This week’s question comes from Don Coffin, who asks:
I was watching a game on TV the other day and wondered whether a longer at-bat favors the hitter, in terms of its final outcome.
More specifically, how do things like BA/OBP/SLG differ with the number of pitches in an at-bat?
Thanks for the great question, Don. Before we look at the actual results, let’s stop a moment and think about what our intuition
might lead us to believe.
For starters, a walk requires at least four pitches, so the difference between batting average and on-base percentage for one to
three pitches should be minimal, with sacrifice flies and hit-by-pitches accounting for any gap. Walks become possible at four
pitches, so OBP (though not necessarily batting average) should rise at that point, and probably remain high at five and six
pitches as well (walks occuring on 3-1 and some 3-2 counts). Similarly, a strikeout requires at least three pitches, so any outs
of the one- or two-pitch variety would have to come via balls in play.
It’s not immediately obvious what to expect from slugging average. Based on the way most hitters approach their jobs, they would
protect the plate with two strikes, so as the counts go deeper (any PA lasting beyond five pitches must end on a two-strike
count), power should stay fairly constant after five pitches. You might expect aggressive first-ball and bad-ball hitters to be
swinging hard and swinging early in the count, so the low pitch plate appearances might show a higher slugging average.
What about unusually long at bats? An extended plate appearance can only be prolonged by foul balls, as no more than five
pitches in a plate appearance can be non-fouls. Does repeated fouling off of pitches indicate a batter who is unable to get
around on an effective pitcher, or instead is it the pitcher who is struggling, and can’t find the speed or location to put away
the hitter? Do the odds favor the hitter more as the pitch count increased?
Finally, what pitch length most favors the pitcher, and which most favors the batter?
I looked at all plate appearances from 1988 through 2000 for which I had individual pitch data, a data set that covers 87% of
all PAs during that span. I grouped the PAs by the number of pitches, and looked at AVG, OBP, SLG, and OPS as simple measures of
offensive performance. I did not attempt to control for park or league factors, nor for differences between patient hitters-who
see more pitches per PA, and thus represent a higher fraction of the sample at higher number of pitches-and impatient hitters,
who are proportionally represented more in the lower pitch totals. I used a cutoff of 500 plate appearances of a given length
over the years covered to be significant, although I show the entire table below.
Pitch # PA AVG OBP SLG OPS 1 286,695 .323 .316 .497 814 2 334,951 .319 .316 .491 807 3 340,944 .267 .269 .411 681 4 371,885 .227 .333 .346 678 5 304,844 .215 .346 .333 679 6 193,051 .211 .374 .326 700 7 79,250 .223 .405 .354 758 8 29,939 .231 .418 .370 788 9 10,797 .237 .427 .392 819 10 3,743 .229 .419 .379 798 11 1,393 .258 .442 .438 880 12 515 .290 .485 .491 976 13 176 .242 .426 .394 820 14 61 .239 .368 .391 760 15 28 .222 .464 .778 1242 16 11 .333 .455 .778 1232 17 4 .500 .750 .500 1250 18 2 .000 .000 .000 000 19 1 .000 .000 .000 000 20 1 .000 .000 .000 000
Everyone who guessed that four pitches was the best PA length for pitchers (678 OPS), and 12 the best for batters (976 OPS) can
go to the head of the class. The 3-5 pitch range was actually pretty equally favorable for pitchers, bringing in a sub-700 OPS.
Offense was pretty high for the first couple of pitches, then dips sharply before slowly recovering over longer and longer plate
appearances. The chart below makes this easier to see.
The first two pitches are more than 100 points of OPS better for the hitter than pitches three, four, five, and six. Slugging,
in particular, dips sharply, almost 175 points worth between one-pitch PAs and six-pitch PAs. Batters start to gain ground again
at the seven-pitch level, and have equalled their production when putting the first couple of pitches in play once the plate
appearance goes for at least nine pitches.
Contrary to the traditional sabermetric support for patience, seeing such a swing towards the pitcher suggests that aggressively
going after pitches early in the count may be a viable strategy for some hitters. We’d really need to do a much deeper analysis,
though, to see how individual batters perform in varying length plate appearances before concluding anything along such lines.
As expected, batting average and on-base percentage match closely until four pitches, and we see a steady rise in OBP
thereafter, indicating that long at bats start to turn the batter’s way. Curiously, even slugging rises after a while, and more
than can be explained by the rise in batting average alone. Perhaps a batter gains an advantage after having seen several
pitches from the same pitcher in quick succession, allowing him to time his swing, or recognize the type of pitch earlier in its
delivery. Or, as speculated earlier, maybe the inability to retire a hitter in six pitches indicates a tiring pitcher, or one
struggling with his command.
This chart is only a reflection of what has happened, and can’t be used to directly infer causality, so we don’t know which
alternative is true. We can, however, note the break point between the outcomes at two and three pitches, where we see the
sharpest decline in aggregate OPS.
Keith Woolner is an author of Baseball Prospectus. You can contact him by
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.Subscribe now