
Greg Maddux PBravesBraves Player Cards | Braves Team Audit | Braves Depth Chart |
| Years | IP | W | L | SV | SO | ERA | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | 5008.3 | 355 | 227 | 0 | 3371 | 3.16 | 78.5 |
|
|
| YEAR | TEAM | AGE | G | GS | IP | IP-SP | IP-RP | W | L | SV | BS | QS | BQS | PA | H | R | ER | HR | TB | BB | UBB | HBP | SO | ERA | FIP | FRA | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | CHN | 20 | 6 | 5 | 31.0 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 144 | 44 | 20 | 19 | 3 | 63 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 20 | 5.52 | 3.87 | 4.41 | 4.9 | 0.5 |
| 1987 | CHN | 21 | 30 | 27 | 155.7 | 149.3 | 6.3 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 701 | 181 | 111 | 97 | 17 | 278 | 74 | 61 | 4 | 101 | 5.61 | 4.49 | 5.93 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| 1988 | CHN | 22 | 34 | 34 | 249.0 | 249.0 | 0.0 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 1047 | 230 | 97 | 88 | 13 | 309 | 81 | 65 | 9 | 140 | 3.18 | 3.35 | 4.46 | 12.1 | 1.7 |
| 1989 | CHN | 23 | 35 | 35 | 238.3 | 238.3 | 0.0 | 19 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 1002 | 222 | 90 | 78 | 13 | 305 | 82 | 69 | 6 | 135 | 2.95 | 3.35 | 4.48 | 16.1 | 2.0 |
| 1990 | CHN | 24 | 35 | 35 | 237.0 | 237.0 | 0.0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 1011 | 242 | 116 | 91 | 11 | 323 | 71 | 61 | 4 | 144 | 3.46 | 3.15 | 3.84 | 36.3 | 4.4 |
| 1991 | CHN | 25 | 37 | 37 | 263.0 | 263.0 | 0.0 | 15 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 6 | 1070 | 232 | 113 | 98 | 18 | 338 | 66 | 57 | 6 | 198 | 3.35 | 3.00 | 4.17 | 33.2 | 4.1 |
| 1992 | CHN | 26 | 35 | 35 | 268.0 | 268.0 | 0.0 | 20 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 1 | 1061 | 201 | 68 | 65 | 7 | 268 | 70 | 63 | 14 | 199 | 2.18 | 2.57 | 3.65 | 30.9 | 4.2 |
| 1993 | ATL | 27 | 36 | 36 | 267.0 | 267.0 | 0.0 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 1064 | 228 | 85 | 70 | 14 | 312 | 52 | 45 | 6 | 197 | 2.36 | 2.83 | 3.96 | 38.5 | 4.5 |
| 1994 | ATL | 28 | 25 | 25 | 202.0 | 202.0 | 0.0 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 1 | 774 | 150 | 44 | 35 | 4 | 188 | 31 | 28 | 6 | 156 | 1.56 | 2.33 | 3.16 | 52.4 | 5.7 |
| 1995 | ATL | 29 | 28 | 28 | 209.7 | 209.7 | 0.0 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 785 | 147 | 39 | 38 | 8 | 193 | 23 | 20 | 4 | 181 | 1.63 | 2.22 | 3.42 | 42.9 | 5.2 |
| 1996 | ATL | 30 | 35 | 35 | 245.0 | 245.0 | 0.0 | 15 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 978 | 225 | 85 | 74 | 11 | 315 | 28 | 17 | 3 | 172 | 2.72 | 2.65 | 4.04 | 37.9 | 5.1 |
| 1997 | ATL | 31 | 33 | 33 | 232.7 | 232.7 | 0.0 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 893 | 200 | 58 | 57 | 9 | 264 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 177 | 2.20 | 2.39 | 3.53 | 48.1 | 5.3 |
| 1998 | ATL | 32 | 34 | 34 | 251.0 | 251.0 | 0.0 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 3 | 987 | 201 | 75 | 62 | 13 | 274 | 45 | 35 | 7 | 204 | 2.22 | 2.74 | 4.00 | 44.0 | 5.2 |
| 1999 | ATL | 33 | 33 | 33 | 219.3 | 219.3 | 0.0 | 19 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 940 | 258 | 103 | 87 | 16 | 354 | 37 | 29 | 4 | 136 | 3.57 | 3.34 | 4.62 | 35.3 | 4.4 |
| 2000 | ATL | 34 | 35 | 35 | 249.3 | 249.3 | 0.0 | 19 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 3 | 1012 | 225 | 91 | 83 | 19 | 320 | 42 | 30 | 10 | 190 | 3.00 | 3.15 | 4.30 | 41.6 | 5.2 |
| 2001 | ATL | 35 | 34 | 34 | 233.0 | 233.0 | 0.0 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 1 | 927 | 220 | 86 | 79 | 20 | 322 | 27 | 17 | 7 | 173 | 3.05 | 3.08 | 4.01 | 37.9 | 4.5 |
| 2002 | ATL | 36 | 34 | 34 | 199.3 | 199.3 | 0.0 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 820 | 194 | 67 | 58 | 14 | 270 | 45 | 38 | 4 | 118 | 2.62 | 3.34 | 4.69 | 15.4 | 2.2 |
| 2003 | ATL | 37 | 36 | 36 | 218.3 | 218.3 | 0.0 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 901 | 225 | 112 | 96 | 24 | 353 | 33 | 26 | 8 | 124 | 3.96 | 3.83 | 4.67 | 24.4 | 3.4 |
| 2004 | CHN | 38 | 33 | 33 | 212.7 | 212.7 | 0.0 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 1 | 872 | 218 | 103 | 95 | 35 | 361 | 33 | 29 | 9 | 151 | 4.02 | 4.27 | 5.46 | 8.9 | 1.7 |
| 2005 | CHN | 39 | 35 | 35 | 225.0 | 225.0 | 0.0 | 13 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 936 | 239 | 112 | 106 | 29 | 380 | 36 | 32 | 7 | 136 | 4.24 | 4.03 | 4.96 | 18.6 | 2.4 |
| 2006 | CHN | 40 | 22 | 22 | 136.3 | 136.3 | 0.0 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 572 | 153 | 78 | 71 | 14 | 239 | 23 | 20 | 0 | 81 | 4.69 | 3.76 | 5.00 | 10.9 | 1.5 |
| 2006 | LAN | 40 | 12 | 12 | 73.7 | 73.7 | 0.0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 290 | 66 | 31 | 27 | 6 | 103 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 36 | 3.30 | 3.76 | 4.81 | 10.7 | 1.2 |
| 2007 | SDN | 41 | 34 | 34 | 198.0 | 198.0 | 0.0 | 14 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 830 | 221 | 92 | 91 | 14 | 326 | 25 | 22 | 6 | 104 | 4.14 | 3.52 | 4.00 | 24.9 | 3.1 |
| 2008 | LAN | 42 | 7 | 7 | 40.7 | 40.7 | 0.0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 166 | 43 | 25 | 23 | 5 | 65 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 5.09 | 4.19 | 5.69 | -2.3 | -0.1 |
| 2008 | SDN | 42 | 26 | 26 | 153.3 | 153.3 | 0.0 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 638 | 161 | 80 | 68 | 16 | 247 | 26 | 22 | 5 | 80 | 3.99 | 4.02 | 5.29 | -4.7 | 0.3 |
| Career | 744 | 740 | 5008.3 | 5001.0 | 7.3 | 355 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 480 | 33 | 20421 | 4726 | 1981 | 1756 | 353 | 6770 | 999 | 822 | 137 | 3371 | 3.16 | 3.21 | 4.31 | 619.3 | 78.5 | ||
| YEAR | Team | Lg | G | GS | IP | FRA | FRA+ | TAv | oppAVG | oppOBP | oppSLG | oppTAv | BABIP | PPF | PVORP | PWARP | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | PIK | Rk | 14 | 12 | 85.7 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 1985 | PEO | A | 27 | 27 | 186.0 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 1986 | CHN | MLB | 6 | 5 | 31.0 | 4.41 | 102 | .288 | .269 | .338 | .421 | .269 | .376 | 107 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 4.9 | 0.5 |
| 1986 | PTS | AA | 8 | 8 | 63.7 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 1986 | IOW | AAA | 18 | 18 | 128.3 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 1987 | CHN | MLB | 30 | 27 | 155.7 | 5.93 | 77 | .274 | .275 | .344 | .426 | .270 | .325 | 106 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| 1987 | IOW | AAA | 4 | 4 | 27.7 | 0.00 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 1988 | CHN | MLB | 34 | 34 | 249.0 | 4.46 | 89 | .235 | .261 | .324 | .388 | .267 | .270 | 104 | 5.5 | 0.6 | 12.1 | 1.7 |
| 1989 | CHN | MLB | 35 | 35 | 238.3 | 4.48 | 93 | .247 | .258 | .325 | .389 | .268 | .273 | 106 | 10.1 | 1.1 | 16.1 | 2.0 |
| 1990 | CHN | MLB | 35 | 35 | 237.0 | 3.84 | 116 | .243 | .268 | .335 | .406 | .273 | .296 | 107 | 38.0 | 4.1 | 36.3 | 4.4 |
| 1991 | CHN | MLB | 37 | 37 | 263.0 | 4.17 | 104 | .228 | .265 | .330 | .402 | .270 | .274 | 105 | 27.7 | 2.9 | 33.2 | 4.1 |
| 1992 | CHN | MLB | 35 | 35 | 268.0 | 3.65 | 107 | .208 | .263 | .331 | .392 | .269 | .252 | 102 | 26.0 | 2.8 | 30.9 | 4.2 |
| 1993 | ATL | MLB | 36 | 36 | 267.0 | 3.96 | 112 | .213 | .276 | .341 | .423 | .270 | .269 | 99 | 36.4 | 3.7 | 38.5 | 4.5 |
| 1994 | ATL | MLB | 25 | 25 | 202.0 | 3.16 | 133 | .181 | .281 | .347 | .444 | .270 | .253 | 102 | 50.8 | 4.9 | 52.4 | 5.7 |
| 1995 | ATL | MLB | 28 | 28 | 209.7 | 3.42 | 124 | .170 | .277 | .346 | .435 | .270 | .244 | 97 | 42.4 | 4.1 | 42.9 | 5.2 |
| 1996 | ATL | MLB | 35 | 35 | 245.0 | 4.04 | 112 | .209 | .276 | .345 | .438 | .266 | .280 | 97 | 37.0 | 3.5 | 37.9 | 5.1 |
| 1997 | ATL | MLB | 33 | 33 | 232.7 | 3.53 | 121 | .194 | .273 | .344 | .436 | .270 | .280 | 97 | 46.7 | 4.6 | 48.1 | 5.3 |
| 1998 | ATL | MLB | 34 | 34 | 251.0 | 4.00 | 110 | .206 | .277 | .344 | .438 | .269 | .262 | 96 | 34.2 | 3.4 | 44.0 | 5.2 |
| 1999 | ATL | MLB | 33 | 33 | 219.3 | 4.62 | 103 | .251 | .284 | .357 | .460 | .273 | .324 | 95 | 25.7 | 2.4 | 35.3 | 4.4 |
| 2000 | ATL | MLB | 35 | 35 | 249.3 | 4.30 | 111 | .213 | .278 | .352 | .456 | .270 | .274 | 95 | 37.1 | 3.5 | 41.6 | 5.2 |
| 2001 | ATL | MLB | 34 | 34 | 233.0 | 4.01 | 109 | .224 | .271 | .342 | .447 | .273 | .286 | 93 | 31.7 | 3.1 | 37.9 | 4.5 |
| 2002 | ATL | MLB | 34 | 34 | 199.3 | 4.69 | 92 | .233 | .273 | .344 | .435 | .271 | .282 | 97 | 11.3 | 1.1 | 15.4 | 2.2 |
| 2003 | ATL | MLB | 36 | 36 | 218.3 | 4.67 | 98 | .249 | .271 | .341 | .434 | .268 | .282 | 99 | 22.2 | 2.2 | 24.4 | 3.4 |
| 2004 | CHN | MLB | 33 | 33 | 212.7 | 5.46 | 83 | .246 | .275 | .346 | .446 | .270 | .285 | 100 | 5.9 | 0.6 | 8.9 | 1.7 |
| 2005 | CHN | MLB | 35 | 35 | 225.0 | 4.96 | 95 | .249 | .273 | .343 | .440 | .270 | .288 | 103 | 12.8 | 1.3 | 18.6 | 2.4 |
| 2006 | CHN | MLB | 22 | 22 | 136.3 | 5.00 | 98 | .248 | .275 | .346 | .454 | .270 | .306 | 101 | 11.4 | 1.1 | 10.9 | 1.5 |
| 2006 | LAN | MLB | 12 | 12 | 73.7 | 4.81 | 104 | .213 | .278 | .347 | .455 | .268 | .256 | 103 | 7.4 | 0.7 | 10.7 | 1.2 |
| 2007 | SDN | MLB | 34 | 34 | 198.0 | 4.00 | 107 | .260 | .279 | .348 | .449 | .268 | .304 | 90 | 23.9 | 2.3 | 24.9 | 3.1 |
| 2008 | LAN | MLB | 7 | 7 | 40.7 | 5.69 | 74 | .253 | .277 | .341 | .441 | .273 | .275 | 97 | -1.0 | -0.1 | -2.3 | -0.1 |
| 2008 | SDN | MLB | 26 | 26 | 153.3 | 5.29 | 75 | .252 | .273 | .344 | .443 | .271 | .284 | 91 | -4.9 | -0.5 | -4.7 | 0.3 |
| Career | MLB | 740 | 5008.3 | 4.31 | 103 | .228 | .273 | .341 | .430 | .270 | .281 | 99 | 542.7 | 54.0 | 619.3 | 78.5 | ||
| Year | Team | Lg | W | L | SV | G | GS | IP | H | BB | SO | HR | GB% | BABIP | H/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | WHIP | ERA | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | PIK | Rk | 6 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 12 | 85.7 | 63 | 41 | 62 | 2 | 0% | .000 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 0.2 | 6.5 | 1.21 | 2.63 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1985 | PEO | A | 13 | 9 | 0 | 27 | 27 | 186.0 | 176 | 52 | 125 | 9 | 0% | .000 | 8.5 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 6.0 | 1.23 | 3.19 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1986 | CHN | MLB | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 31.0 | 44 | 11 | 20 | 3 | 62% | .376 | 12.8 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 5.8 | 1.77 | 5.52 | 4.9 | 0.5 |
| 1986 | IOW | AAA | 10 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 18 | 128.3 | 127 | 30 | 65 | 3 | 0% | .000 | 8.9 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 4.6 | 1.22 | 3.02 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1986 | PTS | AA | 4 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 63.7 | 49 | 15 | 35 | 1 | 0% | .000 | 6.9 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 4.9 | 1.00 | 2.68 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1987 | CHN | MLB | 6 | 14 | 0 | 30 | 27 | 155.7 | 181 | 74 | 101 | 17 | 63% | .325 | 10.5 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 5.8 | 1.64 | 5.61 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| 1987 | IOW | AAA | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 27.7 | 17 | 12 | 22 | 1 | 0% | .000 | 5.5 | 3.9 | 0.3 | 7.1 | 1.05 | 0.97 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1988 | CHN | MLB | 18 | 8 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 249.0 | 230 | 81 | 140 | 13 | 57% | .270 | 8.3 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 1.25 | 3.18 | 12.1 | 1.7 |
| 1989 | CHN | MLB | 19 | 12 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 238.3 | 222 | 82 | 135 | 13 | 59% | .273 | 8.4 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 1.28 | 2.95 | 16.1 | 2.0 |
| 1990 | CHN | MLB | 15 | 15 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 237.0 | 242 | 71 | 144 | 11 | 58% | .296 | 9.2 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 5.5 | 1.32 | 3.46 | 36.3 | 4.4 |
| 1991 | CHN | MLB | 15 | 11 | 0 | 37 | 37 | 263.0 | 232 | 66 | 198 | 18 | 56% | .274 | 7.9 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 6.8 | 1.13 | 3.35 | 33.2 | 4.1 |
| 1992 | CHN | MLB | 20 | 11 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 268.0 | 201 | 70 | 199 | 7 | 61% | .252 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 6.7 | 1.01 | 2.18 | 30.9 | 4.2 |
| 1993 | ATL | MLB | 20 | 10 | 0 | 36 | 36 | 267.0 | 228 | 52 | 197 | 14 | 60% | .269 | 7.7 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 6.6 | 1.05 | 2.36 | 38.5 | 4.5 |
| 1994 | ATL | MLB | 16 | 6 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 202.0 | 150 | 31 | 156 | 4 | 61% | .253 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 7.0 | 0.90 | 1.56 | 52.4 | 5.7 |
| 1995 | ATL | MLB | 19 | 2 | 0 | 28 | 28 | 209.7 | 147 | 23 | 181 | 8 | 65% | .244 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 7.8 | 0.81 | 1.63 | 42.9 | 5.2 |
| 1996 | ATL | MLB | 15 | 11 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 245.0 | 225 | 28 | 172 | 11 | 63% | .280 | 8.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 6.3 | 1.03 | 2.72 | 37.9 | 5.1 |
| 1997 | ATL | MLB | 19 | 4 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 232.7 | 200 | 20 | 177 | 9 | 58% | .280 | 7.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 6.8 | 0.95 | 2.20 | 48.1 | 5.3 |
| 1998 | ATL | MLB | 18 | 9 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 251.0 | 201 | 45 | 204 | 13 | 63% | .262 | 7.2 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 7.3 | 0.98 | 2.22 | 44.0 | 5.2 |
| 1999 | ATL | MLB | 19 | 9 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 219.3 | 258 | 37 | 136 | 16 | 55% | .324 | 10.6 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 5.6 | 1.34 | 3.57 | 35.3 | 4.4 |
| 2000 | ATL | MLB | 19 | 9 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 249.3 | 225 | 42 | 190 | 19 | 68% | .274 | 8.1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 6.9 | 1.07 | 3.00 | 41.6 | 5.2 |
| 2001 | ATL | MLB | 17 | 11 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 233.0 | 220 | 27 | 173 | 20 | 61% | .286 | 8.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 6.7 | 1.06 | 3.05 | 37.9 | 4.5 |
| 2002 | ATL | MLB | 16 | 6 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 199.3 | 194 | 45 | 118 | 14 | 67% | .282 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 5.3 | 1.20 | 2.62 | 15.4 | 2.2 |
| 2003 | ATL | MLB | 16 | 11 | 0 | 36 | 36 | 218.3 | 225 | 33 | 124 | 24 | 54% | .282 | 9.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 5.1 | 1.18 | 3.96 | 24.4 | 3.4 |
| 2004 | CHN | MLB | 16 | 11 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 212.7 | 218 | 33 | 151 | 35 | 54% | .285 | 9.2 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 6.4 | 1.18 | 4.02 | 8.9 | 1.7 |
| 2005 | CHN | MLB | 13 | 15 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 225.0 | 239 | 36 | 136 | 29 | 55% | .288 | 9.6 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 5.4 | 1.22 | 4.24 | 18.6 | 2.4 |
| 2006 | CHN | MLB | 9 | 11 | 0 | 22 | 22 | 136.3 | 153 | 23 | 81 | 14 | 52% | .306 | 10.1 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 1.29 | 4.69 | 10.9 | 1.5 |
| 2006 | LAN | MLB | 6 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 73.7 | 66 | 14 | 36 | 6 | 55% | .256 | 8.1 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 4.4 | 1.09 | 3.30 | 10.7 | 1.2 |
| 2007 | SDN | MLB | 14 | 11 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 198.0 | 221 | 25 | 104 | 14 | 54% | .304 | 10.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 4.7 | 1.24 | 4.14 | 24.9 | 3.1 |
| 2008 | SDN | MLB | 6 | 9 | 0 | 26 | 26 | 153.3 | 161 | 26 | 80 | 16 | 51% | .284 | 9.4 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 4.7 | 1.22 | 3.99 | -4.7 | 0.3 |
| 2008 | LAN | MLB | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 40.7 | 43 | 4 | 18 | 5 | 51% | .275 | 9.5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 4.0 | 1.16 | 5.09 | -2.3 | -0.1 |
| Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03-26 | 2002-04-12 | 15-DL | 17 | 10 | Low Back | Neurological Injury | Nerves | - |
Compensation
|
|
Greg Maddux is referenced in the following articles.
requires BP Premium access to view,
requires BP Premium or BP Fantasy access to view
| Date | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-09 13:00:00 | Hey Jay -
Do you feel that the Hall of Fame will start to give guidelines to the voters sooner rather than later when it comes to steroids? I have seen comments regarding how quickly Bagwell shrunk in size as to why someone was not going to vote for him (Chicago Tribune). As Phil Rogers says, 580+ writers, 580+ opinions on the matter.
Thanks (Brian from Tinley Park) | Good question. I think we're years away from that, because while there are several candidates about to hit the ballot whose careers have been linked to PED use, there are also a bunch of milestone candidates whose elections are a virtual lock. Even without Barry Bonds and Roger Clmeens, you'll still have Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, Randy Johnson and Craig Biggio on that score, as well as solid candidates without the milestones OR PED connections such as John Smoltz and Curt Schilling. I think we're years away before the Hall feels a need to interject itself into the debate on the guideline grounds. (Jay Jaffe's Hall of Fame Special) |
| 2012-01-09 13:00:00 | Most likely to break 1st year ballot vote percentage record: Jeter or Mariano? (tommybones from brooklyn) | Tough call. I'd bet both are high 90s but that Greg Maddux tops either; Jeter's defense and Mariano's relief role will keep a few voters away. (Jay Jaffe's Hall of Fame Special) |
| 2011-05-12 13:00:00 | How DOES Shawn Marcum work? Its bizarre that someone who doesn't break 90 on a radar gun gets those Ks. Is it sustainable? (WisconsinRob from Madison) | I sure hope so. Theoretically, at least, a sub-90 mph pitcher can sustainably strike players out with smart sequencing, good pitches, and good accuracy. Trevor Hoffman, Jamie Moyer, Greg Maddux, etc... Whether Marcum continues to do that is tough to say. He's done a remarkable job of keeping it up since last year, though. I wouldn't be surprised if he continues to do so. (Larry Granillo) |
| 2011-04-18 13:00:00 | Can you compare Greg Maddux to Jamie Moyer? (Jeff from Eh...) | Bo Jackson has better tools. (Kevin Goldstein) |
| 2010-12-07 13:00:00 | There was interesting article I believe in FanGraphs on the decline of Greinke. That it's not just an off year. Thoughts? I watch him and his stuff, arsenal of pitches, and approach to pitching, I'm blown away. I see a guy i'd want more than Felix. Am I hallucinating? (SK from DC) | Greinke's command was a little off this year on all of his pitches. He still had his control, he just didn't fool hitters as much with it, hence fewer strikeouts. Without the extra-special command, he's still great, he's just not Greg Maddux. There is no shame in being Greg Maddux Lite. (Marc Normandin) |
| 2010-03-24 11:00:00 | So if the qualities of Colby Lewis' pitches are nothing special, what's made him able to dominate hitters in Japan? Presumably that's a skill hitters aren't used to seeing over there, but isn't special in MLB. Identifying those specific factors could be valuable to both MLB teams and Japanese teams.
Heck, maybe Matsuzaka's struggled with the same thing -- he can throw many decent pitches but without any one that's great. (Sky from The Roc, NY) | One way to look at it is by analogy to pinpoint control guys who struggle when they hit the majors. Lewis had a (filthy) 369/49 K/BB ratio in two season in Japan. He walked 19 guys last year. That just isn't realistic in the major leagues, because if you left that many low-90s fastballs in the zone, American League hitters would eat your lunch. *Unless you're Greg Maddux, and he isn't. (Tommy Bennett) |
| 2009-12-29 15:00:00 | When eligible Greg Maddux will receive ___% of the vote for the Hall of Fame. (paulbellows from Calgary) | 99.3%. There's always someone.
Here's my problem: if you're a "no first ballot" guy, you've never gotten to vote for some of the greatest players in history. There's a guy out there who never voted for Rickey, Cal, et al, and to me, that's just sad. It would be an honor to vote for a player like that. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2009-10-13 14:00:00 | Your thoughts on Jair Jurrjens' future please. (Frug from UIUC) | There were some who thought his 2008 season would be his best; obviously, he chose to disagree. He suffers from some of the biases against "short" right-handers, and he isn't throwing any harder. Still, he outperformed Lowe (and Kawakami). It seems crazy that even before this season, two of his top comps were Greg Maddux and Dave Stieb, two of the best "short" right-handers of the past generation. It also suggests how extraordinary Jurrjens already is, which is where all the doubt comes from. Could he really be that good? I don't think we can say yes or no with anything like the same sort of authority as we can with more typical players. I'd take my chances with him, certainly. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2009-10-08 14:00:00 | So how good is Porcello, now that he's shown he can strike guys out when needed? (Wendy from Madrid) | Do I need to write an article comparing him to Greg Maddux every six weeks? I love the guy. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2009-10-05 16:00:00 | In what year do you think HOF voting will be "correct" in terms of who gets in (i.e. 98 of 100 or so of the inductees are actually deserving)? Will it have to wait for the fan base to be better versed in statistics? (Tony from Brooklyn, NY) | The first thing that needs to happen is for people who won't vote based on dumb principles like players not ratting on others who took steroids to not have their votes anymore. Or for people who forget to vote for deserving players or neglect to include them because "they'll get in anyway" to lose their voting rights. If Greg Maddux is not a 100% unanimous choice... if Pedro Martinez is not 100%... if Randy Johnson is not 100%... etc. (Eric Seidman) |
| 2009-09-02 13:00:00 | Eric, what team do you root for and who was your favorite player as a kid? (Tex Premium Lager from NJ) | Phillies. Greg Maddux is and always will be my favorite baseball player. (Eric Seidman) |
| 2009-06-15 13:00:00 | Hey Will. Do you have any idea what Jose Contreras did during his demotion to AAA Charlotte to transform himself into 1995 Greg Maddux? (Phil S. from NJ) | No, and things like this are a great mystery. Teams credit their minor league coaches about as often as Apple credits an engineer. (Will Carroll) |
| 2009-06-08 14:00:00 | He went on strike, but isn't Greg Maddux the next test case? (Jon from DC) | No, because he went on strike. I don't remember which guy(s), but at least one voter is on record as saying he'll never vote for a player who went on strike. Jeter doesn't have that. He doesn't have PEDs. He is fully qualified even noting the defense. He's visible and popular and nice. If he's not unanimous, the guy who leaves him off is showboating, plain and simple. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2009-06-08 14:00:00 | Mussina won 20 last year. I think that gets him over the hump. I think people tend to lump him in with the Greg Maddux's of the world. Maybe not a first balloter, but I think he's a certainty. (shamah from NYC) | I'm aware of that. He's still the "almost" guy.
I like Mike Mussina as much as anyone, and I'll tell you right now that no one on this planet lumps him in with "the Greg Maddux's of the world." Nor should they. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2009-06-05 15:30:00 | Eric, on your IMDB page it says you haven't missed a 76ers game in years. Might we see you write for Basketball Prospectus? (Jay from SD) | One of my goals for 2009 was to get more in tune with advanced basketball analysis. It hasn't happened yet for lack of time but I think it would be fun to compare my scouting eyes from watching so much over the years to what the numbers say. With baseball, I tend to only watch the Phillies, Greg Maddux, Matt Cain, and the 5 innings of Javier Vazquez before he implodes. With the NBA, I could watch a Grizzlies-Wizards game and be entertained. (Eric Seidman) |
| 2009-06-05 15:30:00 | Thanks for answering my question. What's your take on the not-so-great reputation of Phillies fans? Do you think it's deserved/accurate or overblown? You don't hear the same thing about other East Coast teams in the area (Orioles, Mets, Yankees, Pirates), so I'm curious if this a matter of perception vs. reality. (David S from Oakland) | It's odd... in many cases it is overblown. For instance, Phillies fans went crazy for Ken Griffey, Jr last year when he came to town with 599 HR, giving him these loud standing ovations every time he came up and every time he went back to the dugout. They also gave Greg Maddux a loud ovation when he left a game, because even though he was a rival for about 13 years, they understood how special of a player they got to see. They even cheered Pat Burrell on when he was struggling in 2003, hoping it might get him out of it. But then again there are certainly knuckleheads, like in any city, who seem to remember one thing about a player and assign that characteristic no matter what. (Eric Seidman) |
| 2009-01-22 13:00:00 | Jeff Kent - Hall of famer? (leitch71 from Baltimore) | I'm considering taking up this question -- and that of other recent retirees like Greg Maddux and Mike Mussina -- for my next piece, so I'll withhold comment until then.
Apologies for the technical difficulties thus far. The epically slow load times I'm experiencing on this end have me needing to reset the chat. Back momentarily... (Jay Jaffe) |
| 2008-10-15 13:00:00 | While I admire the Rays' long term plan and also recognize that this idea may be impossible financially, similar to how the Braves signed Greg Maddux prior to the 1993 season, I am intrigued by the idea of the Rays signing CC Sabbathia this offseason. What do you think? (Brent from Raleigh) | It's an interesting thought, and who's to say it couldn't happen, but I think they are probably pretty set in the rotation and focused on continuing to build from within rather than making that huge signing. If you figure that Price slots into the rotation next year, that's Shields, Kazmir, Garza, Price, and Sonnanstine, with Jeff Niemann and Edwin Jackson as insurance. Of course, injuries could upset that, and you can never have too much starting pitching, but I think the Rays will probably focus on offense. Remember, they were second in the AL in run prevention this year, but only ninth in runs scored. I would think they might look at getting another outfield bat for right field/DH, and as more insurance in case Baldelli is unable to play a full season again. (Caleb Peiffer) |
| 2008-10-06 14:00:00 | Okay, to take Pete from Boston's question to the next level... will we ever have a unanimous first ballot hall of famer? I know there are some who refuse to vote for anyone from the steroid era... but that era has passed. So perhaps Evan Longoria? Madison Baumgarner? (Nick from Chicago) | There are actually some who refuse to vote for any player who went on strike, so you need someone who's career started in 1995 or later. I don't think anyone has said they wouldn't vote for anyone from the steroid era, and in fact, I've heard more the opposite--we can't know who did what, so it's unfair to punish only a few.
Jeter is the obvious choice. Greg Maddux before him, I guess, will be a test. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2008-08-01 14:00:00 | Jay,
what do you see happening over the waiver wires in the next month? And can I still dump Jack Wilson for more prospects, or do I need to wait until the winter? (NealH from Pittsburgh, PA) | I have it on good authority that Jeff Conine will come out of retirement for the express purpose of being included in a waiver deal.
Beyond that I think we can expect to see action on some of the aforementioned Mariners, maybe some junk from the Orioles (Millar, Payton, Mora, Huff) or the Giants (Aurilia, Winn). Paul Byrd, Greg Maddux, maybe either Pierre or Andruw if the Dodgers are willing to eat a whole lot of salary. Jack Wilson can probably be dumped for prospects if you're willing to eat salary, but given what he's locked in for ($6.5M this year, $7.25M in 2009, $8.4M/0.6M club option in 2010) I don't think he's all that appealing or will draw much in the way of prospects. Thank your predecessor once again. (Jay Jaffe) |
| 2008-07-29 16:00:00 | Padres trade: Adrian Gonzalez, Greg Maddux, Heath Bell
Yankees send: Austin Jackson, Phil Hughes, Ian Kennedy, Melky Cabrera, Cano and a throw-in of Kei Igawa (dcoonce from bloomington, indiana) | You've been at Nick's early, haven't you? (Will Carroll) |
| 2008-07-25 14:00:00 | Loved your recent articles on santana. The other day my friend said he was having a bad year, when I asked how he came to that conclusion his response was "his era is in the threes." (its 3.05). Let me just say I now completely understand why some people may consider you a bit hawkish, my response used worse language than I have ever heard you use. Has there ever been another multiple cy young award winner that somehow managed to become underrated? (kevin from boston) | Greg Maddux. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2008-05-23 13:00:00 | Halladay has always been known for having some pretty good stuff as well as great control. He's kind of reminded me of Greg Maddux with a fastball. So his drop in strikeouts the past couple of years concerned me. Why have his strikeouts increased this year? What is he doing differently? (Wendy from Madrid) | I'm not sure--probably just a random fluctuation. Unless you can divine something from his pitch data: http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1303&position=P (Caleb Peiffer) |
| 2008-03-11 12:00:00 | What do you expect out of Chien-Min-Wang this year and for the future, it seems like we may have already seen his best pitching. (SnakeDoctor18 from Washington DC) | There's an upper bound on how good a pitcher with his contact rate can be, so I'd agree with the idea. It's always possible that he'll end up in front of some terrific defense, in which case he could post an ERA in the 2.50 range. He never gives up homers and doesn't walk people; take away the hits, and you have Greg Maddux just outside of his peak. (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2008-03-06 13:00:00 | I think it's unfair to label Randy Johnson a "freak show". Roger Clemens had a freakishly powerful and durable arm; Greg Maddux had a freakish ability to locate a pitch. To be that good one has to have some "freak" in their DNA. (havybeaks from Michigan) | That wasn't meant to be derogatory at all. Most major leaguers are freak shows in that their skill sets are so incredibly rare that the average major leaguer is worth a couple million dollars a year, and the best of them are worth upwards of $20 million at their peak.
At those prices, i wish I could get my freak on. Ok folks, I'm going to take one more question.... (Jay Jaffe) |
| Date | Roundtable Name | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-10-06 10:00:00 | 2010 Playoffs Day One | "Paul (Drexel Hill): Gentlemen, prepare to watch the best pitcher of our generation work his magic. Sit back and enjoy." Honest question, but how do we quantify our generation? Does this current generation include Greg Maddux, Pedro Martinez, and Roger Clemens? Halladay is a good one, but he's definitely in their rear-view mirrors. (Brandon Warne) |
| 2010-10-06 10:00:00 | 2010 Playoffs Day One | "Paul (Drexel Hill): Gentlemen, prepare to watch the best pitcher of our generation work his magic. Sit back and enjoy." Honest question, but how do we quantify our generation? Does this current generation include Greg Maddux, Pedro Martinez, and Roger Clemens? Halladay is a good one, but he's definitely in their rear-view mirrors. (Brandon Warne) |
| 2009-10-16 13:00:00 | NLCS Game Two/ALCS Game One | A year out of date, but compare the peak scores of these then-active pitchers: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7451 Roger Clemens: 83.9 Greg Maddux 86/0 Randy Johnson 77.3 Pedro Martinez 68.8 Curt Schilling 65.9 Mike Mussina 64.3 Tom Glavine 63.7 John Smoltz 58.5 Avg HoF SP 67.2 (Jay Jaffe) |
A Collaboration between BrooksBaseball.net and Baseball Prospectus - Pitch classifications provided by Pitch Info LLC
BP Annual Player Comments
The rest of this card is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.
Not a subscriber? Click here for a free card so you can see what's missing.
Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.