CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

Premium and Super Premium Subscribers Get a 20% Discount at MLB.tv!

Articles Tagged Babip 

Search BP Articles

All Blogs (including podcasts)

Active Columns

Authors

Article Types

Archives

06-17

comment icon

5

Moonshot: Striking Distance
by
Robert Arthur

03-12

comment icon

10

Five to Watch: American League Starting Pitchers
by
Craig Goldstein

03-10

comment icon

6

Five to Watch: National League Pitchers With Elevated BABIPs
by
Craig Goldstein

10-21

comment icon

0

Fantasy Freestyle: Revisiting BABIP for Fantasy
by
Mike Gianella

06-19

comment icon

7

BP Unfiltered: Blind BABIP Results: You Suck
by
Sam Miller

06-19

comment icon

0

BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 227: Julio Urias and Young Pitchers/Prospects Switching Positions/Jose Iglesias and High BABIPs/Goodbye Base Coaches
by
Ben Lindbergh and Sam Miller

06-18

comment icon

40

Pebble Hunting: Blind BABIP Test, Part 2
by
Sam Miller

05-03

comment icon

0

BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 195: Bad Body Language/Upgrading Bullpens/Steroids and the Children/BABIP and Bad Luck
by
Ben Lindbergh and Sam Miller

05-02

comment icon

4

Overthinking It: Three Months in Marco Scutaro's BABIP
by
Ben Lindbergh

04-29

comment icon

9

Pebble Hunting: Ross Detwiler and Baseball's Most Extreme BABIP
by
Sam Miller

04-08

comment icon

43

Baseball Therapy: Rethinking Randomness: Pitchers and Their BABIPs
by
Russell A. Carleton

01-23

comment icon

0

BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 124: A World Without Easily Injured Pitchers/Hitter BABIP, and Whether Mike Trout Was Lucky/What We Think About Booing
by
Ben Lindbergh and Sam Miller

09-10

comment icon

0

Resident Fantasy Genius: Using ISO to Legitimize High/Low BABIPs?
by
Derek Carty

07-09

comment icon

11

Pebble Hunting: The Blind BABIP Test: Results and Revelations
by
Sam Miller

07-06

comment icon

76

Pebble Hunting: The Blind BABIP Test
by
Sam Miller

05-29

comment icon

24

Overthinking It: Jonny Venters and What a High BABIP Looks Like
by
Ben Lindbergh

03-19

comment icon

13

Fantasy Beat: The Impact of BABIP, LOB%, and Luck
by
Jason Collette

11-22

comment icon

30

Spinning Yarn: How Does Quality of Contact Relate to BABIP?
by
Mike Fast

10-10

comment icon

3

Fantasy Beat: Hellickson's BABIP: Lucky or Sustainable?
by
Jason Collette

06-13

comment icon

4

Fantasy Beat: BABIPs, Young and Old
by
Jason Collette

05-10

comment icon

12

Manufactured Runs: The Deconstruction of Falling Stars
by
Colin Wyers

12-15

comment icon

27

Ahead in the Count: Ground-ballers: Better than You Think
by
Matt Swartz

09-17

comment icon

13

Ahead in the Count: High BABIPs and True Skill Level
by
Matt Swartz

09-10

comment icon

19

Ahead in the Count: The Biggest ERA-SIERA Divides of 2010
by
Matt Swartz

08-27

comment icon

43

Ahead in the Count: The Clutch and The Shifted
by
Matt Swartz

03-25

comment icon

26

Ahead in the Count: Predicting BABIP, Part 3
by
Matt Swartz

03-24

comment icon

33

Ahead in the Count: Predicting BABIP, Part 2
by
Matt Swartz

03-23

comment icon

26

Ahead in the Count: Predicting BABIP, Part 1
by
Matt Swartz

03-17

comment icon

12

Ahead in the Count: Why SIERA Doesn't Throw BABIP Out with the Bath Water
by
Matt Swartz

01-10

comment icon

19

Prospectus Roundtable: BABIP and Line Drives
by
Baseball Prospectus

11-23

comment icon

3

Ahead in the Count: Zack Greinke and FIP
by
Matt Swartz

10-21

comment icon

30

Ahead in the Count: What Happened to Cole Hamels?
by
Matt Swartz

09-29

comment icon

9

Ahead in the Count: Pitcher BABIP by Count
by
Matt Swartz

09-15

comment icon

17

Ahead in the Count: The BABIP Superstars
by
Matt Swartz

05-31

comment icon

95

Prospectus Idol Entry: You Can Beat PECOTA Without a Computer Model
by
Matt Swartz

05-24

comment icon

63

Prospectus Idol Entry: Paper Covers Rock: Why Pitchers Don't Control Batting Average on Balls in Play
by
Matt Swartz

03-06

comment icon

0

Fantasy Focus: Deciphering BABIP
by
Alex Carnevale

<< Previous Tag Entries No More Tag Entries

This is a BP Premium article. To read it, sign up for Premium today!

June 17, 2014 6:00 am

Moonshot: Striking Distance

5

Robert Arthur

A look at how pitch distance from the center of the strike zone affects BABIP and power.

"To be a good hitter you've got to do one thing: Get a good ball to hit."
-Rogers Hornsby


The rest of this article is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.

Not a subscriber?

Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get access to the best baseball content on the web.


Cancel anytime.


That's a 33% savings over the monthly price!


That's a 33% savings over the monthly price!

Already a subscriber? Click here and use the blue login bar to log in.

This is a BP Fantasy article. To read it, sign up today!

March 12, 2014 6:00 am

Five to Watch: American League Starting Pitchers

10

Craig Goldstein

These junior-circuit hurlers had elevated BABIPs last year, but was it all because of bad luck?

As we learned in the NL iteration of this exercise, BABIP affects bad and good pitchers alike, but that doesn’t mean it is pure luck. Team defense, ground-ball rates and the ability to miss bats all factor in to a pitcher’s likelihood of retaining a low BABIP, decreasing a high BABIP or just producing consistent a consistent BABIP year-to-year.

Below are the top five BABIP affected pitchers in the American League from 2013. While one has since been sent to the National League, there’s reason to believe that four of the five have the ability to be better this year than they were last year. Then there’s Joe Saunders.


The remainder of this post cannot be viewed at this subscription level. Please click here to subscribe.

This is a BP Fantasy article. To read it, sign up today!

March 10, 2014 6:00 am

Five to Watch: National League Pitchers With Elevated BABIPs

6

Craig Goldstein

These five starters saw a lot of the balls hit against them land for hits, but was it bad luck or a sign of things to come?

A lot of the time, batting average on balls in play (BABIP) is used as a shorthand for luck, and while that can be the case, it’s not necessarily the case. Today I’m going to look at the top five BABIP pitchers in the National League with a minimum of 150 innings pitched to see what, if anything, connects them, and if that means there is hidden value in these players.

The remainder of this post cannot be viewed at this subscription level. Please click here to subscribe.

This is a BP Fantasy article. To read it, sign up today!

October 21, 2013 6:00 am

Fantasy Freestyle: Revisiting BABIP for Fantasy

0

Mike Gianella

Mike reexamines how much you should factor in a player's BABIP this year when forecasting his performance for next year.

Every offseason, there is a hitter or two who is dubbed as a poor bet for next year because of an extremely high BABIP. While the warnings are usually valid, they are often vague and don’t give us enough information. Should we avoid a hitter entirely because of a high BABIP? Or are there circumstances where a strong BABIP hitter might be a decent investment the following season?

Table 1: Top 50 BABIPs 2008-2012

The remainder of this post cannot be viewed at this subscription level. Please click here to subscribe.

All of you, and me. We all suck.

When we did the Blind BABIP test for Jake Peavy last year, we were collectively sliiiiightly better than random guesses. So slight that it was hard to pat ourselves on the back, but better all the same. When we did the Blind BABIP test for Jose Iglesias, we were quite a bit worse than random guesses. On average, each of you got 4.45 answers correct out of 10. It's one thing to say baseball is hard to crack. It's another to say that baseball is actively misleading us, and yet that's the case. Given more information, we do a worse job of figuring out what is going on than if we had no information.

Read the full article...

Ben and Sam answer listener emails about young pitchers, prospects switching positions, Jose Iglesias' high BABIP, and base coaches.

Read the full article...

Can you tell Jose Iglesias' hits from his outs?

Jose Iglesias has a .507 BABIP this year. This article is not about that BABIP, exactly, but we are starting there. Iglesias entered the season with a .164 career BABIP in the majors, and a .300 BABIP in the minors, and a reputation as the best defensive shortstop in baseball, with a bat that might be just weak enough to support that glove. Finding out Jose Iglesias has a .507 BABIP is like finding out that Chin-lung Hu quietly signed with the Pirates and hit 14 home runs in May. Anyway, like I said, this article isn't about that BABIP.

A year ago, we did a blind BABIP test for a Jake Peavy start; 20 balls put in play, 10 were hits, and you tried to guess which were which based on all the information you could collect up to the point of contact. Gosh, did you ever do terribly. Given a 50 percent chance of guessing the correct answers blindly, you collectively got 52 percent of the answers correct. But maybe that wasn't fair; maybe focusing on the pitcher (who, as we know, controls his BABIP only a little bit) is a doomed exercise. Hitters control their BABIP some bit more than that. So maybe we should be focusing on the batter, looking to see if he's balanced and putting a good swing on the ball or flailing, jammed, late, or on top of the ball. So what happens if we do this from the batter's perspective? Will we be any better? I suspect... well, honestly, I don't know.

Read the full article...

Ben and Sam discuss whether a pitcher's body language can cost him strikes, whether it's worth trading for relievers early in the season, a study about perceptions of steroid use, and whether a low BABIP is always unlucky.



Read the full article...

This is a BP Premium article. To read it, sign up for Premium today!

May 2, 2013 12:40 pm

Overthinking It: Three Months in Marco Scutaro's BABIP

4

Ben Lindbergh

A Scutaro hot streak and slump explain why the "good luck" and "bad luck" narratives don't always make sense.

Some players’ stat pages are interesting for any number of reasons. Others are nondescript, save for a single defining stat that stands out so much more than all the others that you quickly come to associate the player with that particular category. Marco Scutaro is a “single stat” guy.

Scutaro’s defining characteristic is that he makes more contact than anyone else. When someone says “Marco Scutaro” 10 years from now, you won’t think about that one time he led the league in sac flies, which his black ink would have us believe was the only time he led the league in anything. You might remember his unusual career arc: a utility guy throughout his 20s who “clearly was put on Earth to be a reserve,” according to Baseball Prospectus 2006, Scutaro bloomed late and became an above-average starter at shortstop in his early- to mid-30s. But mostly you’ll remember that his bat touched the ball on roughly 95 percent of his swings, and that he cut down on his K’s as his career went on while the rest of the league’s strikeout rate rose.

The remainder of this post cannot be viewed at this subscription level. Please click here to subscribe.

This is a BP Premium article. To read it, sign up for Premium today!

April 29, 2013 5:00 am

Pebble Hunting: Ross Detwiler and Baseball's Most Extreme BABIP

9

Sam Miller

What can we learn about hitting from a pitcher with five career hits?

As you know, pitchers seem to demonstrate a small amount of control over their BABIPs, and hitters seem to demonstrate a larger amount of control over their BABIPs. Within reason, at least. No active player has a career BABIP below .244, and no active player has a career BABIP higher than .368, unless you lower the plate appearance threshold to something too low to be significant.

But if you lower the plate appearance threshold to something too low to be significant, then you get to include everybody, including pitchers. Your BABIP if you played baseball would likely be null, because you wouldn’t put any BIP. But if you did put some BIP, your BABIP would be something ridiculously low, like .098 or something absurd.

The remainder of this post cannot be viewed at this subscription level. Please click here to subscribe.

Are we still too accepting of the idea that pitchers have little to no control over balls in play?

I think that we've really misunderstood pitcher BABIP over the years.

The remainder of this post cannot be viewed at this subscription level. Please click here to subscribe.

Ben and Sam answer listener emails about pitcher injuries and pitching prospects, hitter BABIPs (specifically Mike Trout's), and whether they boo baseball players.



Read the full article...

<< Previous Tag Entries No More Tag Entries