|
|
Doctoring the Numbers: The Five-Man Rotation, Part 3
by Rany Jazayerli
To wrap up our series on the merits of the four-man rotation, let's look at some
of the ancillary benefits of making the switch:
In a four-man rotation, there is no dilemma. A starter rests on day 1 after a
start, throws on the side on day 2, rests on day 3, and is back on the mound on
day 4.
Earl Weaver never carried more than 10 pitchers at a time, and frequently kept
just 9. In so doing, he was able to carry as many as seven bench players,
allowing him to mix and match talented role players like John Lowenstein
and Terry Crowley and Benny Ayala. He was able to start a defensive
whiz like Mark Belanger at shortstop because he had enough bullets on his
bench to pinch-hit for Belanger if the Orioles were losing late, and have the
defensive replacement on hand as well.
Today, some teams carry as many as 13 pitchers at a time, leaving room for just
four bench players in the NL, three in the AL - one of whom has to be a backup
catcher. This hamstrings a team's in-game flexibility, limits tactical options
late in the game, and provides little depth to weather injuries.
Switching to a four-man rotation is a move designed to benefit the pitching
staff, but it helps the offense as well.
Three of these four pitchers are among the best starters in the game, and
Schmidt is no slouch. All but Schmidt are on pace to throw over 220 innings
this year. But as these examples show, some of those innings are being used in
low-leverage situations that provide little benefit to their team, because any
major-league pitcher worthy of a roster spot should be able to protect a
five-run lead with two innings to go.
By giving starting pitchers an additional seven or eight starts per year, you
guarantee that those innings will have meaning; after all, every game starts
with a tie score. With more opportunities to pitch, there is less need for a
starter to accumulate innings by working deep into ballgames where he has a
comfortable lead, allowing the less-experienced pitchers on the staff the
opportunity to get some innings in low-pressure situations.
The dilemma of how to best develop pitchers while keeping them healthy has been
vexing baseball teams for decades. Because the minor league season only runs
through Labor Day, there are fewer innings to distribute among minor league
prospects. As every organization wants its best prospects to get as much
repetition as possible, with only 26 or 27 starts available, the only solution
has been to allow those prospects to pitch 6 or 7 innings a start. For a 22- or
23-year-old major league starter, that workload is dangerous; for a 20-year-old
prospect in A-ball, it borders on criminal negligence.
We have already seen at least one influential baseball man, Grady Fuson, take a
different tack. In order to get his charges as much work as possible while
keeping them healthy, Fuson has experimented with a modified version of the
four-man rotation. In his system, eight pitchers are split into four pairs,
working every fourth game, with one member of the pair starting, and the other
relieving after the starter has reached a very conservative pitch limit,
somewhere around 80 pitches. The two pitchers then switch places the next time
through the rotation. Two or three pitchers are made permanent relievers to
fill in the gaps along the way.
Fuson has hit upon something very important: based on the existing research, it
seems safer to allow young pitchers to work on less rest than to allow them to
throw 110 or more pitches in a game. The organization that decides to switch to
a four-man rotation can start at the minor league level, either by using the
Fuson formula or simply going with the traditional four-man rotation, as long as
those starters are placed on very strict pitch counts. With 33 or 34 starts in
a minor league season instead of 26 or 27, those starters won't have to pitch 6
or 7 innings a start to get their innings in. Even averaging only 5 innings per
start, a minor league pitcher in a four-man rotation could throw 165 or 170
innings a season, which is as much as most minor league starters rack up today.
The days of the five-man rotation are numbered. Baseball strategies are
governed by the same evolutionary processes that guide strategies in any
business: those that are successful are kept, while those that are not are
discarded. Major League organizations are learning that the best way to keep
their pitchers healthy is to restrict their pitch counts. Eventually, some
bright guy in a major league front office is going to realize that if the
solution to keeping pitchers healthy is to limit their pitch counts, maybe
limiting their starts isn't part of the solution at all.
And once that light bulb goes on, the only thing that will keep teams from
experimenting with the four-man rotation will be inertia, that pervasive
tendency among baseball teams to keep from rocking the boat and putting their
ass on the line. Don't discount that inertia, for it is a powerful thing - but
eventually, it will be overcome.
At some point in the next five years, I am confident that we will see the return
of the four-man rotation. It might come from the Reds, who have a manager
that's proven he's ballsy enough to try the maneuver, a GM who is willing to
consider anything that might make his team better, and a pitching coach who's
worked wonders building starting staffs out of spare parts. It might come from
another team, one that is both creative and desperate enough to clear away the
mothballs from a concept that worked well 30 years ago, and can still work well
today.
The four-man rotation is poised to make a comeback. As far as I'm concerned, it
can't come back soon enough.
Rany Jazayerli is an author of Baseball Prospectus. You can contact him by
clicking here.
|