keyboard_arrow_uptop

Stuff bouncing around my brain as I wonder how we might contract by 30
owners, not two:

  • I’ve been reading about how
    the Diamondbacks
    are going to lose $50 million this year
    , and how they’re going to suffer
    in the future because of all the deferred money they have to pay, stretching
    into 2008.

    This is another example of the creative accounting so popular in baseball.
    The D’backs’ actual payroll outlay this year is around $50 million because
    of the deferrals. That makes it hard to lose $50 million, especially
    with at least seven postseason home games. Yes, they will have to pay some
    of their players long after their playing days are through, but that just
    means that in 2001, they’re going to turn a tidy profit.

    Using the contract-value payroll figure for 2001, then also counting much of
    that money in the future, is dishonest. Not that we should expect
    differently from MLB, its owners, or its media mouthpieces.

  • This kind of lying occurs against the backdrop of contraction, which is
    a bad idea on its face, but even worse when you consider the timing of the
    story. Does baseball even have anyone with a marketing background
    smart enough to say, "Hey, shut the hell up about this and let the
    World Series be the story!"

    Once again, MLB and the owners are so concerned about where their next
    dollar is coming from, and establishing position in negotiations with the
    players, that they’d rather continue their anti-marketing campaign against
    the game. Hey guys, stop planting stories and let the spotlight shine on
    RJ and Schill and Jeet and Yankee Stadium and all the
    greatness of October baseball.

  • I was up late last night, and came across the move "Major
    League" on television. You remember that one, right? It was about a
    baseball team so bad that its owner wanted it to lose so no one would attend
    and she could move it to a city in a warmer climate. To heighten the
    absurdity, the screenwriters picked the most hapless, downtrodden, joke of a
    team they could find in the early 1990s.

    The Cleveland Indians.

  • I could go on, but people smarter than me are saying it better than I
    can.
    Gary
    Huckabay has a column here on contraction
    , while
    Keith Law takes
    it on at ESPN.com
    . I encourage you to read both piece and to think
    about them every time Bud Selig speaks.

  • I know you were all waiting, so here’s the scoop: yes, she’s kind of a
    real teacher, and yes, he’s a real student.

  • Here’s a prediction: if the Yankees win tonight, Curt Schilling will
    pitch Game Four for the D’backs. Otherwise, Miguel Batista will get
    the start. If Schilling starts and wins, Batista will pitch Game Five, with
    Randy Johnson held back for Game Six. If Schilling starts and loses,
    Johnson will pitch Game Five. Now that he’s up 2-0 I don’t think Brenly will
    allow the Yankees to tie or take the lead in the series without going
    through one or both of his aces.

Joe Sheehan is an author of Baseball Prospectus. You can contact him by
clicking here.

You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe