When Scott Mathieson made his major-league debut approximately four years ago, the Philadelphia Phillies were a very different team. David Bell played third base, Aaron Rowand patrolled center field, and the three-headed monster of Mike Lieberthal, Sal Fasano and Chris Coste were the catchers. Mathieson, a 22-year old flamethrower, had shown plenty of promise but was still in need of some seasoning, which made things all the more disappointing when he fell prey to the injury bug and had to go under the knife for surgery on his ulnar collateral ligament in his elbow. The road back has been tenuous, as rehabilitation was stunted by the need for a second Tommy John surgery. After successfully rehabbing from the second surgery, Mathieson found himself a minor-league reliever with fans clamoring for his presence on the big club’s roster.
Suffice to say, after a call-up in the middle of June, those with dreams of his heater shutting down the opposition were thrilled. Those same people were all the more surprised when, just two days later, the story broke that Mathieson was no longer welcome in the majors for the time being. Unfortunately, the stories that reported his demotion teased curious readers by offering simply that Mathieson had been designated for assignment rather than optioned, and not informing anyone how or why the move was made, or how or why it made sense. Mass hysteria ensued—or at least as much as can occur via Twitter—with fans clamoring for the head of Phillies general manager Ruben Amaro, Jr, until explanations began to surface.
Seeing as this type of confusion, or confusion with regards to the various forms of waivers in general is fairly common, we figured it was time for an explanation on each, noting how they work as well as requirements and examples of each. There are four main types of waivers to discuss: outright, unconditional release, trade assignment, and optional, the latter of which applied to Mathieson, and resulted in the Phillies utilizing a seldom-used method to buy more time before deciding to officially use an option on their reliever.
A waiver, from as broad a standpoint as is possible to explain, is a permission from other clubs to trade or assign the contract of a player. A club files a request with the commissioner’s office, making the player available to be claimed by the other 29 clubs. Once this request is granted, a waiver is valid for a limited time period. Without further ado, here are the tasty flavors.
A club wishing to remove a player from the 40-man roster but keep him in its minor-league system must first place him on outright waivers. Outright waivers are not revocable, so a player claimed on outright waivers may not be pulled back by his original club. For those unfamiliar with the term, revocable means that a claimed player can be pulled back; irrevocable means the exact opposite.
If the other 29 clubs decline to claim the player, his club then may assign him outright to the minor leagues. The Yankees used this process last week in sending backup catcher Chad Moeller to Triple-A Scranton/Wilkes-Barre. He was placed on outright waivers, but none of the other 29 teams put in a claim. After the 48-hour time period expired and nobody expressed interest, Moeller was deemed to have cleared waivers. At that point, the Yankees could send him to the minor-league affiliate of their choosing.
A club may not request outright waivers on a player with a complete no-trade clause or the right to veto a trade as a veteran with 10 years in the majors, including five with the same club. Alex Rodriguez, for example, cannot be placed on waivers given the no-trade clause. Neither can A.J. Pierzynski, who garnered 10-and-5 rights in the middle of June.
Unconditional Release Waivers
A club that wishes to release a player places him on unconditional release waivers. He then may be claimed for $1, but the player has five days to choose whether to accept it or refuse the claim and become a free agent. If the player rejects the claim, he becomes a free agent and forfeits the remaining money left on his contract. If the player accepts the claim, the new team pays him under the contract he signed with his former team. If no team claims the player, he becomes a free agent, with his original club responsible for his contract, except the pro-rated portion of the minimum major-league salary of $400,000 if he signs with another club that season.
Veteran right-hander Jeff Suppan cleared release waivers earlier this month before signing with St. Louis as a free agent. This means that the Brewers decided to release Suppan, and placed him on unconditional release waivers. Though he was available to be claimed, nobody put in a claim for his services, so his ability to accept or reject the claim became moot. Just because no team claimed Suppan does not mean nobody had interest. Obviously, the Cardinals had some interest in his services, but by chancing that nobody would put in a claim, rendering Suppan a free agent, the Cardinals were able to bring their former playoff hero aboard at the pro-rated minimum, as opposed to absorbing his entire contract through an accepted claim.
Trade Assignment Waivers
Trade assignment waivers are utilized in August, and occasionally September, in order to gauge trade interest. Between Aug. 1 and the end of the season, a player may not be traded without first clearing trade assignment waivers. If the player is not claimed within 47 business-day hours, he may be traded to any club. If the player is claimed, his original club has three choices:
- Revoke the waiver request and pull the player back
- Work out a trade with the claiming club within 48 ½ business-day hours
- Allow the claiming club to take the player and his current contract for a $20,000 fee
This was the scenario that unfolded last August when the White Sox submitted a claim on Toronto’s Alex Rios. With six years and $61 million left on Rios’ contract, the Blue Jays simply let him go to Chicago. The Blue Jays received nothing tangible in return as far as players go, but were able to completely wipe Rios’s contract from their books.
Optional major-league waivers are required when optioning a player who is more than three calendar years removed from his first appearance on a major-league roster. This procedure allows a club to send a player to the minor leagues while keeping him on the 40-man roster. Because optional waivers are revocable, players usually clear in this scenario. In the unlikely event a player is claimed, his club may not option him to the minor leagues, and any subsequent waiver request during the same period becomes irrevocable.
Applying these rules to Mathieson, who was eligible for optional waivers having appeared in the bigs back in 2006, the Phillies designated him for assignment and requested optional waivers for him; nobody put in a claim, and if they had, the Phillies could have simply pulled him back. Of course, this would mean that he could not be optioned back to the minors, and if they decided to request waivers for Mathieson later in the season, he could not be protected under revocation.
The Phillies experienced a roster crunch when Carlos Ruiz went down with an injury to his head, but the prognosis was unclear as far as a stint on the disabled list goes; the Phils needed to recall another catcher, but without putting Ruiz on the disabled list, they needed to free up another spot. Mathieson was the odd man out, and so while they had no intention of getting rid of him, replacing him on the roster through a designation for assignment enabled them to call up Dane Sardinha immediately without waiting through the 48-hour waiver window.
Mathieson is not the only player to be run through the procedural thicket of optional waivers this season. Both Matt Chico of the Nationals and Scott Atchison of the Red Sox were subjects to the same thing in separate instances of the relatively rare situation. The Nationals recalled Chico for a Saturday night spot start on May 8, his first start in the majors in more than two years after undergoing Tommy John surgery in 2008. The left-hander, who began the season at Double-A Harrisburg, allowed six hits and two runs while whiffing three in five innings as Washington defeated Florida 5-4.
Though Chico had an option year remaining, he was more than three years removed from his first appearance on a big-league roster. That made it necessary for him to pass through optional waivers before the Nats could return him to the minors. But the Nationals faced another obstacle. It takes 48 hours for a player to clear optional waivers, and Washington had recalled him for only one day. In other words, they needed to free up his roster spot immediately but were required to wait another day before learning if Chico had actually cleared waivers and, in the process, become eligible to be demoted.
The Nationals had to resort to one more transactional layer, by designating Chico for optional assignment. This allowed Chico to be replaced on the active roster for the very next game, and allowed the Nationals to postpone the 48-hour window until Monday.
Boston faced a similar roster crunch in May as center fielder Mike Cameron was returning from injury. To make room on the roster, the Red Sox had decided to designate outfielder Darnell McDonald for assignment. However, when left fielder Jacoby Ellsbury experienced soreness in his side after a session in the batting cage, Boston chose to cancel McDonald’s travel plans at the last minute and keep him on the roster. Instead, the Red Sox designated Atchison for optional assignment and sent him to Triple-A Pawtucket. Atchison has since been recalled and has struck out 20 in 24 innings for the Red Sox.
There are three separate optional waiver periods, and optional waivers are unavailable from the end of the season until Feb. 15:
- From Feb. 15 to the 30th day of the season
- The 31st day of the season until July 31
- After July 31 but up to Oct. 1.
Unfortunately, when a player is placed on waivers, easily available transaction data tends to provide little information aside from the word ‘waivers.’ As we have shown through examples and definitions throughout the course of this article, ‘waivers’ is not an all-encompassing term; there are various forms, with rules and requirements to each its own. Next time you hear of a player being placed on waivers, inquire about which type, as it may be the difference between a calm afternoon and one of mass hysteria, at least in the Twittersphere, over the confusion of a player deserving of a major-league spot seemingly being released.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.Subscribe now