The Outcomes discuss players you ought to buy and sell in trades based on your Scoresheet roster needs.
On the Podcast:
We’re revisiting another one of our monthly topics: trade candidates. We cover both leagues, giving you several ideas for which guys to buy and sell—and, more importantly, we walk through the reasons why we pick each player so you can apply those to your roster.
The rest of this article is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.
Not a subscriber?
Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get access to the best baseball content on the web.
The Outcomes share their round 40 Scoresheet draft rankings.
Welcome, friends, to the most exciting week of the Scoresheet summer calendar! Yes, even after Christopher Crawford has recovered from his draft-induced PTSD, and the remains of Studio 42 have been mothballed in Secaucus’s most beautiful closet for another year, Scoresheet owners remain in the grip of draft fever. Round 40 is when most top draft picks are selected, and teams who have been out of it for most or all of the year have one brief moment of joy before going back to figuring out where to set the hook on Jerome Williams.
Listener emails and the best things the Outcomes saw in an eventful sports week.
As questions from listeners and readers keep coming in, we keep trying to answer them. We love hearing from all of you, so keep it up!
Last week we answered several reader questions that were shorter form or more conceptual. This week, we tackle three specific teams and offer trade advice and guidance for the rest of the season about how to handle the various levels of success that come in different phases of the competitive cycle. We also cover the best things we saw in an extremely eventful week for sports.
Reader questions, notable player performances, and much more.
More listener questions this week, thanks to all the great submissions over the past couple of weeks. We also walk through each of the MLB teams to do a June check up on the bets that Jared and Ben made, as a means for anecdotes and commentary on notable player performances or team situations.
Digging through the reader mailbag, and much more.
On the Podcast:
This week we dig through the mailbag and answer some listener questions—thanks for sending them in, keep it up! We talked about banked stats, projection systems, online data resources, and some pointers on how to handle trade negotiations. We also discuss potential buy and sell trade candidates in both leagues, with each of us highlighting a couple players of each kind in each league.
The outcomes offer recommendations on 10 players in each league, then mock draft the 38th round on the podcast.
While the June supplemental draft is one of the annual highlights of the Scoresheet calendar, as the top Rule 4 draft picks get picked over by teams, May is probably the best chance to pick up some early breakouts and respond to trends. Here are our recommendations for the upcoming supplemental draft, again looking only at players still available in a majority of leagues. You may also want to review our April recommendations, as we still stand behind… well, most of them.
On the podcast:
This week we sit down with Nate Stephens to talk about the season so far, touch upon his many teams, and highlight some players that have over- and underperformed compared to his expectations. Tune in for another excellent conversation with Nate!
The Outcomes review their preseason projections, and much more.
This week we reviewed our preseason projections for team wins, take stock of the bets between Jared and Ben, and discuss whether each team’s early performance is sustainable (and to what degree, and why we might think so).
The Outcomes run down players who might be available in your leagues based on Scoresheet-wide ownership data.
There probably isn’t a more foolhardy errand than mock drafting the 36th round of an already deep league, but no one said that we weren’t just the fools to do so. Here are a few players in each league worth considering so that you don’t just automatically pick the first Brazilian on a two-week hot streak who crosses your path.
The Outcomes celebrate the start of the season, answer reader questions, and discuss strategy.
It’s our 50th episode! We’re celebrating the start of the 2015 MLB season by answering reader questions, going through our draft results for our teams with an eye toward strategy for upgrading your team in season, talking about some of our favorite story lines for the year, and of course mentioning the best things we saw this week.
One of our reader questions is about converting defensive ratings to TAv (True Average) so that you can use the platoon splits for TAv and include defense.
The Outcomes discuss their picks and their strategy for building a team that achieves their goals.
Have you ever wondered why Scoresheet drafts are slow affairs, paced out over the course of a month? Wonder no more, as the Outcomes take you through the draft of one of Scoresheet's flagship leagues, BL DwMurphy. This league, now in its 19th year, has a few special rules—there are only eight optional keepers, there is only one minor-league protection spot, everyone is eligible for the draft (meaning you, me, and your favorite Cuban/Japanese/college sleeper), and, oh yeah, the draft takes place live over one day. You can visit Brian Dewberry-Jones' lovingly maintained DwMurphy page for a complete history, and to meet some of the illustrious present and past participants.
Clocking in at a healthy 9 1/2 hours, more than 700 players were drafted in this deep, grueling league. Traditionally, drafts take place in person, in San Francisco, but the Outcomes discuss their draft from a remote setup in bucolic Michigan, as they slowly descend into madness. Along the way, they provide insight on building a team and achieving goals, interview a competitor, and try to keep their spirits high. For those who love to follow along, final rosters are now available on the Scoresheet DwMurphy League page. The Outcomes ask you: how did we—er, we mean, they—do?