Former Practically Perfect Backup Catcher and current Rogers Sportsnet analyst/plus-plus website proprietor Gregg Zaun tweeted something last December that seemed very silly. So silly, in fact, that I remembered it roughly eight months longer than I remember most tweets. But now that we're two-thirds of the way through the season, what Zaun said is starting to sound slightly more persuasive.

Just over a month after joining the Angels, Jerry Dipoto traded Mathis to the Blue Jays for Brad Mills. By that time, Mathis had been one of the worst hitters in baseball for the better part of a decade: from 2005 to 2011, only one player (Humberto Quintero) amassed at least 1,000 plate appearances with a TAv worse than Mathis’ .207. He was entering his age-29 season, and no one expected him to make any offensive improvement. No one, that is, except Gregg Zaun.

Zaun knows more about catching than every Mathis-mocking blogger combined. Still, his theory seemed far-fetched. Catchers age early, and we'd seen so much evidence of Mathis being a bad hitter that it was impossible to imagine him being anything but.

Then came this season. It's August, and Jeff Mathis is hitting .243/.282/.466. The .243 and .282 sound a little like Mathis (though both would be either career bests or close to it), but the .466 decidedly doesn't. Some of that is Mathis moving from Angel Stadium, where it's hard to hit homers from the right side, to Rogers Centre, where it's much easier. If you want to get park-adjusted about it, that slash line translates to a .256 TAv. That's essentially league average at catcher in a good offensive year for catchers (or at least for Carlos Ruiz). Jeff Mathis being league average is big news.

Maybe Zaun was right. Maybe, freed from Mike Scioscia's single-minded pursuit of defense above all else, Mathis decided that hitting something other than singles might be a good idea after all. Maybe that road to Damascus moment when the power of Mathis became clear to Zaun was real.

Or maybe Mathis is mostly the same. His plate discipline stats and walk, strikeout, and batted-ball rates aren't far off from where they were last season. The differences are that only 48 percent of his hits this season have been singles, compared to 68 percent over the past seven seasons, and that his fly balls have left the park about four times more often than they did last year. Over 113 plate appearances, that probably doesn't mean much. Between now and the end of September, Mathis might not have another extra-base hit.

Did Zaun see something we didn't? I don't know. But it seems at least a little more likely than it did in December, doesn't it?

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
The two teams I watch the most often are the Jays and the Angels, so I've seen a lot of Mathis over the past few years. And he looks like a different hitter this year -- more aggressive, more confident. He's swinging for the fences in a way I never saw him do as an Angel. To me the stat that really jumps out is his 288 ISO this year. He never came close to that as an Angel.
Sorry for the type: 228 ISO. He's better, but he's not THAT much better.
I'm more inclined to pay attention to Zaun than I am most player-analysts. Zaun's a smart, insightful guy, and he's got Scioscia pegged.
If you watch enough Jays games, Zaun has some good insight some of the time, but often he is off-the-wall nuts
Full agreement about Zaun. I seem to learn something new every game when I listen to him. Only other analyst I can say that about is (believe it or not) Buck Martinez.