<< PECOTA Home Player Search     
');// -->

Jarrod Saltalamacchia
Texas Rangers [ Team Audit ] [ Depth Chart ]
Catcher
Bats B
Age 23
6' 4"
195 lbs.

Player Profile

Other References
Baseball Prospectus DT Player Card
baseball-reference Player Card

Sections
Historical Stats | 2008 Forecast | Diagnostics | Seven-Year Forecast | Valuation | Most Comparable Players | Player Comments

Projected Playing Time

Rangers Depth Chart (updated: 04-24)
PosOrderNamePT%PA AVG R HR RBI SB OBP SLG VORP
C 9 Jarrod Saltalamacchia 30 185 .269 21 6 24 1 .337 .446 6.1
1   2008 Total 30 185 .269 21 6 24 1 .337 .446 6.1

Historical Stats

-- Equivalents --
Year Tm Lg PA R 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS EqBRR AVG OBP SLG MLVr AVG OBP SLG EqA VORP Defense WARP
2005 MYR 1C 529 70 35 1 19 81 57 99 4 2 1.0 .314 .394 .519 .330 .260 .323 .411 .254 13.7 93-C -11 2.6
2006 MIS 2A 377 30 18 1 9 39 55 71 0 1 -1.7 .230 .353 .380 .077 .222 .332 .381 .253 4.6 80-C 2 3.0
2007 MIS 2A 94 18 7 0 6 13 13 17 2 0 -1.5 .309 .404 .617 .484 .277 .362 .566 .306 10.4 20-C 1 1.0
2007 TEX MJ 176 28 7 1 7 21 9 47 0 0 1.1 .251 .290 .431 -.095 .253 .295 .446 .250 1.1 23-1B -7 0.2
2007 ATL MJ 153 11 6 0 4 12 10 28 0 0 -1.4 .284 .333 .411 .004 .286 .340 .421 .264 4.4 21-C -1 0.7


EQA Distribution

Seven-Year WARP

2008 Forecast

(projection generated 3/18/08 6:48 PM)
-- Equivalents --
Percentile PA R 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS EqBRR AVG OBP SLG MLVr AVG OBP SLG EqA VORP Defense WARP
90o 490 73 28 1 21 73 48 100 4 2 -0.9 .305 .377 .521 .218 .302 .377 .535 .312 40.2 116-C -14 5.1
75o 462 60 25 1 18 65 43 95 3 1 -0.8 .287 .357 .483 .120 .283 .356 .496 .294 27.1 109-C -14 4.0
60o 445 54 23 1 16 61 40 92 3 1 -0.7 .276 .344 .460 .061 .272 .344 .472 .284 19.8 106-C -13 3.3
50o 432 49 22 1 15 58 38 90 3 1 -0.7 .268 .335 .444 .017 .264 .335 .455 .276 14.7 103-C -13 2.9
40o 414 43 20 1 13 53 35 87 3 1 -0.7 .257 .323 .421 -.040 .254 .323 .432 .265 8.4 99-C -13 2.3
25o 391 36 18 1 11 48 32 83 3 1 -0.6 .243 .308 .393 -.113 .240 .307 .403 .250 1.1 93-C -12 1.6
10o 347 26 15 1 8 39 26 74 2 1 -0.5 .219 .281 .344 -.239 .217 .280 .353 .224 -9.4 84-C -11 0.5
Weighted Mean 460 54 24 1 16 61 40 96 3 1 -0.7 .269 .337 .446 .025 .266 .337 .458 .276 15.0 109-C -13 3.4

Diagnostics

Breakout Rate Improve Rate Collapse Rate Attrition Rate Beta

48%

69%

15%

18%

1.23

Seven-Year Forecast

-- Equivalents --
Year PA R 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS EqBRR AVG OBP SLG MLVr AVG OBP SLG EqA VORP Defense WARP
2008 (age 23) 460 54 24 1 16 61 40 96 3 1 -0.7 .269 .337 .446 .025 .266 .337 .458 .276 15.0 109-C -13 3.4
2009 (age 24) 491 61 26 2 17 68 46 100 4 1 -0.8 .269 .341 .453 .039 .270 .346 .473 .280 17.5 116-C -13 3.6
2010 (age 25) 477 59 23 1 17 65 45 94 4 1 -0.7 .267 .341 .450 .035 .268 .346 .471 .279 15.8 113-C -11 3.5
2011 (age 26) 517 73 28 2 21 76 53 99 4 2 -0.8 .282 .359 .487 .123 .283 .365 .509 .296 25.7 122-C -12 4.3
2012 (age 27) 511 69 27 1 20 76 51 98 3 1 -0.8 .278 .354 .476 .098 .279 .359 .498 .291 23.1 120-C -13 4.1
2013 (age 28) 446 57 23 1 19 66 47 87 3 1 -0.7 .274 .353 .480 .098 .275 .358 .502 .291 20.5 106-C -13 3.6
2014 (age 29) 506 69 26 1 21 76 54 96 2 1 -0.7 .277 .355 .484 .109 .278 .361 .506 .292 20.7 119-C -14 3.5

Platoon

Platoon AVG OBP SLG
vs LHP .269 .328 .442
vs RHP .269 .341 .450
Split +.000 -.013 -.008
LgAvg +.004 -.004 +.007

Valuation

Year OWARP DWARP Tot WARP MORP SuperVORP Upside
2008 2.0 1.4 3.4 $6,350,000 12.1 16.7
2009 2.3 1.3 3.6 $7,775,000 15.1 20.0
2010 2.1 1.4 3.5 $7,975,000 14.9 18.1
2011 3.0 1.4 4.3 $12,525,000 24.5 31.9
2012 2.7 1.3 4.1 $12,025,000 21.0 27.7
2013 2.5 1.1 3.6 $10,825,000 17.7 24.9
2014 2.4 1.1 3.5 $11,625,000 17.9 21.5
Peak 22.6 $45,575,000 112.7 144.0


Stars & Scrubs Chart

Career Path Analysis


Seven-Year Performance
Year 75% 50% 25% Weighted Mean
2008 .294 .276 .250 .276
2009 .297 .275 .250 .280
2010 .289 .267 .245 .279
2011 .309 .279 .260 .296
2012 .310 .279 .262 .291
2013 .301 .275 .243 .291
2014 .310 .281 .257 .292


Seven-Year Attrition
Year Attrition Rate Drop Rate Breakout
2008 18% 0% 48%
2009 18% 3% 49%
2010 22% 4% 42%
2011 26% 4% 54%
2012 22% 11% 50%
2013 34% 7% 45%
2014 38% 17% 50%

Most Comparable Players

Similarity Index

39

Do the years for these comparables look wrong? They are wrong!
Click here for the scoop. We'll have this fixed as soon as we can.
Rank Hitter Year Score Trend Rank Hitter Year Score Trend
1 Mark Bailey 1992 40 11 John Hale 2003 33
2 Butch Wynegar 1979 36 12 Ron Swoboda 1971 33
3 Dale Sveum 1981 36 13 Keith Hernandez 1982 33
4 Gary Carter 1970 36 14 George Scott 1960 33
5 Ben Davis 1973 35 15 Barry Foote 2007 32
6 Dave Nilsson 1992 35 16 Dale Murphy 1975 32
7 Preston Ward 1975 34 17 Joe Garagiola 1969 32
8 Glenn Borgmann 1975 34 18 Clint Hurdle 2000 31
9 Dioner Navarro 1957 34 19 John Mayberry 1979 30
10 Bob Watson 1998 33 20 Edwin Encarnacion 2005 30

Player Comments

Click on the year to report a comment problem (misspelling, premature cutoff, weird characters or rendering, etc.)

2007

Salty suffered a setback at the plate in 2006 as a hand injury deepened an early slump, but he managed to pick it up as the season wore on, hitting .338/.474/.649 over the last two months. His BABIP was well below average, and should rebound this season, improving all of his numbers the way a rising tide raises all boats. Saltalamacchia also destroyed the ball in a short AFL stint, suggesting he`s back to being one of the best catching prospects in the game. The other good news is that he improved behind the plate, throwing out 36 percent of opposing runners, so talk of moving him to first should be quieted. He`s unlikely to displace McCann, but he gives the Braves options; it`ll be interesting to see which way Schuerholz jumps.

2006

In a system deep in young catching talent, `Salty` has the Braves licking their chops. With Francouer`s graduation to the majors and Marte`s trade, he now rates as the Braves` top prospect, as well as one of the top catching prospects anywhere. Tall for a catcher--leading some to speculate he`ll eventually be moved--he has drawn comparisons to Joe Mauer, but switch-hitting Jason Varitek might be a more accurate comp. He`s got a sweet swing, good plate discipline, and plenty of power. He has also improved defensively, despite nabbing only 26 percent of baserunners. With McCann and Pena, the Braves can afford to take their time with him.


Baseball Prospectus Home  |  Terms of Service  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us
Copyright © 1996-2008 Prospectus Entertainment Ventures, LLC.