, the smaller its season-ticket base will be, and the less revenue it can expect to receive from merchandise sales and broadcast contracts. The ramifications from those missed opportunities to make money are often felt far in the future. The less money a team takes in now, the less it can afford to pay players later, which can lead to even harder times ahead.
Until Beane’s “wealthiest man in the world” discovers the secret to preserving players, teams will have to accept that some seasons hinge on who stays healthy. This season is no exception. Here are a couple divisions that could have looked different had injuries not intervened.
Four AL teams rank among the top 10 in WARP lost due to injury, a number arrived at by determining each injured player’s average WARP per plate appearance from 2010-12 and multiplying by plate appearances missed this season. The Red Sox lead all of baseball with 8.3 WARP lost. More talented teams tend to have higher WARP lost totals, since their players tend to produce more when healthy, but Boston also ranks second in days missed due to injury and fourth in percentage of payroll lost.
Given the distance in the standings between the Red Sox and Rays, Boston’s injuries probably only partially explain their current fourth-place position. However, injuries could prove decisive for the teams toward the top of the division. The Yankees have lost roughly 6.6 WARP due to injuries to position players Brett Gardner, Alex Rodriguez, and Mark Teixeira, among others, as well as prominent pitchers CC Sabathia, Mariano Rivera, and Andy Pettitte—and that’s without counting the potential contributions of Michael Pineda, who suffered a season-ending injury in spring training and was never on the active roster. Had the Yankees enjoyed better health, they might have a larger lead over the Orioles than 1.5 games. Then again, the Yankees have by far the oldest team in baseball, so they may have been lucky not to have dealt with more injuries than they did.
The Orioles have lost just 2.7 WARP to injuries, compared to 5.4 for the third-place Rays. Evan Longoria’s injury, which robbed the Rays of an estimated 2.6 WARP, accounts for the difference between the two teams’ WARP lost totals. It also comes close to accounting for the difference between them in the standings: the Rays trail the O’s by just 3.5 games.
The Tigers lead the White Sox by one game. They’ve also lost roughly 1.2 WARP less to injury. If the two teams are separated by a similar margin at the end of the season, a slightly better health record might deserve some credit for salvaging Detroit’s season. It would be ironic if the White Sox missed out on October because of injuries, since the White Sox have long excelled at keeping their players in uniform. Even this season, the Sox have lost just 8 percent of their payroll to injuries, the same percentage as last season and the fourth lowest in baseball. However, not counting Victor Martinez, who was never on the active roster and whose injury prompted the Prince Fielder signing, the Tigers have lost just 4 percent of their payroll to injury, the best figure in baseball. If Detroit’s season ends in disappointment, the team won’t be able to blame bad health.
In the other divisions, the leads are large enough to have held up had injuries affected every team equally.
Injuries aren’t always random: some teams do a better job of avoiding them, whether by managing potential health problems more effectively or by targeting players who are less likely to get hurt. And some teams do a better job of constructing rosters with greater redundancy, putting good players in a position to step up if the starters go down (as Todd Frazier has in Cincinnati this season). The WARP lost totals above don’t account for how a team filled its holes, only that it had them. Still, Beane’s quote hits home: once a season starts, few factors are as likely to affect where a team finishes and how much money it makes as how healthy it is compared to the competition.
â€‹A version of this story originally appeared on ESPN Insider .
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.Subscribe now