Team Audit | Player Cards | Depth Chart

PECOTA Team Projections
​Record: 74-88
Team WARP: 20.2
Team TAv: .253
Runs Scored: 685
Runs Allowed: 756
Team FRAA: 1.1

​1. What kind of effect will the new front office have on the team? What will be most affected by the switch?
Larry Granillo
I think any Cubs fans expecting immediate returns on the new front office are probably expecting too much. That said, I do think Epstein and Hoyer will have an effect. Epstein has already shown that he can envision something and make the moves necessary to create it. That shouldn't change in Chicago, even if he's no longer the actual GM. I'd expect the team to be more willing to take risks that might be hard to explain in talk radio, but ones that could help the team in the long run.

​Stephani BeeExcellent points. I also think that the new front office represents a change in philosophy, from a team that threw money at problems and wound up making ill-advised deals (Soriano being the last remaining major mistake), to a team that, as you suggest, is willing to take risks and wait patiently for prospects to develop. 

And speaking of their farm system, bringing Jason McLeod over to work with scouting and player development will be huge. The Cubs haven't exactly raised the roof in the draft in recent years.

​LGVery true. If I were a Cubs fan, I'd take this as a great sign from the Ricketts family. People have been content with being good enough in Wrigley for far too long. Hiring Epstein makes me feel like the Ricketts want to be better than that.

​SBIt helps that the Ricketts family has a deep pocketbook and should be willing to spend money when Epstein and Hoyer ask for it.

In the short term, I don't see the Cubs signing many free agents. They'll probably shell out the dough to lock up key players like Starlin Castro, but I think this is going to be a steadier, patient front office than the North Side has seen recently.

2. Speaking of Castro, he'll be entering his third season as the Cubs' starting shortstop at the ripe young age of 22. Just how good do you think he'll be?
Castro is going to be very good. The Cubs finally have a hitter they can build around, and he's only going to get better. In his first two seasons in the majors, Castro has hit at least .300 and has gotten on base at a steady rate, but he hasn't shown much power. However, he racks up doubles and has the wheels to snag some triples and stolen bases. Though he might lose some of that speed as his body develops, he might replace it with some extra pop. I could see him hitting about 15 homers.

​LGI agree. At an age when most players would be happy to hit .300 down in Tennessee or Daytona, Castro has done it twice in the big leagues. The Central is going to be really scared of him in a few years. My biggest fear would be someone that young skirting a little bit of his practice time for time out on the town—but that's a blanket fear I have for all young 20-somethings with big bank accounts.

​SBAs long as he doesn't pretend every day is Mardi Gras, Castro is going to be just fine. His work ethic has earned raves, so the Cubs needn't hire Larry Bowa to get on his case. There's no telling if he's going to learn to work some walks, but his excellent hit tool and solid speed are going to keep his OBP afloat. 

Some naysayers insist Castro will need to shift to the keystone in the future. That's totally fine. Right now, he's getting to the balls he needs to at shortstop, and he shows solid range and a good arm, so moving to second base shouldn't be much of a challenge.

LGAnd having a bat like that at second base wouldn't be all that bad of a thing for the Cubs, either.

​SBCertainly not, and there's no guarantee Castro will have to switch. The Cubs have the luxury of watching a 22-year-old develop in the majors to see if a change is completely necessary. Castro's quickness should help him stay at the position longer.

3. Will the Cubs continue playing salary munchers and deal Alfonso Soriano? If so, who are the likely takers?
If there were takers for a guy like Alfonso Soriano, I'm positive Theo would be happy to make a deal with them. But even if the Cubs were to eat his entire salary, I don't suspect they'd be able to find a trading partner. Now would be the best time to just eat the salary—it's easy to cut someone else's mistake—but I bet Soriano will be given a chance to at least prove that he's better than a .289 OBP. Whether Soriano can prove that is a big question.

​SBIt's an albatross to try to move, and since Soriano isn't a youngish pitcher, teams will probably be even less willing to bring him into the fold. Maybe while the Orioles are in town playing the White Sox, Epstein and Hoyer will seize the opportunity to have drinks with Dan Duquette. As Jon Bernhardt can attest, Duquette has shown great aptitude in making deals that make no sense for his club.

​LGVery true. There is always the option of just cutting ties with Soriano and eating his contract, but like I said, there's always the chance that the guy can get on base a little more and make that slugging somewhat worth it…

​4. Will the Cubs deal Matt Garza at the trade deadline? What kind of return might they get for him?
This offseason has shown that teams are willing to reach deep into their farm systems to get a solid pitcher—just look at the respective costs for Mat Latos, Trevor Cahill, Gio Gonzalez, and Michael Pineda. While Garza is older than that quartet and under control for considerably less time, teams get desperate in the hunt for October and can be willing to make major sacrifices for a taste of champagne. 

If the Cubs do trade Garza, I'd expect at least one major prospect to head to the North Side, as well as a lower-level prospect with promise, and maybe a throw-in player or a stack of cash.

​LGThere's no doubt that a halfway-decent pitcher should fetch a decent price. And there's very little reason to expect the Cubs to want to hold on to Garza for the last couple of months of the season. I wouldn't be surprised if Theo was able to manage that kind of package for Garza. The only real question is which team is going to be close enough to the playoffs to want to make that trade.

​SBThe Angels should be duking it out with the Rangers around that time, but they don't have the same kind of farm system they've been known for in the past. Mike Trout probably isn't going anywhere. But perhaps the Rangers will feel the need to pad their starting five. 

If a team does agree to a trade, I'd expect them to also ask for a window to work out a contract extension before Garza hits the open market. The opportunity to snag a solid pitcher who can also handle a 200-inning workload will be extremely valuable come free agency.

​LGAbsolutely. Free agency doesn't always work so well in the team's favor, but I have faith that Theo would send Garza to whichever team would give the Cubs the best prospects.

​SBThe Cubs aren't going anywhere immediately, and they have few prospects who'll serve as building blocks for their next real attempt at a championship, so this is going to be about getting young guys to build around. Epstein and Hoyer have assembled an excellent team of officials, and I expect they'll have their scouts hounding the farm clubs of potential trade partners throughout the year.

​5. Aramis Ramirez was the team's best offensive player in 2011, and he signed with the Brewers over the winter. Can the Cubs make up the offense they lost?
I'm not sure the Cubs can make up that offense. Yes, players like Castro have room to grow (and others, like Soriano, have room to rebound), but I don't think anyone is in a position to get anywhere close to Ramirez's .306./.361/.510 line in 149 games. Carlos Pena is gone as well, which makes me think the Cubs are going to have a tough time scoring runs in 2012. Again, Epstein's game plan is almost certainly long-term, but that might mean something ugly for Cubs fans in the meantime.

​SBChicago is at the disadvantage this time around, as they don't have so many high-upside players who could break out, or guys looking to bounce back from a poor performance. Some of Ramirez's value was negated by his bad glove, but that's still a whole lot of runs to make up. 

The most difficult thing for the club to replace will be power. As you've mentioned, Pena is back in Tampa, there are no guarantees about Castro developing power, and Soriano isn't getting any younger. If you look at the big-league level (or even at the minor-league level), the Cubs have few players who could step in to help fill that kind of offensive void. Brett Jackson is a nice piece, but he's not ready yet, and he doesn't have that kind of bat.

LGLooking at their offseason, it doesn't seem like replacing Ramirez's bat was that big of a priority, either. Hitters are too expensive. It makes much more sense for Theo and Hoyer to wait until they're closer to contending to try for that.

​SBThat last point is the most important. It makes no sense for the Cubs to go out and spend money right now. They can't spend gobs of dough in the draft anymore, but they can save up cash to pay for the pieces that they really want in the future, whether those deals come via free agency or extensions.

​LGAbsolutely. But it might not be pretty in the meantime.

​SBNot much about Cubs history has been pretty in the last 100-plus years.

Team Audit | Player Cards | Depth Chart

PECOTA Team Projections
​Record: 87-75
Team WARP: 34.7
Team TAv: .262
Runs Scored: 765
Runs Allowed: 707
Team FRAA: 17.0

​1. Will Mat Latos suffer any major backlash going from an extreme pitcher's park to an extreme hitter's park?
To state the obvious, moving from a friendly pitching environment to an unfriendly one is going to hurt any pitcher, but Latos does have a few factors working in his favour. He has a solid strikeout rate (8.6/9 last year), and he only allowed 7.8 hits per nine innings last year. Latos will need to keep as many batters as he can off the bases, and keep as many balls as he can in the field. He gets grounders at a fair clip (42.8% of the time last year), but that 0.74 homers per nine is going to jump.

​LGAbsolutely. Latos has also been a fine pitcher away from Petco Park. Last year, he had a 3.24 ERA in 91 innings in San Diego and a 3.68 ERA in 102 innings everywhere else. In fact, he gave up eight homers both home and away, so that HR/9 was actually lower on the road. His lifetime splits are similar, with a 3.11 Petco ERA and a 3.57 road ERA. As you said, any move to a hitter's park will hurt any pitcher, but Latos should fare better than a lot of other pitchers.

​SBHe's also 24 years old and improving, so the Reds now have a rotation anchor for years to come.

​LGVery true, I'm sure Latos would prefer to have Petco behind him 35 starts a year, but his talent should help him navigate his new home.

2. Should the Reds just keep Aroldis Chapman in the bullpen?
Personally, I believe that talented pitchers should always be treated as starters until they prove they can't handle it. A career path like Chapman's, in which the team introduces him to big-league pitching (and all the other cultural shocks someone in his situation might experience) from the bullpen, isn't a terrible one, but only if the club ends up moving him to where he truly belongs. Chapman is still young and learning how to play a 162-game season while also living worlds away from home, but the transition needs to happen sooner rather than later. I want to see what Chapman can do as a starter.

​SBAgreed. The Reds should take care to not take a page out of the Yankees' handbook in their handling of guys like Joba Chamberlain. Constantly jerking a guy back and forth does him absolutely no favours, particularly when that guy is a young man just getting his feet wet in the big game. 

Chapman has had some problems with injuries, and I won't pretend to know that toning down his fastball velocity will help preserve his body in the long run, but it might help him harness some control over his pitches. Walks have been a major problem, but who expects to know exactly where a 105 mph heater is going to hit? Chapman is only 23 and might need some time in Triple-A to tinker, learn some control, and get stretched out, but he should be allowed to prove he can't start.

​LGGood point with the Joba example. I mean, we can't really say what happened there, but that kind of handling can't be helpful. Chapman is very young with some remarkable tools. Work on them, tone them, and see what he can do for you. Don't freeze him into a bullpen role just yet.

​SBThe Reds invested $30 million in this kid, and they should milk it for all it's worth. If that means giving Chapman some time in the minor to refine his repertoire and come up with some complementary pitches to the fastball and his sick slider, then so be it. Don't allow that kind of talent to go to waste. Some pitchers do succeed with two pitches—like A.J. Burnett… sometimes—but the bigger the foundation you have to build from, the better the rewards will be.

And it's probably weird for me to call Chapman a kid. I'm younger than him.

​LGHe's a kid to me, though! Where's my $30 million?

​SBIt looks like we need to have a chat with the financial guys about the state of our contracts and stress that we're in the best shape of our lives. Or that we might need to go to the next question.

LGThat's fair (especially since no one would the BSOHL story!).

3. Should the Reds try to extend Joey Votto now, wait until after the season, or wait until the end of his contract? 
Votto is an interesting case. He's 28, had an MVP season in 2010, and in the prime of his career. How much more money would he make if the team were to hold off on signing an extension for another year? 

If I'm in Cincinnati's front office, I'm obviously hoping to sign this guy for the long haul. It makes sense to engage in talks about a new deal right now, though I wouldn't go so far as to say sign on the dotted line now. Waiting probably won't make Votto cheaper, and even an injury won't tarnish much of his value. Prince Fielder and Albert Pujols both set the market standard for first basemen this year, and the Reds will be expected to live up to that. Maybe after a year things calm down and teams start to regain some rationality about contracts, and maybe Votto will give his team a hometown discount. 

​LGVery good point. Votto is an excellent player and should continue to be one. If I'm in the Reds' front office, I want him in town as long as possible. But you're right. He's 28 this year, and a contract extension would begin with his age-30 season. How long can you sign someone at that age? We're not talking Ryan Zimmerman or Ryan Braun here. Then again, Fielder is only a year younger than Votto and he's signed through 2020. That'd be a good move from Votto's perspective, but the Reds should try to avoid that.

​SBI believe Votto is repped by Dan Lozano, so we might see a little more sanity in these negotiations. Prince is known solely as a hitter, while Votto is capable of doing more than standing like a statue on the diamond. That has value, but you'd hope the Reds realize where to draw the line on these kinds of contracts.

​LGAnd Votto has a body type that is easier to trust. Even still, I wouldn't expect an extension that takes Votto out to 2020 unless he has another MVP or two come his way. My guess is they sign something in the four- to five-year range before the end of the season just so they can avoid any "last year of my contract" headaches next season.

​SBI'd actually expect a deal more in the six- or seven-year range, since this is the team's franchise player. The dollar amount is going to be nutty, and I'll just rest easy knowing I'm not the one signing checks.

​LGIt wouldn't surprise me. Those age-36 and above seasons always frighten me when they're paid for so many years ahead of time.

SB: They're scary, but players get them because teams value (or overvalue) their services. Cincinnati hasn't been in this position very often, so their first go-around could mean overkill. 

​4. What's the team's road to the division crown?
After the Reds' division crown in 2010, I thought they'd have a pretty good shot at a repeat in 2011, even if Votto couldn't give them another MVP season. However, last year showed just how tenuous a situation it is to have a rotation anchored by really young guys and Bronson Arroyo. That situation hasn't changed much for 2012. Latos should  bring the rotation up a bit, but Cueto, Leake, Bailey, and especially Arroyo are back. They'll need to get back closer to 2010 to keep the Reds near the top of the division. Some continued good seasons from Votto, Brandon Phillips, and their outfield (including newcomer Ryan Ludwick) will also help.

​SBThe Astros, Cubs, and Pirates aren't going to contend, so we're left with the Cardinals and Brewers as the Reds' primary competition. Both of those teams took major hits in offense over the winter, which should be a lift for Cincinnati. The team's offense isn't spectacular—they ranked in the middle of the road last year—so they're going to be relying heavily on big seasons from Latos, Bailey, and Cueto. As the Giants have proven, clubs can win with subpar offense, and there is still plenty of time to tinker. Teams might be selling off some bats at the deadline, and it wouldn't surprise me to see Walt Jocketty try to land one.

LGTo be fair, Latos, Bailey, and Cueto aren't exactly Lincecum, Cain, and Bumgarner, etc. in San Francisco. The improved rotation should be a big help, though, and Jocketty would be wise to try to improve the team in the middle of the year if it looks like they're staying in contention (which they should).

​5. Scott Rolen will be playing his age-37 season, but has been bitten by the injury bug recently. Can he make it back this year? If not, how do you view his career?
​SBRolen has had some shoulder woes, which can impact the bat of an older player. It's hard to expect the guy to have another brilliant season in the bag, but stranger things have happened. 

I think Rolen is one of the more unsung players of his era. During a time in which Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez, Derek Jeter, and Ken Griffey Jr. were grabbing headlines, Rolen was picking it at the hot corner and helping hold down the offense for the Phillies and Cardinals. He won a Silver Slugger Award in 2002, and that's a testament to a guy who has knocked more than 2,000 hits, including 500 doubles and 300 homers. His defense was absolutely superb, and those diving stops to snatch doubles down the line were expected.

​LGIn most situations, I'd say that a 37-year-old third baseman coming off a bad, injury-ravaged season has little chance of making a splash. But I probably would have been just as pessimistic about Rolen's 2010 season before it happened. But he was fantastic that year, which at least gives me a little hope for this season. However, a shoulder problem for an older player who has to throw across the diamond as often as Rolen does is a scary injury, so I wouldn't be shocked to see a less-than-stellar season from the Gold Glover. Saddened, yes, but not shocked.

I truly believe that Rolen is a Hall of Fame third baseman. He was always a terrific hitter, and very few match his glove. If he had managed to stay on any one team for a long period of time instead of getting shipped off by managers who didn't seem to like him, he would almost certainly be viewed better by casual fans. That sense that teams were willing to get rid of him has to hurt his stature, even if the teams that did it were stupid to do so. I just hope that Rolen can go out with a nice bang.

Team Audit | Player Cards | Depth Chart

PECOTA Team Projections
​Record: 60-102
Team WARP: 3.9
Team TAv: .243
Runs Scored: 602
Runs Allowed: 814
Team FRAA: -18.5

​1. What does the new ownership and a new GM mean for the franchise?
Houston is a big city with a nice stadium. Theoretically, they should be doing well in Major League Baseball. But things haven't been going so well these past few years, as their 106 losses showed last year. Much like the Cubs, just the willingness to finally move on to a new general manager shows that the team may be willing to try new things. The fact that new GM Jeff Luhnow  promptly hired everybody's favorite BPer, Mike Fast, shows just that. But Luhnow finds his situation much more dire than Epstein and Hoyer, so things might stay tough for a while. However, the team is certainly in a much more optimistic place today than it was last September.

​SBTo the detriment of mediocre relief pitchers everywhere, Houston probably won't be handing out ridiculous contracts like Oprah hands out cars. (But if not, we hope Mike would at least try to prevent that.) It's out with the old and in with the new in Houston, and that means that the team that constantly dealt away youngsters in the hopes of finding a graybeard to top its oldest player is going to have to start from scratch. Luhnow is going to have to show a lot of patience, and I expect that the purse strings will be clamped shut for the next few years, but there is hope for happier days ahead in Houston.

​LGActually, I'd just hope that Mike wanted to hand me a car instead!

There's always hope with a new regime, and oftentimes it ends up being proven unfounded. However, these early moves by Luhnow make me think that the hope is there for a reason.

​SBBut we're still awaiting compensation for Mike. We'll have to take that up with Bud Selig soon.

2. Be an optimist! How do the Astros avoid 100 losses?
First, the team and the front office go out for a really, really long drink. It'll make them forget the season, much less that they're supposed to be competing. If anyone strays down an alley for a visit with their local pharmaceutical representative, that might help as well. 

Anyway. Jose Altuve will prove to be all kinds of gritty and gutty, smacking his way into a starting job. During a game against the Cardinals, lightning will hit off the Gateway Arch (proving it had a better batting average and season than the 2011 Astros) and strike Altuve. He will unlock new super powers: He'll be able to hit 500-foot homers, run faster than a meteor, and the sound of his footfalls will cause his opponents to bow down as he blazes by. Altuve will always be protected by his new best friend, Delino DeShields, who will do as his surname suggests and ensure that no harm comes to Altuve. 

Next, Carlos Lee will hop aboard the nearest unicorn and prance out of Houston to parts unknown. 

This is where the really important stuff comes in! The Astros will be making lots of trades! Wandy Rodriguez will be dealt to the Angels for Mike Trout, and J.A. Happ and Brett Wallace will be shipped to the Nationals for Stephen Strasburg and Bryce Harper. I'd tell you how Houston acquires Matt Moore, Jesus Montero, Eric Hosmer, Evan Longoria, Troy Tulowitzki, and Shelby Miller, but then I'd have to kill you.

While out on a fishing trip, Brett Myers' boat will be swept away to Paradise Island, where he'll have to undergo re-education by Wonder Woman's tribe of Amazons before he's allowed to leave, and Lance Pendleton will show all the cojones of the Marines at Camp Pendleton as he leads the charge for the Astros to not lose 100 games.

​LGHoly cow. That is quite the scenario—and one that I am quite confident will help the team avoid 100 losses. Your powers of prediction are quite impressive. I'm not sure I could top that. Or if I should even try. 

SBIt's a foolproof plan. Let's move on.

3. Say something nice: Are there any bright spots on the team?
Aside from Jose Altuve's miracle lightning strike and Carlos Lee's unicorn, of course!

There's always someone to watch out for on a team, though sometimes you have to stretch a bit. The Astros still have a halfway-decent pitcher in Wandy Rodriguez, even if he is going to be 33 years old in 2012. Other than Rodriguez (and any potential trade chips he fetches in July), Astros fans are probably holding onto some hope for Brett Wallace and newcomer Jed Lowrie. And though the impact on 2012 is minimal, anyone who has watched Carlos Lee clod around Minute Maid Park for the past five years (see what I did there? El Caballo "clods"? Sorry.) has to be excited to realize that his $18.5 million salary will come off the books at the end of the season.

​SB: I thought I said everything was foolproof. But if you insist I take this answer in a different direction… 

There's not much happiness in Houston. The team doesn't have much of a farm (especially in terms of immediate help), so don't expect a minor leaguer to be the shining star. I agree that the true joy of the season will be knowing that this is Lee's final year as an Astro. Much like the Cubs' Soriano contract, even if the Astros eat all of Lee's deal, they won't find suitors. So it's one last lap around the fences for the left fielder before he rides into the sunset. 

On the other hand, Houston could again try to deal Rodriguez for some prospects, and they should get a little more than the Yankees received for A.J. Burnett.

​LGBud Norris had a pretty nice 2011, but even as a fellow Cal Poly-alum, I can't expect another 3.77 ERA from him. He always seems to have solid outings against the Brewers, though, so maybe Astros fans can take pride in being a thorn in their division rivals' sides.

​SBAnd the team finally has a catcher who might not be working hard to make Jeff Mathis look good.

​4. Will Houston's streak of futility be longer than Pittsburgh's?
Pittsburgh has been a miserable place for baseball for about 20 years, and with their top prospects so far away, fans will probably be morose for a few more seasons. Then we have Houston, a franchise that lacks farm-system talent and has no major big-league talent to speak of, as they dealt away their top players over the last few years. 

A big difference between the two franchises? Ownership and the front office. Admittedly, I wasn't a fan of Jim Crane being approved as an owner, but Pittsburgh's ownership has been rancid. Neil Huntington is doing a solid job in trying to rebuild the franchise, and I think things will happen much in the same way in Houston, only at a faster pace. 

So the short answer? No, I don't think Houston will be futile for as long as Pittsburgh has been, but if there is a Borg takeover, I reserve the right to change my answer.

​LGBaserunning is futile?

I have to agree that the Astros run won't be nearly that long. The new front office and the moves they are making are big reasons, but it's more than that. A 20-year streak like Pittsburgh's is really the culmination of very many things going badly in very many different ways year after year. Even running a computer simulation with perfect inputs, the Pirates' run will only show up a very small percentage of the time. I just don't believe that we'll see any run like that again for a very long time, let alone from a team that is so willing to correct it so early in the process.

​5. Carlos Lee will earn $18.5 million in 2012 before leaving the Astros. The club will move to the AL West in 2012. Seriously, what does MLB have against this franchise?
Maybe it's a 10-year delayed punishment for originally naming the stadium "Enron Field." Honestly, it's just really unfortunate timing for the franchise. The balancing out of leagues is something that was a long time coming, as a six-team division coexisting with a four-team division is ridiculously out of whack. The Astros are a very logical choice to fit into the AL West. It's just too bad that they can't at least make good use out of this move by getting extra value from their biggest albatross.

​SBOr it could be a conspiracy theory! Bud Selig totally could have negotiated a requirement that there must be at least one laughingstock in the NL Central per year, and since the Pirates looked somewhat less embarrassing last year, the Astros had to really suck. 

In all honesty, it is, as you said, a series of unfortunate events that have culminated into some extremely bad circumstances. The Astros used to have a hard time knowing when to hold back and when to go for a division crown, and the current state of affairs is a result of that poor judgment. The move to the AL is logical, and it gives the Mariners and Athletics a team they might be able to beat on a regular basis. But in fair trade, MLB could at least offer to absorb that albatross contract.

​LGWell, according to some, the deal from MLB's side was that Jim Crane was allowed to buy the team in exchange for the move. I'm not sure I believe that, but it's not out of the realm of possibility. We'll only fully understand the reach of this move next year, when we finally learn how the DH thing will resolve with constant interleague play.

​SBAnd laugh at how the Astros intend to fill that DH spot. A return engagement with Lee, perhaps?

​LGI hope he realizes just how big of a paycut he'll have to take!

​SBThe guy gets to ride around on a unicorn this season. You see how much money matters to you when you get to canter around on one of those!

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
As far as Castro staying at SS goes, if he keeps making errors like he has made the last two years, he will have to move to a new position. You can't have a SS make that many errors and expect to win. I think it is very likely he will move to another position, because making that many errors offsets the great offense he puts up.
Fair point. His body also might get too big for the position. Some premier shortstops have put up more errors at that age in the minors, so I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt. Living outside Chicago, I unfortunately don't get to see more of his games to get a better look at his skill.

But in the event of that position switch, I think he's going to still do just fine at second base.
The plan for the Astros does indeed seem foolproof. Thanks for sharing it!
I'm glad you agree, and that you read the article. Thanks! :)
Part I? Are you kidding me? Who does PECOTA pick for the division?
Right now, I believe PECOTA takes the Cardinals by a slim margin. Since there is quite a bit of text, we divided this piece into two parts and went in alphabetical order by city.
Does Joey Votto consider his home town Cincinnati over Toronto?
In the literal sense, probably not, but in terms of Cincinnati being his baseball "home" and being the toast of the city probably helps establish some "home" loyalty.
We love Our Pal Joey here in the QC, although there is always the chance that some scrappy scrub like Ryan Freel will steal the hearts of my less enlightened brethren. I think you guys are underestimating the improved performance we are likely to get at SS with a full year (fingers crossed) of Zack Cozart and ROY candidate Devin Mesaroco in the fold. And the bullpen with Marshall and Madsen should be excellent.

Scott Rolen might be a good cautionary tale for Cardinals fans expecting Lance Berkman to repeat his surprise performance of 2011.
I certainly think some improved play at shortstop is in order, but I think there will be a time share at catcher with Ryan Hanigan still holding steady. The Reds are very much in the thick of the NL Central, and they made some solid upgrades this winter. The Brewers and Cardinals both lost major offensive forces this winter, so they'll have to come by new ways of scoring runs, hoping older guys stay healthy, look for a couple breakouts, and hope some guys can maintain their 2011 production levels.

Rolen's issues are different than Berkman's, but I get your message. I don't think Berkman gets close to a repeat, particularly of his first half, but if the fixes he made are legit, he should still be a solid contributor. We delve a little more into his case in Part II.
I heard Larry added 15 pounds of muscle this offseason. Mostly meat purchased in bulk at costco, though.
Steph states in the Reds section that the Brewers have taken a "major hit on offense" this offseason. Before we get to Part II, it's worth noting that while they will probably lose a lot of WARP at 1B, they will make up some of that at 3B, so the hit may not be too terrible. The comment refers to offense, but it is made in the context of who will win the division, so it's also worth noting that they will probably pick up a bit of WARP on defense at SS. Finally, they won 96 games, so odds are they can afford to lose a few more and still be right there.
We do discuss the Aramis Ramirez/Casey McGehee switcharoo and how that helps cushion the blow, as well as how the subsequent lineup shakeup will score runs. We also take a look at the Carlos Beltran signing and how that might help soften the Cards' loss of Pujols.
Sounds good, thanks!
No problem! I appreciate you taking the time to read the piece.
FYI - relative to other MLB owners of big market teams, the Ricketts family does *NOT* have a deep pocketbook. Perhaps relative to the Tribune Company (at least compared to their perceived willingness to spend), but it's an open question as to whether the family could really "afford" to buy the team in the first place. Not quite as bad as the Frank McCourt purchase (particularly given hindsight), but bad nonetheless.