|
|
The Daily Prospectus: Padre Problems
by Joe Sheehan
Yesterday, I went down to San Diego to take in the Padres/Rockies game. As I've mentioned many times, I love day baseball, and
really enjoy taking the opportunity to catch a game on a weekday afternoon.
As as been the case with each game I've attended this year, this one didn't have much going for it. Bobby J. Jones
allowed the first five hitters to reach base, the last of whom, Greg Norton, roped a grand slam to give the Rockies a 4-0
lead they wouldn't lose in a 4-2 win. The second through seventh innings were played at a travel-day pace, and only a couple of
aborted Padres rallies in the eighth and ninth produced any tension.
Those of you expecting to see some blue-sky discussion of the Padres, the team I picked to win the NL West, are going to be
disappointed. I think they're done, short their second-best player for the next six weeks and not getting any offense from about
six lineup spots. Even with a healthy Phil Nevin, the Padres were going to have a hard time overcoming the lousy
performance of their three young infielders (AVG/OBP/SLG):
Sean Burroughs: .221/.261/.282
That's awful, and a big reason why the Padres are 15th in the league in runs and
11th in Equivalent Average.
Burroughs is now on the DL with a shoulder injury, and you can expect him to go on a rehab stint once he's healthy. He was on
the brink of a demotion as it was. The injuries will allow Jimenez to keep his second-base job, at least for now, while Vazquez
will battle Jimenez and Deivi Cruz, who has a bit of a halo around him right now, for playing time.
The Padres aren't going to win anything without Nevin, so it's time for them to focus on 2003. That means getting what they can
for Cruz, Jones, Ron Gant, and Ray Lankford and creating room and playing time for Jake Peavy, Ben
Howard, and Xavier Nady. The Pads have some good talent at the upper levels, although their system isn't terribly
deep. They have to decide where they're going to play Nady, Taggert Bozied, and Jake Gautreau, and what they want
the lineup and rotation to look like come next season.
It's not fun, and it makes for a dreary four months—and the nasty aftertaste that my own words leave in my mouth—but it's time
for the Padres to shift their focus. They can win the West in 2003, and I can't say that anymore about 2002.
That might have been understandable, given that the Padres had used Jason Middlebrook for seven innings Wednesday night
following a two-inning start by Brian Tollberg. But in the fourth inning, the exact same situation arose, and Bochy again
allowed Jones to bat. Another strikeout, another wasted opportunity.
Then, in the eighth inning, Bochy allowed Ron Gant, Bubba Trammell, and Wiki Gonzalez to face Todd Jones
with runners on base, leaving left-handed pinch-hitters Ray Lankford and Tom Lampkin on the bench. The Rockies had no
lefty up in the pen, so no countermove was in play. He simply elected to allow all three players—none of whom has a 500 OPS
against righties—to bat. All three made outs, snuffing the rally.
It might have just been one game, but Bochy's reluctance to pinch-hit—coupled with Tuesday night's refusal to pinch-run for the
glacially slow Lampkin in extra innings, a move that probably cost him that game—is a bad sign. If this is what carrying 12
pitchers is going to do to a manager, there is no way that the extra arm outweighs the loss—the giveaway—of in-game tactical
options.
For my part, I was nice enough to mix up Uhlaender with Jim Walewander, the Tigers' infielder from the 1980s. Let's
see...Uhlaender played eight seasons, six as a regular. Walewander played four seasons, zero as a regular. Walewander had 242
career at-bats, Uhlaender exceeded that total in six different seasons.
If Bill Simmons had been there, I would have had him light me on fire.
Joe Sheehan is an author of Baseball Prospectus. You can contact him by
clicking here.
|