
Mark Ellis 2BDodgersDodgers Player Cards | Dodgers Team Audit | Dodgers Depth Chart |
| PA | AVG | HR | R | RBI | SB | TAv | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subscribe today for access to projection data! | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| YEAR | TEAM | AGE | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | TB | BB | SO | HBP | SF | SH | RBI | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | TAv | VORP | FRAA | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | OAK | 25 | 98 | 404 | 345 | 58 | 94 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 136 | 44 | 54 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 35 | 4 | 2 | .272 | .359 | .394 | .278 | 20.5 | 2.0 | 2.3 |
| 2003 | OAK | 26 | 154 | 622 | 553 | 78 | 137 | 31 | 5 | 9 | 205 | 48 | 94 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 52 | 6 | 2 | .248 | .313 | .371 | .250 | 13.0 | 15.7 | 2.8 |
| 2005 | OAK | 28 | 122 | 486 | 434 | 76 | 137 | 21 | 5 | 13 | 207 | 44 | 51 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 52 | 1 | 3 | .316 | .384 | .477 | .307 | 33.9 | 2.5 | 3.7 |
| 2006 | OAK | 29 | 124 | 500 | 441 | 64 | 110 | 25 | 1 | 11 | 170 | 40 | 76 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 52 | 4 | 0 | .249 | .319 | .385 | .247 | 6.3 | -3.5 | 0.3 |
| 2007 | OAK | 30 | 150 | 642 | 583 | 84 | 161 | 33 | 3 | 19 | 257 | 44 | 94 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 76 | 9 | 4 | .276 | .336 | .441 | .280 | 21.6 | 24.2 | 4.4 |
| 2008 | OAK | 31 | 117 | 507 | 442 | 55 | 103 | 20 | 3 | 12 | 165 | 53 | 65 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 41 | 14 | 2 | .233 | .321 | .373 | .249 | 9.9 | 9.1 | 1.9 |
| 2009 | OAK | 32 | 105 | 410 | 377 | 52 | 99 | 23 | 0 | 10 | 152 | 23 | 54 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 61 | 10 | 3 | .263 | .305 | .403 | .241 | 1.4 | 4.4 | 0.6 |
| 2010 | OAK | 33 | 124 | 492 | 436 | 45 | 127 | 24 | 0 | 5 | 166 | 40 | 56 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 49 | 7 | 6 | .291 | .358 | .381 | .283 | 21.7 | 3.3 | 2.6 |
| 2011 | COL | 34 | 70 | 286 | 263 | 34 | 72 | 13 | 0 | 6 | 103 | 14 | 43 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 25 | 7 | 3 | .274 | .317 | .392 | .237 | -0.1 | -0.3 | -0.0 |
| 2011 | OAK | 34 | 62 | 233 | 217 | 21 | 47 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 63 | 8 | 32 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 7 | 2 | .217 | .253 | .290 | .213 | -3.9 | 4.8 | 0.1 |
| 2012 | LAN | 35 | 110 | 464 | 415 | 62 | 107 | 21 | 1 | 7 | 151 | 40 | 70 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 5 | 0 | .258 | .333 | .364 | .261 | 10.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| 2013 | LAN | 36 | 45 | 168 | 150 | 17 | 40 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 53 | 7 | 28 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 2 | 0 | .267 | .313 | .353 | .259 | 6.2 | -0.5 | 0.6 |
| Career | 1281 | 5214 | 4656 | 646 | 1234 | 242 | 23 | 102 | 1828 | 405 | 717 | 66 | 36 | 51 | 508 | 76 | 27 | .265 | .330 | .393 | .262 | 141.0 | 62.6 | 20.5 | ||
| YEAR | Team | Lg | G | PA | TAv | oppAVG | oppOBP | oppSLG | oppTAv | BABIP | BPF | BRAA | repLVL | POS_ADJ | FRAA | BRR | BVORP | BWARP | VORP | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | SPO | A- | 0 | 331 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .363 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| 2000 | WIL | A+ | 0 | 569 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .345 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| 2000 | WIC | AA | 0 | 27 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .412 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| 2001 | SAC | AAA | 132 | 541 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .306 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| 2002 | OAK | MLB | 98 | 404 | .278 | .265 | .326 | .426 | .000 | .306 | 94 | 7.8 | 10.8 | -0.3 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 20.5 | 2.3 | 20.5 | 2.3 |
| 2002 | SAC | AAA | 21 | 94 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .352 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| 2003 | OAK | MLB | 154 | 622 | .250 | .267 | .326 | .426 | .000 | .281 | 95 | -6.9 | 16.9 | -0.8 | 15.7 | 5.1 | 13.0 | 2.8 | 13.0 | 2.8 |
| 2005 | OAK | MLB | 122 | 486 | .307 | .267 | .323 | .417 | .000 | .335 | 97 | 24.3 | 12.9 | -0.4 | 2.5 | -2.7 | 33.9 | 3.7 | 33.9 | 3.7 |
| 2006 | OAK | MLB | 124 | 500 | .247 | .269 | .328 | .425 | .000 | .274 | 94 | -7.1 | 13.8 | -0.7 | -3.5 | 0.6 | 6.3 | 0.3 | 6.3 | 0.3 |
| 2006 | SAC | AAA | 4 | 16 | .299 | .274 | .349 | .450 | .000 | .200 | 86 | 0.7 | 0.4 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 | OAK | MLB | 150 | 642 | .280 | .266 | .327 | .417 | .000 | .300 | 94 | 14 | 18.5 | -0.9 | 24.2 | -2.8 | 21.6 | 4.4 | 21.6 | 4.4 |
| 2008 | OAK | MLB | 117 | 507 | .249 | .263 | .324 | .410 | .000 | .248 | 95 | -5.7 | 14.5 | -0.7 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 9.9 | 1.9 | 9.9 | 1.9 |
| 2009 | OAK | MLB | 105 | 410 | .241 | .260 | .325 | .413 | .000 | .280 | 96 | -8.1 | 11.9 | -0.5 | 4.4 | -1.8 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 2009 | STO | A+ | 2 | 5 | .112 | .277 | .337 | .388 | .000 | .000 | 94 | -0.8 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2009 | SAC | AAA | 8 | 33 | .140 | .285 | .348 | .451 | .000 | .194 | 87 | -4.3 | 0.9 | 0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | OAK | MLB | 124 | 492 | .283 | .258 | .318 | .405 | .000 | .321 | 93 | 11.7 | 13.9 | -1.1 | 3.3 | -1.1 | 21.7 | 2.6 | 21.7 | 2.6 |
| 2010 | STO | A+ | 2 | 7 | .384 | .280 | .341 | .401 | .000 | .200 | 84 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | SAC | AAA | 1 | 4 | .224 | .267 | .326 | .421 | .000 | .333 | 82 | -0.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2011 | COL | MLB | 70 | 286 | .237 | .250 | .307 | .386 | .000 | .307 | 114 | -6.6 | 4.9 | -0.3 | -0.3 | 2.4 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.1 | -0.0 |
| 2011 | OAK | MLB | 62 | 233 | .213 | .259 | .313 | .401 | .000 | .249 | 94 | -10.9 | 4.2 | -0.4 | 4.8 | 0.7 | -3.9 | 0.1 | -3.9 | 0.1 |
| 2011 | SAC | AAA | 3 | 11 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .200 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| 2012 | LAN | MLB | 110 | 464 | .261 | .254 | .312 | .400 | .000 | .296 | 96 | 0.4 | 7.9 | -0.6 | 0.9 | -1.4 | 10.5 | 1.2 | 10.5 | 1.2 |
| 2012 | RCU | A+ | 4 | 16 | -.005 | .318 | .381 | .540 | .000 | .364 | 100 | -1.1 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | LAN | MLB | 45 | 168 | .259 | .246 | .307 | .386 | .252 | .301 | 97 | -0.1 | 4.6 | -0.2 | -0.5 | 0.6 | 6.2 | 0.6 | 6.2 | 0.6 |
| 2013 | CHT | AA | 2 | 5 | .240 | .226 | .289 | .320 | .234 | .000 | 104 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| Career | MLB | 5214 | .262 | .262 | .322 | .412 | .259 | .292 | 96 | 12.2 | 139.4 | -6.9 | 62.7 | 4.4 | 140.1 | 20.5 | 140.1 | 20.5 | ||
| Year | Team | Lg | PA | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | ISO | TAv | VORP | FRAA | WARP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | SPO | A- | 331 | 67 | 92 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 47 | 47 | 40 | 21 | 7 | .327 | .429 | .452 | .125 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 | WIL | A+ | 569 | 83 | 146 | 27 | 4 | 6 | 62 | 78 | 72 | 25 | 7 | .302 | .406 | .411 | .110 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2000 | WIC | AA | 27 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | .318 | .444 | .364 | .045 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2001 | SAC | AAA | 541 | 71 | 129 | 38 | 0 | 10 | 53 | 54 | 78 | 21 | 7 | .273 | .351 | .417 | .144 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2002 | OAK | MLB | 404 | 58 | 94 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 35 | 44 | 54 | 4 | 2 | .272 | .359 | .394 | .122 | .278 | 20.5 | 2.0 | 2.3 |
| 2002 | SAC | AAA | 94 | 14 | 25 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 4 | 0 | .298 | .372 | .440 | .143 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2003 | OAK | MLB | 622 | 78 | 137 | 31 | 5 | 9 | 52 | 48 | 94 | 6 | 2 | .248 | .313 | .371 | .123 | .250 | 13.0 | 15.7 | 2.8 |
| 2005 | OAK | MLB | 486 | 76 | 137 | 21 | 5 | 13 | 52 | 44 | 51 | 1 | 3 | .316 | .384 | .477 | .161 | .307 | 33.9 | 2.5 | 3.7 |
| 2006 | OAK | MLB | 500 | 64 | 110 | 25 | 1 | 11 | 52 | 40 | 76 | 4 | 0 | .249 | .319 | .385 | .136 | .247 | 6.3 | -3.5 | 0.3 |
| 2006 | SAC | AAA | 16 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .167 | .375 | .167 | .000 | .299 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2007 | OAK | MLB | 642 | 84 | 161 | 33 | 3 | 19 | 76 | 44 | 94 | 9 | 4 | .276 | .336 | .441 | .165 | .280 | 21.6 | 24.2 | 4.4 |
| 2008 | OAK | MLB | 507 | 55 | 103 | 20 | 3 | 12 | 41 | 53 | 65 | 14 | 2 | .233 | .321 | .373 | .140 | .249 | 9.9 | 9.1 | 1.9 |
| 2009 | OAK | MLB | 410 | 52 | 99 | 23 | 0 | 10 | 61 | 23 | 54 | 10 | 3 | .263 | .305 | .403 | .141 | .241 | 1.4 | 4.4 | 0.6 |
| 2009 | STO | A+ | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .200 | .000 | .000 | .112 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 2009 | SAC | AAA | 33 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .182 | .182 | .212 | .030 | .140 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | OAK | MLB | 492 | 45 | 127 | 24 | 0 | 5 | 49 | 40 | 56 | 7 | 6 | .291 | .358 | .381 | .089 | .283 | 21.7 | 3.3 | 2.6 |
| 2010 | STO | A+ | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .200 | .333 | .200 | .000 | .384 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | SAC | AAA | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .250 | .250 | .250 | .000 | .224 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 2011 | OAK | MLB | 233 | 21 | 47 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 32 | 7 | 2 | .217 | .253 | .290 | .074 | .213 | -3.9 | 4.8 | 0.1 |
| 2011 | COL | MLB | 286 | 34 | 72 | 13 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 14 | 43 | 7 | 3 | .274 | .317 | .392 | .118 | .237 | -0.1 | -0.3 | -0.0 |
| 2011 | SAC | AAA | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .200 | .273 | .300 | .100 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | LAN | MLB | 464 | 62 | 107 | 21 | 1 | 7 | 31 | 40 | 70 | 5 | 0 | .258 | .333 | .364 | .106 | .261 | 10.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| 2012 | RCU | A+ | 16 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | .286 | .375 | .286 | .000 | -.005 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | CHT | AA | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .200 | .000 | .000 | .240 | 0.8 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| 2013 | LAN | MLB | 168 | 17 | 40 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 7 | 28 | 2 | 0 | .267 | .313 | .353 | .087 | .259 | 6.2 | -0.5 | 0.6 |
| Date On | Date Off | Transaction | Days | Games | Side | Body Part | Injury | Severity | Surgery Date | Reaggravation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-06-06 | 2013-06-07 | DTD | 1 | 1 | - | Groin | Strain | - | - | |
| 2013-04-27 | 2013-05-19 | 15-DL | 22 | 19 | Right | Thigh | Strain | Quadriceps | - | - |
| 2012-09-26 | 2012-09-28 | DTD | 2 | 2 | - | General Medical | Illness | - | - | |
| 2012-05-19 | 2012-07-04 | 15-DL | 46 | 43 | Left | Lower Leg | Surgery | Compartment Syndrome Acute | 2012-05-19 | - |
| 2011-09-11 | 2011-09-13 | DTD | 2 | 1 | - | Neck | Soreness | - | - | |
| 2011-06-07 | 2011-06-22 | 15-DL | 15 | 13 | Right | Thigh | Strain | Hamstring | - | |
| 2011-04-30 | 2011-05-01 | DTD | 1 | 1 | General Medical | Respiratory | Flu | - | ||
| 2011-04-07 | 2011-04-07 | DTD | 0 | 0 | General Medical | Illness | Ear Infection | - | ||
| 2010-04-21 | 2010-05-22 | 15-DL | 31 | 28 | Left | Thigh | Strain | Hamstring | - | |
| 2010-04-12 | 2010-04-20 | DTD | 8 | 7 | Left | Thigh | Soreness | Hamstring | - | |
| 2010-03-23 | 2010-03-25 | Camp | 2 | 0 | Bilateral | Thigh | Soreness | Hamstring | - | |
| 2009-04-29 | 2009-06-28 | 60-DL | 60 | 55 | Lower Leg | Strain | Calf | - | ||
| 2009-02-15 | 2009-03-22 | Camp | 35 | 0 | Right | Shoulder | Recovery From Surgery | Labrum and Loose Bodies | 2008-09-19 | |
| 2008-09-01 | 2008-09-29 | 60-DL | 28 | 24 | Right | Shoulder | Surgery | Labrum and Loose Bodies | 2008-09-19 | |
| 2008-08-28 | 2008-08-30 | DTD | 2 | 2 | Right | Shoulder | Inflammation | - | ||
| 2008-08-23 | 2008-08-27 | DTD | 4 | 4 | Right | Shoulder | Inflammation | - | ||
| 2008-07-22 | 2008-07-25 | DTD | 3 | 2 | Right | Shoulder | Soreness | - | ||
| 2008-06-23 | 2008-06-25 | DTD | 2 | 1 | General Medical | Illness | - | |||
| 2008-05-12 | 2008-05-23 | DTD | 11 | 9 | Left | Thigh | Strain | Hamstring | - | |
| 2007-06-10 | 2007-06-11 | DTD | 1 | 1 | Knee | Soreness | - | |||
| 2007-05-29 | 2007-05-31 | DTD | 2 | 2 | Knee | Soreness | - | |||
| 2007-04-14 | 2007-04-17 | DTD | 3 | 2 | Shoulder | Contusion | - | |||
| 2006-10-05 | 2006-10-15 | DTD | 10 | 0 | Right | Fingers | Fracture | Index Finger HBP | - | |
| 2006-05-31 | 2006-06-30 | 15-DL | 30 | 26 | Right | Thumb | Fracture | Thumb | - | |
| 2006-05-21 | 2006-05-23 | DTD | 2 | 2 | Right | Shoulder | Soreness | From Sliding | - | |
| 2004-03-26 | 2004-10-04 | 60-DL | 192 | 162 | Right | Shoulder | Cartilage Injury | Labrum Tear From Dislocation | - | |
| 2003-08-25 | 2003-08-26 | DTD | 1 | 1 | Hand | Laceration | Sliding on Astroturf | - |
Compensation
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Mark Ellis is referenced in the following articles.
requires BP Premium access to view,
requires BP Premium or BP Fantasy access to view
| Date | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 2011-11-15 13:00:00 | eric young jr.? (efeder21 from new york) | It's going to depend on what happens this winter, but he's looking more like a deep-mixed flier and an NL-only pickup if you don't have to overextend to buy him. He played a lot down the stretch and finished with a strong September, but his overall line wasn't very good. We know he has speed, but the bat needs to play, and he's only flashed an ability to do that. He's playing 2B in Venezuela this fall, and Mark Ellis is a Dodger now, but the team has plenty of other similar not-nearly-sure-thing options like Nelson, Pachecho, and Herrera. It's also not out of the question that the Rox deal EYJ. His speed and positional versatility give him upside, but that's all it is for now. Pay attention to what the team says about him as we get closer to the season. (Derek Carty) |
| 2011-07-21 16:00:00 | I 've been reluctant to make a trade since my last one was so stupid. Frustrated with Detroit for giving up on Sizemore a month ago or so, I traded Boesch - who wasn't hitting at all and looking like his 2nd half of not hitting last year and Sizemore for Mark Ellis. A few days after the trade Ellis hit the DL, Boesch went on a tear, and Sizemore was traded to Oakland where he was better appreciated. Recently, I almost offered Jennings for Kipnis, but decided not to mess up my team any further. Meanwhile, Ellis came alive in Oakland for a bit and now my Carlos Guillen is up and seemingly pretty acceptable. I still have Granderson, Adam Jones, Melky, Delmon, and Trout for outfielders - not to mention one Jose Bautista, if I didn't need him at first until Butler starts hitting again. Should I make that deal anyway on the assumption Guillen and Ellis will be injured again - or is Jennings' upside too great? (We can keep 13 non-prospects at the end of the season.) (hotstatrat from Scoresheet fantasyland) | Kipnis has good upside as well relative to his position. Grandy, Jones, and Trout work for me but I don't see Melky repeating and I have a hate/hate relationship with Young because I see little skills growth and fluctuating states based off short-term success mixed in with long slumps. (Jason Collette) |
| 2011-06-09 13:00:00 | Thoughts on young Jemile Weeks? And any word on Brett Anderson - is this a surgery thing or will he be making his annual visit to land of the lost? (Jquinton82 from NY) | As good a player as Mark Ellis has been at times, it was really past time to look elsewhere. Weeks isn't going to make anyone forget Ellis on the fielding job (how is it he never won a Gold Glove?)and offensively I don't know that he's going to be anything special, but he should be closer to being a contributor with the bat than Ellis has been in most years. (Steven Goldman) |
| 2011-05-09 13:00:00 | Assuming he can stay healthy, when would you call up Jemile Weeks to replace Mark Ellis at second base? (Tom from Madison) | After I traded Ellis on July 31. (Kevin Goldstein) |
| 2010-03-17 14:00:00 | Hi Christina,
I look at Oakland's line-up without anyone I'd like on my fantasy team and can't understand how Pecota has them playing 500 ball. What are your thoughts on the A's? (lennyd from Portland) | Either you don't have a lot of teams in your league, or you're very picky, or maybe you have no use for steals; while I'm not wild about an outfield with Coco Crisp and Rajai Davis in it as everyday players, they will snag bags. For pitching, whether you're in a keeper league or not, just go grab Brett Anderson. Like steals, saves are a commodity you should want, and Andrew Bailey's the real deal. Position-related supply/demand issues might encourage you to snag Kurt Suzuki or Mark Ellis. Basically, it's going to be a better real-world ballclub than a generator of traditional category fantasy stars. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2009-07-24 16:30:00 | Not expecting a followup but I think I may be underestimating Sanchez to an extent just because of the hype. If you do have time - Sanchez would be #5 this year and possibly my #4 next year as I will lose Mike Mussina (Beckett, Peavy, Lohse, Braden, Laffey round out the staff). I have Mark Ellis/Blake DeWitt platooning at 2B this year. I guess the question is: am I going to kick myself for getting rid of Kendrick after holding out to him for the last four years? I see his K/UIBB ratio is much improved this year but thats about it. (Jm from Tucson) | If I'm in your shoes I take a chance on Kendrick since it isn't as if Sanchez makes or breaks your rotation. (Eric Seidman) |
| 2009-04-20 13:00:00 | Does Adrian Cardenas take over for me next season at third base? What kind of production can we expect out of him? (Eric Chavez from Doctor's Office) | Kevin had a bit about him in today's Ten Pack. My take is that the bat may not play at third base--he'd have to hit a lot of doubles or draw more walks, and playing in Oakland chips away at your BA a bit. In the short term, trying him there makes sense, especially since so much of Mark Ellis' value is actual (defensive) rather than perceived, making him a lousy trade chit. Could Ellis move back to short? (Joe Sheehan) |
| 2009-02-10 14:00:00 | With the AL West appearing so winnable, can the A's really afford to give Bobby "Bones" Crosby a season's worth of at-bats? And what better options are still out there (either in-house or via FA) besides the obvious one in Orlando Cabrera? (Adam from Italy) | It really does seem to be down to Cabrera, especially since so many of the Kathy Griffin D-listers (I'm looking at you, Adam Everett) are already under contract. But I guess I'm a little more sanguine, in that I'd be willing to risk Cliff Pennington for long stretches. The problem's more one of the additional questions over Eric Chavez's playability and availability, and how well Mark Ellis bounces back from his latest spin with the injury bug, because that's an entire infield's worth of unknowns that no amount of happy thoughts get to go away. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2008-12-11 14:00:00 | Beyond the fact that he isn't very good... Would it be a smart bet for Billy Beane to trade Bobby Crosby to a potential Furcal suitor just to shrink the market for him? The A's can't outbid anybody who might want Furcal, so shouldn't they want to be the only ones bidding? Then even if they don't sign Furcal, I don't really see some kind of a Gregorio Petit, Pennington, Mark Ellis as a downgrade at all. At least there's SOME defense, power and obp in that group, albeit not in the same place. (Juan Eduardo from San Francisco) | My problem with that is I don't think there is much of a market for Bobby Crosby. His value is lower than ever. It's a good idea in theory but I think it would be hard to execute. (John Perrotto) |
| 2008-11-03 13:30:00 | I've been dying to read what you have to say about the Mark Ellis signing. Good deal for the A's? Is he worth the risk? What is his value given his hitting, defense, age and injury history? (Scott the Stathead from NY, NY) | Lamentably, the A's were one of two teams I didn't get to in the article that's about to be published, but I expect to comment on their moves (Joe Dillon is free!) and the Blue Jays' after we wrap up here. But to be terse (by my standards), the word that sums up my feelings on keeping Ellis is 'resigned' (as opposed to 're-signed'). OK, we kept him, and in the long and unhappy history of second base in A's history, Ellis is sort of our generation's Dick Green, a nifty player, but not a great one. For that money, it's not a great deal, and given that it's spread out evenly, this isn't even a situation like Terrence Long's contract, where we can always hope Billy gets somebody else to pick up the heavy back end of the tab. (Christina Kahrl) |
| 2008-10-21 14:00:00 | Speaking of Mark Ellis, the San Francisco Chronicle has a blog posting today claiming the "sabermetric set" is outraged at Ellis for taking an under-market contract. Would you agree? (oira61 from San Francisco) | Don't look at me -- I'm not part of the sabermetric set. (Kevin Goldstein) |
| 2008-10-20 13:00:00 | So the A's are on the verge of re-signing Mark Ellis. Even ignoring concerns about his surgically repaired shoulder, why trade for Eric Patterson and Adrian Cardenas and draft Jemile Weeks if Ellis is sticking around for a few years? (Dave from Chicago) | I have to admit I did something of a double-take on hearing of this. Thirty-one year-old second basemen with sketchy injury histories are exactly the kind of players Billy Beane is generally smart enough to stay away from. Perhaps this is a Varitek-like character signing. I don't know. (Steven Goldman) |
| 2008-10-07 13:00:00 | Hey Marc, how's it going? I know I still owe you that $20...it's coming. Anyway, I wanted your take on the Cleveland Indians. It seems that Mark Ellis would be a fantastic fit (with Peralta moving to third and Cabrera at short). Do you agree? What else would you do to send the Tribe to contention in 09? (Peter from Beyond the Boxscore) | Getting a second baseman who can improve their defense while not hurting them on offense is a solid idea, especially if it also fixes their third base situation somewhat. What do you do about shortstop then though? I mean you specifically, Peter.
I don't think the Indians were nearly as bad as they played during the first half--that bullpen was atrocious, and on pace to meet up with some of the worst Royals' bullpens in recent memory before they changed their tune midway and started earning their keep and then some. Because of this, I don't think they need to make any major moves, just work on the margins to improve their chances at the AL Central title. (Marc Normandin) |
| 2008-05-27 13:00:00 | Thoughts on the A's? They have the second-best third-order win percentage in the AL and have been hit by a number of injuries already (including a 2-7 stretch without Mark Ellis). Real or mirage? (John from SF) | I really like that pitching staff, but the thing I'm a little wary of is that they rank 5th in the league in run-scoring even though they're 6th in OBP and 11th in slugging percentage. They're definitely in the right division to sneak into the playoffs, but I don't think they get there without Beane making a summer upgrade or two. (Nate Silver) |
| 2008-02-28 14:00:00 | Mark Ellis is overdue for a Gold Glove--is this the year he wins one? (dwiest12 from Vienna VA) | Man, was he jobbed last year or what? I certainly hope so, but if he's dealt to the National League, his chances diminish considerably. Even if he sticks around in Oakland, guys like Aaron Hill are starting to get some well-deserved recognition. (Christina Kahrl) |
No BP Roundtables have mentioned this guy.
A Collaboration between BrooksBaseball.net and Baseball Prospectus - Pitch classifications provided by Pitch Info LLC
BP Annual Player Comments
The rest of this card is restricted to Baseball Prospectus Subscribers.
Not a subscriber? Click here for a free card so you can see what's missing.
Click here for more information on Baseball Prospectus subscriptions or use the buttons to the right to subscribe and get instant access to the best baseball content on the web.