CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

Articles Tagged Projections 

Search BP Articles

All Blogs (including podcasts)

Active Columns

Authors

Article Types

Archives

01-23

comment icon

14

The Lineup Card: Eight Intriguing PECOTA Projections
by
Baseball Prospectus

01-16

comment icon

10

Moonshot: Projecting Uncertainty
by
Robert Arthur and Will Larson

10-24

comment icon

0

Fantasy Freestyle: Projection Season and the Recency Effect
by
Jeff Quinton

06-19

comment icon

5

BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 474: The Rest-of-Season Projections Test
by
Ben Lindbergh and Sam Miller

06-19

comment icon

12

Baseball Therapy: Should You Trust the Projections?
by
Russell A. Carleton

05-01

comment icon

8

PECOTA Takes on Prospects
by
Andrew Koo

03-07

comment icon

7

TINO (There Is No Offseason): Ep. 9: You Sound How Jesus Montero Looks
by
Bret Sayre, Ben Carsley, Craig Goldstein and Mauricio Rubio

02-13

comment icon

26

Feature Focus: PECOTA Weighted Means Spreadsheet
by
Colin Wyers

02-04

comment icon

1

BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 378: The PECOTA Day Podcast
by
Ben Lindbergh and Sam Miller

07-10

comment icon

6

Manufactured Runs: The Mystery of the Missing .500 Teams, Part Two
by
Colin Wyers

06-18

comment icon

4

Overthinking It: The Most Surprising Team Performances So Far
by
Ben Lindbergh

04-01

comment icon

6

Pebble Hunting: The Astros' Best-Case Scenario vs. The Angels' Worst-Case Scenario
by
Sam Miller

02-20

comment icon

40

The Socratic Approach to PECOTA
by
Ben Lindbergh and Colin Wyers

02-12

comment icon

14

Skewed Left: PECOTA's Projected Bests and Worsts
by
Zachary Levine

02-11

comment icon

103

Baseball Prospectus News: Now Arriving: PECOTA, Depth Charts, and the PFM
by
Colin Wyers and Rob McQuown

01-28

comment icon

35

BP Announcements: The Annual, PECOTA, and Fantasy Subscriptions UPDATED
by
Ben Lindbergh

10-03

comment icon

9

Pebble Hunting: A Very Good Team and a Very Bad Season
by
Sam Miller

09-07

comment icon

0

BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 37: The Tigers' Defense is What We Thought it Was/Brandon Wood and the Quad-A Player
by
Ben Lindbergh and Sam Miller

08-31

comment icon

0

The BP Wayback Machine: The Clemens Signing
by
Joe Sheehan

07-17

comment icon

45

Overthinking It: PECOTA's First-Half Hits and Misses
by
Ben Lindbergh

05-08

comment icon

9

BP Announcements: Rest-of-Season PECOTA Now Available
by
Colin Wyers

03-08

comment icon

45

Reintroducing PECOTA: House of Cards
by
Colin Wyers

04-08

comment icon

16

Ahead in the Count: Projecting Free Agent Performance
by
Matt Swartz

03-30

comment icon

15

Future Shock Blog: Jason Heyward: How Optimistic Can We Be?
by
Kevin Goldstein

03-12

comment icon

130

BP Unfiltered: PECOTA Update
by
Dave Pease

02-07

comment icon

0

Schrodinger's Bat: The Toughest of Them All?
by
Dan Fox

11-08

comment icon

0

Schrodinger's Bat: The Biggest Booms and Busts?
by
Dan Fox

06-19

comment icon

0

Fantasy Focus: Projecting Final Standings
by
Kenn Ruby

03-21

comment icon

0

Lies, Damned Lies: PECOTA Projects the American League
by
Nate Silver

01-16

comment icon

0

PECOTA Takes on the Field
by
Nate Silver

03-21

comment icon

0

BP Does Tout Wars
by
Jonah Keri and Nate Silver

02-01

comment icon

0

The Prospectus Projections Project
by
David Cameron and Greg Spira

<< Previous Tag Entries No More Tag Entries

The staff is either surprised, excited or just amused by these outputs from PECOTA's crystal ball.

Read the full article...

This is a BP Premium article. To read it, sign up for Premium today!

January 16, 2015 6:00 am

Moonshot: Projecting Uncertainty

10

Robert Arthur and Will Larson

Can the uncertainty in a player's projections be projected?

There are two important aspects of prediction. The first concerns the accuracy of the prediction—that is, how close a prediction is to the actual, observed result. The second is uncertainty, which is how sure a forecaster is about his or her projection.[1] These issues are fundamental forecasting concepts, and similarly apply to predictions of the weather, the stock market, or the outcome of tomorrow’s ballgame. At present, only one of these facets of a prediction gets much attention in the world of baseball projections, and that is accuracy. Accuracy is measured by the absolute error, which defines how close, on average, a forecast is to the actual, observed result. Projectionists struggle primarily to minimize this number.[2]

The under-examined facet of prediction that we will address in this article is the uncertainty. Whereas we know that predictions tend to be accurate to within a hundred or so points of OPS, we would also like to know whether we are more or less likely to be wrong on certain players. The uncertainty is often treated as a second-order concern because it is usually more difficult to estimate. However, as we show, it is possible to predict ahead of time which players’ forecasts are more uncertain than others. This concept is important because certain teams may prefer high versus low-risk players—a team with high win expectations (90+ wins) might prefer to reduce risk, whereas a middle-of-the-road team (80-85 wins) would presumably seek risk in order to “get lucky” and reach the postseason.

The rest of this article is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.

Not a subscriber?

Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get access to the best baseball content on the web.


Cancel anytime.


That's a 33% savings over the monthly price!


That's a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

A look at how to avoid allowing biases to influence your projections.

As soon as the baseball season comes to its inevitable and saddening end, baseball, as it does each year, will enter the offseason. For the fantasy baseball community, this means we will be entering ranking and projection season. After following “our players” and players of interest all season, we are now asked to take an all-encompassing look at the league’s baseball players. The result of doing projections periodically, as opposed to continuously, is that we are likely to invite certain biases into our processes, which can negatively impact our results. We will take a look at why we do periodic projections, the biases that come with such a process, how these biases manifest themselves, and some ways to hopefully de-bias our process.

Projection Season
The devil’s advocate in me asks, “if periodic projections causes certain problems, why not do continuous projections?” The short answer is that doing continuous projections is not feasible or desirable for most of us. A computer program could certainly perform continuous projections, but we—as mere people (note: people are awesome)—do not have the ability to continuously adjust our valuations on such a large scale. Sure, each time we watch, read about, or hear about a player, our impression of said player will be altered or reinforced consciously or subconsciously, but that is not what I am getting at. Rather, what I mean is that we cannot watch all players play every one of their plays, and we cannot fully analyze all of what we see or all of the available data. The result of all this humanness is that we can really only fully update our projections on a league-wide basis come decision times; those being the offseason for auctions and drafts, as well as, to some extent, the trade deadline. While we constantly update our valuations for the players we follow, my assumption is that very few people follow every player and those who do probably do not do so diligently enough to properly continuously update each player’s projection.


Read the full article...

Ben and Sam identify the players who've most overperformed or underperformed their PECOTAs and discuss what they'll do next.

Read the full article...

Why predicting player breakouts is more important than minimizing error.

Last week, the sabermetric community had—well, not an argument, because the participants were generally professional and cordial to one another, but a debate about what we might expect over the rest of the season from a player who is currently enjoying a hot (or cold) streak. It all started with researcher Mitchel Lichtman (better known by his initials, MGL) posting two articles, one on hitters and one on pitchers, that made the case that we should trust the projection systems rather than expect a player’s recent performance to continue. Remember Charlie Blackmon, who was the best player in baseball for three weeks and was smart enough to make those weeks the first three weeks of the 2014 season? He’s a good example. He had never been anything special, nor was he projected for greatness this year. And in retrospect, his hot streak to start the season looks a lot like a small-sample fluke.

Read the full article...

This is a BP Premium article. To read it, sign up for Premium today!

May 1, 2014 6:00 am

PECOTA Takes on Prospects

8

Andrew Koo

Does PECOTA love catching prospects? And if so, which ones?

Does PECOTA love catchers?

After we released the PECOTA Top 100 prospects list last week, a few commenters remarked on PECOTA’s apparent catcher leanings. Eleven of them appeared on the list, some higher than nationally beloved prospects. How dare PECOTA! In comparison, Jason Parkstop 101 featured eight catchers, suggesting a small discrepancy in the position distribution of PECOTA’s rankings.

The remainder of this post cannot be viewed at this subscription level. Please click here to subscribe.

There Is No Offseason is a podcast that focuses exclusively on dynasty and long-term keeper formats. We talk major leagues, minor leagues and we never miss an opportunity to take a jab at Craig.

Read the full article...

How to get all of our preseason player projections in one place.

Note: this piece was originally published on July 11, 2013.

Welcome back to another installment of Feature Focus! I’m your host, Richard Kiley. (We spared no expense.) This week, I want to talk to you about the PECOTA Weighted Means Spreadsheet.

Read the full article...

Ben and Sam talk about pitchers, catchers, and PECOTA projections reporting for spring training.

Read the full article...

Have we been underrating big-market, high-payroll teams?

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the distribution of team wins, and the discovery that the distribution may in fact be bimodal, not normal as one might expect.

One of the predictions that came from this theory was that teams right at .500 would, counterintuitively, tend to regress away from the mean. So one thing we can do is actually check to see if the real world behaves the way we expect it to. I took all teams from 1969 on with even numbers of games and split them into “halves” of even-number games. I use scare-quotes for halves since in order to boost the sample size, I split into increments of two and kept any pair where both “halves” were within 20 games of each other. Then I looked at teams that were exactly .500 in the “before” sample— 716 teams total—and saw what they did afterward:The remainder of this post cannot be viewed at this subscription level. Please click here to subscribe.

The teams that have outhit and outpitched their projections, or fallen the farthest short.

We’re approaching the halfway point of the season, though we’re still over a month away from the nominal start of the second half. And that means we’re also approaching the point at which we stop thinking about how we thought the season would play out (except for our probably accidentally accurate predictions, which we treasure forever). According to Colin Wyers, in-season team records become more reliable than pre-season projections around Game 103. Most of us don’t have a particular point of the season at which we entirely abandon pre-season projections—nor should we—but every day we trust what we’ve seen so far a little more and what we expected to see a little less. And eventually, we look back and wonder why we didn’t see certain things coming.

PECOTA has had plenty of successes. The projected team TAvs for the Rangers and Brewers, for example, have been correct to the point, and the projected team ERAs for the Mets and Diamondbacks have been less than 0.02 points off. But while PECOTA deserves a pat on its back for its accurate predictions, there’s much more to say about the surprises. This article is about the lineups and pitching staffs that have defied our expectations so far.

The remainder of this post cannot be viewed at this subscription level. Please click here to subscribe.

If everyone on the Astros played to their 90th-percentile projections, and everyone on the Angels played to their 10th-percentile projections, which would win more games?

Last year around this time I had plans to compare the Astros’ teamwide PECOTA projections to those of a variety of lower-level squads: the best Triple-A roster, the best Double-A roster, an All-Star High-A team, etc. I didn’t get to it, and then the season started, and I still didn’t get to it, because the Astros started off hot and it would have been weird to have run that piece about a team that was 22-23 in mid-May. I was sort of glad I didn’t run it, because the longer I lived with the idea the more it started to feel mean.

So this year, I have a similar idea, and I’m rushing it out before the guilt kicks in. Again I’m going to be exploring just how bad the worst team in baseball is. Or just how good the worst team in baseball is. That’s the point of it, after all. It’s not to prove that the Astros are as bad as, say, a team of High-A All-Stars. It’s to see if the Astros are as bad as a team of High-A All-Stars, and if they’re significantly better (as I suspect they would have been), then we’ve learned a little something about baseball.

Read the full article...

<< Previous Tag Entries No More Tag Entries