
Huston Street PPadresPadres Player Cards | Padres Team Audit | Padres Depth Chart |
| IP | ERA | WHIP | SO | W | L | SV | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subscribe today for access to projection data! | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| YEAR | TEAM | AGE | G | GS | IP | IP-SP | IP-RP | W | L | SV | BS | QS | BQS | PA | H | R | ER | HR | TB | BB | UBB | HBP | SO | ERA | FIP | FRA | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | OAK | 21 | 67 | 0 | 78.3 | 0.0 | 78.3 | 5 | 1 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 306 | 53 | 17 | 15 | 3 | 73 | 26 | 22 | 2 | 72 | 1.72 | 2.78 | 2.85 | 20.6 | 2.1 |
| 2006 | OAK | 22 | 69 | 0 | 70.7 | 0.0 | 70.7 | 4 | 4 | 37 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 290 | 64 | 28 | 26 | 4 | 93 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 67 | 3.31 | 2.67 | 2.47 | 23.7 | 2.3 |
| 2007 | OAK | 23 | 48 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 5 | 2 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 199 | 35 | 20 | 16 | 5 | 56 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 63 | 2.88 | 2.81 | 2.95 | 13.3 | 1.3 |
| 2008 | OAK | 24 | 63 | 0 | 70.0 | 0.0 | 70.0 | 7 | 5 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 287 | 58 | 29 | 29 | 6 | 93 | 27 | 21 | 1 | 69 | 3.73 | 3.51 | 3.94 | 9.6 | 1.0 |
| 2009 | COL | 25 | 64 | 0 | 61.7 | 0.0 | 61.7 | 4 | 1 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 240 | 43 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 72 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 70 | 3.06 | 2.89 | 3.75 | 10.9 | 1.1 |
| 2010 | COL | 26 | 44 | 0 | 47.3 | 0.0 | 47.3 | 4 | 4 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 187 | 39 | 21 | 19 | 5 | 64 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 45 | 3.61 | 3.40 | 4.35 | 5.2 | 0.5 |
| 2011 | COL | 27 | 62 | 0 | 58.3 | 0.0 | 58.3 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 239 | 62 | 28 | 25 | 10 | 107 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 55 | 3.86 | 3.85 | 4.32 | 6.7 | 0.9 |
| 2012 | SDN | 28 | 40 | 0 | 39.0 | 0.0 | 39.0 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 144 | 17 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 30 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 47 | 1.85 | 2.24 | 2.76 | 6.6 | 0.7 |
| 2013 | SDN | 29 | 19 | 0 | 18.3 | 0.0 | 18.3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 37 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 | 4.42 | 7.09 | 8.14 | -6.2 | -0.7 |
| Career | 476 | 0 | 493.7 | 0.0 | 493.7 | 32 | 25 | 211 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 387 | 182 | 168 | 48 | 625 | 130 | 104 | 8 | 501 | 3.06 | 3.19 | 3.56 | 90.5 | 9.2 | ||
| YEAR | Team | Lg | G | GS | IP | FRA | FRA+ | TAv | oppAVG | oppOBP | oppSLG | oppTAv | BABIP | PPF | PVORP | PWARP | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | KNC | A | 9 | 0 | 10.7 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .321 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2004 | MID | AA | 10 | 0 | 13.3 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .312 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2004 | SAC | AAA | 2 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .333 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2004 | pho | Wnt | 13 | 0 | 18.3 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | -.455 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2005 | OAK | MLB | 67 | 0 | 78.3 | 2.85 | 137 | .196 | .273 | .335 | .442 | .270 | .246 | 96 | 20.6 | 2.1 | 20.6 | 2.1 |
| 2006 | OAK | MLB | 69 | 0 | 70.7 | 2.47 | 146 | .224 | .284 | .348 | .459 | .274 | .294 | 93 | 23.7 | 2.3 | 23.7 | 2.3 |
| 2006 | USA | wor | 3 | 0 | 3.2 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2007 | OAK | MLB | 48 | 0 | 50.0 | 2.95 | 135 | .207 | .285 | .349 | .448 | .274 | .252 | 93 | 13.3 | 1.3 | 13.3 | 1.3 |
| 2007 | SAC | AAA | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | -0.01 | 200 | .163 | .300 | .349 | .470 | .263 | .500 | 81 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | OAK | MLB | 63 | 0 | 70.0 | 3.94 | 112 | .236 | .276 | .341 | .440 | .273 | .283 | 95 | 9.6 | 1.0 | 9.6 | 1.0 |
| 2009 | COL | MLB | 64 | 0 | 61.7 | 3.75 | 124 | .189 | .269 | .337 | .421 | .265 | .240 | 109 | 10.9 | 1.1 | 10.9 | 1.1 |
| 2010 | COL | MLB | 44 | 0 | 47.3 | 4.35 | 112 | .218 | .270 | .338 | .429 | .274 | .274 | 112 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 5.2 | 0.5 |
| 2010 | TUL | AA | 2 | 1 | 1.3 | 1.35 | 164 | .141 | .281 | .358 | .405 | .283 | .333 | 84 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | CSP | AAA | 7 | 1 | 7.0 | 5.00 | 120 | .287 | .281 | .351 | .463 | .272 | .455 | 121 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 | COL | MLB | 62 | 0 | 58.3 | 4.32 | 110 | .251 | .265 | .331 | .414 | .268 | .317 | 115 | 6.7 | 0.7 | 6.7 | 0.9 |
| 2011 | CSP | AAA | 2 | 0 | 2.0 | 2.86 | 163 | .038 | .309 | .375 | .475 | .289 | .000 | 138 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | SDN | MLB | 40 | 0 | 39.0 | 2.76 | 129 | .166 | .271 | .331 | .431 | .272 | .179 | 91 | 6.6 | 0.7 | 6.6 | 0.7 |
| 2012 | LEL | A+ | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 36.96 | -476 | .000 | .291 | .360 | .485 | .314 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2013 | SDN | MLB | 19 | 0 | 18.3 | 8.14 | -8 | .317 | .275 | .338 | .443 | .279 | .200 | 94 | -6.2 | -0.7 | -6.2 | -0.7 |
| Career | MLB | 0 | 493.7 | 3.56 | 122 | .217 | .274 | .339 | .437 | .271 | .264 | 100 | 91.1 | 9.1 | 91.2 | 9.3 | ||
| Year | Team | Lg | W | L | SV | G | GS | IP | H | BB | SO | HR | GB% | BABIP | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | WHIP | ERA | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | KNC | A | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 10.7 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 0% | .321 | 7.6 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 11.8 | 1.31 | 1.68 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 | SAC | AAA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0% | .333 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 | MID | AA | 1 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 13.3 | 10 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0% | .312 | 6.8 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 9.5 | 0.98 | 1.35 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2004 | pho | Wnt | 1 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 18.3 | 11 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 0% | -.455 | 5.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 9.3 | 0.71 | 0.98 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | OAK | MLB | 5 | 1 | 23 | 67 | 0 | 78.3 | 53 | 26 | 72 | 3 | 44% | .246 | 6.1 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 8.3 | 1.01 | 1.72 | 20.6 | 2.1 |
| 2006 | USA | wor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3.2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | .000 | 0.0 | 5.6 | 0.0 | 5.6 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2006 | OAK | MLB | 4 | 4 | 37 | 69 | 0 | 70.7 | 64 | 13 | 67 | 4 | 39% | .294 | 8.2 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 8.5 | 1.09 | 3.31 | 23.7 | 2.3 |
| 2007 | SAC | AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100% | .500 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 | OAK | MLB | 5 | 2 | 16 | 48 | 0 | 50.0 | 35 | 12 | 63 | 5 | 44% | .252 | 6.3 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 11.3 | 0.94 | 2.88 | 13.3 | 1.3 |
| 2008 | OAK | MLB | 7 | 5 | 18 | 63 | 0 | 70.0 | 58 | 27 | 69 | 6 | 38% | .283 | 7.5 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 8.9 | 1.21 | 3.73 | 9.6 | 1.0 |
| 2009 | COL | MLB | 4 | 1 | 35 | 64 | 0 | 61.7 | 43 | 13 | 70 | 7 | 41% | .240 | 6.3 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 10.2 | 0.91 | 3.06 | 10.9 | 1.1 |
| 2010 | CSP | AAA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 7.0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 48% | .455 | 14.1 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 11.6 | 1.86 | 10.29 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | TUL | AA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1.3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33% | .333 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 0.0 | 13.8 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | COL | MLB | 4 | 4 | 20 | 44 | 0 | 47.3 | 39 | 11 | 45 | 5 | 38% | .274 | 7.4 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 8.6 | 1.06 | 3.61 | 5.2 | 0.5 |
| 2011 | CSP | AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 50% | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 | COL | MLB | 1 | 4 | 29 | 62 | 0 | 58.3 | 62 | 9 | 55 | 10 | 38% | .317 | 9.6 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 8.5 | 1.22 | 3.86 | 6.7 | 0.9 |
| 2012 | LEL | A+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 50% | .000 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 1.00 | 9.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | SDN | MLB | 2 | 1 | 23 | 40 | 0 | 39.0 | 17 | 11 | 47 | 2 | 43% | .179 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 10.8 | 0.72 | 1.85 | 6.6 | 0.7 |
| 2013 | SDN | MLB | 0 | 3 | 10 | 19 | 0 | 18.3 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 6 | 32% | .200 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 6.4 | 1.31 | 4.42 | -6.2 | -0.7 |
| Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-10-01 | 2012-10-04 | DTD | 3 | 0 | Right | Arm | Soreness | Biceps | - | - |
| 2012-08-11 | 2012-09-21 | 15-DL | 41 | 0 | Left | Lower Leg | Strain | Calf | - | - |
| 2012-05-05 | 2012-06-05 | 15-DL | 31 | 0 | Right | Shoulder | Strain | Latissimus Dorsi | - | - |
| 2011-09-18 | 2011-09-29 | DTD | 11 | 11 | - | Groin | Strain | - | - | |
| 2011-08-09 | 2011-08-26 | 15-DL | 17 | 15 | Right | Upper Arm | Strain | Triceps | - | - |
| 2011-06-25 | 2011-06-28 | DTD | 3 | 3 | Groin | Soreness | - | |||
| 2010-11-09 | 2010-11-09 | Off | 0 | 0 | Trunk | Soreness | Ribs for Last 6 Weeks | - | ||
| 2010-09-29 | 2010-10-04 | DTD | 5 | 5 | Abdomen | Soreness | Oblique | - | ||
| 2010-07-25 | 2010-07-29 | DTD | 4 | 4 | Abdomen | Contusion | Batted Ball | - | ||
| 2010-05-15 | 2010-05-15 | On-Alr | 0 | 0 | Groin | Strain | - | |||
| 2010-03-26 | 2010-06-22 | 15-DL | 88 | 69 | Right | Shoulder | Recovery From Inflammation | - | ||
| 2010-03-01 | 2010-03-26 | Camp | 25 | 0 | Right | Shoulder | Inflammation | - | ||
| 2009-09-02 | 2009-09-22 | DTD | 20 | 18 | Right | Shoulder | Inflammation | Biceps | - | |
| 2009-03-06 | 2009-03-08 | Camp | 2 | 0 | Right | Thigh | Tightness | Quadriceps | - | |
| 2008-06-04 | 2008-06-08 | DTD | 4 | 3 | Groin | Strain | - | |||
| 2007-05-13 | 2007-07-23 | 60-DL | 71 | 63 | Right | Elbow | Neurological Injury | Ulnar Neuritis | - | |
| 2006-08-19 | 2006-09-08 | 15-DL | 20 | 17 | Right | Groin | Strain | - | ||
| 2006-04-19 | 2006-05-02 | DTD | 13 | 11 | Right | Chest | Strain | Pectoralis Minor | - | |
| 2005-06-15 | 2005-06-28 | DTD | 13 | 12 | Left | Thigh | Strain | Hamstring | - |
Compensation
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Huston Street is referenced in the following articles.
requires BP Premium access to view,
requires BP Premium or BP Fantasy access to view
| Date | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-06-10 13:00:00 | Am I a bad person to be rooting for Huston Street to have another setback in his rehab? I'm a Manny Corpas owner in desperate need of saves. (One Flap Down from Clearwater, FL) | We've all done some things we're not proud of as fantasy owners. Unless you're actually rigging traps in his place of rehab, you should feel the same as always. (Marc Normandin) |
| 2009-10-13 14:00:00 | Let's assume for arguments sake that O'Down lets Marquis walk, trades Hawpe for a prospect and non tenders Atkins. That would free up nearly $20MM for 2010. Where would you spend that money? I guess 2B is an obvious upgrade spot, but beyond that, I'm not sure O'Dowd could spend that amount money effectively in free agency. Maybe they could allocate it to the draft and Venezuala? (Dan from Denver) | It's never that simple. Betancourt's on the books for next season if they pick up his option, so that's a big chunk of change ($5+ million). Huston Street's arb-eligible, so is Jorge De La Rosa and Chris Iannetta and Ryan Spilborghs; all will get raises. Tulo's salary goes up a couple of million; so does Jeff Francis' and Manny Corpas'. I wouldn't be surprised if they don't go big-game hunting, beyond seeing what they might get out of a Hawpe deal, whether win-now help or a prospect with near-term value on the big-league team. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2009-09-02 13:00:00 | There is precedent for the closer for big bat trade, i.e. Huston Street for Holliday
(bchak from NM) | Except Street is not Soria and it wasn't a straight 1-1 deal, at all, so it's not a real precedent at all. (Eric Seidman) |
| 2009-09-02 13:00:00 | Eric, you're a bit ornery today (especially considering the pizza). I'm just saying that it's almost as ridiculous to rule out any potential trade out of hand as it is to propose ridiculous trades (like Soria for Howard, for example). Could Soria be packaged with someone like Gordon for a "big bat"? Of course it's possible, but unlikely given KC's history and finances. (bchak from NM) | Not trying to be ornery, apologies if the tone came off that way. It just seemed you were suggesting that because Huston Street was part of a multi-player deal for Holliday that Soria could be traded for a big bat, in sort of a 1-1 fashion as the original question asked. (Eric Seidman) |
| 2008-11-03 13:30:00 | Speaking as a Mets fan to an A's fan, what do you suppose it would realistically take to pry Huston Street from Billy Beane's far-from cold, dead hands? And do you think Street poses the best solution to the Mets bullpen woes (from here he seems to be a better solution than paying retail rates for K-Rod and/or Fuentes, or wishcasting on Putz to be healthy)? (wrightfan5 from MD) | I think you can expect Beane to hold out for the best bits in the organization, but I really doubt that the Mets would deal Fernando Martinez for Street, and if I'm the A's, I don't need or want guys like Mike Carp. Danny Murphy's interesting, but basically this would have to involve a lot of low-level pitching to make it worthwhile. I suppose it depends on whether or not consecutive humiliations at the hands of the Phillies adds any additional impetus; at some point, Omar's going to be the guy taking the blame for failure. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2008-11-03 13:30:00 | Doesn't it make more sense for the Mets to trade Fernando Martinez than keep him? The window for this team is NOW and by the time he would be ready it seems like the window would be closed. Isn't this a rare case where it's better to trade the future for today? (josher464 from NYC) | I can accept that argument, but the real problem then is what is it you want to get with Fernando Martinez? Huston Street? That's a waste of resources; better to just burn money and sign K-Rod if that's your play. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2008-07-30 12:30:00 | Hey John, Is there really a lack of interest in Huston Street, or is Oakland thinking they can get more for him in the offseason? (ashitaka from long beach, ca) | The Athletics are willing to trade him but, justifiably, they want a lot back. If they can't get it now, they'll wait until the winter. (John Perrotto) |
| 2008-07-30 12:30:00 | Will Linebrink's injury force the Sox to acquire a reliever? (Jim from Chicago) | They are looking harder but it won't be a huge deal. I know Huston Street's name keeps getting mentioned but I don't think he's headed to Chicago. (John Perrotto) |
| 2008-07-29 16:00:00 | Does anybody want Huston Street? (John from SF) | Mrs. Street?
The market's pretty thin given what he was worth just a year ago, which is a bit of a surprise. (Will Carroll) |
| 2008-07-24 13:00:00 | To my (untrained) eyes, Huston Street has looked terrible lately. His delivery looks like it's all upper body/arm. (Maybe that groin problem is still bothering him?) Do you get the sense his value is down to the point where Beane won't deal him? (mgibson from DC) | Well, the latest Mill will be up in a few minutes, and Will has something to share on the subject. I'm worried, but that's on the more basic level of fandom, and my sense is that it isn't affecting his value in trade, especially with so many teams on the hunt, and so few "Rauch for nothing" deals available to them. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2008-07-24 13:00:00 | OK, as a Sox fan I would love to see Huston Street on the Southside, but what on Earth do we have to trade for him? Nothing, thanks Kenny. (Doug from Chicago) | Josh Fields is being brought up in that context, and that doesn't sound so terrible to this A's fan. Yes, it's a weakly-stocked system, but if you decide to plan on using some of your playoff revenue to re-sign Joe Crede, Fields is just a prospect on the hoof waiting to be converted into something you can use. Given this team's core, no time like the present. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2008-07-21 15:00:00 | Mr. Carroll- thanks for your time.
Anything to the rumors of Huston Street being next to go from the A's? (Dave from Buffalo, NY) | There's rumors but mostly smoke, no fire. Lots of rumor about bad scouting reports recently, but we'll see. (Will Carroll) |
| 2008-07-17 13:00:00 | Who do you think the Rays will end up with if the asking price for Nady remains high? Matt Murton? Nelson Cruz? (Tommy from OPS,FL) | Gabe Gross and Matt Murton would make an interesting set of corner guys, especially if they can steal Huston Street in the deal too. (Marc Normandin) |
| 2008-03-26 12:00:00 | Is Josh Fields making a run for the top 15 picks in the draft? Is any team looking for a future closer? Maybe Oakland as there is some talk of Huston Street being on the trade block. (Tom Collins from St. Louis) | Fields has been absolutely dominant this season, and I think he has to have some early first round appeal. He's a senior, so he might be a bit cheaper, so maybe the Mets draft him at 18 because they have another pick shortly after. But he's also a guy that a potential playoff contender could draft with the hope that he pitches in September. He's that good, and he's that ready for pro ball. Oakland at 12 seems a bit high for me, though, given that he's just one year removed from some nasty command issues. (Bryan Smith) |
| 2008-01-25 13:30:00 | How much more trade activity do you see coming from Oakland before the season starts? Does it make sense, in your mind, to hold onto any of Blanton, Street, Ellis, and Chavez until the trading deadline and then deal them? (Geoff from Chicago) | Billy Beane has said the stated direction is to get back to the point the team was at just prior to their 2000-2004 run with a stable of prospects that can position them for the next 5 to 7 years.
Given that direction (and since Beane accumulated 9 prospects in the Swisher and Haren deals and so it looks to be working) it would seem that all of those in your list except Huston Street, who at 23 is several years younger than the rest of the bunch, would be candidates for turning over for prospects. That said, since they're not planning on being competitive this year it doesn't seem that would need to deal any of these guys before the season starts and could wait to see if something better comes along. The value of Chavez, unfortunately, is probably at an all-time low (three off-season surgeries and they're not sure he'll be ready by spring training) but Ellis (SFR loves him) and particularly Blanton would certainly be attractive to a lot of teams right now. So for Chavez I would assume that they would be hoping he gets off to a hot start and then find a taker (like the Phils?). (Dan Fox) |
| Date | Roundtable Name | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 2009-10-12 15:00:00 | Phillies/Rockies Playoffs Roundtable | I don't care how many saves the guy has: letting Huston Street, or any right-handed pitcher alive, face Ryan Howard with the season on the line is a mistake. Jim Tracy is making a huge mistake, and if it works, great, but it's a huge, massive mistake. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2009-10-12 15:00:00 | Phillies/Rockies Playoffs Roundtable | Huston Street's OPS split RHB v LHB .619 (129 PA) vs .492 (111 PA) Considering that wicked change-up, this reverse split is NOT a surprise. (William Burke) |
A Collaboration between BrooksBaseball.net and Baseball Prospectus - Pitch classifications provided by Pitch Info LLC
BP Annual Player Comments
The rest of this card is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.
Not a subscriber? Click here for a free card so you can see what's missing.
Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.